Dan Szymborski FanGraphs Chat – 1/29/26
| 12:03 |
: Greetings friends! I am enjoying a balmy 14 degrees now, a full 24 degrees of warming in the last four hours!
|
| 12:03 |
: If only my mazda was a convertible so I could go enjoy the day
|
| 12:03 |
: The Cubs seem like they’re poised to be better in 2026, so what accounts for an only 87 win projection?
|
| 12:03 |
: ZiPS doesn’t necessarily see them as better
|
| 12:03 |
: It already liked PCA a ton. Sees Bregman/Tucker swap a wash. No more excited about the rotation and nobody has a projection as good as Steele last year. Likes bullpen a bit better
|
| 12:04 |
: Does the qualifying offer have to be exactly the number provided by MLB or at least that number? Could a team offer $35m for a player that may want to reconsider going to the market?
You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
|
| 12:06 |
: The official Qualifying Offer specifies *equal* to the (formula for qualifying offer) and that *the* amount of the qualifying offer *shall* be determined by the formula
|
| 12:07 |
: But there’s nothing preventing a team from making a qualifying offer at the same time making a normal offer for more that is only applicable over the same quiet period
|
| 12:07 |
: it’s a paper work thing
|
| 12:07 |
: Thoughts on doing away with minus stats? Let’s just make it all +. It’s redundant otherwise
|
| 12:08 |
: People get upset that higher ERA+ numbers are good
|
| 12:08 |
: and feel it should be the opposite
|
| 12:08 |
: so no reason to bother them
|
| 12:08 |
: I recall you saying not too long ago that a given year’s ZiPs projections are more accurate for the following year’s production. For example a 2024 projection would more closely align with 2025 production than 2024. Am I summarizing that correctly and if so, can you elaborate on that?
|
| 12:08 |
: That is correct. Based on history, you would expect the 2025 preseason projected standings that I published in March to be slightly more accurate in predicting 2026 performance than the *actual* 2025 record.
|
| 12:09 |
: That’s not because ZiPS is magical, but because recency bias is huge. I haven’t tested since I don’t have the same access to other projection systems and their data, for obvious reasons, but I expect this is true of any competent projection system
|
| 12:10 |
: Basically, if you had to project players next year and choose between A) 2025 data only or B) All data before the start of the 2025 season, you’d expect to project a bit better with B
|
| 12:10 |
: Is there a way to project what Bobby Witt’s WAR would be if they played him at second base? Presumably he’d be the best defensive 2nd basemen and would get a positional boost from an oWAR perspective?
|
| 12:10 |
: ZiPS has a model for moving players
|
| 12:11 |
: ZiPS projects him slightly less valuable at second as he’s already terrific at shrotstop, and there are minimal gains to moving an elite player to an easier position relative to league average
|
| 12:12 |
: because there are slightly less impactful opportunities at 2B
|
| 12:12 |
: Like a +15 SS is not going to be a +30 1B or something
|
| 12:12 |
: They’ll likely be something like a +10 1B
|
| 12:13 |
: Do you have a 5-year ZiPS projection for Bregman? It wasn’t included in the article about his signing. Thanks!
|
| 12:13 |
: The three years are on FG and the final two eyars are…unexciting
|
| 12:14 |
: I hear you are cold, have you tried getting more cats?
|
| 12:14 |
: I actually do not like having cats all over me.
|
| 12:14 |
: esepcially when I’m working
|
| 12:15 |
: Over time, cats generally learn pretty well that the soft pillow on the desk to the left of me is where they should sit
|
| 12:15 |
: though Justinian tries to sneak on my lap if I don’t appear to be paying attention
|
| 12:16 |
: I sit in a big soft recliner with ottoman, parallel to two desks, with my massive monitor on an angle on the right desk
|
| 12:16 |
: and my keyboard typically on my right leg
|
| 12:16 |
: I have a third desk behind me
|
| 12:16 |
: and nothing directly in front of me so I can see the TV wall
|
| 12:17 |
: Which Currently has two 52 inch TVs, two 34 inch TVs, which all can be controlled by a laptop on my left desk
|
| 12:17 |
: Does it feel like we are going to get the Rendon contract of pre-arb extensions coming soon? Eventually someone is going to give 100mm to a guy who flames out as a rookie right?
