Five Things I Liked (Or Didn’t Like) This Week, September 5

Vincent Carchietta-Imagn Images

Welcome to another edition of Five Things I Liked (Or Didn’t Like) This Week. You might think that this September is a poor one for baseball drama. The playoff spots in both leagues are fairly decided, give or take a bit of wobbliness from the perpetually star-crossed Mariners and Mets. Few division titles are in play – maybe the NL West or AL East, but neither feels all that likely to flip. But that’s okay, because even the teams that are probably out of it can be fun to watch, and even the teams that are already in it still have seeding to vie for. This week, I’ve turned my eye to a few teams with intriguing storylines in the month to come. I’m focusing my baseball viewing on playoff hopefuls, and there’s plenty to like. So with our customary nod to Zach Lowe of The Ringer, let’s talk baseball.

1. McLean (and Horton and Waldrep and…) Fever
One of my favorite baseball archetypes is the shooting star rookie ace. You know what I’m talking about if it’s happened to your team. Some rookie, often a heralded prospect, makes a mid-season debut and just has it. Their fastball? Unbeatable. Their breaking stuff? It just disappears! And that poise – it’s like they’ve been pitching in the majors for years, not weeks.

Whether you want to harken back to Fernando Valenzuela or rely on a more personally resonant example – 2013 Michael Wacha is my touchstone here – there’s just something special about these meteoric talents. At some point, they’re due for a downturn. How could they not be? It happens to everyone eventually. But until then, we might as well enjoy the ride.

Nolan McLean is on one of those runs right now. In his four starts with the Mets, he’s been near-unhittable. He throws a six-pitch mix, and they’re all gorgeous offerings. Stuff+ and PitchingBot do the algorithmic equivalent of a bemused giggle when they measure his arsenal. Twenty-eight strikeouts in 26 innings is impressive enough, as is a 1.37 ERA and secondary statistics to match, but it’s even better than that: He’s done it against three playoff teams and the rival Braves.

If you had to staff the Mets’ postseason rotation, would you put anyone ahead of McLean? Watching a rookie who has basically never failed in his life try to keep that going against long-time professionals is thrilling, and it adds a little bit to the equation, at least for me, when the richest team in baseball is the one relying on that rookie.

McLean might be the leading contender for the the crown at the moment, but don’t sleep on Cade Horton over in Chicago either. His trajectory isn’t quite as steep as McLean’s – he’s been up since May and had an uneventful first few months – but he’s been similarly dominant in the month of August. I think he’ll probably end up as no better than the Cubs’ third starter in October, but I think he’s the pitcher I’d least like to face.

If it weren’t for various issues of injury or team ineffectiveness, we’d have some other options for playoff pitching phenoms. Hurston Waldrep has been a rare bright spot in Atlanta. Chase Burns was looking good until he got hurt. Jacob Misiorowski doesn’t go deep enough into games to give off the same inevitable vibe. Will Warren is more effective than overwhelming. Payton Tolle and Jonah Tong might end up on this list, but they’ve each only made one start in the big leagues so far. I’m excited for some spectacular playoff rookies – and right now, McLean is our best bet for a little October magic.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
Ad-free browsing
Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
Historical & platoon projections
Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
One-click data exports
Customizable player-page dashboards
Dark & Classic site modes
Weekly Members-only mailbag
FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
Optional homepage photo removal
Gift articles to non-members

2. The NeverEnding Story
Trevor Story’s Boston tenure got off to the rockiest start imaginable. In his first three years out east, he managed only 670 plate appearances due to a litany of injuries. He played his customary great defense, but his bat was headed south and he wasn’t getting any younger. Between Boston’s spectacular farm system and free agent activity, Story’s role on the team looked tenuous at best. When he started the season in an extended slump, you could almost see the writing on the wall: As soon as the Sox got healthy, Story’s time would surely be up.

That’s not what happened, though. Story improved as the season got going, and he remained remarkably healthy while the rest of the team dealt with injury after injury. Story is second on the Red Sox in plate appearances, in fact, a key source of stability while all of their other stars hit the shelf.

