How the Indians Can Win the World Series
The night before the 2016 World Series is set to begin in Cleveland, our playoff odds list the Chicago Cubs with a 66% chance to take home the trophy, which is a remarkably one-sided projection, given the nature of how baseball is played and how any series, let alone one played by two teams who emerged as champions of their respective leagues, often feels like nothing more than a coin flip. But our odds list the Cubs as 2:1 favorites over the Cleveland Indians, and FiveThirtyEight’s odds are almost identical.
These Cubs outscored their opponents by more than 250 combined runs this season, completing one of the most dominant regular seasons in baseball history, and they’re playing at nearly full strength, even improbably adding the slugging Kyle Schwarber, who’s been out since April 7 with torn ligaments in his left knee, to the their World Series roster. These Indians, admittedly, a great team in their own right, outscored their opponents by 101 runs — the fourth-best run differential in baseball this year, although a much more typical number — and are playing without a borderline ace pitcher in Carlos Carrasco, with a limited version of star pitcher Danny Salazar, with a drone-inflicted Trevor Bauer, and now apparently with a hobbled Jason Kipnis, too.
It’s impossible to fault the odds for saying what they do. The Cubs are clearly the better team, clearly in better shape. But a one-in-three shot is still a one-in-three shot, and this is a Cleveland sports town that just saw their Cleveland Cavaliers come back from a 3-1 NBA Finals deficit to dethrone the Golden State Warriors, at a time when the Warriors were being considered 40:1 favorites entering Game Five, so these fans probably don’t care too strongly for the odds.
What they would care for is an Indians championship. Here’s five keys to that happening:
No. 1: Run Like Hell on Jon Lester
This one can happen, starting tonight. Jon Lester is starting Game One for the Cubs, and we all know about Jon Lester’s little problem: he can’t throw to first. Like, really, he just can’t throw a baseball to first base. It might literally be the weirdest thing about an already weird sport, but for whatever reason, he can’t do it from a fielding position, and he just won’t do it from the rubber. The Kansas City Royals made this very clear when they stole seven bases on him and Derek Norris in the 2014 American League Wild Card game, and the Los Angeles Dodgers made this very clear when they toyed with him all throughout the Game Five of the NLCS last week.
But what’s funny about all that toying, as I wrote, is that they never actually ran. Thing is, Lester’s delivery is exceptionally quick to home, and catcher David Ross‘ pop times to second base are exceptionally quick, and as a pair, they can actually be rather difficult to successfully steal against, even given the lengthy leads Lester’s pickoff inability affords baserunners.
That being said, they’ll have a hard time throwing out Rajai Davis if he reaches first, and he’ll be starting against Lester. The Indians have already come right out and said they plan to test Lester, given the opportunity, and given their status as the AL’s best base-stealing team this year combined with Terry Francona’s hyper-aggressive postseason managing style, it wouldn’t be a surprise to see the Indians try and turn World Series Game One into a repeat of Lester’s 2014 Wild Card disaster, getting them Game One with a shot to put this thing away early if they can just…
No. 2: Win Two Games Started by Non-Kluber Starters
I understand that “win baseball games” isn’t a particularly insightful piece of advice, but in this case, it seems compelling, as this very circumstance is a big part of what’s led to Cleveland’s improbable postseason run in the first place. Without Carrasco or Salazar in the rotation for the first two rounds of the playoffs, nobody thought Josh Tomlin was going to be able to handle the imposing lineups of Boston and Toronto, until he did, and everyone counted out the Indians when they threw Ryan Merritt into the fire against the Blue Jays, until he pitched the Indians into the World Series. With Corey Kluber potentially starting Games One, Four, and Seven, the Indians could realistically hope for two wins in games started by their ace, needing just two more by the rest of the pack to seal the deal.
These underpowered Indians starters were able to navigate Toronto’s overpowering lineup by picking a game plan and sticking to it, a game plan that might be similar to the one they employed against Toronto, which aims to…
No. 3: Get the Cubs to Hit Ground Balls
The Cubs were arguably baseball’s best offense this year, and one defining characteristic of that offense is their love for fly balls. Only four teams hit the ball on the ground less often than Chicago, and guys like Kris Bryant, Anthony Rizzo, and Willson Contreras are looking to get the ball into the air almost every time they step to the plate, as that’s how they inflict the most damage. The Indians were able to keep the Blue Jays on the ground by throwing them a steady diet of breaking pitches, but the Cubs were one of the five best teams in baseball this year at producing against breaking pitches, according to our PITCHf/x run values (the Indians were No. 1 by a landslide).
Instead, the key to keeping the top of the Cubs’ lineup on the ground will have less to do with pitch selection and more to do with pitch execution, like pitching away from Bryant — the other half of Cleveland’s game plan against Toronto — and low and away from Rizzo.