|
| 12:17 |
: Yeah, teams are getting pretty good about stupid contracts, but these things happen
|
| 12:17 |
: What’s the pitch du jour this year? Splitter and kick change I think were the last two, haven’t heard of anything so far this year.
|
| 12:18 |
: I think we tend to see the new hotness in spring
|
| 12:18 |
: What can the Giants do now to get themselves closer to high 80s wins in ZIPS?
|
| 12:18 |
: I’m not sure there’s that much they can do unless it’s really weird and off the wall
|
| 12:18 |
: maybe sign Valdez
|
| 12:18 |
: Non baseball, but I’m writing my first ever article hoping to be published. I’m going to try submitting it to local papers. Any advice for a 29-year-old wanting to enter the field of journalism? I was going to study journalism in college but chose a different career
|
| 12:18 |
: I’m not sure my advice is super useful, simply because I had a really odd route to journalism, that I’m not sure is precisely replicable
|
| 12:19 |
: I didn’t right for high school or college papers ever, and took creative writing for my english credits in college
|
| 12:19 |
: write
|
| 12:19 |
: god
|
| 12:19 |
: I said right for write when talking about education in english
|
| 12:20 |
: My first ever newspaper writing was a guest column for the Oakland Tribune in 2005
|
| 12:20 |
: Submitting is a good idea though, I believe. As is having your writing somewhere on the net
|
| 12:20 |
: And networking is really important
|
| 12:20 |
: And so is having a very particular niche
|
| 12:22 |
: I got hired by ESPN by them reaching out to me. And I got hired by FanGraphs on a call to David (I had seen the writing in the wall for me at ESPN, though I left under very cordial terms and turned down a counteroffer chance). Also talked to the athletic briefly. Having done things with David in the past plus having something specific I could do/offer was really helpful
|
| 12:22 |
: I don’t know what it is, but if there’s SOMETHING you can do, that other people don’t, that’s a huge bonus
|
| 12:23 |
: And you did one smart thing by NOT majoring in journalism.
|
| 12:23 |
: I believe Journalism is something you DO more than something you STUDY. I do not believe a lot of journalists would like this answer
|
| 12:23 |
: Yes, there are a lot of ethical things to learn, but there are in most human activities
|
| 12:24 |
: Do you expect the Rays’ front office to operate differently under the new ownership group?
|
| 12:24 |
: Not really
|
| 12:24 |
: Well?
|
| 12:24 |
: What is?
|
| 12:25 |
: 99% of my AI use is as a high-tech toy, to execute dumb jokes I think of
|
| 12:25 |
: I also use it to double check my visual basic code as I am not a good coder
|
| 12:25 |
: ZiPS doesn’t use AI, outside of the traditional supervised learning techniques, and I don’t write with AI
|
| 12:26 |
: How worried are you and/or ZiPS about Ranger Suarez’ declining FB velo? If you linearly project the trendline it seems like he might be cooked within a couple years. But as they say, linearly projecting trendlines into the future makes an ass out of you and me!
|
| 12:26 |
: ZiPS will mostly be worried if he dips below 90
|
| 12:27 |
: a guy throwing 91.5 and having success has a better outlook than a guy having success throwing 94.5 who suddenly starts throwing 91.5
|
| 12:27 |
: hi dan, im a naively optimistic angels fan, but things look goddamn bleak. i feel like 68 wins might be a little lower than what i’d expect of them, but its hard to imagine them doing that much better. what’s their absolute best case scenario? 3rd place in the AL West?!?
|
| 12:27 |
: Probably
|
| 12:27 |
: It’s a really uninspiring team
|
| 12:28 |
: Has Fangraphs considered adding a total bases column to their leaderboards?
