Do The Dodgers Have a Problem At Second Base?

The Dodgers have a problem at second base. The Dodgers don’t really have a problem. This’ll make sense soon, I promise.

Back when the Dodgers signed Cuban Alexander Guerrero for $28 million, I mentioned that some scouts thought his defense was stiff. Thinking that stiff shortstop defense would be fine at second base, maybe I didn’t think that was a big deal. Maybe we all should’ve paid more attention to that facet of the player.

The news has trickled out slowly, but it hasn’t been good. First, Jeff Sullivan identified the position as a problem spot on a contender. Then Mike Petriello pointed out how little safety net the Dodgers had at second base. Then there was a bit of news that the team wasn’t sure about Guerrero’s defense at second. Then someone called the position an open battle, maybe even a platoon situation. Then came the pining for Mark Ellis.

We should have known from the signings alone that something was up at second base: Justin Turner, Chone Figgins, Brendan Harris, Miguel Rojas, and now it looks like Cuban shortstop Erisbel Arruebarruena are all headed to Dodger camp. Most are minor league signings, but that 23-year-old Cuban shortstop may cost the team another $25 million, and maybe he’s not really in the mix for second base anyway. Point is, they’re worried about second base.

The eventual solution may come with Alexander Guerrero in the minor leagues and a platoon in the major leagues. That would disappointing for most parties involved in bringing the Cuban in. As a 26-years-old, he’s close enough to his peak that the expectation probably was that he’d break camp with the major league team. But, considering he’s adjusting to a new league and a new position at the same time, it wouldn’t be enough to render final judgement on the deal.

The Dodgers paid for Guerrero’s upside over the options. Other than Robinson Cano, the pickings were slim — David Adams, Willie Bloomquist, Luis Cruz, Mark Ellis, Rafael Furcal, Omar Infante, Kelly Johnson, Nick Punto, Brian Roberts and Skip Schumaker all feature lower ceilings than the Cuban at least. So it behooves them to groom him the right way in order to better their chances of seeing that upside. Maybe the minor leagues is the right idea.

After all, a platoon between Dee Gordon and Justin Turner — or, really, pick two names from above, with one including possible lefty hitters Dee Gordon or Chone Figgins — might provide the same production as most of the names on that list above. The fans project Infante for a .310 wOBA and his defense was barely above scratch last year. Turner has a lifetime .305 wOBA which might be improved facing just lefties, and his versatility made him a good non-tender to watch. Dee Gordon has been atrocious so far, but a new position and a new role (he’s only been 14% worse than league average against righties) might work for him. Miguel Rojas has been a slick defender in camp, and the team could use some infield defense up the middle. Maybe Arruebarruena will be ready enough to contribute with the glove right away.

But the point goes beyond what the team actually does at second base this year. This team is stacked at other positions and can afford to ‘figure it out’ at second. Last year, they scored 649 runs, the seventh-most in the National League, and this with a second baseman that was 8% worse than league average with the stick. Our projected depth charts have them above-average at every position but second base. Full(er) years from Matt Kemp, Hanley Ramirez and Yasiel Puig should help them at least match their offensive total from last year, even if second base takes a step down from the league average that the Ellis-led crew managed last year.

Projections are just projections, but it’s worth noting that only two of last year’s playoff teams had seven above-average position players. Only one was in the NL — the Dodgers. That the Dodgers have good players everywhere (with some depth) has allowed them to gather this group at second base with less heartburn.

The Dodgers have a problem at second base. The Dodgers don’t really have a problem.





With a phone full of pictures of pitchers' fingers, strange beers, and his two toddler sons, Eno Sarris can be found at the ballpark or a brewery most days. Read him here, writing about the A's or Giants at The Athletic, or about beer at October. Follow him on Twitter @enosarris if you can handle the sandwiches and inanity.

43 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
David
10 years ago

so trade an OF to the Mariners?

Ray
10 years ago
Reply to  David

word.

Kevin
10 years ago
Reply to  David

would make some sense, although acquiring someone young and controllable like Franklin or Ackley would make for a very weird situation after guaranteeing Guerrero $28mill. kinda like declaring him a bust before he even sees a major league diamond.

The Foilsmember
10 years ago
Reply to  David

Someone should’ve suggested that months ago.

DodgersKings323
10 years ago
Reply to  David

Dre

Balthazar
10 years ago
Reply to  David

Ackley for Petersen is a deal I’ve been waiting for all off-season. I suspect the Duhdgahs thought they were too All-Star for that. Franklin may well have been asked for, but the answer should be no.

The Dodgers DO have a problem—for 2014. Maybe some one stands up from the pile of maybe the org’s acquired by next year. It isn’t a given that somebody ‘converts’ from SS to 2B however, certainly guys who haven’t even established that they can play at a major league level. The offseason plan for the org was nutso, and there’s no fall back. Figgins can’t play the position, and can’t play period. Dee Gordon hasn’t shown a whisker of major league performance. We have two international signs who’ve never taken a professional pitch on the continent. And several scrubs who aren’t even that good. I don’t see the Dodgers breaking camp with what they have now, let’s put it that way.

Rich
10 years ago
Reply to  Balthazar

Cuba is considered part of North America.

Johnston
10 years ago
Reply to  Rich

It’s an island. He said “continent.”

Ivdown
10 years ago
Reply to  Balthazar

Joc Pederson is skyrocketing in value right now, Ackley has bottomed out. It’s not about being “too all-star”, it’s about the trade you suggest not making any sense. Pederson for Franklin makes MORE sense, if anything.

Balthazar
10 years ago
Reply to  Ivdown

Franklin is a better player than Pederson. No way to that trade. Ackley’s _perceived_ value has bottomed out, yes, and that’s a major problem in doing a deal for him. Fact is, both teams have a need at the positions for which the other team has a player. The Dodgers have a bigger need and are in serious post-season contention. And Pederson has no place to play on his team (which by itself isn’t a reason to trade him, anymore than a reason to trade Franklin).

If the Dodgers want a black hole at 2B, they’ve got that and they can stand pat upon it. It they want to do something about it, then . . . play ball.

Corey
10 years ago
Reply to  David

I like the Mariners AND the Dodgers, I REALLY want this to happen.