“I Wish We Could Get Guys Like That”

Weird things about baseball fascinate me. One of those things is the concept of discarded players. Every once in awhile, you’ll see a player doing well and think to yourself, “Hey, wasn’t he on our team at one point?” David Carpenter is one such player. Watching him face the Red Sox this week, I couldn’t help but think that it would be sure nice if the Sox had him right now instead of Craig Breslow. Sure, the world will keep on spinning, and Carpenter wouldn’t make or break the 2014 Red Sox, but every little bit counts, and the Red Sox gave him away for free after just five weeks on the roster. In situations like these, we often jokingly say (or at least I do), “Hey, I wish we could get guys like that!”

I don’t mean to pick on the Red Sox, because every team does this. If you scan rosters, you’ll find one such player on just about every roster. And originally, my intention was to run down that list and look at them all individually. But then I got a look at this trade. On July 31, 2010, the Atlanta Braves traded Gregor Blanco, Jesse Chavez and Tim Collins to the Kansas City Royals for Rick Ankiel and Kyle Farnsworth. Take a look:

flow_chart (1)

The Braves made this trade because they really wanted to get back to the playoffs. They had missed out on October berths in each of the past four seasons, they had not been to the National League Championship Series since 2001, and they could no longer claim that Tom Glavine, Greg Maddux or John Smoltz were walking through that door. On the day of the trade, the Braves were 9.5 games behind the Phillies in the East, and were in a dead heat with the Astros for the Wild Card spot. (Remember when there was only one Wild Card team? Ah, memories.) They didn’t need to reinvent the wheel, but they needed to do something.

Do something was an appropriate motto for the Royals’ action as well. Yes, Collins had a little bit of hype behind him, but he was far from a top prospect. The diminutive Worcester, Mass., native was never a top 100 prospect. And at the time, Blanco and Chavez weren’t thought of as much of anything themselves. In our writeup of the trade here at FanGraphs, Jack Moore called Chavez’s involvement in the trade “negligible,” and with good reason. The Royals would become Chavez’s fourth organization, and at the time he had pitched just 145 innings major league innings.

Fast forward four years and Chavez is suddenly a pretty valuable weapon. He had a great 2013 campaign in which he posted a 78 FIP- across 57.1 innings, mostly in relief. This season, as you probably already know, he has been a full-time starter, and acquitted himself quite well. The fly balls that once plagued him are relatively in check — though he still has a pretty healthy HR/FB% — and his Minus stats paint him as an above-average pitcher. But he’s not doing this for the Royals.

In fact, the Royals didn’t extract any value out of Chavez at all. In his season-plus with Kansas City, he posted -0.6 WAR and the team relinquished him to the Blue Jays, who claimed him off waivers. Less than 12 months later, Chavez had an 8.44 ERA in 21.1 innings pitched for the Blue Jays, and they too relinquished him via waiver claim. Now he’s working on 1.8 WAR and counting as a member of the A’s.

Blanco’s situation wasn’t nearly as bleak, but the results were mostly the same. Following the trade to the Royals, he immediately slotted in as the team’s starting center fielder, and compiled 0.5 WAR in his time there, which included 40 center-field starts. Spread that out over a full season, and you have the productive but unheralded player we know today. He managed 10 steals in 12 tries and posted a .348 on-base percentage for Kansas City, but when the next season started he was on the outside looking in. The Royals’ Opening Day outfield consisted of Alex Gordon in left, Melky Cabrera in center and Jeff Francoeur in right, and Jarrod Dyson and Mitch Maier in reserve. Blanco was in Omaha, where he hit just a buck-ninety six, but had a .384 OBP. The Royals had seen enough though, and shipped him off to the Nationals in a conditional deal. Conditional on what, I’m not sure, but it doesn’t appear that the Royals ever received anything in exchange for him. In fact, the transaction doesn’t even appear on the May 2011 transaction logs for the Royals or Nationals on MLB.com.

Blanco remained in Triple-A in the Nationals organization, where his performance got worse. Turns out, he had bone spurs in his wrist, and their removal ended his season early. The Giants, as you can see in the link in the previous sentence, had noticed his very healthy OBP, and took a chance on him. They had their hitting coach, Hensley Meulens, work with him, and he would win the Most Valuable Player Award in the Venezuelan Winter League that year. He went on to become an important part of the Giants’ 2012 World Series team, and was even better last year. He has not started as strong this year, but the Giants are now 6.2 WAR in the black on the Blanco transaction, and that has to feel pretty sweet.

If you’re keeping score, the Royals came out ahead in that 2010 trade. They derived 1.6 WAR collectively from their trio of players, while the Braves derived just 0.6 WAR. I’m sure the Braves don’t regret the trade. After all, Farnsworth picked up a win in the NL Division Series that season, and Ankiel homered as well. Their contributions were just positive enough, in other words. But it’s worth wondering what if. What if the Braves had held serve and kept Blanco. If Blanco had the 2012 season he did in San Fran in Atlanta instead, perhaps the B.J. Upton contract never happens. If Collins was still around, perhaps the temptation to foolishly move a player with legit upside like Alex Wood back to the bullpen in favor of the forever mediocre Gavin Floyd wouldn’t have become a thing that happened this season. Perhaps they wouldn’t have needed Floyd around at all if they still had Chavez.