That’s one key for Cleveland’s pitching, while one key for their hitting might be to…
No. 4: Pounce on Jake Arrieta’s Fastballs
In Lester, the Indians may find a subtle advantage in their ability to capitalize on his weakness in holding runners on first base. In Hendricks, the Indians may find a subtle advantage in their ability to excel against all pitches slow and/or bendy, but Jake Arrieta, to me, represents their most difficult challenge. What the Indians’ lineup really struggles against is premium velocity, and Arrieta is Chicago’s hardest-throwing starter, averaging more than 94 mph on his fastballs, which he throws roughly two-thirds of the time, a percentage that could even increase, given Cleveland’s struggles with the pitch. If guys like Jose Ramirez, Mike Napoli, and especially Tyler Naquin can catch up to Arrieta’s heat, it will go a long way toward neutralizing perhaps Chicago’s strongest starting pitching matchup against Cleveland.
So, run on Lester, get good outings out of Bauer and Tomlin, keep the Cubs’ balls in play on the ground, and jump on Arrieta’s fastballs. Those are all ways the Indians can get out to early leads, which, in actuality, is the single biggest key for the Indians to win the World Series, as early leads allow Francona to…
No. 5: Continue Getting the Most Out of Andrew Miller
I’ve somehow gone more than 1,000 words without mentioning the MVP of the ALCS, Andrew Miller, who’s turning in one of the most dominant postseason pitching performances on record. The first step in the “How to Beat Andrew Miller Handbook” is “Don’t Face Andrew Miller,” and the best way to make that happen is to not let the Indians get out to a lead. The Indians turned into one of the best teams in baseball the moment they got a lead this year, and that effect has only been amplified following the midseason acquisition of Miller and Francona’s rampant usage of him in the postseason. When the Indians have carried a lead through five or six innings, Francona has turned to his two-headed bullpen monster of Miller and Cody Allen to work the remaining three to four innings, and the Indians have appeared almost unbeatable.
The finish line is within arm’s reach, and Andrew Miller’s arms are long as hell. With no more series remaining after this one and an entire offseason to recover, all bets are off with regards to how far Francona pushes Miller, and it wouldn’t be a surprise for him to turn the dial up a notch, even from the unprecedented usage we’ve seen thus far. Steps one through four are how the Indians can get the ball into the hands of Miller with the lead. Step five is how they can win the whole [damn] thing.
August used to cover the Indians for MLB and ohio.com, but now he's here and thinks writing these in the third person is weird. So you can reach me on Twitter @AugustFG_ or e-mail at august.fagerstrom@fangraphs.com.
For an Indians team that averaged 6.4 hits per playoff game, “Run like hell on Jon Lester” requires getting on base against Jon Lester.
They have some ability to hit lefties (wrc+ 100) unlikr the other teams lester has pitched against. (92 and 72)
Glad a summation of basic baseball inputs is getting down-voted. Can’t steal first base, Cleveland friends.
Basic baseball inputs should include walks.
Take 6.4 hits and make it 8.3 base runners. Same problem applies.
Ya….168 isn’t going to cut it.
Agreed about the whole off season to rest part, but there has to be a limit to how much you can push Miller. Can he throws 40-50 pitches two days in a row? Three days in a row? Can you push him beyond 50 pitches if you rest him the next day? At what point does the fatigue start impacting his performance? At what point do you start risking injury? Especially with how many sliders he throws and the supposed to stress that pitch puts on the arm.
No. 6: Rally the team around throwing it in the face of that good for nothing, profit-loving owner Rachel Phelps! And maybe along the way we’ll learn something about ourselves, too.
Arrieta is actually even worse against stolen bases than lester (rsb -3) and lackey is rsb -1. The indians should run on all of them. Also, the cubs are much weaker against rhp than lhp (wrc+ 103 vs 116) and kluber, bauer, and tomlin are all rhp.
“The cubs are much weaker against rhp” are should be were. As they added schwarber, possibly minimizing heyward’s at bats, half seasons of contreras, coghlan etc. Problem with having analytics readily available is people don’t put them in proper context. To use an example last year the cubs had 5 Drs at ss, even though Addison Russell had 10 Drs at ss, he only took over in the second half though. So while at the end of the year they were elite their numbers don’t show it..
Jedi, you’re better off not engaging with jftg… he’s taken every opportunity to downplay the Cubs’ success… you can’t argue with people that don’t want to believe it. Other than Damaso, I’ve never seen a commentor here with such a vendetta against a team. Even if they win, he will be here telling us why there not as good as we think they are. It’s his obsession.
I’m not even trying to argue, just pointing out things like common sense should be added to the numbers.
I would be willing to bet that Heyward’s expected production exceeds that of Schwarber given the circumstances.
Longenhagen said he would bet schwarber provides more productive at bats than soler or coghlan who already provide more productive at bats than heyward. That’s one scout, but then it seems the cubs feel that way as well. I don’t see any way to actually bet on this however or I would take you up on it.
