Giants Add Lefty Starter Matt Moore’s Resurgent Stuff
The Giants just added a 27-year-old left-hander with a 93 mph fastball and major-league success under his belt on an affordable contract until 2019. That left-hander, Matt Moore, hasn’t recorded the same ERA or strikeout rates he’d produced before his Tommy John surgery, but if you look under the hood, the stuff seems to be back.
That stuff, and that contract, made it worth the hefty price: 21-year-old right-handed pitcher Michael Santos, exciting young 19-year-old Bahamian shortstop Lucius Fox, and — most painful of all — 25-year-old major-league third baseman Matt Duffy. Dave Cameron will have more on the choice to include Duffy, but either way, it’s a price you pay for a pitcher you believe can serve at least as a middle-of-the-rotation guy. A price you pay if you believe Moore has his stuff back.
By ERA, Moore has been a bottom 25 pitcher over the last year-plus. Even FIP (18th-worst), xFIP (10th-worse), and SIERA (21st-worst) all suggest that Moore hasn’t been good. The strikeout- and walk-rate differential (K-BB%) hasn’t been amazing either (86th out of 124).
But we’re lumping in Moore’s terrible return last season with his merely mediocre work this year. And we’re ignoring that his stuff took a leap forward this year. The easiest thing to notice is that Moore’s fastball velocity is up a full tick in 2016. But that doesn’t sum it all up. The rest of his pieces are starting to click, too.
Let’s take a look at spin rates, which are the “process” stats for a pitcher’s stuff. Notice, in particular, Moore’s lower spin rate on the changeup. You want a lower spin rate on your changeup because that means more drop and more drop means more swings and misses.
| Pitch | 2015 | 2016 |
| Four-Seamer | 2350 | 2276 |
| Change | 1758 | 1547 |
| Curve | 2539 | 2407 |
| Sinker | 2245 | 2214 |
Lower = better for sinker, change.
Average spin rates for 4S (2226), CH (1750) and Curve (2300).
Moore has maintained the high spin rate on the four-seamer, which gives him ride on the fastball, while removing over 200 rpm from his changeup. That’s given him his drop back on his changeup. Actually, Moore is seeing the most drop on his change that he’s ever seen. It now tumbles a full six inches more than his four-seamer. That’s a top-10 number.
| Pitcher | Changes Thrown | Vert Difference | Velo Difference |
| Francisco Liriano | 361 | 11.9 | 8.5 |
| Chris Archer | 263 | 10.5 | 8.9 |
| Dan Straily | 348 | 10.3 | 5.7 |
| Edinson Volquez | 488 | 9.9 | 8.4 |
| Jose Fernandez | 254 | 9.7 | 10.9 |
| Matt Shoemaker | 738 | 9.5 | 5.9 |
| Scott Kazmir | 363 | 9.3 | 19.5 |
| Matt Moore | 283 | 9.2 | 6.8 |
| Gio Gonzalez | 340 | 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Stephen Strasburg | 271 | 8.2 | 5.1 |
Movement differential off the fastball is one of the best markers for changeup quality, so it’s no surprise that Moore’s changeup has been good for 18% whiffs over his career and remains above average this year (14%). Add to that changeup a fastball that’s two ticks faster than the lefty average, and you’ve already got a one-two punch worthy of the middle of any rotation.
The curve was really the driving force behind a young Moore who once looked poised to join the top-30 pitchers in the league. From the table above, you can tell that the curve has lost some sizzle in terms of spin. The good news is that it’s recovered much of its old stuff in other ways.
| Curve Aspect | 2012-2013 | 2014-2015 | 2016 |
| Velocity | 81.6 | 79.6 | 81.2 |
| Horizontal Movement | -2.8 | -2.9 | -3.2 |
| Vertical Movement | -3.0 | -7.1 | -6.0 |
| Whiff % | 12.9% | 9.3% | 12.1% |
The curve is back.
How does this sum up and compare? It looks like we have a lefty with plus fastball velocity and two above-average secondary pitches. Among qualified pitchers, that sentence describes only Clayton Kershaw, David Price, Chris Sale, Cole Hamels, Francisco Liriano, and Moore this year.
Changeup whiff rate has the lowest correlation to overall strikeout rates, so sometimes pitchers like Moore don’t put up the whiff rates you’d expect from a guy with a plus changeup. But Moore now has two good pitches other than the fastball, and with $26 million dollars in team options over the next three years, he’s also affordable. You can see why the Giants ponied up.
With a phone full of pictures of pitchers' fingers, strange beers, and his two toddler sons, Eno Sarris can be found at the ballpark or a brewery most days. Read him here, writing about the A's or Giants at The Athletic, or about beer at October. Follow him on Twitter @enosarris if you can handle the sandwiches and inanity.
Wow, including Duffy. At least that explains why the Giants went out and got Eduardo Nunez.
Doesn’t Bumgarner have a plus fastball with two plus secondary pitches? According to pitchfx Price doesn’t really fit that description. What about Sale?
I was using 92+ for ‘plus’ fastball. I know velocity isn’t everything, but it was short hand. Piece has plus cutter and change?
I’ll ad Sale. I had four-seamers sorted for velo.
Gotcha, I was a bit confused because I was looking at “Pitch Value” section of FG, and I was reading it as Moore was one of the few with three “plus pitches”, which was true (he has a plus value on FB, Curve and Change), where as Price had a negative value on almost all his pitches this year. But I didn’t look at the velocity portion, oops!
Regardless, I am hopeful for his resurgent stuff as a Giants fan, moving to the NL from the AL, to a more pitcher friendly park, thanks for the detailed analysis!
I use whiff and grounder rates to judge the pitches, I find it a bit better than the pitch type values.
The Giants just out-traded the Dodgers again at the deadline. Again. Crap.
Absolute highway robbery by the Giants. Rays ownership happy, they saved another 26 million for another minimum salary they can add to their collection. Of course they think they can move Duffy to shortstop where his .700 OPS can at least give him some value. Good luck.
Good to see some optimism. Giants fans are generally despondent about losong
I freaking love the good version of Matt Moore. Filthy stuff. Smooth effort.