There’s never been much question about Story’s defense. Even in the back half of his career, he’s going to make plenty of plays like this one:

And this one:

I don’t think he’s a plus defender at shortstop anymore, but he’s sneaky fast and still has excellent instincts in the field. He’s in the middle of his best baserunning season, 25 steals and not a single time caught. Indeed, he has a 25/25 season squarely in his sights thanks to a new offensive approach that I can best describe as “See that Green Monster? I’m gonna hit it there.” (I suppose he says the same about Pesky’s Pole, too.)

Seriously, I can’t emphasize enough how weird it is for Story to be leading the Red Sox through their injury woes. We’re talking about a team so crammed with great hitters that they traded away Rafael Devers at least in part to free up at-bats; now their poor injury luck has them starting Nick Sogard and Masataka Yoshida (and Nats castoff Nathaniel Lowe, but he’s been certifiably awesome). In August, Roman Anthony and Story were comfortably the team’s best hitters. Now Anthony is hurt (jeez, c’mon), and Story is batting cleanup for one of the better teams in the majors. It’s the kind of story you couldn’t make up – pun intended.

3. A Nice Little Setup
Speaking of the Devers trade, the Giants have gone on a run of their own in the last few weeks, surpassing the Reds as the presumptive beneficiaries of any late-season Mets swoon. Devers has been a big part of that surge, shaking off his post-trade slump with a huge August. That’s not really the kind of observation that makes this column, though. Good player plays well? Yes, obviously. No, the thing that’s caught my eye recently is the nice little platoon situation the Giants have worked out with Devers and the rest of the team’s first basemen.

Against right-handed pitchers, the Giants have been DH’ing Devers and playing Dominic Smith at first base. That’s an excellent setup; regardless of what a year of defensive metrics say, I’m comfortable saying that Smith is an elite defender who still hits righties well enough to platoon. His offense is nothing to write home about, but the smooth double plays are an absolute delight:

But one thing you should never do? Play Smith against a lefty. That’s fine for the Giants, though, because they’re looking to give Devers playing time at first base anyway. When a lefty is on the mound, Devers plays first base and Wilmer Flores DHs in his place. Devers might not be a great defender yet, but he looks better than Flores to my eyes already, and he’s trending the right way there, far better in September than he was in July.

Flores, for his part, is well-suited to being a short-side platoon bat. Even when he briefly led the majors in RBI this year, he seemed miscast, more of a role player than an everyday starter. He’s below replacement level this year, for example, and was even worse in 2024. He’s a fan favorite and everyone in the dugout loves him, but quite frankly, competitive major league teams probably shouldn’t be giving someone like Flores a full complement of at-bats.

This clever little semi-platoon – three players for two positions, with one of them playing everyday and the other two rotating – has been in short supply by the Bay of late. The 2021 season wasn’t that long ago, but the platoon-heavy 107 win squad from that year hardly resembled today’s team. This year’s lineup has been disappointingly stagnant, without enough depth to rotate guys and put role players in the best position to succeed. It’s amusing to me that the Giants have gotten back to their platooning ways by trading for a superstar who plays every day. That kind of delicious irony is what Five Things is all about.

4. Pinball
The Giants have the best shot at disrupting the NL playoff picture. Their AL counterparts, the Texas Rangers, are doing their best to make things more complicated on their side. If you want drama in September, you should be rooting for the Rangers to make a little noise – and to keep making plays like this:

Man, talk about bad luck. Two outs in the top of the 10th, a defender perfectly shaded up the middle, and the dang line drive hits your pitcher? Even worse, it caroms to where no one is? There were Diamondbacks pretty much everywhere except down the first base line:

The good news for Arizona? At least it was in extra innings. One run isn’t such a big deal when you get to start the bottom of the inning with a man on second. Bad bounces and unlucky hops are part of the game. Just one tiny problem – the play wasn’t over:

