How the Nunez Lawsuit Could Be Trouble for ACES
This represents the first post by new contributor Sheryl Ring. An attorney in the Chicago area, Ring will cover legal matters for FanGraphs. We’re excited to have her!
Until this week, Juan Carlos Nunez was most famous for having made a website for a fake company selling a fake product, in an attempt to convince the world that Melky Cabrera’s flunked drug test in 2012 wasn’t really Melky’s fault. Since those revelations, Nunez has been barred from baseball permanently and also spent a few months in prison for his involvement with Biogenesis. You would have been forgiven for thinking it would be the last you’d hear of Juan Carlos Nunez.
But if baseball is done with Nunez, it seems as though Nunez isn’t quite done with baseball. This week, Nunez filed a 30-page lawsuit against his former employer, Athletes’ Careers Enhanced and Secured, Inc. (ACES, for short), demanding $3 million in damages. ACES is one of the largest and most well known baseball agencies. According to MLBTradeRumors’ Agency Database, ACES is the current representation for stars like Charlie Blackmon, Carlos Carrasco, and Dustin Pedroia among more than 50 other notable major leaguers. And in 2012, ACES represented Cabrera, as well. You might also have heard of ACES’ two most high-profile names, Sam and Seth Levinson, who are also named as defendants in Nunez’s lawsuit. Sam is the President of ACES; Seth is its CEO.
Nunez contends in the Complaint that the Levinsons knew about Nunez arranging for players to receive performance enhancing drugs like HGH from Anthony Bosch and Biogenesis and actually instructed Nunez to distribute those PEDs to players. Nunez says that better performance meant better numbers and bigger paychecks for players — and bigger commissions for the Levinsons and ACES. According to the Complaint, the Levinsons wanted Nunez to make Biogenesis a selling point in his pitch to get new players to sign with ACES. Nunez even namechecks a couple of stars in his Complaint, alleging that he personally, with the Levinsons’ knowledge and approval, arranged for Nelson Cruz to receive HGH in the early 2012 to help him recover from an infection. And Nunez also says that the whole fake-website debacle was the Levinsons’ idea. As you can imagine, there is a lot to unpack here.
It’s probably important to note that, for the most part, Nunez has a pretty weak case. Underneath all of the sensational allegations about performance-enhancing drugs is actually a pretty standard breach of contract claim. In this case, the contract in question was for Nunez’s employment with ACES. (For those of you who are wondering, Nunez specifically alleges he was employed pursuant to a contract and not an at-will employee.) Nunez says the Levinsons and ACES breached it by failing to pay him finder’s fees and commissions on clients he recruited to the agency, and not reimbursing him for various expenses. But courts, as a general rule, won’t enforce a contract that requires a party to do something that’s illegal. And that’s true even if one of the parties to the contract doesn’t actually do what the contract requires.
Nunez filed in New York, so I’ll use a New York case as an example. In McConnell v. Commonwealth Pictures Corp., the plaintiff sued the defendant for commissions he never received related to a movie distribution. The only problem was that the plaintiff got those distributions by bribery. And so even though the plaintiff in McConnell failed to receive his commissions, the court in McConnell basically said that it would corrupt the moral fabric of society to enforce a contract where a party performed an illegal act.
Now, we don’t have all of the details, and it’s certainly possible that at least some of Nunez’s commissions are based on actions not related to Biogenesis, or Bosch, or HGH, or fake websites. But the problem is that Nunez says in his own complaint that he used Biogenesis as a basis for recruiting players to ACES. And that means that Nunez is basically suing the Levinsons for not paying him for the very actions which landed him in prison. If that’s true, it’s hard for me to see how this isn’t an illegal contract.
