FanGraphs Chat – 4/30/14
| 11:26 |
: Happy Wednesday. I’m at the doctor’s office (no worries, everything is fine) so the chat might be a little late starting today, but I’ll make up for it on the back end if we don’t start right at 12.
|
| 12:06 |
: Alright, let’s get this party started.
|
| 12:06 |
Has your opinion of Trevor Bauer changed at all in the first month? Seem to recall you were pretty down on him (like most of us). |
| 12:08 |
: Personally, I think the most overrated players in the game are bad command/high fastball pitching prospects who rack up strikeouts by pitching out of the zone in the minors. Bauer, Archie Bradley, lots of guys fit this mold, and get a lot of hype because of velo and K numbers, but if you want to succeed in the majors, you have to throw strikes. Sometimes they learn, but it’s not as often as people think.
|
| 12:09 |
Is there any difference between a strikeout swinging and a strikeout looking? I know that it seems like there shouldn’t be, but I was curious to know if one is better/worse than the other. |
| 12:09 |
: Swinging strikeouts are more predictive, for both the batter and the pitcher, going forward. Called strikeouts are mostly a function of randomness.
You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
|
| 12:10 |
Glad everything’s fine! What do you make of Heyward as a hitter? Is that upside starting to fade? |
| 12:11 |
: The lack of power development has lowered his ceiling. He’s a reminder that some 20 year olds are more developed and players follow different aging curves.
|
| 12:11 |
Will Ian Desmond’s brutal D lead to lost playing time? |
| 12:12 |
: He’s the only National that isn’t hurt; they don’t have anyone to replace him even if they wanted to.
|
| 12:12 |
Do you still believe in “The Plan” that Theo and Jed have in place? What is and isn’t working? |
| 12:12 |
: Yes, the Cubs are going to be good in the not too distant future.
|
| 12:13 |
Assuming it’s not a panic move, what do you think the reasoning is for the Cards sending down Wong? |
| 12:13 |
: A wake-up call. Apparently he’s not the most coachable kid around.
|
| 12:13 |
People continue to talk about a Boston trade for G. Stanton. Is there any smoke there? Or is it just a “makes too much sense” scenario. Do you think it happens? |
| 12:14 |
: The Marlins will have to trade Stanton eventually, and when you line up franchises that would have the prospects to acquire him and the cash to sign him long term, it doesn’t leave a ton of options. Boston is the most logical fit.
|
| 12:14 |
how much of a grudge would you hold towards a team if you were killing it in the minors but you weren’t being brought up due to Super 2? Would you make them pay after arb ends? |
| 12:14 |
: None. It’s a business.
|
| 12:15 |
Hi Dave. Hope all is well. Just wondering what you expect from Marcus Stroman in his first few years as a major leaguer. Thanks! |
| 12:15 |
: I haven’t seen him pitch, but based on numbers/reports, sounds like he’s going to be an elite K/BB type who might give up some homers.
|
| 12:16 |
Kyle Blanks has hit 7 HRs in 64 ABs for El Paso. Meanwhile Yonder Alonso has zero HRs and his BA sits below the Mendoza Line. Think we’ll see a promotion any time soon? |
| 12:16 |
: Kyle Blanks isn’t anything special either.
|
| 12:16 |
How often do the wOBA coefficients work in-season? Do they get updated daily? And are they only for this season, or this a trailing average situation from the end last season happening? |
| 12:17 |
: They’re updated every day, but the reality is that they stabilize after a few days and don’t move much after that.
|
| 12:17 |
Milwaukee at St. Louis today. From 2011 – 2013, Garza’s ERA at home has been 2.85 versus 4.43 on the road. He spent most of those years pitching at Wrigley. How much of that is pitching in Wrigley as oppose to Garza simply being a better pitcher at home? |
| 12:17 |
: Embrace randomness. Not every split has a cause.
|
| 12:17 |
Last week, you said that you wouldn’t offer Kyle Seager an extension. I was just wondering if you could offer some reason to that? He still seems like one of the few good position players on the team, how do you let that go? |
| 12:18 |
: Not signing a player to an extension is not the same as letting him go. They have him for four more years. He has the kind of skillset that doesn’t get paid in arbitration, and I don’t see much upside for a breakout, so going year to year won’t cost you much versus giving him guaranteed money now.