Sure, the umpire signaled out, but look how certain Ezequiel Duran was. He was so sure he was safe that he did some combination of a yell, a safe sign, and a call for replay all at once. The umpires didn’t need much time to deliberate. Duran’s slide was just in time:

That second run is a heartbreaker, completely changing the tenor of the game. The Diamondbacks went down in order in the bottom of the 10th without ever threatening. But should it have counted? I contend that it should not have. The only reason it was a bang-bang play at home was that first base coach Corey Ragsdale set an effective pick on first baseman Tyler Locklear. Keep your eye on the top righthand corner:

The rule is pretty clear on this one: “If any member of the batting team (including the coaches) interferes with a fielder’s right of way to field a batted ball, the batter shall be declared out.” There’s little doubt in my mind that Ragsdale interfered with Locklear’s right of way. Neither broadcast had a close-up view of it, but the overhead view makes it clear that Locklear had to take a less direct route to the ball to avoid a collision.

It seems like an easy thing to miss in the moment, and it felt like the play was going to be over with only one run scoring, but that slight hesitation made all the difference. It’s hard to blame the umpires for not seeing this given how much was going on. It’s harder to understand why the Diamondbacks weren’t complaining. But either way, the Rangers are hoping to inject some chaos into the playoff race, and they got a head start on it to kick off the month.

5. Un-Victory Formations
The ultimate sign of a blowout is when the team that’s leading is so comfortable in their advantage that they put a position player on the mound. Inserting a position player when you’re behind? No big deal. Teams do that because allowing more runs doesn’t really matter; there’s no effective difference between a 10-run deficit and a 15-run deficit. The inverse isn’t as true – a five-run deficit is decidedly less hopeless than a 10-spot – which is why few teams go to position players when they’re ahead.

Honestly, though, it’s probably fine. Position players aren’t good, or even decent, pitchers, but it’s not like the other team is likely to put up huge crooked numbers even if they get to hit batting practice fastballs. I was at Citi Field for Jonah Tong’s debut last Friday night and got to see this firsthand. With the Mets leading 13-5 heading into the bottom of the eighth, Miami threw up the white flag and let Javier Sanoja “pitch.” He got shelled to the tune of six runs, giving New York a massive 19-5 advantage heading into the ninth. Enter Luis Torrens, who clobbered a three-run homer in the bottom of the eighth before taking the mound to save some bullpen innings.

As far as I can tell, Torrens had one goal on the mound: strike someone out. I think this because the first time he got to two strikes, he did this:

That’s an 81 mph “fastball,” easily his fastest offering of the night. Another 73 mph try missed wildly, putting Jakob Marsee on first base, and then Torrens went back to normal position player pitching rules, lobbing in mid-50s rainbows and letting the Marlins get their cuts in.

Otto Lopez did what hitters often do against mid-50s rainbows:

Hey, no biggie, it was still 19-7. Then Liam Hicks ripped a solo shot to make it 19-8. Then Connor Norby singled, and Troy Johnston smoked one off the wall:

Carlos Mendoza had seen enough. He went to the bullpen. Fourteen runs was enough for a position player to wear the last inning, but 10 runs and a raft of loud contact wasn’t. All of the sudden, the Mets declared the game to be competitive again. Ryne Stanek entered in what is surely the lowest-leverage spot of his career to mop up.

The Marlins were vanishingly unlikely to come back and win even against Torrens. Against a real pitcher, they had no shot. Stanek actually struck out the two batters he faced, but that’s beside the point. The point was that everyone had already decided the game was over, and then another real pitcher had to warm up and throw real fastballs and sliders.

My favorite part of this wasn’t any of the hits, or even Torrens reaching back for 80 and missing by two feet in a vain attempt at a strikeout. It was watching Stanek after the game ended. Baseball players love celebrating wins. The pitcher who closes the game occupies a place of pride in the post-game high-five/handshake/coordinated celebration line. He gets a handshake and pat on the bat from the catcher, whether it was a tight one-run win or a laugher. Stanek blew a raspberry. What else are you supposed to do when you have to go “protect” a 10-run lead by relieving the catcher you normally throw to?

