Finally Traded, Whit Merrifield Brings Versatility to Blue Jays

Whit Merrifield
Jay Biggerstaff-USA TODAY Sports

For as long I’ve been writing about baseball, Whit Merrifield has never failed to appear on a list of potential trade targets. He’s never been dealt, though, as the Royals preferred to hold onto their speedy, contact-orientated infielder — that is, until now. Past the peak of his powers, Merrifield is finally headed elsewhere — Toronto, to be exact, which acquired him for prospects Samad Taylor and Max Castillo.

The Blue Jays didn’t need to trade for Merrifield, though in hindsight, he’s a pretty good fit. Santiago Espinal has handled second base for most of this season, but a 95 wRC+ isn’t marvelous, and he’s had a crummy July on top of that. Chances are the Jays will alternate between Espinal and Merrifield there, and if the former continues to trend downward, they now have a clear Plan B. In addition, the right-handed Merrifield is also capable of handling a corner outfield spot on a team whose backup outfielders (Cavan Biggio, Raimel Tapia, and Bradley Zimmer) are all lefties. Versatility is great! Toronto now has more of it than before.

It’s a little weird to imagine Merrifield in a depth role, but right now, his bat just doesn’t have enough thump; through 95 games this season, he’s hitting a career-worst .240/.290/.352 (80 wRC+). Granted, that’s partially due to a slow start, so maybe he can bounce back. The projections think it’s possible, but the warning signs persist: He’s hitting fewer line drives than ever, with weak grounders and fly balls taking their place, though his plate discipline is still intact.

If the return for a name like Merrifield appears light, consider the fact that not only is he 33 years old but also in the midst of an offensive slide dating all the way back to 2019. From a trade value perspective, the one aspect that worked in the Royals’ favor is his contract, which keeps him on the Blue Jays for an additional year. It’s also dirt cheap, even for a diminished version of Merrifield. As a result, the Royals are collecting not just one, but two prospects with legitimate intrigue. These aren’t just warm bodies used to package trades, in other words.

The first is Taylor, a statline scout darling. He had himself a dashing breakout in Double-A last season, with 16 bombs, 30 stolen bases, and a .294/.385/.503 slash line, but take caution. The underlying power numbers don’t support a genuine surge, and his swing decisions are troublesome; look no further than the 29.4% strikeout rate that looms over his scintillating triple slash. Nonetheless, the speed is real, and Taylor can handle five positions. In tandem with his decent feel for hitting, his tools are enough to guarantee him a place on a big league roster — think a 1 WAR role player.

The second is Castillo, who I like a lot upon closer examination. He has a short, snappy arm action that concerns me a bit, but it likely adds a good amount of deception to his repertoire. For example, here’s a fastball he threw against Javier Báez earlier this season:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Going against the grain, Castillo’s heater features a heavy amount of tail, which you can see on full display. That won’t let him miss too many bats, but it will let him induce enough weak contact to compensate. It passes the eye test, has worked for him so far in the majors, and grades fairly well on stuff models. Besides the fastball, he relies on a upper-80s changeup that he commands exceptionally well; it’s probably his best pitch overall. An established fastball-changeup tandem means Castillo is one of the safer pitching prospects around — he’s already a viable reliever — but the Royals would need to oversee the development of his slider if they plan on him starting games.

With the player summaries complete, there’s an elephant in the room I wish I didn’t need to address but is breathing down my neck, so here goes. Is Merrifield legally allowed to enter the country of Canada? It’s absurd that this question needs to be asked, but as we know all too well, a recent three-game series between the Blue Jays and Royals revealed that he had not been vaccinated for COVID-19, which is required for entry into Canada. Toronto has given a Merrfield a shot, yes, but can it give him the shot?

As of this writing, there’s been no confirmation of Merrifield’s vaccination status. In an interview, Jays GM Ross Atkins declined to comment further on the matter, saying he would let Merrifield discuss it with his family. Based on the fact that he circumvented a simple yes/no question, it seems like the Blue Jays acquired Merrifield before confirming whether or not he would agree to a vaccine. If so, it’s a move that reeks of irresponsibility. I’m no GM, but I’d want my deadline acquisition to appear in front of the home crowd and not skip half the remaining games. It’s not as if the prospect of a U.S.-only Merrifield was accounted for in the acquisition cost, either. Parting with two 40 FV prospects for a utility bat, albeit an established one with bounce-back potential, is not a bargain.