|
| 12:19 |
How much of Dayan Viciedo should I buy into? Plenty of small sample variance in there, but his O-Swing and SwStr are down significantly and his batted ball profile seem to predict an uptick in power. |
| 12:19 |
: He’s young enough that improvement should be expected, but improvement means he’s okay rather than he sucks.
|
| 12:19 |
What makes Smoak only average defensively? He seems to have better reaction and the ability to make more athletic plays than most first basemen. |
| 12:20 |
: He’s slow and doesn’t have much range.
|
| 12:20 |
Is there any reason to have a positive outlook for the Padres in the next few years? Or does their development cycle just peak with a team that can shoot for 82-85 wins. |
| 12:20 |
: I don’t really get what they’re doing, to be honest. They’re not really rebuilding, they’re not really contenders. They’re just kind of in the middle.
|
| 12:21 |
What would you imagine Jose Abreu would fetch if he was put back on the market after the first month of the season? More than 68 million? |
| 12:21 |
: 168 million.
|
| 12:21 |
: Probably over 8 or 9 years instead of 6, but he’d get way more.
|
| 12:21 |
When do you think Polanco will get called up? |
| 12:22 |
: Around the time Super Two doesn’t apply any more; late June or early July.
|
| 12:23 |
What should the Jays do about Brandon Morrow – he seems like more of a concern than Dustin McGowan right now… |
| 12:23 |
: Morrow is what he is. You just live with the inconsistency.
|
| 12:23 |
At what point during the season is it appropriate for underachieving teams to make moves with only the future in mind? |
| 12:24 |
: Probably not until June or July, unless you’re selling an asset that might explode before then.
|
| 12:25 |
Which team is farther from the mean? Diamondbacks or Brewers? |
| 12:25 |
: Probably the Brewers. I don’t think the D’Backs are a particularly good team.
|
| 12:25 |
Andrelton Simmons 2014: 91 PA, 2 BB, 3 K. Thoughts? |
| 12:26 |
: When you swing at everything and avoid working counts, it’s hard to walk or strikeout.
|
| 12:26 |
After a month into the season, what is the reasonable current games behind line of no coming back for team? I know the Cubs are under that line, but what about the D-Backs? |
| 12:27 |
: You don’t just want to look at games back. Number of teams ahead of you in the race matters too, and number of games left changes the calculations. That’s why we have playoff odds. Just look at those.
|
| 12:27 |
So the Rockies are on a nice little run. I know it’s still April, but they have pitching reinforcements coming and the lineup looks real solid. Thoughts going forward? |
| 12:28 |
: When you have Babe Ruth playing shortstop, it hides a lot of flaws. They will be a solid team as long as Tulo is healthy.
|
| 12:28 |
If I continue my current production/pace, how do the writers plan to rob me of an MVP this year? |
| 12:29 |
: Someone will hit more dingers than you.
|
| 12:29 |
Is there any evidence that hitters may perform worse in blowout games? As in it’s a 10 run game so they don’t go for long ABs and sort of phone it in. |
| 12:30 |
: You have to contrast that with the fact that they face worse pitching in mop-up time. So there’s confounding factors.
|
| 12:30 |
SP: Corbin/Miley/Parker/Bauer/Skaggs Eaton/Parra/Upton/Goldschmitt/Hill/Montero/FA SS/3B from Farm Reasonably cheap, plugging holes with farm. not trading away cheap young talent, pretty freaking good baseball team. FIRE TOWERS |
| 12:30 |
: Corbin and Parker would still be hurt, so that rotation would be atrocious.
|
| 12:30 |
: But yes, Towers hasn’t really improved the team with all these moves.
|
| 12:31 |
Getz isn’t the solution to the Blue Jays second base problem…what is? |
| 12:31 |
: A trade.
|
| 12:32 |
Who has the most trade value on the Marlins? Fernandez or Stanton? |
| 12:32 |
: Fernandez.