|
| 12:28 |
: oops, hold on still answering last one
|
| 12:29 |
: I can see the crazy scenario where the white sox are OK or the marlins or even nationals are OK
|
| 12:29 |
: But the Angels have just so MEH an upside. They’re the least risky bad team in baseball IMO, and that’s a really dumb thing to be
|
| 12:29 |
: We’re having some leaderboard changes that are coming through soon and some new tools Ben’s been working on
|
| 12:30 |
: I don’t know about TB specifically
|
| 12:30 |
: I never erally gave thought to it as I don’t really use TB for anything
|
| 12:30 |
: and if I needed to, I could always just do SLG*AB for the dataset
|
| 12:30 |
: I didn’t even consciously know we didn’t have TB until you said this
|
| 12:30 |
: Adding Framber would do what exactly to our ZiPS projections / AL East race?
|
| 12:30 |
: Should SF or Orioles try to offer Framber the deal Snell signed with SF?
|
| 12:31 |
: I know you’re not the real Sig! He has my email
|
| 12:31 |
: I think the O’s should
|
| 12:31 |
: are contract deferrals unfair or bad for baseball?
|
| 12:31 |
: I think they’re neutral
|
| 12:31 |
: I noticed Zips isn’t ready to buy Colson Montgomery on opening day. How many strong games in 2026 will it take to peel off those awful 2025 AAA numbers?
|
| 12:31 |
: I’m not sure that’s a real linear thing I can identify
|
| 12:31 |
: How, if at all, do newly hired managers and pitching/hitter coaches effect projections?
|
| 12:31 |
: probably some, but an unknown some that is out of the purview of projections. and really, any analyst since people are really complex
|
| 12:32 |
: Any vegan players?
|
| 12:32 |
: Sabathia went vegan at some point, don’t know if it stuck. Betts was for awhile, but I think that didn’t stick
|
| 12:33 |
: Outside of Pat Neshek, nobody else I really think of
|
| 12:33 |
: Prince Fielder had at least a period he was a vegetarian, but don’t know if he went full vegan
|
| 12:33 |
: I COULD probably swing vegetarian if I have to. But I really like eggs and dairy
|
| 12:34 |
: Seems like there’s a load-bearing JJ Bleday that would make me nervous. Is there any chance Christian Encarnacion-Strand battles his way back on the team, Stewart covers 1B, and Steer moves back into an OF corner?
|
| 12:34 |
: It’s POSSIBLE
|
| 12:34 |
: I think the Reds are largely playing it by ear
|
| 12:34 |
: Could the Mariners get up to a 90 win projection if they bring back Geno Suarez or finally reel in Brendan Donovan?
|
| 12:34 |
: that’s a possibility
|
| 12:35 |
: Who does ZiPs forecast to finish with the most career HR among active players? It’s stunning to see that Ohtani is projected for about 420 in 3 years, it might well be him.
|
| 12:35 |
: Soto
|
| 12:37 |
: Soto, Ohtani, Judge, Stanton, Schwarber, Trout, Raleigh, Harper, Vladito, Machado, J-Rod, Freeman, Chourio, Kurtz, Alonso, Wood, Acuna, Henderson, Suarez, Goldschmidt, Olson
|
| 12:37 |
: Ryan Clifford is not far off from there. Though only 20-some WAR
|
| 12:37 |
: Who does ZiPS like in the Super Bowl?
|
| 12:37 |
: buffalo wings
|
| 12:37 |
: What do you think would the single most impactful yet realistic transaction to still happen before Opening Day? Framber to Mets/O’s/Cubs? Skubal to Yanks?
|
| 12:37 |
: rpobably the framber signing
|
| 12:38 |
: If Skubal’s traded, I think it happens in July because something bad happened to teh Tigers
|
| 12:38 |
: We often hear that a player is a change of scenery candidate. When that happens is there an adjustment to be made to the projection? Does the data show any real, meaningful effect?
|
| 12:38 |
: No, it’s something a projection system isn’t going to do well
|
| 12:38 |
: Hammers are useful, but they’re bad at repairing a chipped mug
|
| 12:38 |
: If there’s life on other planets, do you think they play sports like baseball?