Example, 1 for 2 with a single in 2 pitches is a 1.000 ops. 0 for 0 with 2 walks in 25 pitches is a 1.000 ops. Which is more productive?
Runners on base with the single can mean a run, a 13 pitch at bat against Miller can mean seeing the indians 4th and 5th relievers more though.
Still bet?
i’m sure the cubs are shaking when they hear the name trevor bauer. yup they dont stand a chance
also, cleveland against lefties have a 100 wrc+ but the cubs against righties have a 103 wrc+ and youre giving the edge to cleveland
I don’t think he gave the edge to anyone; he just pointed out some facts. Those numbers (especially the rsb) were kind of surprising to me so I appreciated seeing them pointed out.
lol trevor bauer!
Who’s starting for the indians in Chicago by the way, Napoli or Santana?
I don’t understand why you’re getting downvotes.
Nothing official as far as I’ve heard, but Santana has been much more productive offensively and they’re equally subpar defensively. I’d be shocked if it’s not Santana.
The only potential alternative — distasteful as it is — would be iron-glove Santana at 3B, with Ramirez in LF, where he played in the early part of the year. That benches Crisp. Probably the downgrade in defense would more than offset the upgrade in offense.
Yea the last possibility is super unlikely to me so I asked the question. Not too mention nap has postseason heroics to his name already. Apparently Santana was shagging flies in lf yesterday. Dont know if they are thinking about that too seriously though.
I assumed Santana in LF was a ploy to make the Cubs laugh so hard they forget to practice.
Rosenthal tweeting about it adds creedence.
Probably Santana vs. Hendricks and Lackey and Napoli vs. Lester in Game 5.
I think the Indians are a good team but not a great team. The Cubs are a great team that deserves the title of World Champs– the Indians do not. I will root for the tribe but think they are going to get blasted by the world beaters.
The Dodgers did NOTHING to disrupt Lester…dancing around (without stealing) and faking bunts is a joke.
I agree. Maddon said they have some secret play if the indians do test him on baseball tonight, but I’m not buying it.
I think making sure to win the games Kluber starts is a bigger key than No. 2: Win Two Games Started by Non-Kluber Starters. Just because Kluber is starting doesn’t mean those games are locks for the Indians…
If they lose the games Kluber starts, the Indians are toast. If they win the games Kluber starts, they have a chance. Yes, they’ll have to win two starts by Non-Klubonian pitchers to win the series – but if you can lock down the Kluber wins, a coin-flip the rest of the games would still win the series.
I would add that Cleveland really needs to win the first two games in order to have a chance. They don’t want to go into Chicago with the series tied (or down 0-2).
Chicago pitchers were much better at home (2.72 ERA vs 3.60 on the road), and Cleveland hitters were much worse on the road (.691 OPS vs .827 at home). Cleveland will also be at a disticnt disadvantage in Chicago since they’ll have to sit either Carlos Santana or Mike Napoli. And given how bad their catchers have hit this season….they’ll basically be fielding a 7 man lineup, minus one of their top home run hitters.
Cleveland might be able to steal one game in Chicago but it’s entirely possible they’ll get swept in Chicago. So winning in Cleveland is paramount to the Indians winning the series.
But Tomlin can swing the bat– 6 for 12 career with a double (although the .857 BABIP may not be sustainable).
True but he’ll likely have 1-2 PAs max if he starts one of the Chicago games.
Lester should try a pick-off throw with the first guy who gets on tonight– if he can manage to get it to first and look comfortable doing it, he could immediately chuck the Indians gameplan out the window. Might have as much impact on the game as a leadoff HR.
Yeah, but the NBA Finals were fixed…………….
A playoff series always can go either way but realistically a WS couldn’t be any more one sided.
starting pitching: huge advantage Cubs, Tomlin and Merritt did well but they are below the average mlb starters
offense: advantage Cubs (106 vs 102 regular season wRC+
defense: Cleveland is good but Cubs are the best in the majors
baserunning: tiny advantage Cleveland although slightly magnified by Lester and arrieta
bullpen: Cleveland is great but Cubs too. slight advantage Cleveland
so getting Cleveland holds a small advantage in the two least important categories and a big disadvantage in the three most important categories (although defense and BP are probably a wash).
it is true that BP is more important in the PS but still 60% of the innings in the PS are thrown by starters.
there is always a chance in a playoff series and any above. 500 team could occasionally win a series against a top team but make no mistake the Cubs are a big favorite here.
Cubs would have been favorite against Boston and Toronto too but those teams at least have one major category where they are on par with the Cubs while Cleveland really doesn’t. Cubs deserve to win but I’m not excited about the matchup.
I’m not saying a BP and running can’t win a series but usually only if the series is evenly matched otherwise plus the Cubs are pretty good at those things too.