How Much Should We Believe In Dansby Swanson?

Even though Dansby Swanson checks in at number eight on our recently published top 50 free agent rankings, it feels like no one knows just how much to believe in him. Obviously, that’s not completely true. I’m sure Swanson strongly believes in himself. There’s a Re-sign Dansby Swanson petition on Change.org; I bet the 12 people who signed it believe in him quite a bit too. The rest of us, however, fall somewhere in the middle.
Swanson had a career year in 2022. His 6.4 WAR was 12th best in all of baseball, and 3.0 above his 2021 total. While the big jump is encouraging, it also makes him a regression candidate. Of the 83 position players with 500 plate appearances in both 2021 and ’22, only four improved their WAR total more. Aaron Judge improved by 5.9 WAR in 2022, and it’d be extremely unreasonable to expect him to put up anything like a repeat performance. The next three players, Eugenio Suárez, Nolen Arenado, and Manny Machado, were all bouncing back from a down year in 2021. Like Swanson, all three saw their BABIP improve by at least 40 points. Swanson was the only player of the group whose WAR in 2022 was three wins higher than in their best previous season.
As a reward for his fantastic season, Swanson gets to enter free agency as the budget option at his position, behind luxury models like Trea Turner, Carlos Correa, and Xander Bogaerts. With all this in mind, I dug a little deeper into Swanson’s breakout year, looking for reasons to believe or disbelieve the notion that he’s truly leveled up.
| Season | G | HR | BB% | K% | BABIP | AVG | OBP | SLG | wRC+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 60 | 10 | 8.3% | 26.9% | .350 | .274 | .345 | .464 | 115 |
| 2021 | 160 | 27 | 8.0% | 25.6% | .297 | .248 | .311 | .449 | 99 |
| 2022 | 162 | 25 | 7.0% | 26.1% | .348 | .277 | .329 | .447 | 116 |
At the plate, it sure looks like Swanson’s success in 2020 and ’22 was tied to some luck on balls in play. Much of his increased value came from keeping his production consistent in 2022’s tougher offensive environment. However, his contact profile provides some reason for optimism:
| Year | Barrel% | EV | LA | wOBA | xwOBA | HardHit% | HR/FB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 11.4 | 89.1 | 14.7 | .348 | .354 | 40.7 | 15.6% |
| 2021 | 11.4 | 89.3 | 14.1 | .322 | .332 | 42.7 | 15.7% |
| 2022 | 10.8 | 90.2 | 15.7 | .337 | .337 | 46.3 | 13.5% |
Despite a slightly lower barrel rate, Swanson’s career-best hard-hit rate and exit velocity make his BABIP seem a bit more sustainable. His fly balls aren’t suddenly going for home runs at an exaggerated rate. He’s largely done this by getting better at what he was already good at: crushing fastballs. Swanson has always punished four-seamers, but his hard-hit rate on them has climbed to 62.3%, just outside the top 10. The real area of concern is his plate discipline:
| Season | BB% | K% | Swing% | O-Swing% | Z-Swing% | Contact% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 8.3% | 26.9% | 47.2% | 28.5% | 72.3% | 70.6% |
| 2021 | 8.0% | 25.6% | 48.1% | 29.1% | 74.0% | 72.7% |
| 2022 | 7.0% | 26.1% | 49.5% | 31.4% | 74.6% | 71.8% |
Swanson has never run great strikeout or whiff rates, but over the last few years, he’s dropped toward the bottom of the league in both. His swing rates both inside and outside the zone have increased in each of the past four years, while his walk rate has decreased.
With so little room for error, it’s fair to worry about what happens when Swanson’s bat speed starts to decline. This year, he put up a wOBA of .390 on fastballs and .256 on everything else; over the course of his career, those numbers are .360 and .249. If he starts having trouble catching up to velocity, things could get ugly in a hurry.