|
| 12:32 |
Who’s the best and potentially most impactful arm currently in the minors? Is it still Archie Bradley? He’s been off to a rough start this year and is now dealing with elbow soreness. Gausman? Bauer?!? |
| 12:33 |
: I find almost all of the current crop of “top pitching prospects” overrated. Noah Syndergaard is about the only one I think is worth the hype.
|
| 12:33 |
Xander Bogaerts is apparently open to the idea of an extension — would it be crazy to do so this early? |
| 12:34 |
: Absolutely not; I’d sign him tomorrow.
|
| 12:34 |
From your twitter link yesterday, I was looking at the best hitters over the last 365 days. I was shocked to see Justin Smoak on page two, in the top 60. As a 1B, how high does one need to rank as a hitter to be a good player? |
| 12:34 |
: He needs to get to the 120-125 wRC+ range. He’s at 110 or so, I think, which makes him slightly better than a scrub but not a useful starter.
|
| 12:35 |
Is the true talent gap between a fully healthy Tulo and a fully healthy Trout in the range of 2 wins? |
| 12:35 |
: Maybe 3.
|
| 12:35 |
So what’s the inverse of the low command/high FB pitching prospect? Soft tossing lefty junkballers? FB only zone pounders? |
| 12:35 |
: Good command guys whose out pitch is a change-up. Scout/prospect types consistently underrate change-up guys.
|
| 12:35 |
At what point can Red Sox fans start getting excited about Mookie Betts (or should they just not get excited because he’s going to be playing for the Marlins)? |
| 12:36 |
: You should get excited now. He’s either going to be a fascinating 10th man who plays everywhere or he’s going to get you a great return in trade.
|
| 12:36 |
Does the downward trending run environment lead to pitchers’ WAR being overstated or is the lag too minimal to affect anything (or is this not even a factor)? |
| 12:36 |
: WAR adjusts with the run environment.
|
| 12:37 |
Do you ever see FanGraphs getting furthered involved in MLB Draft coverage from an analytics perspective? Or would that be kind of pointless? |
| 12:37 |
: Draft analytics are hard. If we had the right person, we’d do it, but most of the heavy lifting on draft analytics are being done inside MLB organizations.
|
| 12:38 |
Does a high pitch/plate appearance provide value? Is it too nominal to be included in WAR? I always hear analysts say “the more pitches he fouls off, the advantage goes to the batter”, but is there any actual statistical evidence of this? |
| 12:38 |
: There’s no real evidence that a higher P/PA is, in itself, beneficial.
|
| 12:38 |
Charlie Blackmon: Chris Shelton and Brian LaHair? |
| 12:38 |
: No, he can actually play.
|
| 12:38 |
Watching Tanaka pitch, McCann catch, it feels like every fifth pitch is a ball turned into a strike. Do pitchers with excellent control especially benefit from good framing? Are there any kinds of pitchers who get a boost in framing value? |
| 12:39 |
: Framed pitches are generally low/away, so pitchers who pitch up in the zone get less of a benefit than sinker/splitter guys who pound the knees.
|
| 12:39 |
Johnny Cueto has consistently outperformed his FIP every year in the majors. I know the Reds have a good defense, but can we label Cueto as a pitcher who isn’t given enough value by a FIP based WAR? |
| 12:39 |
: Yes. Part of it is that he’s impossible to steal on, so fewer of his runners score than usual.
|
| 12:40 |
How worried should I be about the Indians. I don’t care if they make the playoffs, I just want them to be relevant for most of the year. |
| 12:40 |
: I think they’re roughly a .500 team.
|
| 12:40 |
: So, if that’s what you’re expecting, no need to worry!
|
| 12:41 |
Corey Kluber got roughed up by that solid Angels lineup. Better things for him going forward? |
| 12:41 |
: The Angels can mash. I wouldn’t be concerned about anyone struggling against them.
|
| 12:42 |
How much can a team be expected to lose money-wise by allowing a player to reach Super Two status? Is that money really more valuable than perhaps losing 1-2 WAR or so by letting a guy who is ready to contribute toil in the minors for 3 months? Especially for teams who marginal value of a win is very high? |
| 12:42 |
: You don’t lose 1-2 WAR by letting the Super Two deadline pass. Realistically, the difference of any prospect over 50 games is in the fractions of a win, and the long term savings is often $10M or more.
