Finding the Padres a Shortstop
Over the winter, the Padres changed over almost their entire roster, turning an also-ran into a contender with a flurry of moves that borrowed heavily from the team’s future. The current roster is good enough to be a legitimate Wild Card threat, but despite some big name pieces at the top of the roster, San Diego is still rolling with a tandem of Alexi Amarista and Clint Barmes at shortstop. Unsurprisingly, A.J. Preller is looking to change that.
The #Padres and aggressive A.J Preller still aren't done dealing. They are now scouring the shortstop market, teams say.
— Bob Nightengale (@BNightengale) April 7, 2015
Significant trades are pretty rare in April, but Preller already defied the odds by getting the Braves to surrender the best closer in baseball on the eve of Opening Day, so let’s put aside the fact that most teams aren’t likely going to want to move a quality shortstop right now and see if we can find a fit for the Padres. After all, we don’t need to look for an All-Star to find someone better than what San Diego has at the moment.
The Options
Troy Tulowitzki, Colorado.
Every team who needs a shortstop dreams of trading for Tulo, but after a winter of raiding the pantry, I honestly don’t know how the Padres could pull this off, especially with the Rockies likely to charge an in-division premium to send him to San Diego. You’re not getting Tulowitzki for Hunter Renfroe and Austin Hedges, and the rest of their system is remarkably thin after so much of it was traded away to make upgrades elsewhere. To get Colorado interested, the Padres would have to build a package around a piece from their big league team, and at that point, you’re just robbing Peter to pay Paul.
Tulo would be a massive get for the Padres, but if it costs you Andrew Cashner and Wil Myers, the offsetting losses probably don’t make the short-term gain worth the long-term costs. And it seems remarkably unlikely that the Rockies are going to trade Tulowitzki right now. In June or July, once they are definitively out of the race, but to a division rival in April? It just doesn’t seem like something they would do.
Verdict: Theoretically possible, but I’d be shocked if this happened.
Starlin Castro, Cubs
Perhaps no useful young player in baseball has been hypothetically traded more times than Starlin Castro. Addison Russell’s acquisition last summer made the chatter even louder, and after a big spring, there is a natural replacement for Castro waiting in Triple-A if the Cubs chose to move him. But this one strikes me as particularly unlikely, because at the moment, Starlin Castro isn’t doing anything to keep Addison Russell out of the big leagues.
The trade-Castro argument essentially comes down to unblocking a logjam, but that logjam only existed as long as Javier Baez was playing a significant role in the big leagues. A terrible debut and an awful spring got him sent back to Iowa as well, however, so now the Cubs are using Tommy La Stella and Arismendy Alcantara at second base. Both are interesting and potentially useful role players, but neither one is a serious impediment to the promotion of an elite prospect like Russell, and since he’s not a defense-first SS, he wouldn’t lose much value by breaking into the big leagues as a second baseman. For 2015, there’s no real reason why Castro and Russell can’t co-exist in the big leagues once the Cubs determine Russell is ready for the majors.
So, really, trading Castro would open a spot back up for Baez, not Russell, and that’s a downgrade that Chicago should not want to make this year. You don’t spend $150 million on Jon Lester and then trade away a solid big leaguer so that you can rush Baez back into a job he probably isn’t ready for. Like the Padres, the Cubs are trying to win this year, and trading Castro away makes that more difficult; they may have a future logjam up the middle, but they don’t have one at present. If anything, the Cubs should be looking to add big league caliber hitters, not subtract them.
Verdict: I don’t see a fit here.
Elvis Andrus, Rangers
This is the other obvious name that comes up frequently, and unlike Castro, the motivations for the Rangers to do something are clear; Andrus’ eight year, $120 million contract extension just kicked in, and getting free of that commitment would allow the Rangers to reinvest that money in someone likely to be a better contributor in the future. While Andrus is young enough to bounce back and still projects as an above average shortstop in the big leagues, $120 million is a big commitment to a speed-and-defense who racked up twice as many errors as he got hits in the first three games of the season.
So, Preller likely wouldn’t have to do much sweet-talking here to get his old boss interested in a deal, especially since the Padres have bullpen pieces to spare while the Rangers bullpen is a desolate wasteland. And while trading Andrus away would make the Rangers worse in 2015, they’re already likely to be one of the worst teams in the American League this year, and the marginal difference between winning 72 games or 74 games shouldn’t be large enough to stop them from dumping as much of Andrus’ contract as they can if given the opportunity.