With that in mind, it’s worth noting that Swanson’s improvement from 2021 to ’21 came almost entirely on pitches that broke away from him (cutters, curves, and sliders from righties, along with fastballs and changeups from lefties). His performance against pitches that broke in toward him declined:
| Toward RHB | Toward LHB | |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 wOBA | .368 | .266 |
| 2022 wOBA | .349 | .327 |
| wOBA Change | -.019 | +.061 |
| 2021 Whiff% | 13.6% | 16.0% |
| 2022 Whiff% | 15.7% | 14.5% |
| Whiff% Change | +2.1% | -1.5% |
| 2021 Exit Velocity | 91.1 | 86.3 |
| 2022 Exit Velocity | 91.3 | 88.6 |
| Exit Velocity Change | +0.2 | +2.3 |
| 2021 Run Value | 14.5 | -5.9 |
| 2022 Run Value | 6.6 | 13.2 |
| Run Value Change | -7.9 | +19.1 |
The lion’s share of the changes came against left-handed pitching. This tradeoff certainly seems to have been worth it, as Swanson’s improvement on pitches breaking away from him significantly outweighed his decline on pitches breaking in toward him. Unsurprisingly, this change coincided with a lower pull rate. There’s nothing wrong with Swanson being a better hitter when he’s going the other way and feasting on pitches that break toward the left-handed batter’s box. However, his short track record with this approach makes me more hesitant to believe in it. I’ll be curious to see if this trend continues and whether it affects how pitchers attack him.
Of course, Swanson didn’t just have a career year at the plate. Depending on your preferred defensive metric, he rated anywhere from good to superlative with the glove. The chart below shows how he stacks up compared to his fellow shortstops. The 2022 season is on the left, and to provide a larger sample, the last three seasons are on the right:
| 2022 | 2020-22 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | OAA | DRS | UZR | UZR/150 | Player | OAA | DRS | UZR | UZR/150 |
| Swanson | 20 | 9 | 1.1 | 1.7 | Swanson | 29 | 11 | 2.3 | 1.4 |
| Turner | 0 | -1 | -0.7 | -1.2 | Turner | -2 | -5 | -1 | -0.6 |
| Correa | -3 | 3 | 1 | 1.9 | Correa | 14 | 30 | 3.2 | 2.1 |
| Bogaerts | 5 | 4 | 4.9 | 4.7 | Bogaerts | -7 | -5 | 7.4 | 2.9 |
Looking at this chart, I have two main takeaways. The first is that we should all try to find someone who loves us as much as UZR loves Xander Bogaerts. The second is that while Swanson’s 20 OAA in 2022 deserves some healthy skepticism (just like any one-year spike in a single defensive metric), there’s little reason to doubt that he’s a consistently good defender at short. He had a negative DRS in 2021, but aside from that, he rates highly in all three major defensive metrics year in and year out. He also excelled while playing in traditional shortstop positioning, which should bode well for the shift-free future.
I do have a little bit of concern about Swanson’s arm strength, which Statcast rates fourth-worst among all shortstops. However, DRS credited Swanson’s throwing for 9 runs saved in 2022, so it clearly hasn’t been holding him back so far.
Maybe you can already tell from the back and forth nature of this article, but I didn’t find anything that made me feel more confident Swanson turned a corner in 2022. I don’t have a great reason to believe his elevated hard-hit rate and less pull-heavy approach will last into 2023. However, as long as he’s crushing fastballs and opposing pitchers are happy to keep throwing them more than half the time, he’ll be fine.
Where does all this leave Swanson as he looks to sign a new deal? Below are the Steamer projections and Ben Clemens’ contract estimates for the top four shortstops:
| Player | Age | Years | AAV | Total | 2022 WAR | 2023 Projected WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trea Turner | 30 | 9 | $32M | $288M | 6.3 | 4.7 |
| Carlos Correa | 28 | 10 | $33M | $300M | 4.4 | 5 |
| Xander Bogaerts | 30 | 7 | $31M | $217M | 6.1 | 4.4 |
| Dansby Swanson | 29 | 6 | $24M | $144M | 6.4 | 3.3 |
Steamer is pretty harsh, projecting his WAR to drop right back to where it was in 2021. While Swanson is coming off his first season with more than four WAR, his fellow shortstops have had at least three such seasons each, and Steamer projects all of them to reach that threshold next year. All three have a career wRC+ of 118 or better, a mark Swanson has never reached.
Of course, Swanson isn’t the only shortstop on the market who has flaws. While Correa and Turner have struggled with injuries at times, Swanson has been extremely durable, having missed just two games in the last three years. Turner won’t maintain his elite speed forever, and Bogaerts doesn’t seem like he’ll be able to stay at short for more than another year or two.
It’s also possible that we’ve underestimated Swanson a bit because he’s done so much of his growing up at the major league level where everyone could see it — 2016 was his only season with 100 games as a minor leaguer. He has now recorded four years in a row with at least 2.0 WAR, and this year he demonstrated his upside. Digging into these numbers, I understand why Ben Clemens called him “a sometime All-Star” on the top 50. His breakout season may well have arisen from BABIP luck and noisy defensive metrics, but that doesn’t mean Swanson won’t experience similarly good fortune a couple more times over the course of his next contract.
