How The Royals Nearly Let Brandon Moss End Their Season
What are you going to remember from the AL wild card game? Be honest, really.
You’re going to remember Ned Yost. Hooooooo boy, are you going to remember Ned Yost. There’s going to be no shortage of post-mortems in Kansas City about Yost, for about 40 different reasons, surprisingly not all about bunting. (Argue about whether it was smart to take out James Shields [yes] for an on-one-day-rest Yordano Ventura [no] all you want, I’m still not over the early botched Eric Hosmer / Billy Butler double steal that was actually called on purpose.) You’re not going to forget Brandon Finnegan, either, or Salvador Perez, or Jarrod Dyson on the base paths.
You’re going to remember Bob Melvin and that eighth inning, too, inexplicably leaving Jon Lester in to rack up 111 pitches, get three men on base, and (along with Luke Gregerson) turn a 7-3 lead into a 7-6 nailbiter. You’re going to remember Jonny Gomes in left field, and what should be by all reason the last game that Derek Norris ever catches in the big leagues. I’ll remember thinking that for every time we laugh and make jokes all while understanding that managers know a million times more than we do, every single thing in this game happened. Yost was often brutal in this one. Melvin wasn’t necessarily better.
There’s so, so much to unpack there, and I’ve barely scraped the surface of what was one of the weirdest, greatest, worst, best, ludicrous baseball games ever. So much happened, in fact, that what no one at all is going to remember is what seemed for much of the evening like the biggest story of the night: Brandon Moss, who had hit two homers in the previous two months, hit two in the same playoff game. Let’s talk about that, a little.
I’m going to drop some honesty here: I started writing this when the A’s were winning in the eighth inning. Not that the game was over, obviously, but what happened after that was totally inexplicable. Sitting here now, writing about Moss, seems like it’s entirely disconnected from what last night was really all about. What’s below this is mostly already written, so we’ll proceed. Maybe that’s the point, though. If Moss doesn’t hit that homer off of Ventura, Yost doesn’t get flamed nearly as much. The A’s don’t get a big lead to blow. This all doesn’t happen without Brandon Moss.
Recall, if you will, just how drastic Moss’ collapse had been up until this point. In the first half, as the A’s were tearing up the entire sport, a big reason was Moss, who had a 148 wRC+, good for 16th-best. In the second half, as the A’s were falling apart and giving away the AL West, a big reason was Moss, who had a 75 wRC+, the 20th-worst in baseball. He hit a grand slam off Anthony Bass on July 25, and then didn’t go deep again until popping one off of Chris Young on Sept. 16.
Why? Well, that’s easy. As soon as Yoenis Cespedes left town, Moss lost his protection and forgot how to hit, or so went the narrative that TBS unceasingly attempted to beat into our skulls last night, nevermind the fact that Moss actually hit behind Cespedes for most of their last six weeks together, or that Moss’ skid had began before the Cespedes/Lester trade was even made, putting up a .287 OBP in July.
Jokes aside, we know that a much more real reason is that Moss has been dealing with a serious hip injury, one that will require surgery, and one that he’s received cortisone shots for. When Eno Sarris had his outstanding interview with Moss last week, Moss gave everyone a pretty great scouting report on himself, saying:
I get close to the plate, because people think I want the ball in, but it’s really so that the pitch away becomes middle, and it’s like a heart of the zone pitch. I hit in way better than I hit away, so I trust myself on the inside pitch and I make the outside pitch middle.
and:
I know that up in the zone is a big hole in my swing because I have an uppercut swing. So up in the zone is going to be a problem.
and:
Up and away is a big hole, and you just have to leave it alone.