That’s the sticking point, though; how much cash would they be willing to include to pay Andrus to play for the Padres? While Preller has shown a willingness to take on overpriced players in Matt Kemp and Melvin Upton, he didn’t take the full weight of either contract in those deals. And I can’t imagine anyone would take Andrus at $120 million right now, so a deal would be dependent on the Rangers subsidizing his contract in order to get most of the contract off the books.
How much would Texas have to eat in order to get the Padres to give up a spare reliever like Brandon Maurer or Kevin Quackenbush? Andrus’ two opt-outs complicate the calculations a bit, but based on his projected future value, I’d estimate about $30 million or so. The Rangers are going to pay Andrus his $15 million salary this season either way, so if they picked up that tab and then another $15 million at the end of the deal — probably after the two opt-outs have passed, so that they only have to send the second part of the payment if Andrus doesn’t play well enough to choose free agency when those options come up — then they’d have the full $15 million he’s due next year to reinvest into their 2016 product.
But the Padres have already committed a large part of their future to deals that probably won’t end well — or in Upton’s case, are already sinkholes — and they might be a bit reluctant to take on another $90 million for a guy who was barely a +1 WAR player last year. Buying low on Andrus wouldn’t be all that different from what they did with Wil Myers, but at least they can cut bait on the young outfielder if it doesn’t work out. My guess is that even if Texas offered to pick up a good chunk of the deal, the Padres aren’t going to be too excited about taking on a good chunk of Andrus’ contract. From what we saw in Preller’s first winter as a GM, speed-and-defense don’t seem to be particularly high on his list of priorities.
Verdict: I’d guess neither side wants it to happen enough to make a deal.
Jose Ramirez, Indians
If you want an Andrus-type but don’t want to sign up for a $120 million commitment, then Ramirez might be the next best option. A glove-first 22 year old who probably won’t ever hit for any power, Ramirez projects as roughly a league average player based on his defense and contact skills, but probably isn’t the long-term answer in Cleveland with Francisco Lindor already in Triple-A.
That said, there’s little reason for Cleveland to want to trade Ramirez. They’re a contender this year and aren’t going to want to weaken their 2015 position just to help San Diego out, and even if you think Lindor is as good as Ramirez right now, having both around as depth gives the team a much higher floor than just relying solely on Lindor and hoping he’s ready. If the Indians were going to subtract from their 25 man roster, they’d want to upgrade elsewhere on the roster, but the Padres don’t really have superfluous pieces who would improve the Indians in a real way. You’re not getting a young everyday shortstop in exchange for spare relievers, after all.
If the Indians fell out of the race, Ramirez could be an option in a few months, but not right now.
Verdict: No real motivation for Cleveland to move him yet.
Jean Segura, Brewers
Now we might have something. The Brewers look like a team with disaster potential, especially because they lack anything resembling reasonable pitching depth. Segura’s had an up-and-down big league career, but the projections look at the total package and see a roughly average big leaguer, the kind of player that would be a real upgrade for San Diego.
For the Brewers, though, Segura isn’t necessarily something the need to hang onto, especially once they realize that they aren’t a particularly strong team this year. They’re not going to throw in the towel after an 0-3 start, but we currently give them about a 3% chance of winning the division and a 6% chance of winning a Wild Card spot; they don’t have to lose too many more games in April before making future-focused trades becomes a viable decision.
And there’s probably a deal to be made here that doesn’t even require them to punt the 2015 season. The downgrade from Segura to Luis Sardinas and either Amarista or Barmes — one of the two would likely have to be included just so Milwaukee still had a shortstop, and San Diego wouldn’t need both anymore — would hurt the Brewers a little bit, but that lost value could be made up by building the deal around Odrisamer Despaigne, a capable big league starter who would represent a massive upgrade over the team’s options for when they need a fill-in starting pitcher.
If you add in one of the spare bullpen pieces — say, Brandon Maurer — so that the Brewers could add depth to their bullpen as well, and it’s not clear the Brewers would even get significantly worse in 2015. Swapping four years of Segura — three of them at arbitration prices, which he may not even be worth if he doesn’t have a bounce back season — for six years of Despaigne and five years of Maurer is the kind of future-oriented trade Milwaukee could make without going into a full-scale rebuild.