Unfortunately, you’ll have to take my word for it. The broadcast very reasonably cut to Tong celebrating his first big league win and the team doing their normal post-game huddle. By the time the cameras found Stanek again, he had recovered and looked like just another Met celebrating an easy victory. Poor Torrens, denied his coveted strikeout. Poor Stanek, having to pitch in this farce. Poor Marlins, for obvious reasons. But lucky me! My first time at Citi Field in eight years, and I got a 28-run game with a position player getting pulled off the mound for ineffectiveness – on the team that scored 19 runs.

6(?!). Bonus Athleticism
I know, it’s five things, but I have to get a tiny plug in for the US Open. If you’re a sports fan who reads FanGraphs, you’d probably love tennis. The rules are so simple – everyone’s played a game like this. The athleticism is spectacular. The tiny little moves players make to succeed are just as fun as the feats that populate this column every week. Watch Jannik Sinner creep wider and closer to cut down on big lefty serves. Watch Aryna Sabalenka step back to find more room to unleash her hellacious forehand. Watch Novak Djokovic think five steps ahead of his opponent now that he can no longer just out-physical them. Today alone you could see three of the 10 best male tennis players of all time on the court, plus a former top prospect, still only 25, looking for his first major tournament win. The next three days will feature some of the best tennis of the year. I definitely recommend watching it if you enjoy great athletes in their element.





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.

34 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
cashgod27Member since 2024
1 year ago

List of all the rookies that will probably start a game in the postseason:

Will Warren

Cam Schlittler

Payton Tolle(?)

Troy Melton

Nolan McLean

Jonah Tong(?)

Jacob Misiorowski

Cade Horton

Last year, the rookie starters were Yamamoto (if that really counts), Luis Gil, Tobias Myers, and AJ Smith-Shawver (who pitched one game in the regular season).

So way more, and they’re a lot better.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  cashgod27

Here’s a fun question: What is the best rookie class of starters? Let’s go 1970 to the present, because it’s a nice round number and it’s after the mound got lowered, and let’s go with Top 5 since it’s what we usually see for a rotation. And let’s not count Yu Darvish and Hideo Nomo, they weren’t really “rookies” in the classic sense. (This blows up 2024, which otherwise would be up really high with Skenes, Imanaga, Yamamoto, and Schwellenbach).

Here are some contenders, fWAR in parentheses, I’ll put them in my personal preference order, based on their performance in that year and with a playoff rotation in mind:
1984: Doc Gooden (8.3), Mark Langston (4.2), Orel Hersheiser (3.8), Roger Clemens (3.4), Mark Gubicza (2.7). Bret Saberhagen somehow was only ninth this year!
1981: Valenzuela (4.9), Dave Righetti (3.5), Bruce Berenyi (2.2), Mike Witt (1.7), and Brad Havens (0.9), but remember, a third of the games were cancelled! Righetti only pitched 105 innings, and Havens only pitched 70.
2013: Jose Fernandez (4.2), Julio Teheran (3.8), Gerrit Cole (2.4), Shelby Miller (2.1), Sonny Gray (1.4…but in only 60 innings)
2014: deGrom (3.6), Stroman (3.3), McHugh (3.0), Shoemaker (2.5), Yordano Ventura (2.5). This year also had half-seasons to remember from James Paxton (1.1) and Kyle Hendricks (1.6).
2006: Matt Cain (3.7), Fancisco Liriano (2.9), Justin Verlander (2.8), Cole Hamels (2.6), Josh Johnson (2.6), although if you like ERA over FIP you could put in Jered Waver (2.5) over Hamels.
2024: Skenes (4.3), Schwellenbach (2.9), Luis Gil (2.1), Kyle Hendricks (1.6, but only in 80 innings), and your choice of Mitchell Parker (2.4), Gavin Stone (2.1), and Tobias Myers (1.9) depending on your ERA vs FIP preference. Also note that this would easily be #2 if Imanaga and Yamamoto were allowed.
1972: Jon Matlack (4.9), Rick Reuschel (4.2), Dick Tidrow (2.5), Lynn McGlothen (2.5), Bill Slayback (1.8)
2003: Brandon Webb (4.3), Dontrelle Willis (3.4), Jerome Williams (2.0), Jose Contreras (1.5…in only 58 innings) and Rich Harden (1.4…in only 73 innings).

