How Much Does Height Affect a Hitter’s Zone?
This is Nate Freiman’s second post as part of his August residency. Nate is a former MLB first baseman. He also played for Team Israel in the 2017 World Baseball Classic and spent time in the Atlantic and Mexican Leagues. He can be found on Twitter @natefreiman. His wife Amanda routinely beats him at golf. To read work by earlier residents, click here.
Being a tall hitter came with its drawbacks. Long arms, lots of moving parts. Eight-hour bus rides starting at 11pm. Getting pitched inside. (In fairness, I saw thousands of pitches and only suffered two broken hand bones.)
And yes, the low strikes. My entire career, anytime I’d get a low strike called there would be someone from the dugout yelling, “He’s six-eight!” Hopefully, by that time, it wasn’t news to the umpire. My hitting coach in A-ball told me to wear my pants Hunter Pence style. Above the knees. He figured the umpire would see the bottom of the zone better. I figured that would get me ejected.
So I can honestly say I sympathize with Aaron Judge. Travis Sawchik has done great work on Judge’s relationship with the bottom of the zone. It makes sense that a guy that big is a strike zone anomaly, but do other guys have the same problem? I used Statcast data to investigate.
The MLB pitch data features anywhere between 50 and 90 columns of information for every single pitch thrown. One of them is “sz_bot,” or strike-zone bottom. I used this number to adjust the strike zone for each hitter. The problem is, sz_bot varies. Of the hitters who have seen at least 500 pitches in 2018, the top of the zone measurement (sz_top) has an average range of 2.8 feet, while the bottom of the zone (sz_bot) varied an average of 3.4 feet.
Most of this is due to random outliers. One of the columns for David Freese, for example, suggests his strike zone on one pitch extended up 11 feet. To address this, I took the median strike-zone top and bottom for each hitter instead of the average.
Once determining the approximate strike-zone boundaries for each hitter, I isolated somewhat arbitrary window at the top and bottom of the zone. The window at the top of the zone is simply every pitch that is coded as being at least half the diameter of the baseball above sz_top. The bottom window is every pitch located between half a ball below sz_bot and one foot below sz_bot. The batters receiving strike calls on these pitches are, in theory, those who are the greatest victims of low strike calls.
| Batter | % of Low-Pitch Strikes, 2018 |
|---|---|
| Aaron Judge | 19.1 |
| David Peralta | 16.6 |
| Justin Bour | 14.5 |
| Lucas Duda | 13.5 |
| Christian Yelich | 12.0 |
| Yasiel Puig | 11.3 |
| Jake Lamb | 11.3 |
| Jordy Mercer | 11.2 |
| Cameron Maybin | 11.1 |
| Gregory Polanco | 10.7 |
Not surprisingly, Judge is way ahead. In fact, there’s a statistically significant difference between him and Peralta, who’s still ahead of everyone else in baseball. These guys also happen to have an average height of 75.4 inches, or a little over 6-foot-3.
What about high pitches?
| Batter | % of High-Pitch Strikes, 2018 |
|---|---|
| Brian Dozier | 13.0 |
| Albert Pujols | 8.3 |
| Jose Iglesias | 6.0 |
| Eduardo Escobar | 5.9 |
| Kole Calhoun | 5.8 |
| Todd Frazier | 5.8 |
| Brett Gardner | 5.4 |
| David Freese | 5.4 |
| Shin-Soo Choo | 5.3 |
| Scooter Gennett | 5.3 |
Brian Dozier is the Aaron Judge of the top of the zone! Like Judge, Dozier is ahead of second place by a statistically significant margin. Also notably, the average height of the batters here is 71.8 inches, or nearly four inches shorter those those from the low-strike sample.
I also wanted to see if low strikes plague hitters year-to-year. Here’s a chart comparing the rate strikes called in the low window over the past two seasons.

Aaron Judge is such an outlier that I actually had to take him out before drawing the regression line. The overall chart has a correlation of 0.65. Clearly there’s some consistency. The guys who get low strikes called on them tend to keep getting those pitches called.
Is height the deciding factor? Here’s what the low-strike percentage looks like as a function of height. (The heights are listed in discrete values, but I added normally distributed noise.)

