Eliminating Teams Using the Thome Corollary

In the first chapter of his (excellent!) Big Data Baseball, Travis Sawchick describes how now-Pittsburgh Pirates General Manager Neal Huntington used an interesting bit of historical analysis to help inform a controversial roster move. Writes Sawchick:

Using the software [DiamondView], the Indians made key decisions, such as when they elected not to sign aging star Jim Thome to an extension after the 2002 season, in part because of the database, the Cleveland Plain Dealer reported. […] Huntington noted that the Indians found in a payroll analysis that no major league club, dating back to 1985, had won a World Series when committing 15 percent or more of its payroll to one player.

Let’s call that 15% rule The Thome Corollary.

Has The Thome Corollary held up in the years since 2002, when price tags for choice free agents and franchise cornerstones has escalated at a rate far greater than your journeyman’s/rookie’s salary? The answer is: “No, The Thome Corollary has not held up,” or, “Yes, it sure has, with some small tweaks.”

It turns out that seven of the thirteen World Series champions since 2002 have had a player who takes up more than 15% of their team’s Opening Day payroll:

Year Champion Highest-Paid Highest Salary (in $M) % of Payroll
2014 Giants Matt Cain 20.8 13.9
2013 Red Sox John Lackey 15.9 10.2
2012 Giants Barry Zito 19.0 14.4
2011 Cardinals Matt Holliday 17.0 15.5
2010 Giants Zito 18.5 19.2
2009 Yankees Alex Rodriguez 33.0 16.3
2008 Phillies Pat Burrell 14.3 14.5
2007 Red Sox Manny Ramirez 17.0 11.8
2006 Cardinals Albert Pujols 14.0 15.7
2005 White Sox Paul Konerko 8.8 11.6
2004 Red Sox Ramirez 22.5 17.6
2003 Marlins Ivan Rodriguez 10.0 22.2
2002 Angels Tim Salmon 9.7 15.6

So while plenty of teams have “violated” The Thome Corollary, only four did so by more than a percentage point: the 2010 Giants, 2009 Yankees, 2004 Red Sox, and 2003 Marlins.

I feel comfortable moving the 2009 Yankees and 2004 Red Sox into their own category: the mega-spenders. The Yankees were first in the league in salary in 2009, and the Red Sox were second in 2004. Yes, they both violated The Thome Corollary — but not by very much. Furthermore, they did so with excellent players (Rodriguez had 4.0 WAR that year; Ramirez had 3.3 in his) still had significant amounts of money to spread out over the rest of the roster. The lesson still stands, I think, for Huntington and most of the rest of baseball, who are in small or medium markets by comparison.

So what about the 2010 Giants and 2003 Marlins? They weren’t big spenders, and they actually are the two biggest violators of the rule. Basically, if a team violates The Thome Corollary to such a degree, they must do two things in order to also win:

1. Be active at the Trade Deadline. The Marlins paid the eventually hefty price of Adrian Gonzalez to receive Ugueth Urbina at the deadline, and they also acquired Jeff Conine. The 2010 Giants only traded for one excellent player at that deadline — Javier Lopez, who is still with the team — but were generally active, also adding Chris Ray, Mike Fontenot, Jose Guillen. But this is probably not as important as:

2. Have a historically awesome rookie class. The Marlins had a 23-and-under nucleus of Josh Beckett, Dontrelle Willis, and Miguel Cabrera. Giants 23-and-unders included Madison Bumgarner, Pablo Sandoval, and Buster Posey. Uh, pretty good.

Of the seven teams who had one player violating The Thome Corollary, only one of them had two players who were receiving over 15% of the team payroll. And, as you can see below, this is also a team with a historically awesome rookie class:

Year Champion 2nd-Highest-Paid 2nd-Highest Salary % of Payroll
2011 Cardinals Albert Pujols 16.0 14.6
2010 Giants Aaron Rowand 13.6 14.1
2009 Yankees Derek Jeter 21.6 10.7
2006 Cardinals Scott Rolen 12.4 13.9
2004 Red Sox Pedro Martinez 17.5 13.7
2003 Marlins Luis Castillo 4.8 10.6
2002 Angels Kevin Appier 9.5 15.3

Those 2002 Angels saw debuts from John Lackey, Scot Shields, Brendan Donnelly, and Francisco Rodriguez, and two of their team leaders in WAR (David Eckstein, Troy Glaus) were both on rookie contracts.

So! It looks like a more accurate, updated version of The Thome Corollary goes like this:

A. No team has won the World Series while dedicating at least 18% of the total payroll to one individual player — unless that team has significantly talented young players and is active on the trade market.

