David Dahl May Not Be the Rockies’ Answer
The Colorado Rockies are acting like a team with expectations for 2018. Before the start of the offseason, Cot’s Contracts projected a salary of $131 million for the team, an all-time high for the franchise. That was before they added $40 million in average annual value by signing Wade Davis, Chris Iannetta, Jake McGee, and Bryan Shaw. The players seem to expect big things as well, and have used this energy in their pursuit of free agents. McGee, according to Patrick Saunders, helped sell Wade Davis on the Rockies saying, “[T]his was a team that was going to win now.”
Now, many questions remain for the Rockies, and those questions have led some to doubt Colorado’s ability to contend. Can the pitching keep up its pace from last year? Can Charlie Blackmon repeat his MVP-type performance? Is Jonathan Lucroy back? While all three of those uncertainties can be addressed by playing the actual games, there’s another question that might have been answered recently.
#Rockies outfielder Dahl (rib/back) cleared to swing bat https://t.co/YEDOKU62RT via @MLB
— Thomas Harding (@harding_at_mlb) January 4, 2018
Unfortunately, those fantasies had to be postponed. On March 6th of 2017, the Rockies released a seemingly innocuous announcement that Dahl had suffered a stress reaction in his ribcage and would be reevaluated in two weeks. That injury would persist for basically the entire season.
Reports concerning Dahl’s return to health give the Rockies some hope of improving an outfield that was horrendous outside of the aforementioned Blackmon; however, the combination of Dahl’s profile as a hitter and the consequences of missing a full year suggest that enthusiasm ought to be curbed.
This is not Dahl’s first experience with serious injury. In May of 2015, he required a splenectomy after a collision with a teammate, but amazingly avoided missing the entire season. The 2017 injury to his ribcage may have longer lasting effects, however. The last of his 82 plate appearances happened on July 31st, and his first spring training at-bat will be his first against live pitching in over six months. Furthermore, the performance of former rookies returning from a lost year is mixed at best.
| Player | Rookie Year | Rookie wRC+ | Return wRC+ | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kelly Johnson | 2005 | 95 | 118 | 23 |
| Jason Castro | 2010 | 56 | 99 | 43 |
| Ryan Kalish | 2010 | 87 | 42 | -45 |
| Jurickson Profar | 2013 | 75 | 78 | 3 |
| Jose Iglesias | 2013 | 102 | 97 | -5 |
| Christian Vazquez | 2014 | 70 | 52 | -18 |
| Gregory Bird | 2015 | 137 | 86 | -51 |
| Average | — | 89 | 82 | -7 |
Since 2000, seven players have both (a) missed an entire MLB season the year after surpassing the 130-plate-appearance threshold and then (b) returned from the injury to accrue over 100 PAs in their first season back. Several were top prospects prior to their rookie season, including Johnson (No. 47 by Baseball America), Kalish (No. 76 by Baseball Prospectus), Castro (No. 41 by Baseball America), and Profar (No. 1 by Baseball America, MLB, and Baseball Prospectus). Their injuries were varied, from Tommy John surgery to torn ACLs to torn labrums. Dahl went into his rookie season ranked 31st by Baseball Prospectus, 39th by Baseball America, and 46th by MLB. His offensive upside was surpassed by only Profar and (maybe) Bird, and his performance was bested in this group only by Bird.
Of this group, however, only Kelly Johnson and Jason Castro made substantial progress after returning — and Castro only because he really couldn’t do much worse and still remain in the majors. Profar continued to struggle, Iglesias continued to bat better than expected for one more year, and Greg Bird had a dip in line-drive rate and BABIP. It is a very small sample size, but these players definitely did not progress as a whole at an age where some progression is not unexpected.
However, a small collection of disappointing returns is not the only reason to have reservations about Dahl’s prospects this season. His 2016 line has several worrying trends that should scare some evaluators. He does has some free-swinging tendencies, even if his 24.9% strikeout rate doesn’t leave you thinking of Joey Gallo. Despite this, Dahl chased pitches outside the zone at a rate of 35.6% (compared to a league average of 30.3%) while recording a swinging-strike rate of 14.9% (league average 10.1%). All this leads to a low walk rate (6.3%), something that has continued from his minor-league lines.