|
| 12:39 |
: I mean, hitting a round object with a cylinder isn’t that weird a cocnept. But it may not be that close to baseball
|
| 12:39 |
: Has modern pitching dev messed up the accuracy of projections at all? Or would a lot of that stuff (pitch/arm angle changes) be baked into the margin of error
|
| 12:39 |
: I haven’t gotten less accurate, so I ‘d say no
|
| 12:39 |
: modern ptiching dev has also come with much richer data!
|
| 12:39 |
: What’s the highest preseason win projection you’ve seen?
|
| 12:40 |
: I THINK it was 2021 dodgers who I think hit 100 (but I may be wrong memory wise)
|
| 12:40 |
: I’m pretty sure it was 2021 dodgers, not sure if it was 99, 100, or 101
|
| 12:40 |
: it was AROUND there
|
| 12:40 |
: Is there a chance the Royals make a move for Luis Arraez? And if they do, are they a legit world series contender
|
| 12:40 |
: I think one of the worst places for Arraez is KC
|
| 12:41 |
: He’s not an upgrade on Pasquatch
|
| 12:41 |
: and if he’s DHing in KC, then that means that Perez is playing more catcher, which means Jensen is playing less catcher
|
| 12:41 |
: And with D included, I don’t think he’s actually better than India at 2B
|
| 12:42 |
: Weirdly, Arraez SHOULD be pretty useful in SD
|
| 12:42 |
: Because if you start Arraez at first, you’re playing Cronenworth at 2B instead of fucking around with him at first
|
| 12:42 |
: and then Song can be a super utility type
|
| 12:43 |
: I don’t THINK Song’s played much outfield, but I’d give him some time out there in sht epsring
|
| 12:43 |
: Why did the Reds give Schwarber a mostly fair offer but now throw their hands up? Are they satisfied with their 83 wins? I guess ZiPS is pretty pessimistic on them anyway, right?
|
| 12:43 |
: The Reds don’t mind winning, but they really don’t want to spend money if they can avoid it
|
| 12:43 |
: I think they REALLY liked schwarber
|
| 12:44 |
: and aren’t going to spend money unless they CAPITALI LIKE players
|
| 12:44 |
: What is the difference between ZIPS and ZIPS DC? For example, Jackson Chourio is projected with a 3.2 WAR by ZIPS but a 2.4 WAR by ZIPS DC in 21 more PAs.
|
| 12:44 |
: There’s something some weirdness in there with the PA
|
| 12:45 |
: I’m not sure what’s going on with that though
|
| 12:45 |
: usually it scales pretty neatly
|
| 12:45 |
: I don’t calculate it myself at all
|
| 12:46 |
: Why do you think ZIPS likes Torkelson so much more than the other projection systems?
|
| 12:46 |
: It’s really hard to say simply because I can’t dig into the other projection systems
|
| 12:46 |
: I don’t think ti’s a CRAZY outlier or anything
|
| 12:46 |
: it’s basically a couple extra hits and a couple extra homers
|
| 12:46 |
: Very much a *_not_* ZiPS question, but one of my favorite genres of Hall of Famer are the compilers who, by their early 30s, are in a “hey, if they could just have an endless summer into their mid/late 30s without declining, they’d actually be an interesting HOF case” guys. Who do you see in the game right now who could fit that profile? Not superstars, just… very good dudes who could compile their way in by aging (very) gracefully?
|
| 12:48 |
: I think Muncy is kind of already doing that. He just isn’t really declining at the rate you’d expect
|
| 12:48 |
: I could see Friedl lasting a really long time
|
| 12:49 |
: He’s an above average contact hitter, is really selective, is a competent center fielder without actually being fast
|
| 12:50 |
: He could be at 20-25 WAR without anybody noticing
|
| 12:51 |
: Do we have any data on how long pitchers coming over from the KBO are able to maintain their effectiveness? My guess is that whatever gains they made won’t fool MLB hitters for very long.
|
| 12:51 |
: Unfortunately, nto enough data on their long term performances in MLB to draw a conclusion
|
| 12:51 |
: What would a true-talent 162-0 team’s World Series odds be?
