Daniel Murphy Is a Value-Adding Teammate

PITTSBURGH – Daniel Murphy spends much of his offseason in his hometown of Jacksonville, Florida, where he hits in the batting cages of his alma mater, Jacksonville University. He works out there alongside his brother, who is also an alumnus of the program and who is also a local high-school coach. At the university, with his brother’s high-school team, Murphy will often talk about the craft of hitting with amateur players.

Murphy is, of course, one of a number of hitters who has changed his swing, improved his launch angle, and enjoyed significant success and improvement. He was an early adopter along with the usual names mentioned like Josh Donaldson and J.D. Martinez. But as Murphy talks to players at the grassroots level about swing concepts, he notices there are often curious looks when he discusses the idea of hitting fly-balls.

“They kind of look they give you is ‘What? You want me to hit fly balls?” Murphy said. “When they hear ‘fly balls’ they think 35 degrees, so we are getting too close to pop ups.”

Because he’s run across skeptics at all levels of the game, Murphy believes the idea of fly-ball revolution needs to be re-branded.

“I like to think ‘air balls.’ I never want the infielder to catch my ball,” Murphy said. “A line drive is still Position A. And it’s in the air. I think fly balls can be misconstrued as pop ups, as high fly balls. The place you want to be is still line drives. That’s still where you have the most success, where the batting average is highest, where most of the damage is done. That kind of 10-20 degrees, there. That’s the sweet spot. That’s not the Kris Bryant, launched, 45-degree homer that are majestic to watch. So Position A is still a line drive, which to me is more of an air ball than a fly ball.”

I asked Murphy if he considers himself the Johnny Appleseed of swing plane, of the air ball. After all, there are a significant number of Mets position players — like Jay Bruce, Yoenis Cespedes, and Neil Walker — who have begun to lift more balls into the air. Have they followed his path? His example?

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

The same is true in Washington, where Ryan Zimmerman has increased his launch angle this season and is enjoying tremendous results after conversations with Murphy this spring — even if Zimmerman doesn’t believe he’s made dramatic adjustments.

Murphy is now sharing his philosophies at the grassroots level. When asked about how much credit he deserves for the movement, Murphy quickly redirects and credits New York Mets hitting coach Kevin Long with spreading the philosophy. Long worked with Murphy on better incorporating the lower half into his swing in New York, thinking about pulling the ball to the right-center gap, and “getting on plane” which the pitch.

Long was talking about these ideas before anyone was talking about exit velocity or launch angle.

But even if Murphy doesn’t want to take credit for being an innovating early adopter, he’s the type of communicator from which all major-league clubhouses could benefit, especially in the data age. No one can influence like a peer. As documented earlier in this post, he articulated how he thinks the fly-ball revolution is being branded incorrectly, that there are still many skeptics. But he will not proselytize. Rather, he’ll typically wait for curious teammates to come to him with questions, which is perhaps the best way to create interest. “Not everything you say is going to work for someone else. I will talk hitting,” Murphy said. “I will talk approach. I will talk plan at the plate.” He investigates Statcast data and can relate what he thinks are meaningful insights in simple and relatable ways. Full disclosure: he’s a reader of FanGraphs.

He’s also familiar with his radial chart at Baseball Savant.

“I know 10 degrees is about the point where infielders cannot catch it. So I’ve gone on Baseball Savant just to get an idea of what does this look like,” Murphy said. “Get to 9, 10 degrees and an infielder cannot catch it. And then 25, 27 [degrees] is the sweet spot for home runs.

“The numbers interest me, but it is still an athletic event. I’m trying to the ball as hard as I can.”

Since 2015, according to Baseball Savant, Murphy’s average launch angle is 14.8 degrees. This season, it’s 16.5. A year ago, it was 16.9. In 2015, it was 12.1 degrees.

He cares about the game. While many of teammates were engaged in card games or scrolling through their smart phones at their locker, Murphy was excited to watch Clayton Kershaw pitch an afternoon game that was being televised in the road clubhouse at PNC Park. Only Murphy seemed to be watching the broadcast.

Does Murphy see the idea he helped spearhead accelerating across the game?

“It’s tough for me to speak [about] anyone else specifically,” Murphy said. “I know what I am trying to do with my game. I see someone like Freddy Galvis last year hit 20 [homers last season]. We just came from Philadelphia, and Cesar Hernandez with the Phillies, it looks like he’s driving the ball more.”