And this is one of the few deals I can find where the Padres actually could make a real SS upgrade while only giving up pieces they don’t really need. They have the pitching depth to spare a couple of extra arms, and buying low on a league minimum Segura is likely a better plan than doing the same thing with a very expensive Andrus. Even if the Brewers needed another low-level prospect to get it done, this is probably the kind of trade that the Padres should be looking to make.
Verdict: This is the move that makes the most sense to me.
Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.
Ryan Flaherty!
Not sure I understand this deal at all from the Brewers’ perspective. Going off of Kiley’s future rankings for each player, Segura is 55 FV and 24 years old, so a rebuilding team would better of trading him for Despaigne, a 45 FV, 27 year old and a bullpen piece (which comes with obvious future volatility)?
I’m certainly not opposed to the idea of trading Segura, but that seems like a really underwhelming return.
Where do you find Kiley’s FV values for everyday players?
Prospect lists for each team under ‘Big League Growth Assets’.
Might be the last chance to sell Segura for anything. He’s a few hundred PAs away from proving he really can’t hit MLB pitching. Absolute ground ball machine.
Despaigne and Maurer aren’t that far away from nothing.
Keeping in mind that Jean was an All Star two seasons ago and hit a 440 foot home run yesterday. If the Brewers are looking at moving him at some point, his trade value could double by the time we’re in June if he keeps hitting.
I was thinking the same thing. In theory it’s fair value, but the Brewers are only going to trade him if they go into rebuilding mode. A depth starter, depth middle infielder and reliever may have value to a contender, but to a rebuilding team are essentially worthless.
A theory was proposed that had it at fair value, but it rested on assumptions that are wrong.
why wouldn’t the cubs trade baez? why is castro the only option? granted his stock is low, but he seems like the one without long-term potential in the middle infield for chicago.
The time to trade Baez has passed, you would be selling low now because of last year’s issues in AAA and MLB.
Now, if he absolutely crushed AAA pitching for the first couple months, you might be able to convince a GM that he’s made an adjustment.
Cruel assessment of Baez. Possibly accurate. Maybe not. Baez’ MLB strikeouts are a mark against, and not going away. But if the guy is a decent defensive shortstop in a low scoring Era…he could still be an All-Star down the road…
Yeah, I’m not calling Baez a failed prospect, I’m just saying if I’m a rival GM and I’m calling the Cubs about Baez my line is going to be “he’s struggled badly in the majors and Aaa you’ll want to sell now in case his stock gets even lower and you get nothing and I’m not paying the price of a future star for him”
M’s have Miller and Taylor (injured, but be back soon). I wonder if there are some calls about that.
Yeah, this is the most logical fit. Surprised the M’s double barreled SS situation wasn’t mentioned. As we’ve seen in the past (Owings and Gregorius) these situations must eventually be resolved. Of course, if we’re talking about the Pads biggest surplus – RPing – that also seems to be a Mariner surplus, so I’m not sure the obvious match works but they would probably find a fit somewhere.
I mentioned Ruben Tejada if the Pads decided to slum it a bit. A guy like Quackenbush would fit the Mets perfectly in fact. Not sure Tejada would float AJ’s boat, but this deal might be out there if nothing else materializes.
I don’t get the Segura deal at all… nor why the popular hating team of the moment has become the Brewers. They seem like a solid .500 roster to me. And finally, I think we’ll see the Tribe lean toward trying to move Kipnis and keep Ramirez at 2B instead… just a hunch.
Tejada just seems like a lateral move.
Amarista: 72 wRC+ in 1223 career PAs
Barnes: 71 wRC+ in 3950 career PAs
Tejada: 83 wRC+ in 1778 career PAs
Tejada had such a disastrous 2013 that people forget he was decent in 2012 and actually put together a 11.9% walk rate for a .342 OBP last year. I would say that Ruben Tejada has a better chance of being a major league player than Amarista.
I’d imagine the Padres have called, but I also don’t see much of a fit, with both teams “going for it” this year.
Why would the Rangers trade for bullpen arms? Why would a team with little chance to win be hunting immediate bullpen help instead of just seeing which of the many live arms they have in the system develop? If the Rangers deal Andrus I can’t see it being for relief help.
The relief would be future payroll. A salary dump, nothing more of substance.
Did you read the piece? Trading Andrus would be more about salary relief than whatever player came the other way. But even with that in mind, it’s unlikely.
They wouldn’t be trading for bullpen arms, they would be trading for contract relief. Getting bullpen arms back would almost be a throw in
Definitely a salary dump, but they’d probably want someone other than a reliever.