|
| 12:51 |
: Well, if they’re true talent invincible…
|
| 12:52 |
: But that team can’t exist or even come close to it
|
| 12:52 |
: It would have to be a Ty Cobb suspension walkout game situation
|
| 12:53 |
: In the Brewers writeup you said maybe Zips didn’t give enough juice to Andrew Vaughn for escaping the White Sox. Is there a formulaic adjustment for change of scenery cases, or is it something you do manually or just mentally? I want to guess that it’s a real but marginal effect, and basically impossible to quantify.
|
| 12:53 |
: I think it’s really hard to quantify
|
| 12:53 |
: it’s somewhat intangible. which means we can’t really measure the magnitude or even the DIRECTION
|
| 12:54 |
: Any teams you would expect the eventual Fangraphs playoff odds to disagree with this most recent ZiPS standings the most?
|
| 12:54 |
: maybe Cardinals, maybe Guardians
|
| 12:54 |
: Today’s so called journalists have no ethics, at least 95% of them. All political unfortunately
|
| 12:55 |
: I don’t want to make a blanket accusation like that
|
| 12:55 |
: Though I do have some complaints about journalists generally, though not likely to the degree that you do
|
| 12:56 |
: Just to make a smaller point, I do think there’s a real problem with writers being *fair* to things they don’t like. That doesn’t mean you make up stuff to say nice about things you don’t like or create false balance
|
| 12:56 |
: But I’m not sure that writers, across the spectrum, give enough grace to things they disagree with, and I do think that’s a problem
|
| 12:57 |
: The mindset I was raised with (my grandfather’s influence) is to try the HARDEST to be fair to people, places, and things you don’t like
|
| 12:57 |
: Like, i said a LOT of negative things about how the Rockies were run in the late 2010s/early 2020s.
|
| 12:58 |
: But believe it or not, anytime I had something negative to say, I felt obligated to REALLY dig into stuff they did to make sure I didn’t like it
|
| 12:58 |
: and when they did something I did like, I would ask myself if I’m covering it as positively as I would as something I think a better run team did
|
| 1:00 |
: As I said, my grandfather was the biggest influence on my thinking generally. He was an old NY lawyer, an old style new deal-era NY democrat. But he alwyas believed in truly understanding things you don’t like and things you hate and he tried to impart that on me
|
| 1:00 |
: In high school, when that high school was becoming a law magnet, in GT social studies in 12th grade, we basically did ALL scotus cases all year, and had to argue them
|
| 1:02 |
: and when we’d have to argue cases in the roles of lawyers, which we did a lot, I ALWAYS volunteered to take the sides I didn’t believe in, the side I thought was odious. I think that kind of thinking helped me develop as a person
|
| 1:03 |
: I go into every article I write, every ballot I make, trying to think about *how I am wrong* or *how I could be wrong* first and foremost. I have very little interest in projections I get right. I want to knwo the projections that ZiPS got wrong and know WHY ZiPS got it wrong, and HOW I can improve the model
|
| 1:04 |
: and that’s part of the reason I’m so self deprecating generally. I ALWAYS feel compelled to trust myself and my opinion less than that of ANYONE else. Since I have the responsibility of my opinion, it’s up to me MOST of all to make sure it’s not me being stupid
|
| 1:04 |
: Sorry, this got a little tangential
|
| 1:04 |
: Any chance for a time warp of Babe Ruth playing against non-whites?
|
| 1:05 |
: Probably none.
|
| 1:05 |
: We actually had an idea for something like this at ESPN one time
|
| 1:06 |
: but I do not feel I have the sensitivity to write about the topic. It’s a dark part of baseball history, and I have a tendency to take very little seriously without jokes.
|
| 1:06 |
: My hope is that my last words some day are me making light of my imminent death.