Pretty straight-forward, I think. Moss takes care to put himself in better position to handle the ball on the outside part of the plate. He really hates high pitches, and knows he’s unlikely to do anything productive with them. His heat map, sorted by SLG — we are about to talk about homers, after all — indicates exactly that:
That’s a big red “do not enter” zone for pitchers, or at least it should be. I probably don’t have to tell you where the two pitches he took out of the park were. I will anyway. Take a guess:
Now, let’s be clear for a second: though these pitches were in the same spot, they weren’t the same pitch. Against Shields, Moss laid off a fastball in the zone, then went after a low, lousy change that didn’t really do much of anything at all other than leave the park very quickly:
Against Ventura, Moss laid off a 99 mph fastball up. He laid off a 98 mph fastball up, pitches that he knew he could do little with. Though both were balls, Ventura had the right idea. Get it down just a little, to the top of the strike zone, and either get back into the count, or force Moss to swing at something he really didn’t want to.
Ventura got down, anyway. Way down. Right into the sweet spot.
This is ostensibly about Moss, but let’s continue, because the A’s had more runs to score in the sixth inning. Ventura stayed in the game, and got to a 2-2 count on five pitches to Josh Reddick that were either above the zone or high in it. The sixth one was a low fastball. Reddick got what he wanted, and lined a single to right. Jed Lowrie flew out on a middle-in pitch, then Kelvin Herrera got Steven Vogt to pop out on an 101 mph pitch at the top of the zone. You’re seeing a pattern here. With two outs, Norris singled on a low strike. Eric Sogard singled on a low strike. Coco Crisp singled on a pitch right down the middle. Finally, Sam Fuld whiffed to end the inning on a fastball above the PitchF/X zone.
This Oakland offense, remember, was built specifically to crush low pitches, because the A’s had identified that in the world of pitchers attempting to keep the ball down to induce grounders and avoid homers, that’s what would work. (It’s also part of why Sean Doolittle worked out so well for them, too, as I wrote back in June: He’s always up in the zone, trying to give hitters a look they don’t often see.) On high pitches, they are the worst team in the AL, so far as slugging percentage goes. On low pitches, they’re among the best. I’m not cracking a mystery here; this is well-known.
The Royals throw high in the zone more than any American League team, and when you break it down by pitcher, it’s mostly their relievers. Taking Shields out when they did wasn’t really a bad idea at all. Putting in Ventura on one day rest is far more questionable. But the worst move, pitching-wise, was to throw low pitches to a team that crushes low pitches, and especially to a hitter who crushes low pitches. As Moss told Eno, part of his work to reverse his slide was to do better on laying off pitches he knew he couldn’t do much with, the better to swing at pitches he liked.. It’ll be forgotten in the midst of everything else; everything else may not have happened, otherwise. For a short while, the Royals got away from their game plan. It very nearly ended their season.
Mike Petriello used to write here, and now he does not. Find him at @mike_petriello or MLB.com.




I loved that within 30 seconds of the broadcast saying how much Cespedes leaving had hurt Moss’ power… boom.
Yeah, these broadcasters are awful, and we haven’t even had Joe Buck yet.
Or his buddy, Tim McCarver.
You mean Tim McCardinal’s Way? That guy should not be allowed near a microphone for a Cardinals playoff game. It’s disgusting to hear him verbally fellate that entire franchise for 3 and a half hours.
Queue dirge.
Great game despite the bad decisions. That KC crowd was really fun to watch, people just agonizing over every pitch. Great baseball.
why not write an article about how the A’s failed to utlize their perfectly constructed roster?
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/athletics-complete-roster-construction-with-adam-dunn/
Because he’d already written this? Rewriting the story to fit the outcome of the game just sounds like too much work.
If you’re looking for a standard game recap, there are plenty of other sites that do that. This story was about the guy who hit two homers after having been awful for week. That his team did or didn’t win doesn’t change what Moss did.
Always good advice to tell your readers to go somewhere else if they want what they’re looking for. Maybe if the Royals win the World Series they’ll get their due on this site, but I doubt it. Even if they win the coverage will be about why they didn’t deserve to win or why the other team pissed it away.