Fangraphs may call their bullpen a “desolate wasteland” but I personally think having 20 guys in the pen, coming off the DL soon, or in AAA that all have a shot of being decent to great relievers is alright.
If JD knows one thing, it is how to build a pen. Lots of young guys with options, some of whom will flame out, and some who will make it. I expect after April, the pen will be better than average.
Exactly. They’re not going to trade for a reliever just to get payroll relief. I mean if they see a reliever they really like that’s young, has upside and control, sure. But they are NOT going to trade for a reliever just because their CURRENT bullpen isn’t great.
maicer izturis? lol
Yeah the Brewers / Segura idea is interesting but, it would take more then Despaigne and Maurer. What could that be?
why would it take more than that? Segura hasn’t proven anything except 1/2 a good season.
pretty solid resume leading up to majors. no reason to bail low on him if you’re the Brewers.
Segura had “proven” much less when he was the centerpiece of a trade for Zack Greinke. The idea that the Brewers would trade a promising young starting SS for a reliever and Despaigne is laughable. But then again this is Dave Cameron commenting on the Brewers, so what do you expect.
they should trade for eduardo escobar before danny sanatana turns into a pumpkin…
I could see a deal being more likely at the deadline than anything else. As of right now, most teams that didn’t blow it all up aren’t going to be looking to make moves.
It is a bit of a hot take, but if I am the Cubs, I just might consider moving Russell instead of Castro. Castro is still really young,quite good, and his deal is decent. I believe Russell will be very good, but not substantially better than Castro and could fetch a bigger return. Maybe the Cuba’s do what the A’s did and flip him at the deadline if they are contending for the division.
As Dave writes, though, Russell doesn’t have to be better than Castro for the Cubs to want to keep him. He just has to be better than any of La Stella, Alcantara, or Baez, which certainly seems plausible. And I’m not sure the Padres have enough pieces they’re willing to part with to get Russell, anyway.
I can see them going for Alcantara, though. After Dave brought him up, the lack of future mention is bizarre.
I was going to quibble with Castro being described as “quite good” given that he isn’t by historical standards, but holy crap shortstop has become a wasteland in terms of hitting competency. Somehow Castro’s 98 wRC+ is good for ninth best at the position since he reached the majors.
the castro scenario is completely moot, as Baez has been a non-factor so far in his MLB career. And now he has taken a leave of absence for the death of his sister, with whom he was very close, who knows if that might mess with his head even more? I personally am not counting on any contribution from Baez this year.
Yes. The shortstop position is a total MLB wasteland right now.
I feel like the Reds could be open to a trade with both Cozart and Suarez around.
That is because they are both below replacement level
Ruben Tejada?
How about signing Adam Dunn? He’ll make like 73 errors, but who wouldn’t pay to see this?
Adam Dunn’s defense is better-suited to center field.
I’d pay to see him play SS. Hopefully behind a ground ball pitcher.
Every time I read Clint Barmes name, I think “But he’s HAWKEYE oh BARMES, not BARTON.” ;-p~~
What about Andrelton Simmons? The Braves seem happy to take pretty much everything the Padres have left.
Sure, they’ll trade him for Justin Upton and Craig Kimbrel. 😉
I dunno. I can see the Cubs bringing up Russell to play SS full time in a week or two (long enough to delay his FA), and he should not be much worse (and quite possibly much better all-around) than Castro once he arrives. Why do they need to do anything at 2B? Just ride the role players and wait for Baez to figure it out.
Because Castro is good at hitting baseballs, and there’s no guarantee of Baez ever becoming good at hitting baseballs.
Pretty soon the White Sox will realize that even though they filled some holes, they still have a bunch of replacement level players in the lineup, rotation and bullpen, that they are really only about an 80 win team, and that they are still high on a bunch of light hitting, good defense middle infield prospects. When that happens, 33 year old Alexei Ramirez and his $10M this year/$10M team option next year might start to make sense to both teams.
Lowrie’s not an option? Padres don’t appear to care about defense too much and the Astros have Gonzalez to be a stop gap until Correa is up next season. Okay, I may be biased as I don’t look forward to seeing Lowrie play defense all year in MMP. Haven’t we suffered enough?
“Haven’t we suffered enough?”