That said, the Levinsons could — could, I stress — have a problem anyway. The most reported allegations in the Complaint tie ACES and the Levinsons to PEDs. Perhaps equally important, however, are allegations by Nunez that the Levinsons and ACES, against the express instructions of the MLBPA, gave kickbacks to players and players’ families. According to Nunez, ACES paid 10% of its commissions to Fernando Rodney and his family as an incentive for him to return to their agency. Nunez says in his Complaint that ACES and the Levinsons did so despite being told by the MLBPA not to contact Rodney. Nunez says that it was standard practice at ACES to compensate players in this way for hiring, or remaining with, ACES.
And Nunez lays out in his Complaint a conspiracy between the Levinsons and ACES to have Nunez take the fall for the entire scheme — websites, PEDs, and all — while telling Nunez they would protect him and continue to pay him. According to Nunez, this conspiracy included hiring a lawyer for Nunez, having Nunez leave the country during an investigation, and having Nunez lie to a reporter, among other things.
Nunez’s credibility has serious questions. After all, after Nunez’s resignation, the MLBPA actually investigated ACES and the Levinsons to determine their role in the website saga and eventually cleared them. The MLBPA also reportedly declined to investigate whether ACES was involved in PEDs at that time.
But if there’s any truth to what Nunez is alleging, there could actually be some fallout here. The MLBPA, which certifies and regulates player agents, expressly prohibits in Rule §5(B)(5) the sort of kickbacks Nunez is alleging. And Rule §5(B)(20) also prohibits an agent from providing banned substances to a player. And so it will be interesting to see how seriously MLB and the MLBPA react to these allegations, given their apparent seriousness on the one hand and their source on the other.
Sheryl Ring is a litigation attorney and General Counsel at Open Communities, a non-profit legal aid agency in the Chicago suburbs. You can reach her on twitter at @Ring_Sheryl. The opinions expressed here are solely the author's. This post is intended for informational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice.
If Sheryl Ring is correct that Nunez contract was no longer valid due to his committing illegal acts, but Nunez can prove that the Levinsons promised to continue to pay him for lying to, or withholding information from,authorities then the promise of payment from the Levinsons becomes an offer of a bribe to conduct illegal activity.
I’m not so sure Nunez can get much out of this case but the Levinsons have a great deal to lose.
yes, this likely was Nunez’ final available move after trying to reach a settlement agreement with ACES.
Maybe nunez also knows he is down and out and now wants to take the agency boss down with him as a revenge.
Maybe he sees himself as a scapegoat and now wants to sink the rest of the crew.
Very interesting. This at least has the potential to be really big. If there’s any truth to what Nunez is alleging, then I would say there BETTER be some fallout here.
Welcome!
Is the move here to survive a motion to dismiss, go to discovery, get some really damaging info and then use the dirt as settlement leverage?
Thank you! I’ve learned not to comment on another attorney’s litigation strategy, but I think the risk in any lawsuit when you are this sensational in the complaint is that you then have to show a court what your good faith basis was for making the allegations. If after *that* complaint, Nunez has to go and find the damaging info he needs to support it, he already has a problem.
Lenny Dykstra wrote a book called “Nails”. In it Dykstra said he hired a private detective to dig up dirt on umpires and then blackmailed some of them to provide a favorable strike zone for himself and his Phillies teammates. If this is true it’s the biggest game fixing scandal since the Black Sox.
No corporate media have ever acknowledged Dykstra’s book. He is blacklisted from all corporate baseball media who insist they are part of a “free press” here in the USA.
Could you address the legal issues in Dykstra’s book in a future column?
Interesting. I’ll take a look at it.
I’m confused about the issue of kickbacks. Why would the agency give a kickback to a client rather than just charging a smaller commission?
I was wondering the same thing. Perhaps charging a smaller commission to certain clients would have raised the suspicions of the MLBPA, or there could have been tax implications. Presumably the discrepancy would have been apparent in publicly available records one way or another, otherwise I agree it doesn’t make much sense.
This incidentally was also my question. One answer I received was that a client could be “cash poor”, and need money prior to signing with the Agency.
Though I completely agree that outside of needing money right this second, I’m not sure why an Agency would risk running afoul of the rules when there appears to be a perfectly legitimate way to give more money to your clients.