I think there’s a pretty big drop off after those seven, although I might be forgetting a year or two. 2005 was pretty strong too with Kazmir and Chris Young, as was 1990 with Tapani and Appier.

formerly matt wMember since 2025
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Heads up, you have Kyle Hendricks in 2024 as well as 2014.SWR, Spencer Arrighetti and Jared Jones are very close for the final spot as well, though Jones wouldn’t have been available for the playoffs.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago

Hendricks definitely he should only be in 2014. I think I probably would have gone with Tobias Myers at #4, because he improved a lot over the course of the year, and then Gavin Stone at #5. Parker’s xERA indicated he got hit a bit harder than his FIP says.

Fun-Hating DorkMember since 2019
1 year ago
Reply to  cashgod27

Feel like Ben completely whiffed on not mentioning Cam Schlittler, considering he’s almost assuredly the Yanks’ #3 in the playoff rotation. I expect Warren may get a start, but it’d likely be more of a true piggyback situation with Gil/Yarborough (depending on who’s available).

Donna LevinsohnMember since 2024
1 year ago

Assuming that he continues to pitch well in his final few starts (beginning tonight vs. the Blue Jays), there’s no doubt in my mind that Cam Schlitter has surpassed both Luis Gil (whose control problems have continued, with his velocity noticeably down from last year) and Will Warren (consistently inconsistent) as the Yankees’ third starter.

Donna LevinsohnMember since 2024
1 year ago

Schlittler. At least I didn’t make the expected mistake!

villapalomaresMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  cashgod27

I was about to say Cam Schlittler. He’s been good and unflappable.

montrealMember since 2022
1 year ago
Reply to  cashgod27

You hit the nail on the head with Troy Melton but the stubborn Tigers won’t let him start. Of course now with Finnigan hurt the pen needs Melton. Still for me I would go Skubal-Mize-Melton. Charlie Morton is a beating waiting to happen. He no longer has good control and gives up too many Home Runs.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago

Going to go out on a limb here: Payton Tolle is going to be the best pitcher who debuted this year. He is averaging 96 on his fastball and gets 7.5 feet of extension with a deceptive delivery. His stuff is nastier than McLean or Burns and he throws more strikes than Misiorowski. This is like a Yankees / Cleveland – level stuff out of Andrew Miller, except he starts.

dangledangleMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Tolle started the year playing A+ ball it’s crazy how fast he moved.

A Salty ScientistMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I like Tolle a lot. Maybe it’s lazy of me to immediately think of Crotchet 2.0 since they’re on the same team, but they both are huge and strong lefties with that A+ fastball/cutter combination. There’s so much to also like with Burns and McLean (and Miz too of course–though his control makes him much riskier). I love Burns slider–I just think he needs a bit more from the change to be an ace. And I can’t get over McLean’s curveball nearly requiring Savant to change their axes to accommodate its movement. tl/dr Don’t make me choose.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago

I think McLean probably has the highest floor and Burns and Misiorowski have the highest ceilings. We’ve seen what happens when Burns and Misiorowski are “on” and they are totally unhittable, but the strike-throwing is real iffy.

McLean’s a very different sort of pitcher because he’s going to induce far more ground balls and fool fewer hitters into strikeouts. If you take a look at McLean compared to Burns or Misiorowski you’ll see that they’re inducing more swinging strikes and fewer called strikes, and overall they’re putting the ball into play a lot more against McLean than the other two. But as long as they’re hitting them directly into the ground it’s fine (opposing batters have a launch angle that is like 3 and a half degrees).