This regression line had to be drawn without Judge, David Peralta, or Jose Altuve. Removing the outliers, we get an R squared of .23. Height isn’t the only factor at play here, in other words, but it does explain about a quarter of the variance in that low strike. Look at Brandon Belt! He’s not a short guy, but he’s getting a good bottom of the zone.
What about high strikes? This one looks a little different:
| Metric | Correlation with 2017 | R-Squared with Height |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 High-Strike Percentage | R = 0.715 | 0.05 |
Height doesn’t seem to the be factor here. Umpires have a better view of the high pitch, so that’s not too surprising. The high pitch is also less sensitive to catcher framing. (Sorry, Stephen Vogt, I know I just said the f-word.) Good catchers let high breaking balls get deep but the real skill is sticking that low pitch. For the young catchers out there, one of the big barriers to entry on that front is flexibility. The lower you get, the easier that low pitch is to stick. Catchers have crazy hip flexibility. When I played, many would be in the weight room at 6:30am on spring-training days doing what can best be described as “painful-looking yoga.”
What’s interesting is that the percentage of high strikes doesn’t correlate with height, but still correlates year-to-year. There’s something intrinsic to a hitter that results in all these supposed bad calls.
One theory, at least as it relates to Dozier, is that his swing throws off the strike-zone coding.
Dozier starts tall and then, as the pitch is delivered, begins sinking into his legs. That’s an athletic timing movement, but it also possibly affects both the umpire and data perception of the top of the zone.
If low strikes correlate with height, but high strikes do not, can we still visualize the different strike zones? I built a model from the entire 2017 season to get predicted probabilities for each pitch this season. This introduces a year-to-year bias, but I wanted a consistent measure of pitches, even if that measure is based on last year’s standards.
Once I eliminated missing data, there were about 350,000 taken pitches last season. I built a tenfold cross validated regression using a lightning fast algorithm called XGBoost. It ran 10 iterations (each time creating a random training set and giving a single predicted value for 230,000 taken pitches in 2018) in a total of 15 seconds. Technology!
The next step was separating the data by height. I filtered this data so I was looking at hitters over 6-foot-4 who had seen at least 300 pitches. I also broke it down to just righties with fewer than two strikes. This produced a list of eight players, as follow:
- Aaron Altherr
- Kris Bryant
- Dexter Fowler
- Ryon Healy
- Aaron Judge
- Jose Martinez
- Domingo Santana
- Giancarlo Stanton
For the other group, I did the same thing except restricted it to players listed at 5-foot-8 or less. Here’s that group of nine:
- Ozzie Albies
- Abraham Almonte
- Jose Altuve
- Mookie Betts
- Delino DeShields
- Josh Harrison
- Jose Ramirez
- Devon Travis
- Christian Vazquez
Here are the 50% contour lines of the predicted strike zone for each height group:

In the chart above, I also drew in the median strike zone parameters for each group. Again, we’re just looking at right-handed hitters with fewer than two strikes.
A couple observations. The inside corner looks a tiny bit bigger for tall guys. Tall hitters tend to stand farther from the plate, which is possible what makes that pitch look a little better. Plus, pitchers tend to attack tall hitters inside, so there’s a better chance those are executed locations (rather than misses that make the catcher reach outside his body to the glove side). But what we’re really interested in is the low pitch. There’s a difference, especially on that pitch down and away. But it’s not as pronounced as the differences in coded zone boundaries.
There are some takeaways here. First, the real strike zone does vary by batter height, but it doesn’t take into account the entire variation. Second, some hitters have a higher percent of high strikes called, but it doesn’t appear to be related to their height. That surprised me, and I’d love to explore that further or hear people’s theories. Third, and not surprisingly, tall guys do get some extra low strikes.
I can’t complain, though. Ben Lindbergh pointed out to me that I had an unusually fair zone called in the 530 or so pitches I saw playing for Oakland. In fact, Baseball Prospectus had my number exactly equal to the number of predicted called strikes. Instead, I’ll keep my pants rolled down and stick to stories about the legroom on bus rides through the Texas League.