If the Dansby Swanson experience entails solid defense at shortstop, a league-average bat, and the occasional great season mixed in whenever the BABIP gods decide to look favorably upon him, most teams would sign up for it in a heartbeat. And if he’s able to hold onto his 2022 gains either at the plate or in the field, he might make believers out of all of us.
Davy Andrews is a Brooklyn-based musician and a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @davyandrewsdavy.bsky.social.
I think there are good reasons to be skeptical of Dansby Swanson’s 2022. OAA is a bit aggressive; I don’t really think he saved 20 outs above average in 2022 because at that level the metric tends to get a bit carried away, and this was a huge amount of his value. And Dansby Swanson has always had periods where he runs higher BABIPs, and while it looks like he earned it based on xwOBA it’s hard to sustain.
This leaves him as roughly league-average hitter and an above-average defensive shortstop–what he was in 2021. Which is a really good player! He’s clearly in the “Erick Aybar zone”, where simply doing things at an average level at an extremely hard to fill position makes you very valuable. In this case, I think he might be better than that at the beginning of the contract, with better defense than average at SS and occasional offensive burst too.
And he’s relatively young too. I’d expect the Braves to make a strong push to retain him but if not, I’d think the Giants, Twins, and Cardinals to be interested somewhere in the $100M-$130M range and potentially as high as Ben’s guess. Maybe the Dodgers if they miss out on both Correa and Turner, although I’m thinking they’ll probably land one.
I think he shares the Aybar zone floor, but with more pop in the bat. That additional upside merits a low nine-figure deal.
I think the way I would put it is that in most years, he’ll be in the Erick Aybar zone. It’s unlikely he will be below it. And you might get a couple of years where he’s meaningfully above it, simply because sometimes he gets hot. But you shouldn’t count on it.
I’m not like all in but also he is, by far, my favorite of the FA SSs for Cubs…Think he’s been a much more consistent offensive player than painted (xwOBAs btw .337-.354 the past 4 years, EVs, hard hit, barrel, etc all better than league), arguably has the most power potential *moving forward* thanks to his combo of strong EVs and lots
of flyballs (could pull the ball more), and hits a ton of flyballs (Cubs were a GB heavy team, bottom of the league)
Definitely think he suffers in perception due to his non-linear development track. It seems totally lost that the other 3 SSs were more 3-5 win players the majority of their careers too, a range his defense and power should put him in most years under the new deal
Move him to 2nd and let Hoerner play SS, if he agrees of course. Then you greatly improve the infield and cover his lack of arm strength
Good article, and I share the ambivalence. I’d be happy to see the Braves bring him back, but probably not for $144 million. That said, they lack internal options and their farm is too depleted to land a quality replacement in trade, so I would be more disappointed to see them whiff on all four of the top available shortstops than to pay Swanson somewhat more than he’s worth.
They’ll sign somebody.
Sure, but they might sign like, Jose Iglesias. No disrespect to him, but that would suck.
This regime won’t let that happen.
If they want to give Grissom a shot, they could play him and have Iglesias back him up.
Grissom’s glove is probably poor at second and completely inadequate at short.
Then he’s trade bait or a LF
I keep wondering if he can play third base. My understanding is that he has the arm for it.
But at this point would you have enough faith in Grissom’s bat to move a star with an extension (Riley) around to try to fit Grissom in somewhere?
The question is (or one of many questions is), would you rather have Dansby for half the cost of Turner or Correa?
I think it depends on the team.
If you ‘re one of the big boys like the Dodgers, I think you clearly prefer Turner/Correa because you need the 5 win guy to improve your team.
If you’re a team that has more than one big hole to fill seems Dansby and another 3 win guy helps your team more for the same money.
Question: Why are those guys such sure 5 WAR players?
Or more – relative to Swanson moving forward
I mean, no one is a guaranteed 5 WAR player. But there are several factors that make it statistically more likely that you can get 5 WAR out of Turner/Corea in 2023 than Swanson.