|
| 1:07 |
: (also like my grandfather, who spent his final days at 96 cracking jokes about the whole thing)
|
| 1:07 |
: Popped up in a discussion I saw the other day (admittedly can’t remember where I saw it), but I’m just curious about Wander Franco continuing to get Steamer projections on his page even though he hasn’t played in a few years and likely won’t be returning to MLB. Obviously it’s understandable about Clase/Ortiz getting projections despite their non-likelihood of returning (they at least played in 2025 and the very damning details came out at the beginning of the offseason), but Franco continuing to get them seemed a bit weird. A case of “Steamer is projecting them regardless, so might as well”? (Not necessarily a criticism, just curious.)
|
| 1:07 |
: That’s kind of a Jared thing
|
| 1:07 |
: I usually project disappeared players (for whatever reason) for one last season
|
| 1:07 |
: Believe Strider is mostly vegan, with the occasional piece of salmon thrown in.
|
| 1:08 |
: I can see it if you’re doing it for health reasons
|
| 1:08 |
: though it’d be weird if it were for ethical reasons
|
| 1:08 |
: (I have no idea what Strider does it for)
|
| 1:09 |
: but just the thought of “I don’t believe in taking from any animal. Except fish. Fish can go FOAD!”
|
| 1:09 |
: I’ve seen mention of the MLBPA potentially being okay with a “soft cap.” How is that different from what there is now (where there’s a luxury tax but no hard cap)?
|
| 1:09 |
: Has there been? It’s hard to say. We kinda have a fairly soft cap
|
| 1:09 |
: Do you believe it’s right to limit the amount of money someone can pay you to make them even more money?
|
| 1:09 |
: OH god, did I start something?
|
| 1:09 |
: And no.
|
| 1:09 |
: Hang on, I just noticed something. Ohtani’s MEDIAN projection for runs is 138??? That has happened twice in the last 15 years (admittedly including Ohtani last year)
|
| 1:09 |
: Dodgers are gonna score a lot of runs
|
| 1:09 |
: As somebody who studied journalism and then transitioned out of it pretty quickly – Dan’s advice is spot on. Find a niche, and DO. You’ll never get good, you’ll never make the adequate connections, or build the portfolio you need unless you actually write. And great writers write constantly.
|
| 1:10 |
: Dan, excellent work as always. Can you explain why the AL divisional runners-up in the Zips projections all have higher WS Win % than the top teams? In the AL East, teams 2-4 ALL have higher WS Win % than Toronto.
|
| 1:10 |
: I was surprised to
|
| 1:11 |
: but when the Orioles REALLY work out, it’s because Bradish and Rogers go absolutely insane
|
| 1:11 |
: they have longer tails than Cease or Gausman do
|
| 1:11 |
: How much better would people understand your projections if you called them “over/unders”?
|
| 1:12 |
: Maybe a little, but I think people generally understand. The people who get mad are the people who just don’t like comptuer proejctions, on principle
|
| 1:13 |
: Is Ryan Clifford really projected for around 350 HRs and 20 WAR?
|
| 1:13 |
: ntot hat high
|
| 1:13 |
: 274, 17.8 WAR, 115 OPS+. I didn’t mean he was right behind Olson
|
| 1:13 |
: Will Smith HOF?
|
| 1:13 |
: I think ti’s a real possibility
|
| 1:13 |
: A lot has been made of Louis Robert moving to the Mets and potentially performing better with a better lineup around him. Is there any way to actually quantify this in a system like ZiPS?
|
| 1:13 |
: I haven’t actually found this kind of thing to have predictive value
|
| 1:13 |
: May I add that today’s writers/journalists and head line writers do not know proper English.
|
| 1:14 |
: Danny it’s cold outside My projections are done… Danny it’s cold outside ZiPs has been fun… |
| 1:14 |
: if a presidential candidate announced they were a Geoist, what’s the likelihood they’d get your vote? Is it more of a “this seems good” thing, or would you take a lot of other things into consideration?
|
| 1:14 |
: It’s hard to say since there are a lot of other considerations
|
| 1:14 |
: For example, I’m also an incrementalist.
|
| 1:15 |
: I see political ideology as a goal, nto something you can just implement suddenly in a rapid change.
|
| 1:16 |
: 2 radio stations want to book you for an interview at the same time. You haven’t heard either of them before. Do you choose the market with the better ZiPS projection, because it’s easier to talk about good teams?