When Murphy presents his beliefs, they’re convincing and easily digestible. You could understand how he could sell the idea to teammates. Exhibit A: “For me, it’s easier to try and beat three guys covering more ground in the outfield than it is to beat five guys covering [less ground] in the infield,” Murphy said. “My goal is to hit every single ball so that it cannot be caught by an infielder.”

With regard to crediting the air-ball idea to a key actor or actors, Murphy said there might not be any one person responsible for it. He certainly doesn’t believe it’s himself. And his impact is difficult to quantify. But Murphy is the type of communicator and researcher who would be an asset in a major-league clubhouse, and who can — and likely has — influenced peers. After all, players spend more time around teammates than family. Murphy’s value goes beyond his on-field production. Murphy is the kind of clubhouse presence from which all teams could benefit, not just with the air-ball revolution, but with any concept that might be beneficial to adopt from an individual and club perspective.

Murphy is evidence that in the data age there is more benefit to having smart, curious players in the clubhouse. Zimmerman might be evidence of that; perhaps some Mets are following his message, too. And perhaps there are amateur players in Jacksonville, Fla., who will benefit, as well.





A Cleveland native, FanGraphs writer Travis Sawchik is the author of the New York Times bestselling book, Big Data Baseball. He also contributes to The Athletic Cleveland, and has written for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, among other outlets. Follow him on Twitter @Travis_Sawchik.

27 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago

This is a good, but weird article after the Zimmerman one where he denies he played much of a role.

Pig.Pen
9 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Zimmerman is one of the best in baseball at the Crash Davis cliche interview. He gives the media next to nothing, despite what he may or may not believe.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
9 years ago

Donaldson has also spread it a lot. He also worked with a guy named tewksbary who teaches that stuff (I actually know tewks from a baseball forum, he is a really smart guy).

caponehollywood
9 years ago

“I consider him a net negative.” – Sandy Alderson on not re-signing Daniel Murphy. They’ll be playing that clip on boomer and carton until Murph retires.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
9 years ago

To be fair murphy at that point was a slightly above average hitter but his defense was getting so bad that it ate into value he created at the plate.

At that point he was 30 years old and only had one big half season as a record of hitting really good.

I can understand Alderson did not want to give murphy a multi year contract given his age and declining defense. Even in 2015 murphy only had like 2.5 war including his monster second half. It wouldn’t have required great creativity to imagine him slipping to a below average player at that point.

Now in hindsight the nats signed a great contract but who saw that coming?

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
9 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

No one really. He was at best their 3rd choice. They tried to sign Zobrist but got out bid by the Cubs. They had a trade in place for Brandon Phillips before he exercised his no-trade clause. There was talk about just making do until Trea Turner was ready to come up.

Warning Track Power
9 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

Justin Turner, I think.

The problem with not re-signing Murphy is that he demonstrated a new ceiling for himself and taking a gamble that his new ceiling was real–or at least that his old ceiling had been significantly raised–would not cost much of anything.

LHPSU
9 years ago

Or he could turn into Omar Infante. A friendly reminder that people were discussing whether Murphy should be offered a QO at all.

phil43
9 years ago

Sandy never said that. Gary Cohen did.

gotham scout
9 years ago
Reply to  phil43

i just never made sense for the hard pass on Murph with David Wright’s health in question.

teufelshuffle
9 years ago
Reply to  phil43

Yeah I have no idea how this quote got attributed to Sandy. Sandy clearly wanted to improve the double play defense, and thought he could get a draft pick from Murphy and then another from Walker. Walker was also the highest fWAR position player on the 2016 Mets so it’s not like it was a terrible plan. Finally, Murphy himself didn’t expect this–if he had, he would have accepted the QO and then gotten a monster contract after his 2016 season. Yes, we have gone over these points many times. Bottom line: Mets got cute with draft picks, prioritized double play defense, and made the same offensive projection as everyone else, Murphy included, and it would have mostly worked out for them had not Murphy gone to the Nats and then slugged 4.000 against them 18 times a year.

gotham scout
9 years ago

Gar y Cohen echoed those words throughout the end of 2015 season. Any time he would boot a ball. It was such bullshit. not really a great time to be a Mets fan right now. ;(

James
9 years ago

I do t think you’ll convince anyone on this site that Murph wasn’t a negative.
No one thought Murph would have then season he had last year. Not even Murphy himself. If he did, he would have taken the Mets qualifying offer, and hit free agency for this soeason, as one of the top 2 free agents out there.
Murphy probably cost himself $30-$50 million turning down that qualifying offer

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago

So…would Curtis Granderson be the real “patient zero” in the FB Revolution?

carterMember since 2020
9 years ago

I agree. I would venture it was Granderson that spread the idea to Murphy

Mahoney
9 years ago
Reply to  carter

And Granderson had made his move to flyballin’ it when he was with the Yankees. His hitting coach: Kevin Long

boogshine
9 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

and this is the reason the Mets had all manner of puzzle pieces that should have told them the change in Murphy was real. As far as defense, their corner infielders were known to be fragile and he’d make a nice insurance policy there even while he bungled around at 2B.