Even when Dahl makes contact, there are indications he’s headed for a downturn. The most glaring point is his .404 BABIP, a rate of mammoth proportions that is certainly unsustainable, even at Coors. This is especially unsustainable considering his 87.9 mph exit velocity, which found him sandwiched between Gordon Beckham and Christian Bethancourt at 248th best in 2016. His 90.7 mph exit velocity on fly balls and line drives was 350th in the league, and his barrels per plate appearances (according to Statcast) was 287th. In short, his power and batted-ball profile leave one with several questions.
Dahl’s sprint speed falls at 27.7 mph (slightly above average), and he is an adequate defender in left field. All in all, if his BABIP regresses to normal levels, his combination of low walk rate, adequate defense, and some power will render Dahl a corner-outfield version Adam Jones in a good scenario. While that is nothing at all to disregard, it is a little ways from the .300 and 20-20 thoughts that may have filled some heads after 2016.
Dahl is young, and he is undoubtably talented. He is also now ostensibly healthy and ready to return for 2018 in some form. He also will surely be better than Raimel Tapia (-0.1 WAR), the 2017 version of Ian Desmond (-0.8 WAR), or Alexi Amarista (-1.2 WAR). However, to expect him to cleanly return from an injury that cost him a full year and progress from his 2016 level is probably not advised. Further, his own impressive 2016 line has many holes once you get underneath the surface even just a little bit. Dahl could be good, but he probably will not be good enough for the Rockies to start expecting too much for 2018.
Stephen Loftus is a Visiting Assistant Professor in Mathematical Sciences at Sweet Briar College in Virginia. In his spare time he usually can be found playing the pipe organ or working on his rambling sabermetric thoughts.
Agree Dahl’s health is a huge question mark. But his pedigree, 2016 minor league results and raw tools all suggest a solid major leaguer, at a minimum. The Rockies should know his health better than any of us…
Just traded Jesse Winker and my 3rd overall draft pick for him. Oops
Curious what’s included in that cots projection (can’t open the link) but your wording makes it sound like they are currently sitting at a payroll of ~$171M. All the estimates I’ve seen have put them somewhere around $130M-$140M after their 4 free agent signings (bbref has them at ~136M right now).
Also, Lucroy’s 2018 performance doesn’t have much impact on the Rockies, especially after the Iannetta signing.
Exactly. The Cot’s projection of 131M you link INCLUDES the $40 to Davis/Shaw/McGee. 2017 was the previous record-high payroll at ~129M so it’s not like they are blowing out the bank for some reason.
In fact, the end of season payroll for the Rox in 2017 was much higher because they paid Holland $7M in bonuses and added Neshek and Lucroy’s salary after the trade deadline. If anything, you should expect the Rox to add at least one more MLB level free agent signing before the offseason is through and they will still be comfortably within the same payroll window as 2017.
I think they need dahl to be the answer. It is not guaranteed but the Rockies can’t just buy players as much as they want, they are a small market team.
A team like the Rockies needs to flip some coins, if they don’t fall your way you are just done.
Cubs had a similar situation with schwarber who didn’t technically miss a whole season but almost and even they went with him although he wasn’t all that good. Can’t give up on a top prospect that quickly.
Of course they need a plan B in case he does not make it but they can’t really afford a second plan A like the dodgers or yankees.
Schwarber actually should be included in the table in the post. He didn’t *technically* miss his entire second season, but 1 game + some DH at-bats in the World Series is functionally the same. For the record, Schwarber was at a 131 wRC+ his rookie year and just 102 in his return year.
The spending on the bullpen sure seems to indicate a plan to rely on both Dahl and McMahon pretty heavily.
Parra is still a capable 4th OF. I guess you don’t think much of Tapia or Jordan Paterson? If you really think they are a risk, then they could sign another OF to compete like Maybin or Gomez…Austin Jackson? Or maybe even a 1b like Duda/Morrison if they drop enough and push Desmond back to the OF? I guess they could swing a trade as well…I’d like to see Kiermier in COL…OF defense so important in that place.