Eeeeh, not sure I’m fully on board? Here’s how his 2022 ended up compared to the other top FA SSs:
Tied 1st in fWAR and rWAR (6.4) with Trea Turner
1st in GB% (38% to 42%, 43%, and 46%)
1st in FB% (40% to 37.5%, 35.7%, 33?%)
1st in avg EV (90.2 to 89.9, 88.1, 88.9)
1st in HRs
2nd in O-Swing% (31.4%, a full 5% better than Turner, sandwich in btw Correa’s 30.8% and Boagert’s 31.9%)
3rd in CSW% (surprisingly Boagerts was at 29%)
1st in OOA, DEF, DRS
1st in defensive innings
1st in games played
Swing and miss is a part of his game, but there’s room for more walks both based on his track record and this year’s chase rate. Career walk rate’s around 9%, he was at 7% this year. I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s 30+ HR potential in 2023, xIsoSLG of .204 is right behind Correa’s .208.
If playing lots of good defense and hitting HRs at a premium position is the easiest track to ~5 or more WAR, and it prob is, then I’d say he’s your best shot*
*I waffle alot on Correa, but Swanson stole his 2019 batted ball profile
Fair point.
The contract makes a difference: are Turner and Correa $100M better? Probably.
And that difference can bring in good talent elsewhere.
He is above average at worst but his peak might be now.
A lot of vesting options and incentives might be in order to sign him if he wants a big number.
Swanson grew up in Cobb County, not far from where the ballpark is, which makes him likely to re-sign with the Braves.
That’s the big “pro” to him staying in Atlanta.
The big “con” might be the fact that the Braves put a lot of $ into the extenstions for Riley, Harris, and Strider (not to mention Olson). If you had told me Atlanta would be putting this much money in extensions prior to this past season, I would have been convinced that they’d written off any chance of re-signing Dansby. That said, it’s not like they can’t afford to keep him at a market-value FA contract, so I could be way off base here.
I’d say the extensions are a reason that they CAN sign him. They have cost certainty for years to come. They could likely afford a mid-level deal to Swanson.
Lots of cost certainty.
Speaking of the Strider extension…we ever gonna get an a analysis of a top tier team extending a top tier young pitcher or nah?
Most of those big deals don’t pay much for years – they could definitely fit Swanson and he’d be a good candidate for a front loaded contract so he’s ramping down when the other guys are ramping up
The Braves have already extended a qualifying offer to Swanson. If he is back with Atlanta in 2023, it will be because the Free Agency market was not kind to him.
From what I’ve read, here’s why he’ll stay with the Braves:
He’s become the clubhouse leader in the wake of Freddie Freeman’s departure.
He’s building a new house in the Atlanta suburbs.
He’s more comfortable with a winning team than with leading another team in that direction (e.g., Cubs).
And here’s why he’ll leave:
More money.
The challenge of building a winning team.
A “Freeman Part Two,” whereby the Braves move on and he has to catch on somewhere else.
And, more money.
To whom to the Braves “move on”? Which SS are available in trade? Javier Baez? Nicky Lopez? Amed Rosario? Bryson Stott? I’m not seeing a Matt Olson in this bunch.
Rosario would be a nice short-term fix.
Add Amed to the list of guys who perked up after leaving the Mets.
Thank goodness for that – Olson would be terrible at SS!
What would he look like with a position change? If someone wanted him at 2B it seems his arm would play better, his bat would be an advantage, and his age related decline wouldn’t be such a risk.
I’m not sure I agree.
In the 1st half of 2022, Dansby Swanson was on an unsustainable fire. (Not an unforgettable one – that would be a U2 album.) He crashed back down to earth in his last +/- 250 PA and in the last two months of the season batted much more like his career 90-95 wRC+ expectations. He also had absurd home/road splits in 2022, just like he did in the 2020 season (but not 2021 when his performance was park-neutral).
Whoever pays for Swanson based on full-season 2022 numbers is overpaying based on about 500 PA’s at Truist Park in 2020 and 2022 that are an outlier from the other 2500 PA’s of his career.
As far as defense goes… I still really don’t know what to make of defensive metrics, but Swanson to me covers a lot of ground with his legs and is sharp with the glove but somewhat wet noodle on long throws.
If I’m the Braves, I’m hoping he walks. Prospects break your heart, but Braden Shewmake (rather than Grissom) would have been called up in August if he hadn’t gotten hurt, and Shewmake projects kinda similar to Swanson at that age and won’t cost the Braves $150 million. And Shewmake is Rule 5 eligible this year.
Have you looked at Shewmake’s numbers in the minors? Might want to reconsider that option
I have indeed. And read some of the 2022 scouting reports on him, pre-injury.
Swanson played in AA at age 22, then AAA (brief) and MLB at age 23. Shewmake played in AA at age 23, then AAA at age 24 and would have been promoted to the majors but for injury. They’re a year apart, but with similar backgrounds from college to minors.
