FanGraphs After Dark Chat – 2/17/15
5:36 | : Hi everybody! Jeff and I will be here at 9 pm ET. Before you ask about us Kiley’s prospect list, let me remind you that he did a chat this afternoon: |
9:02 |
It’s 9:01! You’re late |
9:02 |
It’s 9:02!! YOURE LATE!! *LOUD NOISES* |
9:02 |
![]() BASEBALL IS BACK TOMORROW!! |
9:02 |
: MY COMPUTER SAYS 9:01. And no, baseball is most definitely NOT back tomorrow.
|
9:03 |
: Yep
|
9:03 |
: Hi
|
9:03 |
The guy who owns Xander Boegarts in my 7×7 (standard 5 plus OBP and SLG) has essentially given up on him. I’m in position to win it all this year, and don’t really need him to do that, but could really use him in 2016 and beyond. How aggressive should I be to get him? |
9:04 |
: I would be pretty aggressive, but not at the expense of your championship roster.
|
9:04 |
Breaking News!! Pablo Sandoval is hefty! Let’s all act like this is some kind of unexpected outcome because he has obviously been so skinny his entire career!! Cue the ridiculous spring training stories already. |
9:05 |
: I would prefer to NOT cue them, but maybe I’m just a dreamer.
|
9:05 |
As a Red Sox “fan”(despite being emotionally disconnected), it is odd I would rather have Shields’s contract than Sandoval’s? It seems like the marginal value is greater and possibly a old Shields will be better than a 1B playing Sandoval.… |
9:05 |
: Jeff is having some connectivity issues, FYI.
|
9:06 |
|
9:06 |
If Vazquez ends up being an elite framer like BP’s latest number suggest, would would be more comfortable with Vazquez or Swihart? BP is suggesting Vazquez could be worth 3ish WAR on franing alone. If that is accurate, wouldn’t you end |
9:08 |
: This question sort of cuts off, but I think I get the gist. While I think the work by Judge/Brooks/Pavlidis is good stuff, I’m not going to bank on Vazquez being that good after half a season. So I wouldn’t be able to make that determination any time soon. In the meantime, let’s not bury Swihart before he gets a chance. Also, there’s no reason why the two of them can’t just job share.
|
9:08 |
Would you rather be the Braves/Diamondbacks combined roster or the Red Sox? They are roughly equal by depth chart WAR. |
9:09 |
: That’s interesting. I think the Red Sox, because the Dbacks and Braves basically have their best player at the same position (first base). Perhaps if the Braves/Dbacks was an AL team it’d be a tougher question.
|
9:10 |
Any strong preference between Starlin and Kole Calhoun over the course of the next 3 years. I can keep one of them in a 5 x 5 16 team league. |
9:11 |
|
9:11 |
Who are your picks for the player with the most negative WAR next year |
9:11 |
: If Jordan Pacheco makes the Dbacks, he’s an easy pick.
|
9:11 |
: I see no reason you can’t keep both, but Castro may have playing time issues as the cub prospects come up.
|
9:12 |
: I think the Dbacks are strong bets to have a negative WAR player at catcher.
|
9:12 |
: Moustakas
|
9:12 |
|
9:12 |
McCutchen is also an MVP writer. How would you resolve the issue of low income kids and baseball? Would you pay more too lower draftees? Make baseball scholarships more abundant/visable? Establish more academies in the US. |
9:13 |
: Speed test
|
9:14 |
: Look, we could spend a whole chat – multiple whole chats – on just this topic. There is a lot that MLB could do. The very first thing would be to pump legitimate resources into the RBI programs and the MLB Youth Academies that they have in places like Houston and LA. They could work with cities to build more baseball parks, and make them cost effective for kids to play at. We could go on and on and on.
|
9:15 |
: Ultimately, nothing will change until players like McCutchen call his employers – be it MLB or high-profile sponsors – to the mat and hold them accountable. Right now, MLB spends token sums on their programs. Amounts that are negligible to the bottom line, and that when spread out across the country have very little impact, but still look good on a press release.
|
9:16 |
: No one is more at fault for baseball’s dip in popularity among African-Americans than baseball itself. A lot of it is marketing too. Football markets its stars. The NBA spent a whole generation putting Jordan and Shaq on TV 10-20 times a season before the playoffs even started. That makes a difference. Baseball does nothing of the sort.