Not yet.
bogaerts seems to be a lost cause against al pitching so maybe a change of scenery trade of him for a super young high upside guy like jordan paroubeck would make sense
Paroubeck was a throw in to the Kimbrel deal, but I agree the Barves should absolutely trade him for Bogaerts.
Find something else to talk about.
1/10 troll
Seriously. Everyone knows everdiso loves Bogaerts, too.
How about Everth Cabrera??? Oh…my bad
Normally I’m pretty receptive to Cameron’s ideas but the Segura trade seems very squarely one-sided. I’m not convinced Segura is a 2-3 win SS but I’m not convinced he isn’t. Trading him for a 5/6 starter and a reliever doesn’t seem to make any sense for the Brewers, especially if the goal is to start a rebuilding process.
If they want to trade Segura they’re better off waiting to see what kind of season he has this year. If he proves he’s a 2-3 SS they can get a lot more than the proposed offer. If he proves he’s not a 2-3 win SS they’re out a 5/6 SP and a reliever, which is to say they’re not out much at all.
If the impetus is the Brewers aren’t good, why would they possibly want Odrisamer, Maurer, and Amarista? The Brewers like Segura more than Dave does here, so they’re not trading him away for what they see as pennies on the dollar in ANY scenario with the standings.
Especially considering that Segura lost his son last year. There’s no telling how much that (entirely justifiably) fucked with his head.
I don’t understand something.
Cole Hamels over the last three years has been worth 13.3 WAR, averaging 31 starts per season.
Troy Tulowitzki over the last three years has been worth 11.8 WAR, averaging 88 games per season.
Hamels is due 94/4, with a 20M team option (6 M buyout)
Tulo is due 114/6, with a 15M team option (4M buyout)
Hamels is 31
Tulo is 30
Trading Cole Hamels is likely to net the Phillies a B prospect at best; certainly not a team’s best prospect.
“You’re not getting Tulowitzki for Hunter Renfroe and Austin Hedges”.
How is this possible? Is Tulowitzki’s surplus value that much higher than Hamels’? He may be worth more on a per game basis , but the total financial commitment is bigger. Pitchers carry risks, sure, but doesn’t a shortstop of Tulo’s injury history carry just as much, if not more? Also he has a bunch of his value derived from defense, which doesn’t age well into his 30s.
I recognize that the market is the market, and teams might be more willing to pay a lot to get Tulo and less to get Hamels (especially after that first game – oof), but I don’t see how this is such a completely different situation. Supposedly Renfroe and Hedges were being considered for Hamels and Amaro turned Preller down. But as Jeff wrote at the time “the offer seems in the vicinity of fair”. One might believe that if Wisler had been included in that offer, it would have been enough to close the deal.
If Renfroe and Hedges are ‘in the vicinity of fair’ for Cole Hamels, how is it not possible that they’re in the vicinity of fair for Troy Tulowitzki?
Disclaimer: I am not a Phillies, Padres, Rockies, or Red Sox fan. I’m just a guy askin a question.
Well, I’m no GM, but it seems that on the face of it there are two things working in Tulo’s (or rather, Colorado’s) favor:
1) The AAV is 4m less. While they look similar at first glance, that gives Tulo about a half-win head start in any value calculations.
2) At 31 starts/season, Hamels is getting (basically) the maximum playing time already. No room for improvement there, so you’re betting on the status quo. All it takes is one or two GMs to think they can be the one to keep Tulo healthy, and nearly double his playing time.
At current levels, yes, the value is very similar, but Tulowitzki just has SO MUCH more upside in the form of health. It’s like choosing which scratch ticket to buy: Do you buy the one that pays $10 every time, or the one that pays $10 XX% of the time and $18 XX% of the time? The percentages don’t even matter. The second ticket is better every time, so you’d pay more. Depending on how you think those percentages play out determines how much more it’s worth.
How much for one of your “win $10 every time” lotto tickets?
$15… and people keep buying them…
Tulo’s health is unlikely to get worse (famous last words?) and Hamel’s health really can’t get better.
Solid question.
The answer is it not there to speculate on the trade return one vs. the other, because nobody knows.
The Tulo skillset is more rare than the Hamels skillset, but less rare than the Venters skillset, which was just yesterday pretty modestly traded off.
Another team really has to offer something nice for either player, and likely there will not soon be any chance for comparision.
Market conditions.