I don’t put a ton of stock into major-college player performance until they get to AA. So I toss out the window the statistical side of A-ball and high-A, where advanced college hitters *should* dominate.
If you normalize their AA seasons (Shewmake appears to have some batted ball bad luck; Swanson just about where I’d expect him to be), they are very similar in comparison. Shewmake actually has the higher ISO.
However, Shewmake lost a year to the pandemic. It’s going to take us a long time to understand how that impacted player development. But what I see in Shewmake’s AA performance is:
The scouting reports seem to match this take.
Then, Shewmake goes to AAA. We don’t really have a AAA comp for Swanson since he spent only 11 games at the level. But Shewmake’s ISO in AAA was higher than Swanson’s in AA, a level lower.
Then Swanson was really bad in MLB for three years, 2017-2019. Like, we’re talking less than 85 wRC+ for 1500 PA’s.
So yes, I do think Shewmake comps well to Swanson, at the plate and in the field, thinking about Shewmake’s first four years in MLB compared to Swanson’s. And Atlanta has shown the ability to develop hitters.
Shewmake….wow there is a player that I almost forgot we still had in the minors. I hadn’t checked on him since his first stint in AA where he looked completely overmatched. His 2021 and 2022 seasons definitely show some reasons for optimism at that plate. However, I don’t think he has has particularly bad batted ball luck. Unless the Braves have reworked his mechanics, I remember him have a long flat swing, one that generated very little lift. And he’s not the kind of player that can beat out grounders for hits at an above average rate. Basically, I don’t personally believe there is all that much positive regression to be expected from his BABIP given his swing profile.
His swing has not been totally reworked, and is still a little bit long, but it will play:
https://www.milb.com/video/shewmake-s-7th-homer-for-gwinnett?t=playerid-669699
(There are other Shewmake videos there).
Look, I’m not saying the guy is going to be an All-Star. I think he can be what Swanson was at a similar age.
Here’s another one from last summer… still long, but way more loft and launch than he was showing in 2021.
https://www.milb.com/video/shewmake-blasts-two-run-homer?t=playerid-669699
When Swanson tails off at the end of a season, he’s “falling back to his previous performance”.
When Shewmake tails off at the end of a season, he’s “fatigued”.
You throw out performance in the lower minors when comparing the two, detail how Shewmake has had bad luck with batted balls, etc etc…leaving out one key fact: Swanson has had more 100+ wRC+ seasons in the majors than Shewmake has had in the minors.
You pick and choose data as a reason to disregard Swanson and then pick and choose data to support Shewmake.
One could pick and choose data and also come to exactly the opposite conclusion that you have.
Sure, one can always pick and choose data. But looking through data for underlying trend lines is not picking and choosing. Throwing out low minors data for both hitters is not picking and choosing. Your arguments lack logical consistency.
Said differently, there’s a lot more data to know what Swanson IS and a lot less data to know what Shewmake is.
The Shewmake who didn’t improve from or even sustain his age 19 season in college, who put up a .271 OBP in AA with a 4.5 to 1 K to BB rate, and a sub-.300 OBP and sub-.700 OPS combined in the upper minors? On top of that he’ll be 25 in 2023. He’s no young Dansby Swanson, who came up at 22—and it’s not close.
In Swanson’s age 25 season, he put up a 91 wRC+ in MLB after putting up a lower number in his first 1200 career MLB PA’s.
Defensively, they comp similarly.
So, yes, I do think Shewmake at age 25 can be what Swanson was at age 24 – an 80 wRC+ hitter and a 1.5 fWAR shortstop. Absolutely, I think that is right in his probability band, especially after having missed a developmental year in 2020 with the pandemic impact on minor league ball.
And I think that if that’s what he is, then the Braves are better off rolling with that than spending $150M on Swanson.
You have an oddly optimistic view of a 25 year old who barely cracked a .700 ops in the minors last year. I’d be surprised if Shewmake ever had any meaningful AB’s in the majors.
If thinking someone can be an 80 wRC+ bat is “oddly optimistic,” then call me Sam Obisanya.
Sadly, looking at Shewmake’s progression as a pro player. I Think expecting an 80 wRC+ at the major league level next year would be on the optimistic side. Its not impossible, but they aren’t the kind of odds I would want the Braves betting the 2023 season on.
Just a small correction. Correa’s total estimated contract should be $330M, not $300M.
Ah, what’s $30M between friends? A million here, a million there… look what I found between the cushions of your couch!