Rewrite the Balk Rule, Don’t Expand It

Demonstrating a commitment to modernity, baseball’s rules committee has spoken: “The fake-to-third, throw-to-first pickoff move” is now a balk. As of now, implementation is uncertain as baseball waits for the Major League Baseball Players Association to consider the rule change. But as far as MLB is concerned, you can’t do that any more.

So here’s the current rule, which is on the cutting block:

A pitcher is to step directly toward a base before throwing to that base but does not require him to throw (except to first base only) because he steps. It is possible, with runners on first and third, for the pitcher to step toward third and not throw, merely to bluff the runner back to third; then seeing the runner on first start for second, turn and step toward and throw to first base. This is legal. However, if, with runners on first and third, the pitcher, while in contact with the rubber, steps toward third and then immediately and in practically the same motion “wheels” and throws to first base, it is obviously an attempt to deceive the runner at first base, and in such a move it is practically impossible to step directly toward first base before the throw to first base, and such a move shall be called a balk. Of course, if the pitcher steps off the rubber and then makes such a move, it is not a balk.


Got that? (If not, then Ben Lindbergh made fun of it over at Baseball Prospectus, and he has a ton of animated GIFs that should help.)

I don’t like the balk rule. And I think it needs to be reconsidered or completely rewritten, rather than simply expanded. As I wrote two-and-a-half years ago, while the balk is clearly intended to protect baserunners from deception on the part of pitchers, “it’s not clear that any of the motions it prohibits are any more successful in fooling baserunners than the motions it permits — and moreover, it’s not clear that the motions it prohibits are all that distinguishable from the motions it permits.”

The balk rule, as written, is a bit of a catch-all. It is mostly used as a punishment for pitcher actions, but not exclusively. Rule 4.03(a) states that a balk is committed by a catcher who, on an intentional walk, leaves the lines of the catcher’s box before the pitch is thrown. Rule 7.07 states that, on a squeeze play or a steal of home, a balk will be charged if anyone tries to block the plate without the ball. What’s more, rule 8.02(a) provides that, if a pitcher is charged with throwing an illegally doctored ball — “what is called the `shine’ ball, `spit’ ball, `mud’ ball or `emery’ ball'” — the batting team will be given the option to accept the play as it occurred, or not accept it, in which case the ball is dead and a balk is assessed.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

So a balk is a penalty for illegal behavior. Other than the exceptions I mentioned, most instances of the balk rule are set out in rule 8.05, which set out a stringent set of prohibitions. You probably know all of this already, but basically:

  • If a pitcher “swings his free foot past the back edge of the pitcher’s rubber,” he has to throw to the batter.
  • If a pitcher makes a motion to first, he has to throw there.
  • A pitcher has to step toward a base before throwing there.
  • A pitcher can’t fake or throw to an unoccupied base unless there’s a play there.
  • A pitcher can’t throw a quick-pitch before the batter is set in the box.
  • A pitcher can’t pitch to the batter when he isn’t facing him.
  • A pitcher can’t make any part of his pitching motion when he isn’t touching the rubber.
  • A pitcher can’t unnecessarily delay the game.
  • After coming to a “legal pitching position,” a pitcher can’t remove a hand from the ball unless he is going to pitch or throw to a base.
  • A pitcher can’t drop the ball while touching the rubber.
  • A pitcher can’t throw an intentional ball while the catcher is not in the catcher’s box.
  • A pitcher can’t pitch from the set position without coming to a stop.

If there were no balk rule, it would be much harder for batters to take a lead, and there would be many fewer stolen bases. Of course, during the steroid-Moneyball era, there were many fewer stolen bases to begin with. I’m not sure how much baserunners need to be protected from deception when so much of the game revolves around deception and gamesmanship. From infielders deking baserunners on balls hit to the outfield by pretending they’re about to get a relay — the play that famously tripped up Lonnie Smith in the 1991 World Series — to the ancient hidden-ball trick.

This particular move doesn’t have a lot of significance in itself. As Boone Logan told a reporter in May, when the move was originally being discussed, “How often does it work? Maybe once in never.” The significance of the move, such as it is, is it creates one more thing for which the penalty is a balk, and I would have thought there were already enough of those.

It seems strange to prohibit a move that almost never works, but at least this is one case where we can be pretty sure that the balk rule will always be called. It can be hard for an umpire to figure out what constitutes a pitcher’s “pitching motion,” because it’s different for every pitcher, and that’s a big reason that balks are so infrequently called. But it’s awfully easy to tell when a pitcher fakes to third and then tries to throw to first. I wish baseball would come up with a balk rule that could actually be applied as written.