We could do this dance with the Royals as well. Lorenzo Cain and Jarrod Dyson are essentially the same players as is Blanco, but in retrospect, you have to wonder if the Royals should have received at least something in return for his services. And While Blanco might have saved the Braves from Upton, perhaps Chavez could have saved the Royals from committing to Jeremy Guthrie once he hit free agency. Probably not, but it’s still interesting.

Again, the point of this post isn’t to criticize the Braves, Royals, Blue Jays or Nationals for discarding useful major league players. It’s simply to illustrate just how fragile success is in the majors, and how fates turn quickly. After being discarded by two organizations, Blanco would play a semi-starring role in October. Chavez woke up this morning leading a very good A’s pitching staff in strikeouts. Meanwhile, Farnsworth and Ankiel spent just a couple of months in Atlanta. Let’s let Smooth Jimmy Apollo sum things up for us (fast forward to the 16 second mark):

Indeed.





Paul Swydan used to be the managing editor of The Hardball Times, a writer and editor for FanGraphs and a writer for Boston.com and The Boston Globe. Now, he owns The Silver Unicorn Bookstore, an independent bookstore in Acton, Mass. Follow him on Twitter @Swydan. Follow the store @SilUnicornActon.

40 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anon21
9 years ago

If Collins was still around, perhaps the temptation to foolishly move a player with legit upside like Alex Wood back to the bullpen in favor of the forever mediocre Gavin Floyd wouldn’t have become a thing that happened this season.

That’s an innings-limit thing, not a slight to Wood’s value. Wood will start for the Braves in the playoffs if they make it.

vslykemember
9 years ago
Reply to  Anon21

I was going to say that exact thing. Wood’s on the same schedule that Medlen was on in 2012. Its frustrating to see an author of an otherwise well done piece slam a team and be so wrong about his information (although I will admit my jimmies are more rustled than usual because I’m a Braves fan).

Anon21
9 years ago
Reply to  vslyke

Eh, I wouldn’t expect a guy on the national beat to know what the deal is. It was just a subsidiary point, in any event.

vslykemember
9 years ago
Reply to  Anon21

Yeah I guess. As I said, my personal bias made that a bigger deal to me than it otherwise would have been. Still pissed about the Red Sox series.

vslykemember
9 years ago
Reply to  Paul Swydan

Medlen was great for a year and a half. I don’t think you can say that Medlen had a second TJ so its a bad idea. No plan will work perfectly for everyone.

Secondly, Floyd is running a 3.37 xFIP and a 3.12 FIP this year. That’s a good sign and Floyd has a good track record (3 3+ fWAR seasons). And as Eno has noted, Floyd has made some adjustments (namely adding a changeup) that could explain his success. Not sure why you have such a low opinion of Gavin.

Anon21
9 years ago
Reply to  Paul Swydan

I’m well aware that this is the plan.

Then why did you imply it’s primarily a decision about a thin bullpen?

I’m also well aware that I’d be hard pressed to hold up Medlen as an example of this plan working in practice.

He pitched as a starter down the stretch and started the wild card game, then was good (but not otherworldly) in 2013. You’d be hard pressed to show any connection between the way they handled his workload and his subsequent second Tommy John surgery.

To boot, Gavin Floyd isn’t the guy you make this play for.

Again, if it’s about preserving Wood’s bullets for a stretch and playoff run, there’s no particular “guy” you make the play for, because the play isn’t for the “guy.” Floyd looks adequate–would you disagree?

It’s a poor decision on multiple levels by the Braves.

Maybe, but you’ve presented no evidence or arguments to support that characterization.

Anon21
9 years ago
Reply to  Anon21

If you think a player is fragile, ramping him down and trying to stretch him back out in the same season strikes me as an incredibly poor decision.

Why? It’s certainly driving his innings and pitch counts way down, and given the medieval state of knowledge about pitcher health and injuries, it’s entirely reasonable to think it will keep him fresh and protected for a stretch run.

Zhenya
9 years ago
Reply to  Anon21

I’ll preface my comment by saying I live in Atlanta and care about the Braves, so I’m not just trying to attack your precious team.

The Braves have three veterans (Santana, Harang, and Floyd) who, despite having some good seasons, each have a career ERA and FIP over 4. I think we can all agree Wood has significant upside, and I don’t see why he should ever be blocked by them.

If it’s an innings-limit thing, Wood did pitch nearly 140 innings last year, so following a typical increase he should see 160-170 innings, right? I suppose he’s actually on pace for that now, but I agree with Swydan. If you’re worried about a guy’s arm, why make him pitch 100 pitches per outing for a months, then 20 pitches per outing for a few months, then 100 again? Doesn’t make much sense to me. Seems more reasonable to stretch out the innings somewhat equally over the course of the season. Plus, if our pitcher health knowledge is in a “medieval state” and we just don’t know, why don’t we just let the guy pitch? It’s not like trying to protect pitchers has been working out very well, right?

BMB
9 years ago
Reply to  Anon21

I think Paul is trying to say, if you want to save a young arm for the playoffs, you should ramp them up over time. Not ramp them down, then back up again. Starter to Reliever to Starter?