Craig Kimbrel Is Basically Perfect Again
I’m sorry to have to tell you that you’re never going to hit in the major leagues. As far as how well you’d do if you got the opportunity — it’s fun to think about the lowest possible limits, but random fans never get the chance. It’s an experiment that will never be run, but the closest we can get to an understanding is by examining American League pitchers. Every last one of them is a professional athlete worth millions of dollars, but they’re not supposed to have to hit. The fact that they do hit sometimes is more or less an accident of scheduling. They practice hitting just about never, and that’s reflected in their results. In this table, there are two lines. One shows how American League pitchers have hit so far in 2017. The other shows how all the regular players have hit so far against Craig Kimbrel.
| Split | BA | OBP | SLG | BB% | K% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ??? | 0.108 | 0.159 | 0.157 | 5% | 47% |
| ??? | 0.092 | 0.132 | 0.169 | 3% | 53% |
I kept it a mystery because it’s a popular writer technique. Look, they’re almost indistinguishably bad! Point made! But just for the hell of it, I’ll tell you now, the AL pitcher line is the first one. The Kimbrel line is the second one. The second one is the worse one.
Half a decade ago, Craig Kimbrel became the first pitcher ever to pitch fairly often and strike out at least half of all the batters he faced. Sure, he barely eclipsed 50%, and sure, Aroldis Chapman followed that up two years later, and sure, league-wide strikeout rates have been rising for a while, but 2012 Kimbrel was practically perfect. He had maybe the most dominant relief season of all time. His FIP was lower than 1. He was a sensation, and it would’ve been impossible for Kimbrel to repeat a summer so flawless.
Narrative took over from there. Narrative and, just as much, human nature. It’s in our blood to get used to things, and to raise our standards to impossible heights. Kimbrel’s ERA climbed for four consecutive seasons, and the discussion became one about how Kimbrel had fallen off. How he’d grown unreliable. A knee injury screwed with some of his numbers in his first year in Boston, but there was definitely a reduced level of trust. We love to think about players simply; we declare they’re improving or on the decline. Kimbrel’s been declining. That was, at least, the consensus.
It is consensus no more. Kimbrel so far has pitched in 19 games. He’s put nine hitters on base. It’s 2017, and Kimbrel — who’s still just 28 years old, for another few days — is basically perfect again. The Red Sox haven’t had the pitching staff they expected, but Kimbrel is pulling more than his weight.
19 games, I said. Kimbrel’s thrown nearly 20 innings. Let’s look at his entire career in 19-game samples. First, here’s how Kimbrel has thrown pitches in the strike zone:
Nothing subtle about that. What’s one explanation for why Kimbrel has been so very good? He’s thrown plenty of strikes. Not at a personally unprecedented level, but at a rare level, a level he hasn’t reached for years. Kimbrel has peppered the strike zone. There’s more. How about how hitters have done against those pitches in the zone?
This plot shows in-zone contact rate. I love the pair of recent trends. Kimbrel has thrown far more strikes, and even when he’s thrown strikes, he’s generated far more whiffs. What could be better than that? There is no more certain mark of utter dominance. So let’s put this together. More than 300 pitchers to this point have thrown at least 15 innings. Here are all of them, plotted by in-zone contact rate, and by overall zone rate. The Kimbrel point is highlighted in red.
It’s the perfect combination, and nobody else is all that close. Okay, Trevor Rosenthal is kind of close, but Kimbrel ranks 16th in zone rate, around names like Kenley Jansen and Ivan Nova. Yet when you sort by zone contact, Kimbrel easily ranks first, by more than five percentage points. The pitchers with similar zone rates have allowed in-zone contact more than 80% of the time. Kimbrel’s rate is barely above 60%. This is how a guy can end up with two walks and 36 strikeouts.
Kimbrel’s profile is still pretty simple. He still throws that high-90s high-spin fastball, and that high-80s curveball. He hasn’t changed his repertoire or added velocity. He’s simply commanded the ball extremely well, and it helps to not have anything torn in his knee this time around. What this comes down to, as usual, is a mix of health and consistent mechanics, the former allowing for the latter. Yet it’s not like Kimbrel hasn’t made his adjustments. For example, here are pitch-location heat maps from Baseball Savant.
Kimbrel is keeping his fastball within a tighter area, and he hasn’t missed nearly so often up and to the arm side, which is a symptom of flying open. The fastball locations show that Kimbrel is better about completing his delivery. And then on the bottom half, you see that Kimbrel is keeping his curve closer to the zone, if not within it more often. The curve has become a tougher pitch to take, and both the curve and the fastball have sort of come closer together. It’s not so easy for a hitter to eliminate one or the other.
Out of all the pitchers who have thrown at least 100 four-seam fastballs this season, Kimbrel ranks an easy first in swinging-strike rate, at 27%. It’s been no contest. At the same time, out of all the pitchers who have thrown at least 50 curveballs this season, Kimbrel ranks 17th in swinging-strike rate. Just by contact rate, he ranks fifth, so he’s still throwing a curveball that’s tough to square up. Both pitches are working. They’d have to be, to lead to numbers like Kimbrel’s.