Problem is signing Maybin/Gomez/Jackson et al. ties up a roster spot and the Rox basically resign themselves to a) playing Desmond at 1B full-time, or b) sending Dahl/Tapia/Patterson to AAA unless there is a significant injury.
Signing another average guy in the OF just doesn’t make sense from a roster construction standpoint because they could give that spot to one of Dahl/Tapia/Patterson (whoever shows best in spring training) and pay them league minimum. They should get close to the same production, and you at least have the possibility of one of them breaking out. A veteran FA signing doesn’t have “options” to send back to AAA if he’s slumping, could turn into an anchor for the entire roster/lineup (see CarGo 2017, Desmond 2017, Parra 2016).
To me, a signing at 1B makes much more sense. This allows you to better utilize Desmon’s positional “flexibility” at 1B only in emergency or very limited situations, but to primarily have him in the outfield. Then, you can free-up McMahon to play a bit of 1B and backup 2B and 3B as well while the FA signing (Logan Morrison please!) plays most of the time at 1B. Seems to me, this is a much better use of resources and the Rockies clearly have the payroll space to sign a guy like Morrison and potentially get him for something like 2-years $20-24 Mil (not much demand left on the FA market for 1B so this seems reasonable).
I don’t quite think this sprint speed stuff expressed in MPH is correct. Leonard Fournette had a 80 or so yard touchdown run this season in which he reached the top speed recorded in the NFL in 2017 … a little over 20 mph. Usain Bolt’s top speed in his world record 200 meters was 27.4 MPH. Nobody has been faster than Bolt ever (not even Billy Hamilton or Trout).
For fun let’s take a superb 40 yard time to reach top speed, say 4.4 seconds, and prorate 27.7 MPH over the last 60 yards. The last 60 covered at exactly 27.7 MPH would require 4.43 seconds. This would be a new world record for 100 yards of just under 8.9 seconds.
If Dahl is that fast, there ain’t nothin’ average about his baseball speed. He would be lightning, and deserving of the nickname White Lightnin’.
You’re right — Baseball Savant measures speed in feet/second, not miles/hour, as the author incorrectly states. 27.7 ft/s is 18.9 mph.
David Dahl has the sprint speed that cars are requested to drive at in order to keep children safe in suburban neighborhoods
Trout usually topped out @ 20ish mph according to statcast – is he the Leonard Fournette of MLB?
Maybe so, I wouldn’t want to have to tackle him.
Horrendous outfield? What team were you watching? Blackmon, Parra and Gonzales were at the very least, average, and arguably much better than that. Stats geeks always make me nervous because they seem to ignore the eye test. Dahl can rake and run. He may provide some of the pop that was sometimes missing last year. Cargo WAS horrendous at the plate and the Rockies still made the post season.
Blackmon was fantastic. Every other OF was somewhere between decidedly below average (Parra) to horrendous (Cargo, Desmond, Tapia). Like, not playable bad. They didn’t make the playoffs because of those guys, they made playoffs DESPITE those guys.
I was referring to their outfield defense, which I assumed the author was…my mistake.. Granted, if you factor in offense, Desmond and Cargo were awful and Parra just OK.
https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=of&stats=fld&lg=all&qual=400&type=1&season=2017&month=0&season1=2017&ind=0&team=19&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0
Parra is the only player who was positive in either defensive metric.
Blackmon has great range but his noodle arm prevented him from having a positive defensive contribution by both DRS and UZR. That’s some of the largest negative ARM value I’ve seen of any outfielder, actually.
I was watching the Rockies, myself, and while “horrendous” isn’t really accurate slightly below-average certainly would be.
Man y’all are down on the Rockies of late
As a fan, I keep waiting for them to realize the fact that the offense was their biggest issue in 2017, and actually has been for many of the past several seasons, then act accordingly.
Sprint speed is measured in feet per second. Hence, 27 plus feet per second not 27mph as mentioned in the article.
Tapia is the answer here, he has upside and took his lumps last year, which is reflected in a pessimistic projection. Let him try and settle in while Dahl warms up in AAA for a couple months.
Bird did not just have a dip in line drive rate and BABIP, he also had a bone bruise in his ankle. He should be included in the table, and promptly disregarded
When I look at David Dahl, I can’t help but see enough Randal Grichuk to scare me.