The treatment the Royals get on this site is just shameful and is a big reason that I’ll be re-subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Have fun with your circle jerk, dipshits.
Sandy Kazmir is the perfect example of a hometown fan searching for posts to read where glorious indignation is the reward.
Sandy,
That is a ridiculous argument. If I asked Mike to write an article about which stadium has the best hot dogs, he would have every right to tell me to go to another website(I’m sure grantland has done a ranking of that before lol). He is absolutely correct in saying that there are many recaps of the game out there, and they all pretty much say the same thing. Thank you, Mike, for writing this article, which I enjoyed, instead of some garbage I could find on mlb.com
SK is a notorious shitposter. Aimless tantrums like the one above are the norm. He leaves fangraphs forever once every couple of months or so.
Unfortunately, he keeps finding his way back…
Sandy Kazmir — KC is such a crap city. Great job averaging 24,000 tickets sold this year! Maybe next year your team will crack 2 million in attendance. Such a great sports town!!
I’m sorry, but this is a lazy narrative to take away from last night’s game. I’m sorry it was late and the game played out such that your story didn’t work, but sometimes you gotta suck it up, make a pot of coffee and rewrite your article.
which part of this do you find inaccurate?
He didn’t say it was inaccurate, he said it was lazy. And I’d add not very relevant to such a fantastic game.
I would differ on the idea that two home runs in a one-game playoff weren’t very relevant, but to each their own.
Brandon Moss played in that fantastic game, and hit two absolute bombs in that game. How was that feat not relevant to that game?
Hey Indy, can you re-do your time card? You put down that you’ve been working non-stop since two hours ago.
A lazy narrative is a manufactured and unsupported storyline, which this article is definitively not.
I kind of agree. Pitchers are human. Despite being the best at what they do, sometimes a ball gets away. Your story would have meaning if the Royals pitchers admitted their strategy was to throw low pitches to the As.
What is lazy about it – that he featured a player on a losing team? Well, that player had the most impact on the game from either team. And with a game as amazing as that one, there are plenty of interesting items to write about. The guy had 2 home runs in 6 innings, when he had 2 since July – that’s pretty incredible, and worthy of a story. I’m sure you’ll get your fill of Royals features in the very near future.
Lazy is a really harsh word to use. If he had left out the part about full honesty here, it wouldn’t have seemed ‘lazy’ to you, but just a standard feature article on this website about a baseball player or team doing cool things. There was a headline about the Colorado Rockies just two days ago, a team that was basically out of contention since July.
Why would anyone read this piece about Brandon Moss after there has been exactly one (ridiculously eventful) playoff game and come to the conclusion that this is the only piece that will be written about it today? Mike was first to press with this angle, but I think it’s a pretty safe bet that a few which might be more to your liking will appear throughout the day.
Exactly. August just wrote on KC bunts. I believe Dave will have something on the Ventura choice soon.
Of course he would
Great article, Mike. Thanks for taking the time to produce quality, free content which provided insight into the game that I previously did not have.
thanks!
Yost got out-Yosted by Bob Melvin.
Now that’s an article worth reading.
I believe that is called being reverse Yosted
Talk about getting screwed.
I believe that’s the “what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.”
What the hell is a gander anyway?
It’s a goose that’s had the ol’ switcheroo pulled on her.
Loved this article. A breath of fresh air from just repeating what everyone could see happened. This is why I come to Fangraphs.
7runSB – runCS = 1 Run.
There’s the answer.
Pretty cool that your recap of this game doesn’t say anything about the team that won other than to take some shots at the manager carried his team to victory. Maybe you should have torn up the one you wrote and started over when the game didn’t go to your liking.
…….
If all you’re after is who won, just look at the score. If you want insight that applies not just to this game, but to all the players involved on both teams, read this recap. Not every single thing that happens in a game leads in a direct, linear manner to the final outcome, particularly in a game with the twists and turns that this one had. If you don’t have the patience for that, just read other websites.