Easy. Position tulo’s top ss. Hamel is maybe 3rd best sp in his own division after $200 mil man and harvey
I also don’t see Jose Ramirez as an option, but what about Mike Aviles? If the Tribe could get a decent return for Mike, they could bring up Lindor and let Ramirez take Aviles’ spot as a utility infielder, giving them both plenty of playing time.
God, if you’re really up there, please have Preller offer Mozeliak something…anything for Pete Kozma.
I fear it’s the only thing that’ll keep Matheny from playing him.
God, if you’re really up there, please PLEASE don’t listen to chuckb!
Why should he start now? I’ve been praying for them not to put Kozma on the roster for years.
If the Padres are seeking ++defense they should target Cozart, the Reds can plug in Suarez (who they just acquired for Alfredo Simon from the Tigers). Not sure the Reds would trade him in the first week of the season but I think he’ll be shopped in July if they are out of it, he comes with 2 additional team controlled years.
I think Justin Upton would vote for a new shortstop right about now. Might even be willing to pitch in a few bucks.
If Justin Upton had even average range or reaction time he wouldve been standing under that popup for a routine out. Clearly a ball he shouldve easily caught.
You and I can agree on that, but given the choice between “that was my bad” or “man, we need a new SS”, I think he’d go with the latter.
That would explain why the scorer ruled an error on Barmes.
Ach, I’m being too flip. That game featured some far more horrible defense from Giants’ third base-ish person Casey McGehee, each of which the visitors’ team defense (led by SS Crawford) was able to withstand. Plus that’s not nearly a routine play, and while Barmes may not exceed or even reach MLB replacement quality at short, the Padres’ defense has so many new faces it’s unsurprising they’ll take some time to get acquainted.
Tho, whereas Upton doesn’t have an actually bad history on defense, Barmes OTOH … well, let’s just say it appears that he’s something of a YouTube favorite for his many, varied and even creative errors.
Kennedy is hurt so OD cant be traded now. Any other ideas? Maybe Maurer?
Sign Jeter after convincing him to come out of retirement. Trade Jeter to the Yankees for Severino, Judge, and Bird so Jeter doesn’t retire a Padre. Trade Severino, Judge, and Bird to Atlanta along with Renfroe and Hedges for Simmons.
Still suck because this team isn’t a playoff team. Trade Upton, Myers, and Kimbrel for prospects.
and Simmons.
The sad thing is that Atlanta would probably make that trade.
BTW, I also see absolutely no reason the Pads would be interested in taking any part of the Andrus contract. I can’t fathom why that has taken up so much room in the discussion.
To me the obvious guy is Chris Taylor. After that, they’d prob drop a rung down for guys like Escobar or Tejada or Marwin Gonzalez.
I don’t see Preller trading away Despaigne and Maurer. I have a feeling they plan to “Tyson Ross” Maurer; fix him and turn him back into a starter. So trading away two strong arms who have the abilities to be starters, for a player who struggled pretty bad last year, doesn’t seem like a very good deal for the Padres, especially with the possibility of losing Kennedy and Morrow after this year.
I could see swapping in a different bullpen arm, like Nick Vincent, or Dale Thayer, with Despaigne for Segura, because that would allow them to bring Quackenbush back up to the bigs.
I see no reason the Brewers would trade low on Segura unless they’re really down on him. Even still, they’d wait until he rebounded some before dealing him. And while they may lack an ace, they do have 5 capable SPs at the moment so I don’t see where the motivation to deal him come from.
…that is, to deal him for Despaigne… or Despaigne and a RPer.
Royals fan here, why not place Cherington up in Boston a call about Brock Holt? He can help you all over the place and plays hard, Ryan Flaherty (Bal) or Yunel Escobar (Was) Just a thought!
I’d go for Arismendy Alcantara, personally. Castro is the only reason he isn’t playing short in the MLB, and Russell is the only reason he isn’t playing short in AAA.
What a shocker, Dave Cameron doesn’t know who Tyler Thornburg or Hector Gomez are, yet they’re the likely first replacements for long term at SP and SS. He hasn’t followed what’s going on with Blazek or how well Jungmann has done.
He mentions Sardinas, yet suggests the Brewers take back replacement and sub-replacement level players rather than just use him. He doesn’t know who is in the bullpen at AAA. He doesn’t say who he thinks should be cut from the MLB bullpen to bring in someone who may be worse.
The team has 4 SSs between AA and MLB that are all contributing or likely to at the MLB level, 5 if Yadiel Rivera were thrown in.
This is such a poorly argued and flawed post that Cameron should correct it.