For what it’s worth, when Merrifield did miss out on that earlier trip to Toronto, he told reporters that “the only reason that I would think about getting [the vaccine] at this point is to go to Canada…. Something happens and I happen to get to a team that has a chance to play in Canada in the postseason, maybe that changes.” Those comments didn’t endear him to Royals fans (or his own general manager), but it does sound like someone who would hopefully get his shots now that the situation has shifted.

There are a few other concerns regarding Merrifield, including an alarming dip in his defensive metrics, but the priority here is getting him into Canada. Hopefully the Blue Jays have a plan; otherwise, I’d prefer not to think about the ensuing logistical nightmare. As for the Royals, they’ve at last traded Merrifield. It’s a few years late, sure, but as they say, better late than never.





Justin is an undergraduate student at Washington University in St. Louis studying statistics and writing.

62 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
EonADSMember since 2024
4 years ago

Am I the only one who finds it really trashy that some athletes will say “sure, I’ll get vaccinated if not having it might hurt our playoff chances” but otherwise have no willingness to do so? The vaccine isn’t perfect, but it’s safe, and it does reduce both the risks of contracting and passing on COVID. I respect guys like Kyrie Irving, who stick to their ideals even if it screws their team over (and even if their ideals are based on faulty information), more than I respect guys like Merrifield.

OddBall Herrera
4 years ago
Reply to  EonADS

I count myself among those who think that getting outraged about other peoples’ medical choices is a waste of time. He didn’t feel a compelling need to get vaccinated before. If such a need came along he would get vaccinated. What else is there to say?

Last edited 4 years ago by OddBall Herrera
Luy
4 years ago

What did the comment above have to do with medical choices?
Seems like you really DO want to talk about medical choices. Because I read a comment about someone who doesn’t really believe his own nonsense, and openly said “my current team is trash so I don’t care how my actions effect them”.

Last edited 4 years ago by Luy
synco
4 years ago
Reply to  Luy

What are you saying, you haven’t turned green, grown a horn, gone sterile, or died since you got vaccinated? Because I have.

TKDCMember since 2016🏆 MVP
4 years ago

What else is there to say? Plenty. “What else is there to say?” sounds like something you say when you want to be loudly wrong but also want to go unquestioned. I’d also settle down on calling something a waste of time if you, like me, have spend countless hours in the Fangraphs comments section for years on end. In some cosmic sense, literally everything you or I have ever wrote in this comment section is a “waste of time.” I’d suggest taking that particular argument out of your rotation.

hopbittersMember since 2020
4 years ago
  • It’s a choice to get it for yourself or not.
  • It’s also a choice to get it or not for the sake of those around you.
  • It is not a choice for the people around you who are affected by your actions or inaction.
gavinrendar
4 years ago
Reply to  hopbitters

It reduces the danger of COVID. It really doesn’t reduce the chance of getting infected or spreading it. Everyone gets COVID with or without. But vaccinated people get much fewer symptoms or hospitalization/death.

Smaleb Cith
4 years ago

If the front office isn’t going to do a serious job of putting a competitive team together (for the 7th consecutive year), why do you expect a player to take what he considers an unexpected risk. Its the same argument as when when a slugger hits a ground ball to short. If it is game 62 of the regular season, he’s not legging it out. It is an unnecessary risk for injury without much upside. If it is to get into the playoffs, he needs to be running that out.

D-WizMember since 2019
4 years ago
Reply to  EonADS

I agree that it’s a really (really, really, really) crappy stance for a teammate to take, but also,,, Maybe don’t respect Kyrie Irving either! It’s just as dangerous a position to take regardless of whether or not there’s conviction behind it.

EonADSMember since 2024
4 years ago
Reply to  D-Wiz

I didn’t say I respected him much, just more than Merrifield. I don’t agree with Irving’s stance either, it’s just more respectable than being two-faced.

dodgerbleu
4 years ago
Reply to  EonADS

You may not agree with his stance or reasoning, but – and I’m paraphrasing – he basically communicated “I didn’t get it because I didn’t have it, but if it started messing with my work, I would get it if I had to.” Not sure that is necessarily two-faced. Irresponsible, short-sighted, etc. But I don’t see anything two-faced about it, seems pretty direct.

Luy
4 years ago
Reply to  dodgerbleu

It did mess with his work. And he didn’t get it.