|
| 12:43 |
What is the answer to Colorado’s pitching problems? Sinkerballers? There must be something they can do to improve their staff. Is it as simple as talent? |
| 12:44 |
: Their staff is actually fine once you look at park adjusted numbers.
|
| 12:44 |
WHat are the chances that Tanaka doesn’t take the opt out, compared to two months ago? |
| 12:44 |
: It all depends on health. If he’s healthy, he opts out. He only opts in to the last three years if he’s hurt.
|
| 12:45 |
how should I feel about the increase in Mike Trout’s K%? I’m concerned he’s selling out for power and that it could lower his ceiling from outer space to the heliosphere. |
| 12:45 |
: Selling out for power is okay if you hit for more power.
|
| 12:45 |
What should one use and why?: Plate discipline stats, or pitch f/x plate discipline stats? |
| 12:46 |
: I use the PITCHF/x numbers; their definition of in-zone/out-of-zone has been consistent over the years, so it’s easy to look at changes, while BIS’ definition has fluctuated.
|
| 12:46 |
How long can Oakland survive at the top of the West with their current rotation |
| 12:46 |
: All year. They’re really good.
|
| 12:47 |
Why did the Cubs spend most of their free agent budget on relief arms when they had no plans of contending? Was that a mistake? |
| 12:47 |
: Relievers are one of the last places you can spend money without committing multiple years. So for teams looking to spend but maintain long term flexibility, the bullpen is now more attractive.
|
| 12:48 |
Are you surprised by how high the Marlins ROS winning percentage is (.463)? |
| 12:48 |
: Yeah, they’re overachieving a little bit.
|
| 12:48 |
How much predictive value does batted ball data have? |
| 12:48 |
: A lot. Batted ball data is one thing a player has a lot of control over.
|
| 12:49 |
What helps to explain hitters who showed well-above average plate discipline in the minors that struggle with the same skill set in the Majors? Is it simply more quality pitches that a hitter has not experienced yet? |
| 12:50 |
: Walk rates in the minors can be inflated by simply not swinging, because minor league pitchers suck at throwing strikes. That doesn’t work as well in the big leagues.
|
| 12:50 |
but more P/PA does drive up the pitchers pitch count, therefore it provides value, right? |
| 12:50 |
: The difference between a high and low P/PA is about 1 pitch per plate appearance. A hitter faces a starter about three times in a game, so we’re talking three extra pitches at the extremes. It’s just not a big deal.
|
| 12:51 |
How do I express RE24? “Joe Smith has a 10 RE24 so he has ____” Is there a best of both world metric that combines RE24 and WPA or something to enhance the context of RE24? |
| 12:51 |
: has been 10 runs above average.
|
| 12:52 |
: RE24 is expressed in runs above/below 0.
|
| 12:52 |
: And if you want more context than RE24, you want WPA.
|
| 12:52 |
Wow 10M for fraction of win? Then there is no reason to call any of these guys up b4 super 2 then, right? |
| 12:53 |
: It depends on how open you think they are to a long term deal. A lot of the recent contracts have bought out Super Two at a premium of closer to $5M, so if you think you can get them to sign early, then it’s worth doing, perhaps. If they’re a Boras client, leave them down.
|
| 12:53 |
As a Tigers fan, I still wish we had Fister instead, but should Robbie Ray’s strong performances in AAA give me hope that he’s somehow better than everyone thought? |
| 12:54 |
: That’s basically the entire point of that trade. If the Tigers are right about Robbie Ray, it was a good deal. If they weren’t, it wasn’t.
|
| 12:54 |
It’s sort of sad to watch Yankees fans get upset over a player leaving for more money. |
| 12:55 |
: Fans are selfish, not logical. They don’t care that they’re booing a player for doing what every player who comes to NY does. They only care that Cano doesn’t help them win anymore, and that’s basically the only variable fans care about.