|
| 1:16 |
: Whoever asks me first
|
| 1:16 |
: I’m not in THAT Much demand
|
| 1:16 |
: but I will NEVER ask someone I previously agreed to a time with for a change of time for soemone who asked me afterwards
|
| 1:17 |
: so if I have a 3 PM podcast scheduled with a small podcaster, and a big market radio station wants to do a hit with me at 3 PM and asks me later, well, I can’t do the second one on that occasion, but I can do it another time
|
| 1:18 |
: and I’ve never had any real pushback. there’s rarely a radio emergency that requires Dan Szymborski on THAT specific day
|
| 1:18 |
: let’s be honest, there’s no emergency of any kind that requires Dan Szymborski
|
| 1:18 |
: unless my clutzy mom falls (since I’m across the street and my sister lives 40 mins away)
|
| 1:19 |
: if you were a time traveler back to say, 1700 do you think you could get baseball to take off, if that was your only mission?
|
| 1:19 |
: I doubt it. You still have to have INFLUENCE
|
| 1:19 |
: Honestly, if you stick me in a time machine, my natural inclination would be to use knowledge to make money
|
| 1:20 |
: just call me Berlinghoff Rasmussen
|
| 1:20 |
: The White Sox just DFA’d Bryan Ramos. If the ZiPS machine was capable of human emotion, would it be shedding tears?
|
| 1:20 |
: ZiPS already had a breakup with Ramos last year
|
| 1:20 |
: Love the Szymchats. Long philosophical tangents, and just as likely that the next question is like, “What would Great American Ballpark look like if the Ohio River was suddenly made of Skyline chili?”
|
| 1:20 |
: A place I’d never go again!
|
| 1:20 |
: And probably a lot of flies once that chili turns
|
| 1:21 |
: I understand the whole “regressing to the mean” concept, but can you explain in words that will break into my monkey brain why there could be 5 93+ win teams last year, and yet Zips thinks only the dodgers will eclipse 91 wins in an average projection?
|
| 1:21 |
: sure, these are all 50th percentile projections
|
| 1:21 |
: but you expect three teams to be 90th to 100th
|
| 1:21 |
: three teams to be 80th to 90th
|
| 1:21 |
: three teams to be 70th to 80th
|
| 1:22 |
: and division winners consist of far more teams taht BEAT expectations than teams that fell short of expectations
|
| 1:22 |
: do you pretty much agree to any podcast requests, or does it have to be of a certain size?
|
| 1:22 |
: I will agree to ANY thing if it intrigues me
|
| 1:23 |
: an old BTF poster whose handle I won’t mention as to not embarrass him, got me to live snark his league’s fantasy draft
|
| 1:24 |
: oh wow dan just admitted skyline is chili!
|
| 1:24 |
: oh no
|
| 1:24 |
: I mean it is chili, just awful chili
|
| 1:24 |
: I love the minimalist ballpark graphics that you use for the ZiPS projections. Do you know the Eephus League person who made them? It would be so cool to get them all on a poster or something
|
| 1:24 |
: The basic outlines were obtained by carson years ago
|
| 1:24 |
: technically I do a lot to them – the color schemes and the like
|
| 1:24 |
: and I’ve made changes to ones I’ve needed to
|
| 1:24 |
: You’ve made occasional comments suggesting you have contact with some in the Rockies’ R&D department. If so, what have you heard about how they feel about the team’s recent changes?
|
| 1:25 |
: I talk to most teams!
|
| 1:25 |
: There are very few teams I don’t talk to
|
| 1:25 |
: You typed head line and complained about proper English…
|
| 1:26 |
: What have been the top five World Series in your lifetime?
|
| 1:26 |
: 1986, 1991, 2025, 2011, 2016
|
| 1:27 |
: When it’s this cold out do you do a full ZiPS run to warm your house up?