Smaleb Cith
4 years ago
Reply to  D-Wiz

It’s a crappier stance to have to play Carlos Santana for 2 months with 2 major prospects at the position in the system ready to play in the majors. GMDM cannot criticize players if he isn’t putting enough talent on the field to stay in contention through the end of April.

TKDCMember since 2016🏆 MVP
4 years ago
Reply to  EonADS

That’s a low bar, but I guess I agree. The hubris of these athletes is unbelievable. Imagine how they’d feel if a doctor walked out on the field and told them about how their swing or their jump shot were all wrong and the doctor knew best how to do it.

This is also a very clear example of why all the hemming and hawing about the Blue Jays having an “advantage” because other teams’ unvaccinated players can’t travel there, was so stupid. Well, there unvaccinated players also can’t travel there. If anything, the Blue Jays are *more* disadvantaged.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  EonADS

I admit I do not subscribe to this opinion. I am in favor of whatever gets someone to take the jab. My ideals are to improve population health and keep people from getting sick.

I will adopt whatever response is necessary to convince people to take the vaccine if they haven’t, and whatever positive reinforcement is necessary once they have.

Last edited 4 years ago by sadtrombone
EonADSMember since 2024
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Fair, and I agree with you. I just hate that Merrifield is being two-faced about it. He doesn’t actually care about health, he cares about money and recognition.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

That said, I admit if I had a teammate who somehow managed to tank my team’s chances to win because they didn’t take it I would be pissed. I remember back when NC State had to forfeit their chance at a trophy in the college world series because not enough of them had gotten the shot, or something like that. You cost me a chance to win it all because you couldn’t do something so simple as take a shot? In that case, you let the team down and my rationality goes out the window.

wobatusMember since 2024
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Two NC State players were unvaccinated and tested positive, and wouldn’t have played. Protocol then meant all of them had to test, and 4 vaccinated players tested positive. I think that’s what happened.

EonADSMember since 2024
4 years ago
Reply to  EonADS

NOTE: I’m not saying I actually like Kyrie Irving’s BS either. I think he’s an idiot. I just think Whit Merrifield is both an idiot AND a greedy jerk who only cares about money and his recognition as a baseball player.

Six Ten
4 years ago
Reply to  EonADS

I don’t think this is about Merrifield being greedy for money or recognition. He’s frankly been undervalued for most of his career because he came up so late and had an unusual prospect profile that didn’t look like he’d have staying power. His contract goes for another year past this one so he’ll be a 34 year old when he’s a free agent, not ideal for anyone but especially so for someone whose value comes in large part from positional versatility and good baserunning. He’s not likely to parlay this move into huge money or stardom.

Instead, I think this is about a sort of grumpy stubbornness that is not rare among athletes in general and baseball players in particular. Personally I am pretty confident it aligns with these players’ politics too but at the end of the day it doesn’t matter whether that’s true. It’s selfishness but not for money or recognition; it’s a Randian “I worked so hard to get here, I know my body, my body is my livelihood, nobody can tell me what to do with it, quit babying me” thing. It’s shortsighted and an inaccurate view of how they got to where they are, but the belief that it’s true probably can be helpful to athletes. But if you overextend that misconception a little bit past where it’s actually useful, it leads you to make decisions like this.

The thing about Kyrie is he’s already proven what he can as a player. He’s already made lots of money and gotten lots of recognition. He tried to reach higher in Boston and it just didn’t work, so he reset his notions of what kind of star he was. I think it’s hard to compare how he would handle the same question if he was at the same much lower level of stardom Whit Merrifield is. I wouldn’t give Irving any grudging comparative respect here.

Antonio BananasMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  Six Ten

You mean a population of largely white southern men who have had their ego stroked most of their lives have inflated senses of their intellectual ability? Seems…well yea this actually makes a lot of sense.

MikeSMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  EonADS

On Merrifield: It’s not just you.

On Irving: I don’t respect anybody who puts their fellow human beings at risk and decides they don’t want to do simple, basically harmless, things that can help to mitigate the largest public health crisis in a century, no matter how consistent they are in their stupidity and selfishness.

gavinrendar
4 years ago
Reply to  EonADS

It reduces the risk of contracting and spreading? Then how come everyone is getting it vaccinated and unvaccinated?

BTW I am vaccinated, and yes I got COVID after vaccination, because it makes COVID much less dangerous.

HughesMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  gavinrendar

You seem to be confused that “reduced” and “reduced to zero” are not equivalent statements.