|
9:17 |
|
9:17 |
: And that “speed test” from Jeff was to indicate he is still having connectivity issues.
|
9:17 |
As a NEU undergrad and a BU law student, Life is confusing. But Adam Ottovino has taken the seat of awesomeness from Carlos Pena from NEU, but BU’s hockey team is just silly good. |
9:18 |
: For the record, in the Beanpot final, you need to root for Northeastern. Undergrad always trumps grad school in head to head matchups.
|
9:18 |
A question in reality and fantasy. I ended up with both Norris and Vogt on my team last year in a very deep MLB keeper league. I assumed I would keep Norris and cast Vogt adrift. It strikes me now though that Vogt might have a fine couple of years ahead to rival Jaso’s peak, while Norris’s good few months last year may have been a fluke. Is this why Norris was exiled to SD? Should I dump him too? |
9:19 |
: I don’t know that I buy Vogt being that good, so of the two I would hang onto Norris.
|
9:19 |
Are you going to the Beanpot Final/need a ticket |
9:20 |
: I don’t know, I doubt it. I really don’t have any desire to set foot inside the city right now, especially with the train the way it is. I don’t like parking near the Garden, I prefer to train it in, but the train is a goddamn joke right now, so….
|
9:21 |
What’s the dynasty difference between Polanco and Springer? |
9:22 |
: I think the difference is that I’m not sure Polanco escapes that Alex Gordon friend zone of being better in real life than fantasy life, whereas I think Springer is good for a good Mike Cameron impression (HRs and SBs with bad BA) at the very least.
|
9:22 |
Curious on your thoughts about CarGo this year. Is he going to stay healthy or are his best days behind him? |
9:22 |
: He’s a stay away for me until I see how the knee responds. I have heard some horror stories.
|
9:22 |
Hey fellas, hopefully you can give me some insight. 20 team H2H dynasty with 20 keepers. R. Zimmerman and Semien for Reyes. Which side do you prefer? Thanks. |
9:23 |
: In a 20 team league, you want depth, but it’s hard to find elite talent, and if you subscribe to the notion that Reyes is still that kind of talent, then I think this is a no-brainer.
|
9:23 |
: I don’t believe in Zimmerman staying upright and I don’t believe in Semien being able to log a whole season of playing time.
|
9:24 |
Who do you like more over the next 4 years, Chris Sale or Marcus Stroman? |
9:24 |
: I have to choose? I guess Sale, but it’s close.
|
9:24 |
Which would you prefer. A team with a preseason 10% chance to win the world series or a team in Game 7 of the world series down in the bottom of the 9th such that they have a 10% W/E? Is one more variable than the other or is 10% = 10% no matter what. |
9:25 |
|
9:25 |
: Test
|
9:25 |
: I see it, Jeff.
|
9:26 |
In a 2-catcher NL-only keeper, I can keep two of Posey, Tulo, Harper, and Billy Hamilton for the upcoming season. What would you advise? Thanks! |
9:27 |
As for Cardinal Shark (great name btw), I think you have to keep Tulo and Posey. You HAVE to keep Tulo. And in the Posey vs. Harper battle, Posey has a good chance of being just as good, and when you factor in the positional stuff, I think that clinches it. I wouldn’t sweat Hamilton. |
9:27 |
Hey guys. I’m in an 11-team AL-only league where we have more keepers than ever this year. To give you an example, Drew Smyly will be the #5 best SP available, and will likely go for $25. I am the biggest Smyly fan and yet I think that’s way too much to pay for him. So I ask you, in such a case is Smyly worth it because of the scarcity, or is my best bet to allocate the $25 elsewhere? Thanks. |
9:28 |
: Allocate it elsewhere.
|
9:28 |
Should we be worried about my offseason surgery? If not, any chance I’m primed to have a huge season? |
9:28 |
: Sorry, test again
|
9:29 |
: It worked
|
9:29 |
: Definitely worried about it, but Cleveland’s ballpark should be much better for you, and I can see – not a breakout season, but a better season than last year – if you stay healthy.
|
9:29 |
: I like Moss going into this season. I expect more of the same.