|
| 1:27 |
: Not intentionally
|
| 1:28 |
: But it worekd out this way in that I was doing a run over the weekend when it was snowing
|
| 1:29 |
: I keep my thermostat set to 68 in the winter, but my basement office was up around 70-72 over the weekend while the laundry room on the same floor was at 65
|
| 1:29 |
: Having a 8700K and a 5900X running at 100% for 24 and 18 hours respectively generates a lot of heat!
|
| 1:29 |
: especially since both are overlcocked
|
| 1:29 |
: Wait, let’s go back to the 5 tvs….what are you watching with 5 tvs?
|
| 1:29 |
: A lot of times nothing
|
| 1:29 |
: Is it a lunch day? If so, what’s for lunch?
|
| 1:30 |
: It is not a lunch day
|
| 1:30 |
: Which regional food (NOT Maryland, though) do you like despite it being objectively weird? Rochester Garbage Plate isn’t so bad….
|
| 1:30 |
: fried spam? is that weird?
|
| 1:30 |
: maybe fried pickles if that’s not weird enough
|
| 1:30 |
: or frito pie
|
| 1:31 |
: I’m not sure there are a lot of weird regional things I don’t like
|
| 1:31 |
: you’ve mentioned you have ZiPS stored away in a secret location before. I’m not going to try to find it, BUT are there clues / breadcrumbs that would hint as to its location? Like under a rock shaped like home plate? Or its coordinates are your birthday or something? Or is it completely random?
|
| 1:31 |
: In my will
|
| 1:32 |
: I’m still trying to decide if I want to do a treasure hunt
|
| 1:32 |
: if I die before putting together a succession plan, my executor has instructions to do a treasure hunt
|
| 1:32 |
: though I’m not sure how serious Alan woudl take me since he’s known me forever
|
| 1:33 |
: Percentage of players who debuted in each decade to reach the HOF among those who reached at least 5k PAs or 2K IP –
Pre 1900: 22% Looks like it USED to be the Hall of Very Good and we’ve been making it tougher to get in for the last 50 years. |
| 1:33 |
: You run a million sims of the season where each team varies in its own quality, right?. But wouldn’t the 50th percentile projections be taking a 50th percentile outcome for each team and running sims of that?
|
| 1:33 |
: No
|
| 1:33 |
: ZiPS FIRST simulates a million versions of the roster itself, which is not the median outcome
|
| 1:34 |
: so sometimes a bunch of players will have their 10th percentile seasons or their 90th or something
|
| 1:34 |
: The underlying ability of a team in the million sims is already a distribution, not a point
|
| 1:34 |
: These stupid journalismmen now a days cant even right proper
|
| 1:34 |
: Could there be a competitive advantage to be gained by having the league’s best grounds crew?
|
| 1:34 |
: Not sure. There might be one at having the most devious grounds crew
|
| 1:35 |
: Could there be a competitive advantage to be gained by having the league’s worst grounds crew?
|
| 1:35 |
: There might be!
|
| 1:35 |
: In what I guess is old internet terminology, I am a ‘newbie’ here but will wait and see if my question is appropriate
|
| 1:35 |
: It’s really hard to have an inappropriatei
|
| 1:35 |
: still, I feel like a few years ago the chats were lit up with things that were / were not chili. You calling skyline chili is WILD to 2021 me
|
| 1:36 |
: maybe I’ve mellowed
|
| 1:36 |
: or maybe I’m just tired since I didn’t sleep well last night
|
| 1:36 |
: Teams that are already overperforming at midseason tend to acquire good players and get better. Team that are already underperforming trade away good players and get worse. Does ZiPS know this in it’s percentiles? Seems like it would stretch the tails in both directions
|
| 1:36 |
: I’ve tried to model this, but it’s been too shitty to be useful
|
| 1:36 |
: On that note, I do have to head out foranother week
|
| 1:36 |
: thanks for coming everyone!
|
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
You have the “write” stuff Dan! I often miss the chats luve but enjoy catching the transcript later.
Shocked me to see the non-acronym FAFO related to Cronenworth and Arraez! Doesn’t bother me, just caught me off guard scrolling th transcript! It was a good day for English education!
Positive weather vibes, spring training is approaching