Home Runs and Drag: An Early Look at the 2022 Season

© Charles LeClaire-USA TODAY Sports

The month of April is now complete and the verdict is in: The in-play home run rate for the 2022 season is down from recent seasons, as shown in Figure 1. Much has already been written about this feature by a variety of authors, including Jim Albert, Rob Arthur, Eno Sarris and Ken Rosenthal, and Bradford Doolittle, Alden Gonzalez, Jesse Rogers and David Schoenfield, and various reasons have been proposed for the relative dearth of home runs. Some argue that the baseball has been deadened, resulting in lower exit velocities and therefore fewer home runs. Others have suggested that the drag on the baseball has increased, perhaps due to higher seams. Yet others have argued that it is the effect of the universal humidor.

Figure 1

In this article, we will address the issue of reduced home run rates and hopefully add more light to the discussion. Specifically, we will examine home run rates during the month of April for the 2018-22 seasons, excepting the ’20 season for which there was no major league baseball in April. Here is our approach.

The Carry Properties of the Baseball

We start by investigating the carry properties of the baseball using a technique described by the MLB Home Run Committee. With 2018 as our reference season, we fit a generalized additive model relating the probability of a home run to the launch parameters. Ideally, all the relevant launch parameters would be used, including exit velocity, launch angle, spin rate, and spin axis. In practice, that is somewhat problematic, since the batted ball spin rate and axis are not publicly available. Accordingly, for this analysis, we use only exit velocity and launch angle.

Having fitted a model based on the April 2018 data, we then apply that model to the April data from a subsequent season to arrive at a predicted home run rate histogram as shown in Figure 2, which also shows the observed home run rate. The observed home run rate for a particular season is determined by both the launch parameters and the “carry,” which is a measure of the distance of a fly ball for given launch parameters. The carry depends on the aerodynamic effects that govern the flight of a baseball, primarily the drag. The predicted home run rate distribution for a future season reflects the carry properties of the 2018 season and the launch parameters of the future season. If the observed future season home rate is in the middle of the predicted rate distribution, that indicates the ball carry is the same as in 2018. If the observed rate falls above the predicted distribution, it indicates better carry; if the observed rate falls below the distribution, then it shows worse carry.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
Figure 2

From Figure 2 we draw the following conclusions:

  • The predicted home run rate distributions in 2019 and ’22 (top and bottom graphs) are essentially identical and consistent with the ’18 rate, indicating distributions of exit velocities and launch angles are equally conducive to home runs in those seasons.
  • The predicted rate distribution in 2021 (middle graph) is greater than in the other seasons, indicating exit velocities and launch angle were more conducive to home runs in ’21.
  • The observed home run rate in 2019 is greater than predicted (indicating better carry), equal to predicted in ’21 (indicating the same carry), and less than predicted in ’22 (indicating worse carry).

We can therefore say that the reduced home run rate in 2022 relative to that in the ’18 season is primarily due to reduced carry. Since much of the recent discussion is about the reduction in the in-play home run rate in April 2022 relative to that in April ’21, we present the relevant numbers in the table below. These numbers show that there is a 21.7% reduction in the in-play home run rate in 2022 relative to ’21, of which 7.5% (or about one-third) is attributed to less favorable launch parameters and 14.2% (or about two-thirds) to reduced carry:

In-play Home Run Rates for April 2021 and April ’22
Year Predicted Actual
2021 0.0465 0.0465
2022 0.0430 0.0364

Drag Coefficients

Since the carry is largely determined by drag, we next look at a property of the baseball known as the drag coefficient CD. We use the technique described by Kagan and Nathan and apply it to the voluminous amount of data from pitched baseball trajectories. The primary thing you need to know about CD is that a larger value means greater drag and therefore worse carry, and a smaller value means less drag and therefore better carry. The graph in Figure 3 shows monthly averages of CD values for fastballs (red points). We see considerable year-to-year variation, indicating real differences in the aerodynamic properties of the baseball. The difference between the largest (April 2022) and smallest (June ’19) values is approximately 0.028, or about 8%.