|
| 12:55 |
What would you do vis-a-vis Allen Craig? Continue to play him in the OF, hoping that his not hitting isn’t caused by defense? Bench Adams? Play Craig in RF vs righties and at 1B (w/ Adams on the bench) vs. lefties? |
| 12:55 |
: I’d probably platoon Craig and Adams at 1B, like they did last year.
|
| 12:56 |
You’re using a double-standard on the Super Two estimates there – You can’t say “any prospect” only gets you a fraction of a win, and then use the star-player $10+ million estimate if that “any prospect” reaches Super Two. you have to apply the same quality-of-player standard, no? |
| 12:56 |
: By any prospect, I was setting an upper bound. More accurately, I’m saying that no prospect projects to be worth +1 to +2 WAR over 50 games. They don’t all project at the same level, obviously, and you don’t care about Super Two for marginal prospects.
|
| 12:57 |
I know you don’t generally lost 1-2 WAR by letting the Super Two deadline pass. But in some cases it’s not unreasonable. I think 3 mos of Polanco is probably worth 1 WAR+ over the Pirates replacement level starters. |
| 12:57 |
: It’s not three months. You absolutely want to leave any real prospect down for at least the first few weeks of the season to get the extra year of team control, so the time between that and the Super Two deadline is closer to 50 games.
|
| 12:58 |
Does WAR “add up” at the end of the season? I mean to say that it seems like if MLB is 500 as a whole (mean 81 wins) and a replacement level team would be 48 wins, then there should be about 33 WAR per team on average league wide (roughly 900 in MLB). Has WAR correlated to that? Is it indexed to do so? |
| 12:58 |
: There are 1000 WAR per season. The stat is designed to hand out that number every year.
|
| 12:59 |
: I should say, 1000 WAR per season based on 30 teams/162 games. In years with fewer teams/fewer games, there’s proportionately less.
|
| 12:59 |
So you aren’t a fan of working the counts? or do you think it is overrated? |
| 1:00 |
: Working counts is good if the goal is to get to 2-0/3-0/3-1 counts, so you can whack a hittable fastball. Just taking pitches and making outs for the sake of running up a pitch count isn’t helpful.
|
| 1:00 |
Re: P/PA and good vs. bad accounting for 1 pitch per PA; 5 “patient” hitters will reduce a starters outing by an inning. I see plenty of value on getting into a team’s bullpen 15-20% quicker. |
| 1:00 |
: Relievers are better than starters.
|
| 1:00 |
: Getting into a team’s bullpen isn’t actually a good way to score more runs.
|
| 1:01 |
Do we have a better way of spotting a Doug Fister in the minors and distinguishing him from someone like Blake Beavan? |
| 1:01 |
: Fister always had a very good change-up, Beavan never has.
|
| 1:01 |
Can the DET trade really be that simple? Even if they were right about Ray, if no one else agreed, they shouldn’t pay their price for him they should pay the leagues price for him. |
| 1:02 |
: If the league was wildly undervaluing Robbie Ray, and the only way for the Tigers to get Robbie Ray was to trade Doug Fister, the trade is justifiable because DET was getting the wrongly valued asset; the league price for a correctly valued player might not be any better long term. But this all depends on the Tigers being the only organization to recognize Ray’s value, and Fister being the only way they could acquire him.
|
| 1:03 |
Running up the pitch count of, say, Justin verlander, though, makes sense, no? |
| 1:04 |
: Not at the expense of taking hittable pitches. Running up the count by not swinging at pitches out of the zone is good. Running up the count by staring at strikes isn’t worth it.
|
| 1:05 |
: Alright, have to run. Thanks for chatting today, everyone.
|
Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.
Hey Dave, what do you think is going on with Eric Hosmer right now?
He’s probably relaxing before the game. Maybe stretching? Having a sandwich? Who knows?
Good answer, Dave.
Probably making fun of Eno.
“Relievers are better than starters.”
Say what?!
I had the same thought! Huge amount of context missing there. That 4 FIP starter could probably be a 3.5 FIP reliever if he could blow it out for one inning.