Luke I am your Father
4 years ago
Reply to  EonADS

“ I respect guys like Kyrie Irving”
Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha, bye

moosetacos
4 years ago

Castillo is listed as a 40 FV but not listed on the Jays 2022 prospects. He’s only pitched 20 major league innings. Why isn’t he included?

jaysfan39Member
4 years ago
Reply to  moosetacos

He was probably ranked lower then a 40 before this season and the Jays list hasn’t been updated, he came into this year as mostly a minor league innings eater and wasn’t seen as much of a prospect. This year his fastball ticked up a bit which helped his other pitches a bit while also improving his strikeouts and ERA a fair bit in the minors.

Last year he had a 4.85 ERA in AA with 89Ks in 102 IP this season he has 1.92 ERA between AA & AAA with 64 KS in 56.1 IP as well as a 3.05 ERA with 20 Ks in 20.2 IP in the majors. He is still probably more of swing man then a true starting pitching prospect at this point but he has made some leaps in development since the Blue Jays list was updated.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

All this with the COVID-19 vaccine aside, which is kind of messed up in a bunch of different ways, I think I’d be pretty mad at Dayton Moore if I were a Royals fan.

The Royals passed on something like 3 years of deadlines and offseasons where they could have gotten serious hauls for Merrified and sped up their rebuild. The logic was that it was important to keep homegrown stars, to give the fans someone to root for. But by that logic, there’s no way he should have traded Merrifield now because he’s the guy they kept for the fans to identify with. They basically kept him until he lost all value except the senitmental value, but then they traded him for a return which is arguably not as much as the sentimental value.

Pick a lane, Dayton Moore! You could have had the prospects for a rebuild, or you could have had the hometown hero for the fans, and instead you have neither.

Last edited 4 years ago by sadtrombone
EonADSMember since 2024
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

It’s really hard for me to pick whether the Royals or Rockies are the more poorly run org. Yes, the Rockies have a habit of making boneheaded moves, but they also make some decent ones (keeping German Marquez, who is more valuable to them than anyone, signing Cron to a low-cost extension, actually getting something from the worst trade in franchise history with Austin Gomber not utterly sucking for them and Montero making a quick debut, relatively speaking).

The Royals, meanwhile, look like they’re stuck in perpetual reverse, or at the very least they don’t stack up compared to other teams. They trade for Soler, he sucks until he hits his stride, they trade him too late, he rebounds and wins a ring. Carlos Santana should never have been signed, sucked for them, got traded and seems to have rebounded somewhat while they get nothing. Sign Whit Merrifield to a very team-friendly deal, hold him too long, get a pittance for him on a down year where he reveals himself as a dickhead. The Rockies at least have a strategy, even if it’s flawed. Dayton Moore honestly looks lost when it comes to team management.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  EonADS

Before this deal I would have put the Rockies as being way, way worse. And I still would put the Rockies lower. But less enthusiastically.

I maintain the Royals are mostly misunderstood, but I can’t defend this one.

Six Ten
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I don’t have a good handle on exactly how widespread this is, but a lot of fans were very angry about Merrifield’s comments about his vaccine decision. I know this wasn’t how he meant it, but it was functionally indistinguishable from “I would do this for other people if I had access to something better, but I won’t do it to play on this team with these teammates for these fans.” And even if the fan sentiment was limited, he was excoriated by Royals beat writers. I’m quite sure Moore had his finger on that pulse. (The team’s director of comms was also until last year a beloved columnist at the Kansas City Star, I’m sure he could tell the execs how this was going down.) A lot of Royals fans probably agree with him on the vaccine as such! But they aren’t into the idea that they aren’t worth it while someone else is.

All of which is to say: I think Merrifield really undermined the sentimental value at the end.

I don’t disagree with your larger point. He obviously should have been traded years ago. But I do think Moore would argue that sentimental value mattered more when the team was a bit of a talent wasteland. For all the problems this team still has, having young players who will be around for a while to root for isn’t one. To that end, the sentiment for Merrifield already accomplished its purpose. I disagree with him on this, but I think there’s an internal logic to it.

Mahoney
4 years ago
Reply to  Six Ten

The weird thing about the sentimental value issue is that you would think that signing Perez to that extension would make him that guy, given that Merrifield has NO connection to the WS teams of 2014-15.