Instead, as Craig Calcaterra notes, they passed a rule that “must be aimed at bloggers and color commentators, who will now no longer be able to say `that move rarely works, so I don’t know why they do it.'”





Alex is a writer for The Hardball Times.

23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Eminor3rdMember since 2019
13 years ago

I bet they did it because pitcher’s use it to delay the game, and it never works so it was no big deal to take away.

Justin Ruggiano
13 years ago
Reply to  Eminor3rd

Pitchers use it to see if the batter is going to bunt and to see if the runner is moving on first movement, not to delay the game.

attgig
13 years ago

Seems like this was the ONE trick a righty could use, but a lefty couldn’t. Disappointed that they took this one away.

MikeS
13 years ago

Jack McDowell is saddened by this.

Alan
13 years ago

I seem to recall Turk Wendell getting this move to work twice in one inning. He would be sad, too.

Alan
13 years ago

Game was May 16, 2000. Happened in the 11th inning.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/NYN/NYN200005160.shtml

Mr Punch
13 years ago

If it’s sneaky, stupid and time-consuming, it qualifies as “conduct detrimental to the game,” so punishment is in order.

MikeS
13 years ago
Reply to  Mr Punch

You just described any number of pitchers that feel compelled to take a lap around the mound before throwing each pitch. Or batters who must re-lace their shoes after each checked swing.

Matt
13 years ago
Reply to  MikeS

True, but still, banning it can only be a good thing. Eliminate a few extra wasted seconds.

Now they just need to ban the other unnecessary laps around the mound. And you get one chance to adjust your batting gloves per at bat, that’s it. Sheesh.

bobabaloo
13 years ago
Reply to  Mr Punch

the move really isnt used to pick anyone off. its to make sure the runner at first isnt getting a jump off the first move. this seems to be lost on everybody talking about this new rule.

Baltar
13 years ago

I whole-heartedly agree that the balk rule needs to be rewritten. It is so confusing and nonsensical that umpires have largely substituted their own rules for it anyway.
However, I give three cheers for the elimination of the annoying and boring fake-to-third throw-to-first move.

jauer
13 years ago

Don’t like the rule change. Is there any evidence the fake-third throw-first works at a significantly lower rate than any other type of pickoff move? Of course it rarely works: it’s a fucking pickoff move.

AJ
13 years ago

Balkin’ Bob is happy.

4233
13 years ago
Reply to  AJ

Damn, you beat me to it…Also doesn’t “Cowboy West” call alot of balks?? They are probably the ones who suggested the new rule

glassSheets
13 years ago

Can you fake to third and throw to second? Thus if the runner is going the pitcher can toss it to the SS. Then it will be still be used to see if the batter is bunting without risking the free base to the runner.

glassSheets
13 years ago
Reply to  glassSheets

Or are all fakes to a base without throwing the ball now a balk? Including the lift your leg and spin move to second? Or does that now only apply to third?

jono
13 years ago

i didn’t care to read the whole article (so if this was discussed, I apologize), but doesn’t this eliminate the wheel move to second as well (the inside move). It is simulating a pitch and done to deceive the runner. Like the third to first it should be ineffective, though possibly done to unveil a bunt attempt, but deceptive nonetheless

tylersnotes
13 years ago
Reply to  jono

i didn’t read your whole comment but if you asked a question the answer is “maybe”

Eric Cioe
13 years ago

Max Scherzer has had that move work a few times in the last few years.

Corey
13 years ago

I don’t understand the obsession with this move at all, this move only does 2 things 1) gives some hints about offensive strategy to the defense, 2) forces the runner not to go as soon as the pitcher’s leg comes up. It’s purpose isn’t really to pick someone off at all, if that were its purpose it would be stupid to ever do it, but the very fact that runners know a pitcher CAN do it slows down a steal of second a tiny bit. I can’t conceive of any argument for banning this.

Corey
13 years ago

Having read the new rule, thought about it, and simulated this move a couple of times, I can’t figure out what exactly they’re banning. The way I always did that move, and the way I see everyone do it appears to me to be legal.

Youthful Enthusiast
13 years ago

The mid 90’s Pirates used this a ton and got a guy or two every year.

J. B. Rainsberger
13 years ago

This is crazy. Simply enforce the part of the rule that demands that a pitcher step *towards* third base. So many pitchers pick up their foot, put it down, then wheel to first base. Not actually stepping towards third base is the balk.