Oh I dunno about all that.
context, like there are maybe a solid handful of RPs that may be better than a lot of SPs. As for the majority of RPs, they’re simply not good enough to be SPs. And the RPs that usually get mid-game innings (i.e. when a starter gets knocked out early) aren’t the ones to fear. Hello, this isn’t deep stuff. This is why teams do make an effort to knock SPs out and get into the opposing team’s pen early… Most teams hold their best pen arms only for late innings.
Another case of conventional wisdom being wrong RPs as a whole give up less runs than SPs as a whole. Its easier to score off a SP the third time through than it is a fresh RP. Look at hitting numbers against SP the 3rd time through.
That would pretty heavily depend on the team, though, right? If you’re facing the Royals, don’t bother trying to get in to the bullpen faster because they’re mostly better than the starters.
But if you’re facing, say, the Mets? And you can get Terry Collins started on his revolving door of bullpen pitchers? Driving up the starters’ pitch count can be pretty helpful.
It just seems silly to state it as a universal principal by looking at averages, when the situations are so different from team to team.
Relievers generally have 1-2 pitches that are really good, and not the 3-4 different pitches that allow one to be a starter.
IMO, 2 different animals for different purposes.
Starters have the “stuff” to get through a lineup 2-3 times. Relievers generally have to the stuff to overwhelm batters that see them once.
I’d imagine the big difference between starters and relievers is a quality changeup.
it was simply a strange answer for DC to give. I’m sure he’d like to clarify what he meant.
They sure are, higher K rates, better stuff over shorter stints, more LH/RH matchups, not seeing the same batters multiple times. League average team SP era is 3.98ish, reliever era is 3.62ish. As a whole its easier to score off a SP. Of course there are situational exceptions.
Easier to score off SP because, as you said, they generally face all batters multiple times and are not brought in to face a specific batter in a specific situation most suited to give them a more favorable outcome.
Or, as explaining dude helpfully explained below, they have better results due to these factors, not because they’re actually better pitchers.
and as with SPs, the ability to run up pitch counts is equally effective in the pen. and as we know, RPer effectiveness wears out quicker on the average than SPs.
I think he just meant that they have better results, not that they are actually better. Of course, stick a Verlander in the bullpen and his stuff goes up a tick and he becomes a beast.
But he was just comparing 6.5 inning starters vs 1 inning relievers.
Still, I think Dave is a tad wrong when he says you don’t want to let hittable strikes go by just to work counts. I mean, I’m not sure how many hittable strikes Verlander throws (other than for Pablo Sandoval, oh!).
The point is not to just work counts to ultimately make an out. Dave’s piece on the Twins points out that players in general swing more than they should. They tend to swing at a lot of balls. Sometimes, to work a deep count, to take a walk, you need to let some called strikes go. No to let meatballs go, but how many are meatballs?
But I get what he is saying about bullpens and I hadn’t thought of that. Nevertheless, i think working a count, being able to foul off a few strike 3s, etc., has some value in and of itself, which i think was the initial question. maybe not a hell of a lot, but some. And ultimately, I think taking walks, which is obviously beneficial, requires taking some strikes sometimes.
I agree. This seems like a very writer-esque response. If you have an ace up there, you can have an approach to get into deep counts and increase a pitch count while still being aggressive on meat balls. And I don’t care who analyzes what data, getting an aces pitch count up high so you can break into the bullpen IS an advantage and DOES have value. Not to mention the long-term advantage of thinning out a teams usable relievers for games later in the series.
Indeed, SPs are usually more talented than RPs but RPs put up better numbers in their shorter stints.
However, I think taking pitches to get to the bullpen still works as sound logic in many circumstances.
For instance, if you take a normal pitching roster for today’s MLB, 5 SPs and 7 relievers, and have one do or die game, if the pitcher pitches 5 IP instead of 7 IP, you’ll still likely have 3-4 solid arms to pitch the 6th-9th innings. But if you’re in the middle of a season, and you’re constantly asking your 7 relievers to take care of 4-5 innings every day, you’ll not only be putting in tired pitchers — you’ll be putting in the worst pitchers on your staff more often than if your starters consistently go 7-8 innings. Granted, this effect doesn’t matter much to an individual opponent unless they can build up this fatigue over a 3- or 4-game series.