Tolle is more like Burns and Misiorowski. And he’s definitely more of a control pitcher than a command one but he seems like he’s got a much better chance of throwing strikes than either–Burns has done less of that than any of the others, and Misiorowski has serious strike throwing issues in his past. Tolle is a lot more like Cam Schlittler where the two of them are throwing the ball in the zone very hard and daring opposing hitters to get it, but Tolle’s stuff is harder to hit because he gets over a foot longer extension on his pitches, which is the difference between being in the 99th percentile and in the 40th percentile.

The reason to be down on Tolle is that he doesn’t have the sort of “projectability” in his command that Burns, Misiorowski, or McLean do. Burns and Misiorowski are more athletic and have less violent deliveries, McLean hasn’t actually pitched that much. Tolle…it’s not a pretty look. But his stuff is already unhittable, so as long as he throws strikes I’m not worried. It’s a bit like Ohtani or Hunter Greene or Spencer Strider who throw very hard, live in the zone, and have nasty, nasty breaking stuff. For all of them, the real obstacle isn’t strike-throwing, it’s health.

A Salty ScientistMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I agree with all of that, except maybe Miz’ delivery not being as violent as Tolle’s–I’m really not sure that Miz is ever going to have a repeatable enough delivery to have decent command. I think Miz’ floor is still lights-out reliever if the walks make him too volatile. McLean’s path to being an ace is to basically follow the Logan Webb blueprint. Webb has a better change, but McLean throws quite a bit harder and has the curve along with the sweeper, so the comp isn’t perfect. But the floor for a guy with good command and a high GB% is pretty high. I think Miz has the highest ceiling

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I was struck by Tolle’s graceful delivery and balance. It is only one game, as I wait anxiously for his next start in 30 minutes, but there was a lot to like in his first performance. It is fun to think of seeing two 6’6″ -250 lb. towers pitching for the Red Sox for several years.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

Two massive left handers with excellent velocity and a premium breaking ball. He probably won’t be as good as Crochet but that’s a very high bar.

It’s a good foundation for a rotation, and there are some interesting other guys who might show up next year like Connelly Early, and maybe Tanner Houck will pitch again someday.

giantgonzales
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

He was a two way player until his last year at TCU and in his first season of pro-ball has jumped his FB on avg 5 mph and has made a non-existent cache of secondary pitches into a group of 45-50 in a year. The buzz on Tolle was as much as it was with Wasdin and Rose, but over the past 30 years, there’s been few who delivered as much as quickly. Lester/Buccholz come to mind, maybe Lester was 21 at the time? Exciting times for Red Sox fans.

dangledangleMember since 2024
1 year ago

I wonder if Nathaniel Lowe keeps it up if the Red Sox sign him.to an extension as insurance. It would be hard to make it work with the roster they have but they need insurance at first. Rob Refsnyder has toyed with retirement and is on a one year contract. They could use Lowe against lefties fairly consistently if Refsnyder either hangs it up or leaves..

Refsnyder will get a contract from someone if he still wants to play. I am surprised he’s though about retiring because his career earnings are low and his bat has remained productive against lefties.

David Klein
1 year ago
Reply to  dangledangle

Lowe has another year of control no need to extend him.

cashgod27Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  David Klein

He’d be making like $10 million in arbitration, I’d definitely expect a non-tender though they could re-sign him afterwards

dangledangleMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  cashgod27

Yes that or extend before non-tender. Rob Refsnyder’s contract is for $2m as a comp.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  dangledangle

David Klein notes that Lowe is controlled for another year through arbitration.

It is very hard for me to imagine Casas beating out Lowe for the job on performance with his injury issues. I would probably give the job to Lowe, and then park Casas at AAA and tell him to work on his defense for the year. If he stays healthy he’s part of the solution for 2027. If they can bring back Bregman their only real hole would be 2B, and Gonzalez could handle part of that load anyway.