However, more relevant for our purposes are the density-corrected CD values (blue point), which is the product of air density and CD*, normalized to a fixed air density. For those of you who like equations, CD* = CDρ/ρ0, where ρ is the actual air density and ρ0 is a fixed standard air density. The essential point is that the drag force is determined by the product of air density and drag coefficient, so the expectation is that the carry will be better related to the CD* values. Indeed, the variation of the blue points in the graph shows the expected seasonal variation, i.e., high in April when the temperature is low and low in the summer when the temperature is high. Comparing values only in April, the relative ordering of the values is consistent with the findings discussed with respect to Figure 2: Relative to 2018, the ’21 value is about the same, the ’19 value is lower, and the ’22 value is higher.

Figure 3

Relating Carry to Drag

To investigate more fully the relationship between drag and carry, the April 2018 model was applied to each of the subsequent months through April ’22, allowing a determination of the ratio R of the observed to predicted home run rate. It is expected that R is a surrogate for the carry relative to that of the reference month, April 2018. In Figure 4, R is plotted versus the monthly average of CD* values, with the error flags equal to the standard error (i.e., one standard deviation or the 68% level).

Figure 4

We see that there is a linear relationship between R and CD*. The slope of the line is such that an increase in CD* by 0.01 results in a reduction in the in-play home run rate by about 19%, assuming the same launch parameters. For the reference month, April 2018, R is expected to be 1 and it is indeed 1. It is also 1 for April 2021, consistent with Figure 2. The highest values of R, and the lowest values of CD*, are for July-August 2019. The lowest value of R, and the highest value of CD*, is for April 2022, the very month that motivated this study.

Summary

In summary, we have investigated changes in the in-play home run rates for the 2018-22 seasons, using April ’18 as our reference. We have developed a technique to separate the changes into those due to changes in launch conditions and those due to changes in carry. We have further shown that the latter are directly correlated with changes in the density-corrected drag coefficient. Finally we have shown that the significant reduction in the in-play home run rate for the 2022 season relative to April ’21 is due in part to changes in launch conditions (approximately one-third) and in part to changes in the drag (approximately two-thirds).

Addendum: One of us (JA) has written a shiny app that allows one to create graphs such as those in Figure 2, where the model and predicted seasons are selectable by the user.





28 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
dbminnMember since 2016
4 years ago

Great article! Always enjoy Dr Nathan’s work (respect to JA too). Now do Cd* vs. pitch movement 🙂

timmer
4 years ago

I read this as dismissing the humidors as a cause? I wouldn’t think the humidors increase drag, or maybe they do?

JoserMember since 2021
4 years ago
Reply to  timmer

I don’t recall anyone suggesting that the moisture content of the ball leather has an effect on drag, or a mechanism that would link those two enough to matter.

The generally accepted mechanism is that drier leather is harder and therefore the bat-to-ball impact imparts more energy (ie less is lost in the flex of the ball cover). So in parks where ambient conditions tend to make the balls drier and harder, such as Colorado and Arizona, the humidors soften the balls and thereby deaden them resulting in lower initial exit velocities. However, that is only true if the ambient conditions have a lower humidity than whatever relative humidity the humidors are set to; since they are all set to a the same humidity league-wide, in parks where the ambient humidity is already higher than that setting the humidors will act to (slightly) dry the balls out and make them come off the bat a little more energetically, So in parks where the ambient conditions in April tend to be damp, like Seattle, you might expect to see slightly higher exit velocities. But it may take more than a year of data (with the humidor) before that effect will be visible above the noise.

Pirates HurdlesMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Joser

But writers here and on other sites have been citing big changes in HR/BIP in the parks with the new humidors compared to those that already had them. See – https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/mlb-home-runs-are-way-down-so-far-in-2022-heres-how-the-leagues-recent-tinkering-deadened-the-baseball/

Wegandi727
4 years ago

Slug and OBP is pretty much identical to recent years in all the parks that had humidors. The changes in Slug and OBP is taking place in parks with new humidors. Seems pretty confining to only look at HR’s. The game is about more than just HR’s.