What is interesting about the complaint is that it goes out of its way to say that this *wasn’t* just a deduction in a commission, and was a series of actual payments. If that is true, it might be because the money was also going to friends and family of the player rather than just the player himself. But I agree, there are unanswered questions here.
Thanks for the response! I don’t even understand why kickbacks would be against the rules in this case. My understanding is that usually, there is a third party who is the victim in a kickback case. Like, I decide that my company is going to become a client of some vendor, and the vendor kicks me back some of the payments, so my company is a victim. In this case it seems like it’s just two parties exchanging money, so who’s the victim?
Edit: that is, assuming that Rodney and his family are working together.
Kickbacks are prohibited in this context because they prevent a level playing field. Let me back up and explain.
As I mentioned above, Nunez alleged that the kickbacks to Rodney were paid after the MLBPA gave ACES a no-contact order. I didn’t go into too much detail in the post because the backstory would have been too long, but evidently the no-contact order was because of a dispute between ACES and another agency over who represented Rodney. The kickbacks were ACES’ way of getting Rodney to pick them over the other agency.
It’s convoluted, and that’s a gross oversimplification, but I think it gets the point across.
My company did the same thing. Companies dont like to drop prices since other clients will find out. Prices are easier to leak out while “rebates” are not as easy to find out about since fewer people are involved in the latter (eg MLBPA probably sees all player-agent contracts, while rebates can be a handshake deal or something else not required to share). Also, If one of your clients find out you give a lower price to another customer they may leave or demand the same. Also, many companies are more focused on revenue growth which are looked at in any future sale of the agency or for marketing. A full commision is better than a discounted commission for that purpose. Rebates just are expenses that reduce profit and not income.
” the court in McConnell basically said that it would corrupt the moral fabric of society to enforce a contract where a party performed an illegal act.”
I found this to be counter intuitive, from the court’s perspective. In essence, the court is saying ‘if you, as a company, write a contract that requires illegal action, you will not have to pay your contractor.
If anything, the court should require payment, as it could dissuade companies from trying to break the law.
It would be amazingly stupid for a company to actually leave a paper trail where they’re hiring someone to do something illegal. You don’t, for eample, sign a legal document like a contract if you want to take out a hit on someone. Nunez’s argument isn’t built on having a contract stating that he should supply PEDs to players he recruits: it’s built on him hoping he can provide enough dirt to convince the judge.
This lawsuit strikes me as a legal shakedown by Nunez. I seriously doubt he can provide sufficient evidence to corroborate any of his allegations. But he will be able to seriously damage the reputation of ACES and the Levinsons and thus negatively impact their ability to attract and retain future clientele. The entire situation appears designed to coerce the Levinsons into a more favorable settlement with Nunez, simply to make him go away.
Very nice job. Would any of the “kickbacked to the client” commission have been advanced payments?
Welcome to Fangraphs! It’s wonderful to experience another diverse perspective on baseball.
If the lawsuit is allowed to go forward and Nunez is awarded damages could this lawsuit be used as a basis for further litigation against ACES and the Levinsons by MLB and MLBPA?
P.S. I am very much looking forward to your fangraphs audio debut!
If true you can bet they settle out of court before it gets too messy for Aces, to the point MLBPA has to decertify them.
Please correct me if I’m wrong, but my understanding is that libel can’t be asserted if such salacious claims are made solely in a legal document.
Without writing a full legal memo, the right to petition (1st Am.) and the related Noerr-Pennington doctrine do provide some protection for statements made in lawsuits, but it is not absolute, and does not cover intentional misrepresentations, even if in a legal document (indeed, there are lots of legal rules that punish making false statements in a lawsuit, including perjury and discovery sanctions against counsel and parties).
But with that as background, it is very, very difficult to make a defamation/libel claim based on allegedly false statements in a petition, and based on this article, I doubt there’s any basis for it in this case.