So yes, a player consciously trying to see more pitches may cause more harm than good by letting meatballs go by, but if you fill your lineup with high P/PA hitters, you ought to more often face worse relievers, when compared to average P/PA lineups.
Dave, are you really implying that Molina got beat by Cutch in the MVP race due to hitting 9 more HR? I realize you feel we are undervaluing C defense a lot, but 2.6 WAR difference is made up by that alone? Come on, you have often said that framing is not that big of a run swing.
Framing makes up a bit of the difference, but where Yadi outclasses everyone is his handling of the pitching staff. He hardly takes days off and calls every game, in that pitchers who have pitched to Yadi will talk about how they never shake off Yadi and regret it when they do. The Cards were 2nd in FIP and 5th in xFIP last season and while the pitching talent is obviously a huge part of that, Molina was behind the plate calling 136 of those games.
“handling the pitching staff” is probably overblown. This comment thread: http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/searching-for-the-value-of-yadier-molina/
bats around a lot of ideas surrounding this, but ultimately there were two camps. There is the camp that says “game calling trust, a coach on the field” over and over, and a camp that sees no reason why this needs to be a skill that resides in a player and can’t be an organizational philosophy.
I’m gonna quote myself:
“If a catcher was for some reason bad at calling a game, somebody on the bench who is good at it can do it instead. There is no smart reason for a team to ever let a poor game caller call a game. You could even argue that by calling it for him from the bench, you are teaching the catcher to do it themselves. And scouting reports allow teams to plan out pretty much every batter before a game.
Personally, I like MGL’s take: http://mglbaseball.wordpress.com/category/pitching-strategy/ on the discussion, that “All pitchers…randomize their pitch selections precisely so the batter cannot figure out what is coming with any certainty.” Maybe a catcher can do better than weighted randoms, but I’ll wait for somebody to prove otherwise.
However, I don’t really like the type of analysis that focuses on the big picture like this, instead of the sequencing itself to strip out other aspects of the game. What if there was some sort of way to quantify the effectiveness of different pitches in different counts, based on what other pitches were thrown in an at-bat?
“Confidence” in the pitch called is probably overrated, and can be rolled into the pitch blocking, framing, and throwing numbers. “I’m more confident to throw a slider in the dirt with a runner on 3rd because Molina will block it” or “I can throw one on the edge in a 3-2 count because Molina will preserve the strike” or “I can focus on the hitter, Molina will throw this guy out if he tries to steal 2nd” are all just another way of saying that a catcher is good at an aspect of the game.
It is hard to ignore events like Romo striking Cabrera out looking to end the 2012 WS – it had to be a game theory thing where Cabrera couldn’t prepare for anything besides the slider. Thus, the fastball was an incredible call (that Posey didn’t call for). Thinking about it, Posey would be the one getting credit in a sequencing analysis, even though Romo had the idea. Baseball!”
This whole thing screams “I’ve never played an inning of baseball in my life.”
RT, your flippancy screams “Kevin Towers is onto something with all of his gritty players”
I don’t think he was implying anything. I took that as a more general comment about MVP voters. Dave had McCutchen as his MVP last year, I believe.
What gets the better end of this deal in a standard 5×5 12 team roto with OPS instead of AVG.
Team A: Longoria + Porcello + T. Hunter
Team B: Pedro Alvarez + Rosenthal
I would personally say Team A by a longshot.
Allen Craig has had back-to-back seasons of a 135 or better RC+, with wOBAs of .363 and .374.
He had a .655 OPS in April last year, and now, after a slow start to 2014, people are panicking?
In the just-completed series with the Brewers he reached base 10 times and had five extra-base hits, including two homers, and he now sits at a .644 OPS through April. I think he’ll be fine.
Its hard to strikeout when you swing at everything? hmmm
He means if you swing at everything early on, you make contact and put the ball in play before getting behind in the count and chasing something out of the zone for a strikeout. An example of this is Simmons’ season numbers so far, which prompted the response in question. Hope that helps!