Josh
4 years ago
Reply to  Wegandi727

Arguably, current MLB is not.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Wegandi727

It’s weird, the authors state “others have argued that it is the effect of the universal humidor” and then never mention it again.

I think there’s going to need to be a ballpark-specific analysis. In 2021, there were 9 teams using humidors: Rockies, D-Backs, Red Sox, Mariners, Mets, Astros, Marlins, Cardinals, and Rangers. What does it look like in those stadiums vs the others?

Another Old GuyMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

That is a great question, sadtrombone. The sample size is relatively limited, but if the decline in HR rates is significant from last year in those stadiums, it would seem one to believe the humidor was an insignificant contributor.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

So the home run rates for the humidor parks are down, from 4.5% to 3.8%. That’s pretty big.

In non-humidor parks, it’s down from 5.1% to 3.5%. That’s even bigger.

Of course the weather and time of year matter, neither of which I think they cover here. But the fact that the increase is twice as big in the non-humidor parks makes me think that this is at least partly what is going on.

Josh
4 years ago

This is why I come to FG, much less so for the fantasy and “guy did a thing, woweee” articles. Thanks for a throwback to the site’s origins.

joe_schlabotnik
4 years ago
Reply to  Josh

i mean theres only so much you can write about the profound implication of x or y on baseball. i am satisfied

dl80Member since 2020
4 years ago

Are you not entertained!?

ismailadiemeMember since 2020
4 years ago

City Connect, players weekend, etc., I would be on board for an optional players in drag series.

Jon L.Member since 2016
4 years ago

This is a really great article, clearly illuminating the changes we’ve been seeing from season to season.

I would edit this bullet point though. It reads like the subject is “the observed home run rate in 2019”:

  • The observed home run rate in 2019 is greater than predicted (indicating better carry), equal to predicted in ’21 (indicating the same carry), and less than predicted in ’22 (indicating worse carry).
Alan NathanMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Jon L.

Good catch. I was a bit careless with my sentence construction. “in 2019” should come after the first occurence of “predicted”.

miltonfriedman
4 years ago

The Tigers have 11 homeruns. 11! Can you name who has hit the homeruns?

nathanaldayMember since 2025
4 years ago

Thanks for the article! I think the Actual 2022 In-play Home Run Rates for April 2021 and April ’22 have a misplaced decimal: 0.3646 instead of 0.03646?

Meg RowleyFanGraphs Staff
4 years ago
Reply to  nathanalday

Indeed – had updated it earlier, but appears the update didn’t take for some reason. Should be fixed now. Thanks!

Another Old GuyMember since 2020
4 years ago

I greatly appreciate the research you folks have presented in this article.

channelclemente
4 years ago

Out of curiosity, what does the distribution of flyball exit velocities look like over each of the years in the study?

dukewinslowMember since 2020
4 years ago

Dear MLB,
Please quit messing with the ball. And please stop pissing on us and saying it’s raining with regard to lying about messing with the ball.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

How many times can I upvote something again?

96mncMember since 2020
4 years ago

If this holds up the definition of a barrel is going to need to be adjusted.

Mitchell MooreMember since 2020
4 years ago

And now I have some baseball news one can use to share when I meet up with my buddy for the ballgame tonight. Thanks for the terrific work, gentlemen.

Adenzeno
4 years ago

Has anyone looked at the air temperatures and wind effects during games this year as opposed to previous years? Are there differences in enclosed stadiums this year compared to previous years?

Alan NathanMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Adenzeno

The analysis Jim Albert and I did takes into account temperature variations, which affect the air density. It shows up in the density-correct drag coefficients. Looking at covered stadiums is a good idea and we have not done that. Perhaps later in the season when we have much more data.

RonnieDobbs
4 years ago

Hitters got way worse during the juiced baseball era. The art of hitting has tanked. All of that just try to yank flyballs logic was trash, as is looking for a walk rather than looking to hit. Hitting has regressed a ton in the name of progress. It all made a good promotion for AWS though. Hitting line-drives and making good contact is ball-proof. Praying for FB to go over the fence was never a good plan.

Next up, how this is all somehow related to incredible defense and pitching.