And that gets to what I’m wondering now: did Merrifield place more value on being a sentimental favorite of the Royal fandom, or finding a way to get to be part of a postseason before his career ends. Because Merrifield’s next playoff game will in fact be his first playoff game ever.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Six Ten

So in other words it’s possible no one was sad to see him go at the end? I’m not sure if that makes it better or worse. It makes the present move more justifiable but the earlier one less so.

Shirtless George Brett
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

The Royals passed on something like 3 years of deadlines and offseasons where they could have gotten serious hauls for Merrified and sped up their rebuild. 

I disagree with the “serious hauls” part of that claim. There is almost zero evidence that the Royals would have gotten anything significant for Merrifield 2 or 3 years ago (which is probably why they didnt trade him). He was a 30 year old, slightly above avg hitter with no power. That does not command a “serious haul” from anybody. You telling me 30 year old Trey Mancini got traded for a 23 year old, 40+ FV pitcher but 30 year old Merrifield was going to bring back a haul that would help rebuild the Royals?

In “what if” situations like this I’m always reminded of an old Dave Cameron quote. “Teams generally take the best deal they are offered”. I have a hard time believing Dayton Moore was swatting away high value offers for Whit Merrifield for 3-4 years. If he didn’t trade him for a serious haul, its probably because it wasn’t a option. I suspect that the offers 2 or 3 years ago were marginally better than the deal they finally took.

Last edited 4 years ago by Shirtless George Brett
joedrewMember since 2019
4 years ago

FWIW, unvaccinated people are permitted to enter Canada; they just have to quarantine for 14 days afterwards. So even if Merrifield doesn’t get vaccinated, he could choose to come and play only home games, or stay in the US and play only away games.

My hope is that Atkins’ non-response was a “we’re messaging this in a very careful manner, but we do have an understanding” political turn of phrase. As a Jays fan, I can say he’s got that way of speaking down pretty well.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  joedrew

So I’m not sure what the situation is currently. It’s possible that he got the first shot after realizing he wasn’t going to be able to make that trip.

But I think that you have to wait something like 3 weeks in between the shots for the primary series, and you’re not fully “cleared” for travel until 2 weeks after that. So if he gets the shot tomorrow, and then the second dose 3 weeks after that, he basically won’t be ready to travel across the border and actually play games until the playoffs. This works for someone like Benintendi, perhaps, but for Toronto it doesn’t work at all until the postseason. Until then, he’s probably just going to have to remain stateside (or spend 14 days in quarantine in Toronto, but that’s 2 fewer weeks available).

TKDCMember since 2016🏆 MVP
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

You can also just do the JAndJ and two weeks later you are good. My understanding is that is what a large percentage of MLB players did.

Six Ten
4 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

In which case he’d be eligible on August 27 if he got vaccinated today. They aren’t at home until August 25 so it’s just two games missed.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

I think Canada now requires two doses for the J&J since doing that puts it on par with the mRNA shots. But I may be misremembering on that.

TKDCMember since 2016🏆 MVP
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I think you are. I just looked at the Canadian website and it said one of JJ is okay.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

I must be thinking of provincial guidelines then. There’s been a lot of variation there.

bluerum29
4 years ago
Reply to  joedrew

That fact that we are still discussing the vaccination status of players is what is ridiculous. The vaccine is available, that is all that should have to be known at this point. Whether players get vaccinated or not shouldn’t really matter, its up to them individually and we as the public shouldn’t know who is and is not. Other than circumstances that previously required the status of other vaccines, no reason to have this one stand on its own.

TKDCMember since 2016🏆 MVP
4 years ago
Reply to  bluerum29

Whether I get loaded and drive my car also shouldn’t matter, right? No reasons for you or anyone to know or care.

bluerum29
4 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

The fact that you relate one to the other is just lacking common sense. On the road, if you are drunk, other drivers can’t protect themselves. You can protect yourself from the virus by taking the vaccine, that’s the benefit of having vaccines. If you want to be protected, get vaccinated. I want my pets to be protected so I get them shots, as a result I’m not worried about strangers pets.