B. No team has won the World Series while dedicating at least 16% of the total payroll to two separate players.

With these new requirements in mind, let’s look at all of the players who are earning at least 15% of their team’s Opening Day payroll this season (or, in violation of the original Thome Corollary):

Team Player Salary % of Payroll
Twins Joe Mauer 23.0 21.2
Rockies Troy Tulowitzki 20.0 20.6
Mariners Felix Hernandez 24.8 20.1
Mets David Wright 20.0 19.7
Mariners Robinson Cano 24.0 19.4
Blue Jays Jose Reyes 22.0 17.4
Indians Nick Swisher 15.0 17.0
Phillies Ryan Howard 25.0 17.0
Phillies Cliff Lee 25.0 17.0
Rangers Prince Fielder 24.0 16.9
Rockies Carlos Gonzalez 16.4 16.9
Cubs Jon Lester 20.0 16.6
Angels Albert Pujols 24.0 16.4
Tigers Justin Verlander 28.0 16.2
Phillies Cole Hamels 23.5 16.0
Cardinals Adam Wainwright 19.5 15.9
Blue Jays Mark Buehrle 20.0 15.8
Mets Curtis Granderson 16.0 15.7
A’s Scott Kazmir 13.0 15.5
Indians Michael Bourn 13.5 15.3

There are three teams that we can eliminate for paying 16% or more to two players on their roster, none of whom were close to the World Series anyway: the Rockies, Mariners, and Phillies, who have three players over the threshold. This confirms the reputations that these teams all already have — transcendent stars who toil in anonymity, surrounded by near-anonymous teammates.

We’ll have to use our judgment with four other teams, and I’m sure you’ll agree with mine:

New York Mets: Wright’s injury issues are certainly not making that outsized contract look any better. In addition, the Mets are just a few percentage points away from violating the two-over-16% rule with Granderson’s contract. As impressive as the Mets apparently bottomless young pitching staff is, I think it’s too much to ask any team to overcome both tennants of the New Thome Corollary. Eliminated.

Toronto Blue Jays: Just like the Mets, the Blue Jays have one contract over 17% (Reyes) and one that is a hair away from 16% (Buehrle). Coupled with an inexperienced young pitching staff, I also declare them eliminated.

Cleveland Indians: With two salaries at 17.0% and 15.3%, the Indians are definitely not in violation of the New Thome Corollary. As lovely as Francisco Lindor and Trevor Bauer and Danny Salazar are, though, the lack of contributions from both high-salary players make this, I think, too steep a hill to summit. Sorry to do this right after the NBA Finals, but: eliminated.

Minnesota Twins: Whoda thought that consistent ol’ Joe Mauer would ever own one of the league’s most bloated contracts. While the idea of the Twins as playoff contenders could be laughable by as quickly as August, Byron Buxton is here and Miguel Sano could be shortly on his way. Accordingly, I give them the tiniest sliver of a chance.

We hoped you liked reading Eliminating Teams Using the Thome Corollary by Miles Wray!

Please support FanGraphs by becoming a member. We publish thousands of articles a year, host multiple podcasts, and have an ever growing database of baseball stats.

FanGraphs does not have a paywall. With your membership, we can continue to offer the content you've come to rely on and add to our unique baseball coverage.

Support FanGraphs




Miles Wray contributes sports commentary to McSweeney's Internet Tendency, Ploughshares, The Classical and Hardwood Paroxysm. Follow him on Twitter @mileswray or email him here.

newest oldest most voted
olethros
Guest
olethros

“Tenant” = renter, “tenet” = principle

To be fair
Guest
To be fair

he said ‘tennant’

Well-Beered Englishman
Guest

Which as everyone knows means “to play a time-traveling doctor”

wildcard09
Member
Member

Still my favorite Doctor. Matt Smith is pretty great, but Tennant takes the cake, or should I say the Banana?

Well-Beered Englishman
Guest

My favourite Tennant role so far is the Hardened Bitter Cop in season 1 of Broadchurch. It’s a pretty powerful detective show on Netflix. Ignore subsequent seasons.

wildcard09
Member
Member

Hmm, I’m assuming Tennant isn’t in subsequent seasons, hence ignoring them? I’ll have to add it to my list.

Well-Beered Englishman
Guest

Well, it’s like True Detective in that each season is a case, except that for whatever reason, they decided seasons 2-3 should be all the people from the first case reacting to the reveal of the murderer’s identity and being sad. Thus lack of plot, stupid twists.

Ben Hall
Member
Member
Ben Hall

I’d agree that the second season was not as good as the first, but they haven’t shown the third season yet, so it seems premature to dismiss it.

Herby Smith
Guest
Herby Smith

Actually, he was referring to the lead singer of Pet Shop Boys.