|
9:29 |
Im pessimistic about the rockies in 2015. you have them as your sleeper team, but im not buying it. but kiley’s way bullish on most of their prospects, and if they could get a windfall for a healthy tulo, the future might be looking pretty bright, but probably not |
9:30 |
: The problem is part what Cameron has been beating the drum on – teams that don’t do much look like they had bad offseasons. The problem is also partly that they can’t win without Tulo and CarGo. That is the bed they made. But they definitely have the talent to win.
|
9:30 |
: For them to take the next step this year, ALL the pitching prospects will need to pan out and Tulo and Cargo will need to play 300 games combined
|
9:31 |
If you had to rank the baseball prospects for a dynasty league, roughly where do you think Odor would rank if he were eligible? Found it interesting, ZIPs projected Betts for a 104 OPS and Odor for 100 and Odor is 16 months younger. |
9:31 |
: Yeah I like Odor. He’d probably slot into the top 50-60 prospects, but that really is a better question for Kiley.
|
9:32 |
: I don’t know. 100 to 200 if I include the other prospects 25 and under.
|
9:32 |
: Yeah that’s a good point Jeff.
|
9:33 |
what would the Rockies projections look like if Tulo and Cargo played 300 games EACH? |
9:33 | : |
9:33 |
: It would be about 4 years worth of projections
|
9:34 |
am i crazy to think Hanley is a late third rounder at best this year? |
9:34 |
: Yep, if things fall right, he could be a first round talent.
|
9:34 |
: No, not really. His ADP right now on Mock Draft Central is 43.42.
|
9:35 |
: Earliest is pick 27.
|
9:35 |
: Having said that, I’m in BIG on Hanley this year.
|
9:35 |
ZITO IS BACK!!! A’S GOING TO THE WORLD SERIES |
9:35 |
: Can Zito do the Bernie Lean???
|
9:36 |
: Zito needs to hang it up
|
9:36 |
How do you feel about Joc Pederson in an obp league where I can play matchups? |
9:37 |
: I feel pretty good about that.
|
9:37 |
: I like him long term, but I think he may struggle this season.
|
9:37 |
Im in a keeper league and i have to pick 3 from blackmon, dickerson and daniel murphy at $8 each, scherzer at $24, price at $20 or bumgarner at $20, who should i keep? |
9:38 |
: Dickerson, Bumgarner and … Price
|
9:38 |
: I might just role with the pitchers.
|
9:38 |
: Or, roll, perhaps.
|
9:38 |
How soon do you think Manfred will implement game-quickening measures? Next season? Also, think he will engage fan opinions more on this issue? I seem to recall Bud Selig favoring a more “top-down” approach to changes like the wild card play-in. |
9:39 |
: Yeah, I think this year is a moratorium period, and we’re going to hear about changes for 2016 when the playoffs start.
|
9:39 |
: I agree with Paul
|
9:39 |
: I don’t expect Manfred to incorporate any fan opinions.
|
9:39 |
: Probably owner opinions though
|
9:40 |
Can Arrieta get to 200 innings this year? Or do his injuries of the past concern you? |
9:40 |
: I think he can break through to 200 innings, but Jeff knows better than I do.
|
9:41 |
: I think the 200 is within reach, but the breaking ball usage has me scared off.
|
9:41 |
Noticed this year all the reputable prospect sites(fg, ba, bp, mlb, Klaw) staggered the release of top prospect list. Is this a coordinated effort amongst industry friends so as not to step one toes or just purely coincidental? |
9:42 |
: Not on our part it isn’t. I would vote for coincidental. The only one consistent people are Keith and BA. I think the rest of us just finish when we finish.
|
9:42 |
: I think coincidence.
|
9:42 |
5 years ago my team was owned by Frank Mccourt and the GM was Ned Colletti, today my team is owned by Guggenheim and run by Andrew Friedman. |
9:42 |
: Oh indeed.
|
9:43 |
: At least it isn’t owned by David Glass and run by Dayton Moore
|
9:43 |
So the Orioles and their stingy ways are pretty much screwed after this season, given Chris Davis, Wieters, and to a lesser extent Pearce are all free agents, and they have a hodgepodge OF as it is. Is this their last year of fighting in the AL East for awhile? |
9:44 |
1. You’re underestimating Dan Duquette. Has to be said. |
9:44 |
: They could have some extensions and their is some decent pitching in the minors. Also, the rest of the AL isn’t lighting the world on fire
|
9:45 |
Thoughts on Michael Saunders this year? I kind of like him in Toronto. |
9:46 |
: Yeah I think that is a good fit for him. The Mariners seem to focus on what their players do poorly, instead of what they do well. Perhaps Saunders just needed the change of pace.