TKDCMember since 2016🏆 MVP
4 years ago
Reply to  bluerum29

I refuse to believe that this long into this, there are people who still don’t understand the basics of how vaccines work. Telling others they can take the vaccine is the same as saying “wear your seatbelt and then you don’t have to worry about drunk drivers.” Please stop being intentionally stupid. You do that enough with your baseball takes.

bluerum29
4 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Everyone needs to make their own medical choices based on their needs. Those who are at higher risk due to their own health, it is a different situation than those who are not. Individuals who may have contracted it, but are in the asymptomatic group it is also a different situation for them, no real need for them to take it. It all depends on your personal health situation and what your needs are. I also love how we have different baseball opinions, so that makes mine stupid. Not just different than yours, but stupid. Nice take.

Luy
4 years ago
Reply to  bluerum29

How the fuck are people STILL getting this wrong.

TapeyBeerconeMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Yes, that’s a perfect analogy. Genius!

Twitchy
4 years ago

This is a weird interpretation of the deal. Espinal provides high level defense so even if the bat doesn’t bounce back he still hits LHP well, so he’d make a great platoon with Biggio. There’s no reason for Whit to play 2B over Espinal or Biggio.

There was absolutely no reason to acquire him for this reason.

As for backup corner OF, maybe, but you wouldn’t really bench Gurriel or Teo vs a lefty.

More likely this was a CF insurance policy for Springer…but maybe get someone with more experience in CF.

Last edited 4 years ago by Twitchy
JSJohnSmithAnon
4 years ago
Reply to  Twitchy

Vs a lefty I’d go with Merrifield>Biggio at any position (but 1b). Of course Espinal would be better than Merrifield at the INF spots as you said, but he could be injured or playing SS or 3b to give someone a day off/injuries.

Once Tapia cools off Whit can take over the 4th OF role (and potentially get a lot of CF starts).

Not sure there were many/any better options who’ve played a lot of CF, especially this cheap. In the smallish sample Whit’s been solid there, he should have the speed and his weaker arm doesn’t hurt him there as much as RF.

Jason BMember since 2017
4 years ago

As long as this ends the Bradley Zimmer experiment Jays fans will be amenable.

HughesMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  Jason B

So far it doesn’t.

Bench tonight: Tapia, Biggio, Zimmer, Jano.

What Zimmer has going for him is that the replacement option is Zach Collins, to bat vs R and provide EMERGENCY ONLY catching.

Last edited 4 years ago by Hughes
JSJohnSmithAnon
4 years ago
Reply to  Jason B

I actually really wanted Zimmer to work, too bad he was cold at the start of the year and thus didn’t really get a great shot.

Mitchell MooreMember since 2020
4 years ago

So Dayton Moore is a subscriber to that famous Branch Rickey line, “better to trade a year or two late than not at all?”

Last edited 4 years ago by Mitchell Moore
Antonio BananasMember since 2016
4 years ago

I love this trade. Mostly because it seems like a spiteful act towards a jackass.

Dmjn53
4 years ago

They kept him so they could lose 104, 103, and 88 games the last few seasons only to eventually trade him anyway after his value had completely tanked?

The Rockies get a lot of slack here (justifiably so), but the Royals do some really weird things

proiste
4 years ago
Reply to  Dmjn53

I hate to bash the Royals, because they are one of the few organizations who actually seem to care about their employees to the very bottom levels of the org. Their refusal to make COVID layoffs was truly admirable, and they’re good about paying their guys.

It’s sad that such an unusually kind ownership group employs a mind-numbingly incompetent front office.

Seeforman
4 years ago

Believe the Canadian requirement mirrors the American requirement: either be vaccinated to enter the US, or do the quarantine.

Six Ten
4 years ago
Reply to  Seeforman

The one difference is the US exempts unvaccinated citizens from its restrictions, while I believe Canada still requires unvaccinated citizens to quarantine.

But yeah, the main distinction here is just that relatively few MLB players are Canadian citizens. If you play for Toronto you basically have to be vaccinated, whereas every other team has some exposure to losing unvaccinated guys whenever they cross the border. Most of the non-American players are vaccinated for the same reason: they could play here, but they could never go visit their native country.

People who don’t like the vaccination requirements are getting mad at Canada’s liberal overreach or whatever, but that’s not actually what’s happening.

johndarc
4 years ago

WTF Fangraphs, why so political? /s

He literally can’t do his job and play baseball if he doesn’t get it. He’s not good enough to only play away games.

HughesMember since 2016
4 years ago

Merrifield confirmed he can return with the team to Toronto. Next game at home is August 12.

Last edited 4 years ago by Hughes
Halladay In CambodiaMember since 2020
4 years ago

Would it be unreasonable to read his statement as leverage to be traded to Toronto?