But Lowe probably won’t sign for less than his salary this year (about $10.5M) and if the Red Sox are in penny pinching mode they might pass on him. They shouldn’t let that factor into their decision but considering how erratic their front office has seemed lately I don’t have a clue who will be making that call.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

It is really difficult to get any idea on what the Red Sox are thinking about with Casas. I can’t imagine them not giving him another opportunity to see if he can be the player they were counting on in a big, big way just a few months ago. Lowe has been good but I also can’t imagine a team that should be a strong contender in 2026 going through the winter with him as the primary 1st baseman on their roster. The 4 very good outfielders have to be utilized in a major move in some way and what is done could make or break 2026. There appears to be talent showing up everywhere and I hope Breslow does a better job than Elias has done in maximizing the value.

Last edited 1 year ago by bosoxforlife
David Klein
1 year ago

McLean is a joy to watch and such a breath of fresh air considering how the other starters are stinking it up. I was fortunate enough to be at his start vs the Phillies and he was just untouchable for the most part and besides for a great catch by McNeil he did not break a sweat til the 8th inning and he escaped that one too. He was super impressive Vs the Tigers when he had nada in the first two inning and then it clicked in and he got fourteen in a row to finish his start. He’s not only getting strike outs almost no one can lift his pitches as he has a ground ball rate near 70% he’s a beast.

jb1205Member since 2022
1 year ago
Reply to  David Klein

Agreed. He has been not only good, but efficient– for a team that is desperate for length– and the video game movement on his pitches makes him fun to watch.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
1 year ago
Reply to  David Klein

I really enjoyed the viral clip of the Tigers’ broadcast team gawping at the movement on one of McLean’s inning-ending strikeout pitches. “It’s a sinker, but, like, glowing.”

Fun-Hating DorkMember since 2019
1 year ago

Have to disagree on the Rangers/D’backs play analysis. You might be able to call interference on the letter of the rule, but not the spirit — Locklear had to take the wide angle because the ball would have been well past him if he continued that way. He might have been able to take a slightly less severe angle if the first base coach isn’t standing there, but he played it correctly by going wide because he had no backup — if the ball gets past him, it’s an even worse debacle.

EDIT: If Locklear was trying to avoid the collision, that’s the wrong play to make. He should have barrelled ahead and gotten what would have been a pretty easy interference call.

Last edited 1 year ago by Fun-Hating Dork
MikeSMember since 2020
1 year ago

I was definitely thinking he should have run him over. It makes it a much easier call for the umpire and he would have to go pretty far out of his way to look like he was trying to get that call.

chewbaccaMember since 2019
1 year ago

Glad you still have a soft sport for the Fredbirds and the days of Wachawachawacha. Are you even old enuff to remember Pac-Man’s Wachawachawacha? Maybe in defiance to the orange felon we should call the game ‘Pac-NounGender’. And speaking of the orange felon, have you checked out recent South Park news? I find myself empathizing with the devil. Was he/she/they not a fallen angel?

I cannot believe I am lucky enough to have you as a legacy. Full disclosure, yo mama (and our national pasttime) deserve the vast majority of the credit.

PS Is it my imagination or is Robert F. Kennedy Jr. sporting his own version of an orange hew?

Long Suffering Guardians FanMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  chewbacca

Not the place, not the time.

David Klein
1 year ago
Reply to  chewbacca

I wonder do you post about baseball on political blogs

ScottMember since 2020
1 year ago

I wonder if Mets are trying to thread the needle. Didn’t bring up McLean until 8/16 to keep rookie status. 100 ip last year. Already at 140 ish IP this year. They want to a. Hit innings cap but have some innings for playoffs b. Have him be eligible for Roynext year c. Still make playoffs and have him lead the run. I’m betting 3 more starts with innings cap and 47 ish mlb ip this year (26.1 currently).

hurricanexyzMember since 2016
1 year ago

Was “rockiest start imaginable” a deliberate pun?

carterMember since 2020
1 year ago

I see this was written a day ago, and a bit changed, but I wouldn’t say the AL is close TJ settled. 5 teams within 2.5 games of each other for the last spot.

Also while I don’t really think the giants have a chance, it is fun to see how they seemingly can’t lose and the Padres seemingly can’t win. I mean what the hell shutout in Coors