|
9:46 |
: I am kind of at a wait and see. Could be a nice pick up
|
9:46 |
In an auction, how much of your total payroll are you willing to spend on one player? Let’s say that player is Mike Trout. |
9:47 |
: 20% I like to have all my players between $5 and $20. Even approach instead of Stars and Scrubs.
|
9:48 |
: It’s an impossible question to answer. Can you get a lot of sleeper players for cheap, or is your league full of guys who know those guys and are going to bump up your bids? Do you have an active league, or do guys sit on their hands all year? Finally, I find that when I put limits on stuff like that I miss out on guys I really want, so I don’t put a limit on it.
|
9:48 |
Zimmerman needs to hang it up! I’M BACK BABY!! |
9:48 |
: Ya, JEFF.
|
9:48 |
: No problem.
|
9:49 |
: You had a good run, buddy.
|
9:49 |
In a standardish size league (~24-25 players), what’s your typical breakdown between hitting and pitching? 10/15? 12/13? Say there are 1 or 2 UTIL spots. |
9:50 |
: Usually 13 hitters and 9 or 10 pitchers. I usually budget 70% hitters and 30% pitchers
|
9:51 |
C, 1B, 2B, 3B, SS, OF, OF, OF, Util, SP, SP, RP, RP, P, P, P, BN, BN, BN, BN, BN, BN, BN, DL, DL So, 9 required position players vs 7 pitchers, and then 7 bench spots to fill how you see fit. |
9:51 |
: Though I will readily admit that my league is non-standard.
|
9:51 |
Why do red sox fans come to fangraphs and muck up the boards with homeristic nonsense |
9:52 |
: Because it’s been snowing for THREE WEEKS STRAIGHT and we’re just trying to stave off cabin fever long enough to not go on a four town killing spree?
|
9:52 |
: Well, Paul is in charge and picks the questions. You think?
|
9:53 |
Any insight into why some teams seem to have better medical staffs than other ones? Not just baseball–for example, the Phoenix Suns have a great staff. Others (thinking of the Mets) are really bad. Is this an institutional thing? |
9:53 |
: I think some teams are just more on the ball than the others. I wouldn’t be surprised if the Warriors now end up with better medical personnel now that Steve Kerr has relocated there.
|
9:54 |
: Some of it is risk they take on. The White Sox are crazy good at it and they won’t say a word.
|
9:54 |
If they change the strike zone again, doesn’t it would make the games slower than now due to more hits and walks? |
9:55 |
: It might, ya.
|
9:55 |
: No, not really. Hopefully there is more action with hits.
|
9:56 |
: I wouldn’t be as worried about that. I would be more worried about calling the rulebook strike zone.
|
9:56 |
Will the snow be melted in Boston by late March, or should I cancel my trip |
9:56 |
: I’m going to say there is a 0.0% chance of that happening, but the city should certainly be back in swing by then. I wouldn’t anticipate you having any problems by then.
|
9:56 |
: Once it melts, you will need to deal with the flooding.
|
9:56 |
: QUIET JEFF!
|
9:57 |
: just saying
|
9:57 |
The refs are biased against the Patriots. |
9:57 |
: Ya but it doesn’t matter anymore.
|
9:57 |
: Hopefully
|
9:58 |
Thoughts on Jorge Soler and do you project for him this season? |
9:59 |
: I expect good results, but I think the hype is getting too much around him (and the rest of the Cubbies).
|
9:59 |
: I like Soler a lot. I think it’s a little harder to peg his playing time with Alcantara, Fowler and Coghlan also in the outfield mix, but hopefully he nets 650 PA, and if he does, I like him for 25+ homers.
|
9:59 |
The Nationals probably are keeping all of their pitchers at this point, no? |
10:00 |
: I think so, and I like that. I hope more teams push their chips into the middle of the table. The game is more interesting that way.
|
10:00 |
: They will keep them all for now. Slim chance all will stay healthy.