There’s one more thing. Kimbrel has always thrown just the two pitches. Here’s how he’s mixed them up by situation over his career, expressed by fastball rate. You see his rate of fastballs thrown when behind or even in the count, and then when ahead in the count.
Classically, when pitchers are even or behind, they’ve thrown fastballs more often. And when ahead, they’ve thrown fastballs less often. Kimbrel used to follow the same pattern, but so far in 2017 he hasn’t. He’s thrown a career-low rate of fastballs in more typical fastball counts, and a career-high rate of fastballs in more typical breaking-ball counts. In short, even though Kimbrel has just two pitches, he’s tougher than ever to predict. It’s not so easy for hitters to guess what’s on the way, and that’s what you can do when you have command of a blazing heater that touches triple digits. It makes both of Kimbrel’s pitches better, and the result is a near-automatic shutdown inning.
Craig Kimbrel, today, is healthy. Craig Kimbrel, today, is throwing free and easy. At no point did his stuff ever leave him, and now he has the best command of it he’s had in some years. Throw in some improved unpredictability and you have an unhittable closer. A closer who doesn’t even have to go outside of the zone to miss bats. Kimbrel can’t always be this good, but he’s done it for a whole season before. The scariest thing is this isn’t coming out of nowhere.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.





It’s worth noting that Kimbrel gave up a walk-off homer to Ryon Healy a couple games ago that JBJ robbed pretty spectacularly
Wasn’t that spectacular. You saw his reaction. Everyday stuff
Just your everyday game saving robbed HR against an elite closer.
In the previous era when Kimbrel was perfect, I proposed a stat called the Kimbrel, which counts the number of appearances with a negative FIP.
So far this year, Kimbrel already has 8 Kimbrels, putting him atop the AL. The only major leaguer with more Kimbrels this year – Kensley Jansen (of the 0.04 overall FIP), who has 10 Kimbrels.
My first thought when I saw the headline was “Why isn’t this about Kenley Jansen?” But then I realized that’s a boring story. The one about Kimbrel bouncing back to his old self after down seasons is way better.
The Kenley Jansen article probably deserves to be written too. After 16 innings he still had a negative FIP, it took a solo HR in his 17th IP to finally put his FIP into positive territory.
Plus he still hasn’t walked anyone, and struck out 32.
I agree there should be a Kenley Jansen article.
Suggested title: “Could Kenley Jansen Become The Greatest Reliever Ever?”
When you are striking out nearly 2/3rds of batters and not walking anyone you’re probably in one of the greatest 17-inning stretches in reliever history. Maybe that should be article; most dominant 20 inning stretches ever. I’ll revise my earlier assessment; I’d love to see how Jansen compares.
Errata – In the NL, Greg Holland and Trevor Rosenthal also have more Kimbrels than Kimbrel. Holland’s 9 Kimbrels so far this year already match his season total for 2015.
Also, Kimbrel is actually tied for 2nd on the AL Kimbrel leaderboard with….wait for it…. the Jays’ Joe Smith, who also has 8 Kimbrels. Leading the AL with 9 Kimbrels so far in 2017 is the White Sox Tommy Kahnle.
(note – making a Kimbrel leaderboard by hand is a pain in the neck. Explains why I’ve never actually done one.)
Final note – Kimbrel shares the single-season Kimbrel record (in the Fangraphs game log era) with Eric Gagne (32). Kimbrel is also the only player in that era to have more than one 30-Kimbrel season (31 in 2011, and 32 in 2012).
The Kimbrel gets to keep its name.
Kershaw has had 3 such outings as a starter with a negative fip. However one was only 3.2 innings on the last day of the season. But 2 as a SP is still pretty impressive.
Scherzer actually has 7!
And if he stopped acting like a dingus before every pitch he’d be a fan favorite.
He’s not even on my team anymore and he’s still my favorite.
Speaking as a Braves fan, he was definitely a fan favorite here.
And stop acting like a skirt, before each court will be successful.
Ooh, can you combine your love of N-game rolling averages with your love of scatterplots? A plot of contact% vs. zone%, rolling averages, trajectory over time.
You know, this might be a great way to see adjustments. Trajectory of a hitter’s swing% and zone%, they change their approach to swing less, so pitchers attack the zone, so hitter starts swinging — the trajectory moves down, then rightward, then up, as successive moves in the game.
If the Red Sox make the post season, which they are still favored to do, they would be really, really hard to beat.
The Indians made it to extra innings of game seven of the world series last year behind Corey Kluber, Andrew Miller and not much more. It is only a quarter season, but Sale is better this year than Kluber was last year, Kimbrel has been better than Miller was, and they have more around them than Cleveland did.
To be fair, Cleveland raked last year and Miller pitched a lot of innings in the playoffs…a lot more than Kimbrel would.