John Autin
9 years ago

Opinions will vary, but I can’t assess Murphy’s value as a teammate (or baseball ambassador) without considering his outspoken anti-gay bigotry.

I’m not trying to brand the guy, or dismiss any good that he does just because of the prejudice he has often expressed. But I certainly question Travis’s glowing statements that “Murphy is the type of communicator and researcher who would be an asset in a major-league clubhouse” and “Murphy is the kind of clubhouse presence from which all teams could benefit.”

Murphy is a zealot in numerous ways. Some strike me as helpful to teammates, others not.

LHPSU
9 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

“After reading his comments, I appreciate that Daniel spoke his truth. I really do. I was visiting his team, and a reporter asked his opinion about me. He was brave to share his feelings, and it made me want to work harder and be a better example that someday might allow him to view things from my perspective, if only for just a moment.

I respect him, and I want everyone to know that he was respectful of me. We have baseball in common, and for now, that might be the only thing. But it’s a start.”

John Autin
9 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

I’m not sure of your intent in posting that quote. But one person’s measured, tolerant response doesn’t change my view of Murphy’s statements.

Also, notice the subtle jab — the hope that Murphy might someday “view things from my perspective, if only for just a moment.”

My only point was that Murphy’s expressed views towards gay people — like, “I do disagree with the lifestyle, 100 percent” — are bigoted. No matter what he means by the word, to presume that such a large group of disparate people automatically shares a “lifestyle” is a bigoted view.

How much that matters to any teammate or fan is a matter of personal judgment or taste. And to be clear, I’m not aware of any hurtful *actions* by Murphy in this regard, and I’m not saying my personal taste is any better than someone else’s.

But I do find those statements extremely distasteful. I would have trouble being a teammate of Murphy, or of any religious zealot.

MatMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

I understand that by definition he is a bigot. Likewise your intolerance of his views make you a bigot as well.
big·ot
?bi??t/Submit
noun
a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.

I’m not sticking up for his views. I am pointing out the irony of your opposition of him as a valuable teammate. The beauty of our country is we can all have our own opinions, even wrong ones. The beauty of analytics is, we can appreciate valuable baseball players in a sort of vacuum, excluding non-baseball related issues.

LHPSU
9 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

As far as I’m aware, he spoke about the issue all of one time. How you come up with the descriptions “outspoken” and “often expressed” escapes me.

The point of posting that quote is that the person who is allegedly being victimized is quite capable of providing a measured response and recognizing the right to hold different opinions. Both of these people understand they don’t need to let their views on sexuality get in the way of other things – something that you don’t seem to understand.

dudleyMember since 2026
9 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

We don’t think the racists who targeted Jackie Robinson had a valid viewpoint to share, so I don’t see why murphy’s homophobia is any different. Not tolerating intolerance doesn’t make you a bigot.

dudleyMember since 2026
9 years ago
Reply to  dudley

wow, the pro-homophobia crowd is a lot more prevalent than i would have anticipated for this community.

John Autin
9 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

You may well be right that Murphy has only been publicly quoted once on this subject. I can’t prove otherwise. So, my bad for mischaracterizing. Moving on to your other points:

The single individual whose presence prompted Murphy’s reaction is not the only person referenced by Murphy’s statement, nor the only one entitled to have a response.

There are different kinds of opinions. If I were to voice an opinion condemning as sinful something you feel is an innate part of your being, you might not consider it a mere opinion — especially if the “your kind” had traditionally been subject to violence and oppression.

If Murphy really didn’t want to let his “views on sexuality” get in the way of other things, he wouldn’t have said what he said. I can’t see the point of it, except to signal to his fellow zealots that he was still in their camp despite meeting with Bean.

Hank G.Member since 2016
9 years ago

Baseball Savant can’t afford a second avatar for left-handed batters? That looks weird as hell.

dudleyMember since 2026
9 years ago

I hope Dave Sheinin of the Washington Post paid you royalties for your Thames article. He basically just reposted it with his own byline.