It’s not a game recap. We don’t really do those.
Time for your diaper change, Sandy. But I must say, this –
“the manager carried his team to victory”
– is truly brilliant.
I’m interested to know more about Norris’ catching performance
Well he was channeling the spirit of Matt LeCroy.
Don’t remind me
Norris stole at least one clear “ball” and framed it into a called strike three. So there’s that… He’s only slightly better than Lester at throwing to bases, however.
Is he normally that bad at throwing on steal attempts?
His previous defense metrics don’t look bad at all on FG, except for this year. And he’s been hampered by a bad back since maybe mid-season (or earlier) — FG doesn’t have a breakdown between halves to see if his D collapsed big time in 2nd half. Isn’t that why they started Soto instead of him for this game?
Not sure if this is in the above story or comments because I am reading this quickly and dashing off a post before I get back to work, but I have to say that the homerun call by Ernie Johnson on Moss’s second homerun – a huge moment in the game and in the season of both teams as well as MLB generally – was absolutely horrible.
To paraphrase, he basically just said “Well, there’s a fly ball (in this dour, bland tone) and oh, look, it cleared the wall.”
Just a terrible call…looked like Johnson had no idea how well the ball had been struck and literally got caught looking very foolish on that call when it was a blast to dead center over the 410 mark on the wall.
That was an absolutely atrocious call in a big moment of a big game.
I’d have rather had Gus Johnson than Ernie Johnson calling that game.
I would rather have had Magi…haha, no, no, I can’t say that with a straight face.
I think the dropped pitchout that led to the walkoff is one of those moments one never forgets and probably a good metaphor for Oakland’s season. Though this game had all sorts of moments one never forgets. The walk-off hero is a guy who looked completely lost at the plate until this point, the butchered double steal by the Royals was a goodie (and Joe Buck having no idea that this is a normal baseball designed play was hilarious, even if it was botched real good), and for the capper the Gomes/Feld dueling cross body blocks at the left field wall with Gomes neglecting to go for the pin. You couldn’t have scripted it better. Actually, it might be one of those script that get rejected for being unrealistic. Just a fantastic game.
And thanks for the insight on Moss. I was just baffled to where that power came from all of a sudden.
You have been wrong on the Royals all season.
Well-written article, but I do have to quibble about one part:
“As soon as Yoenis Cespedes left town, Moss lost his protection and forgot how to hit, or so went the narrative that TBS unceasingly attempted to beat into our skulls last night, nevermind the fact that Moss actually hit behind Cespedes for most of their last six weeks together, or that Moss’ skid had began before the Cespedes/Lester trade was even made, putting up a .287 OBP in July.”
I don’t believe in protection any more than you do, but doesn’t the end of the quote tend to support protection rather than dismiss it? Essentially, his skid started within 2 weeks of no longer having Cespedes hitting behind him. If he tore the cover off the ball in July while batting behind Cespedes, then that would support the anti-protection side. But by performing poorly in July, that helps with the protection myth.
How is it supposed to work? Cespedes protected Moss by clearing the bases before Moss came to the plate? Is that right?
Good insight on locations.
Would disagree on bashing the Ventura decision, it was his throw-day between starts and he knew he could be used, he just failed to execute, like a couple of aces in the same game.
As usual, managers are geniuses when their players perform, idiots when they don’t, and Billy Beane’s stuff still doesn’t work in the playoffs.
Are you seriously trying to put this on Billy Beane? What is his “stuff” that doesn’t work? Having good hitters and excellent pitchers?
I’m a Royals fan and I was at the game but this comment is just straight up stupid. The Ventura decision was horrible and it doesn’t take a saber savvy person to understand that. My friend played college baseball and has no interest in statistics and even he couldn’t understand why a lefty wasn’t coming in when they had 4 consecutive left-handed batters coming up. That screams the perfect time to use a lefty.