2013-2014 Oakland A’s
This is really well done.. I had mostly wondered about the impact for the shorter guys on high strikes (as an Altuve fan), but interesting to see the bigger guys may have more direct correlation for low strikes.
This is very interesting. I’m left a bit confused why Judge in particular is getting so many more, though, and why the next highest is David Peralta at only 6’1. Honestly maybe more than when I started the article haha. Where does Stanton fall on the first 2 graphs? Their heights are very comparable and Stanton doesn’t seem victimized by it so much over his career. What’s causing that?
I’d think the most obvious candidate for explaining the rest of the variation here would be batting stance.
Another project would be to combine this with Roger Cheng’s THT article with batter pose analysis from video.
He is 6′ 8″, he played ball in the big leagues (for my favorite team!), and he writes Fangraphs pieces that are so smart they make my head hurt. Hardly seems fair!
BTW, this is a great piece.
Lol, about the only thing you could trash talk him about is that he’s 6’8″ and he couldn’t make his college basketball team.
(Oh, wait……nevermind).
Great piece. I was looking heavily into that 2017 vs 2018 low-strike chart, and found it interesting as the players you seemed to profile in height (namely Judge, Bour, Peralta) all had an increase in low strike calls by at least 7-8+%. And then at the other end of the curve, Correa and Markakis both had it in the opposite direction with about 7-8% less called.
Interestingly, Carlos Correa is listed 6’4. Wonder what he’s doing different this season to earn fewer called low-strikes. He does have a bit of a crouch in his stance and a small leg kick, but even comparing swings from this year and last year the difference looks pretty negligible in film if there’s much of one at all. And with Markakis, who’s 6’1, he wouldn’t exactly fit in this profile, but for a guy that is certainly a patient hitter, being able to get a better strike zone should obviously be beneficial for him (maybe slightly playing into his monster season).
Is this data that can also vary heavily year to year then? Given the way the two years of samples have varied with the +/- of 7-8% on the highlighted players. Maybe players of height are just more volatile to these changes? Either way, there’s a lot of interesting studies that can be done in this area I feel.
I wonder if it has less to do with the crouch and more to do with the hand position in the stance when clocking into a swing. I’ve seen numerous times guys like Pedroia who have a set clocking position (elbow right in front of face) vs. Judge who clocks a little bit above the face (ie: these guys tend to put hands up high moving away from inside pitches).
I think there should be work on the hand positioning, because it seems to be the most visual to an umpire when gauging the zone. And not just hand positioning but the spot right where the batter is about to make a swing or where he would end up checking his swing.
Tony Phillips use to get a ton of walks by diving his shoulder and hands into the pitch, thereby making pitches seems like above his hand at his head. Since the entire body can’t move as fast to gauge the strike, getting your hands under the ball would make the zone look smaller. He was… extremely good at this. As were other players like Lofton etc.
Smaller players seem to get the benefit as they don’t need much movement to clock their hands around the ball, but overall its a trait I’ve seen in many batters to game the zone.
holy shit, Nate, all three of your pieces have been incredibly impressive.
Interesting work. It’s amazing at how Altuve and Judge can be such extreme outliers and still so good.
“For another perspective, here is Eddie Gaedel.”
It would have been more useful to see a Dozier take than a Dozier swing, but really good article.
Great article Nate. I loved all the tidbits from a player’s perspective that you peppered throughout the article, especially the comment about catcher flexibility. Tony Pena was so good at getting down low that he played for more than a decade after he completely forgot how to hit MLB pitching.
I’ve really enjoyed your columns so far.
Ew
Hope you join Fangraphs in a more permanent role.
Agreed! This article makes me want to come back for more!
Super interesting and incredibly well done! Can you explain more about how you got those strike zone ovals?
This issue was brought up by Mike Krukow, the Giants broadcaster, in last night Giants – Dodgers game.
Nate, how much larger is the overall PitchFX strike zone for 6’4″+ vs 5’8″- players? Also, do you think that MLB should move to an automated system for ball and strike calls?
Hi Nate. I’m very impressed with your articles so far- interesting questions, on-point statistical analyses, well-written! Your perspective as a former player also adds insight.
I’m curious as to your background in research, statistics and/or sabremetrics before you began your FG residency
This is excellent work!