|
10:00 |
What is more important for baseball: faster games or more offense? |
10:00 |
: Honestly, I think more offense.
|
10:01 |
: More offense
|
10:01 |
: But I’m sure I am in the distinct minority on that.
|
10:01 |
: One thing we don’t need more of is faster chats, but for now, we’re going to sign off. Thanks, as always, for hanging out, and we’ll see you next week!
|
10:02 |
: See everyone next week,
|
Paul Swydan used to be the managing editor of The Hardball Times, a writer and editor for FanGraphs and a writer for Boston.com and The Boston Globe. Now, he owns The Silver Unicorn Bookstore, an independent bookstore in Acton, Mass. Follow him on Twitter @Swydan. Follow the store @SilUnicornActon.
Great read per usual. Here’s my pressing fantasy question I can’t seem to wrap my mind around. Why is Anthony Rizzo consistently ranked almost a full round (if not 2 or 3 in some cases) ahead of Freddie Freeman? I run my own projection analysis that influences my rankings and I actually have Freeman AHEAD of Rizzo. Same age, Freeman with almost 20 points higher in AVG, Runs the same, Steals the same, RBI about the same, and Rizzo with only 5 extra HR’s. If I’m taking Rizzo in the late 1st or 2nd, I’m punting a considerable amount of AVG for maybe a handful of Homers? That doesn’t seem like a sound strategy. So can either one of you or a fellow commenter play devil’s advocate for me here?
And for the sake of giving full disclosure, below are my projections of each:
Freeman: .287-83 R-20 HR-86 RBI-2 SB
Rizzo: .265-79 R-27 HR-81 RBI-5 SB
I think there is the temptation to fall in love with the home runs. With respect to Freeman vs. Rizzo, I think people are comfortable in saying that Freeman has a very small chance of ever getting past that 20 HR mark, while Rizzo might have a 35-40 HR season in him, and as such he’s worth grabbing a little earlier. That might not be wise, and won’t be baked into the projections, but I think that is why Rizzo goes earlier.
I understand that but we aren’t talking about James Loney here. Freeman has hit 21-23-23-18 and the ISO has averaged .179 during that time. Meanwhile Rizzo has hit 15-23-32 and that 32 came on the heels of a .240 ISO that has never been replicated outside of his AAA time in 2012 when he had a .354 (?!?!) in the PCL. Wouldn’t a regression to his mean of .196 sit hit squarely in the 25-30 group that fits his profile?
Appreciate the response Paul. Always good to bounce ideas off another fantasy geek…
Re: MiLB stats — 07-08 he had Hodgkins Lymphoma; 09 wasn’t great; the rest of his MiLB ISOs are >.215 and get increasingly higher as he moves up. (2010: .231/.217 between A+/AA; 2011: .320 in AAA; 2012: .354 in AAA)
It’s never, of course, unreasonable to expect tempering of career-best performance. And both his IFFB% and HR/FB are likely to regress against his baseball card stats as compared to last year. But to the extent MiLB stats are worth much of anything, I wouldn’t get too concerned about how his ISO looked.
(FWIW I like Freeman if you can get him for value — personally grabbed Rizzo last year for value when perception on these two was the other way around, and will be happily keeping him in light of the above.)
If your projections are correct, then you are right about the draft order. The problem is that your projection for Rizzo is way lower than the groupthink. (nitpicking – your projection has Rizzo with 7 more HR, not 5). It doesn’t seem like you are too far off on either player’s projections, but you seem to be using a better-case scenario with Freeman and a worse-case with Rizzo.
The Braves offense looks terrible which will adversely affect Freeman’s R/RBI production. Conversely, the Cubs are hyped to be on the cusp being the best offense in baseball. Whether or not either of those talking points become reality, that sort of thinking changes draft orders every year. Like you implied, Rizzo HAS to be really good in order to justify that 1st round draft position – and its not wrong to avoid a player like that.
Yeah I agree and the point was to discuss the group think. I guess I am bias towards Freeman because I like watching him live (gap to gap power, good at bats) and think his floor is higher than Rizzo’s. But your argument of using best-case for Freeman and worst-case for Rizzo I guess makes sense. Baseball Prospectus is pretty down on Rizzo and that’s dragging my projection down.
Appreciate the response.