A Fun Comparison for Denard Span

I’m an unabashed fan of Denard Span, and for my money, he remains one of the game’s most underrated players. But I’ll admit that when I saw this a few hours ago, even I was surprised.

Below, a side by side comparison of Span and Jacoby Ellsbury since the start of the 2012 season.

Name PA BB% K% ISO BABIP AVG OBP SLG wOBA wRC+ BsR Off Def WAR
Denard Span 1872 7% 11% 0.109 0.318 0.287 0.340 0.396 0.325 105 10.9 21.7 21.4 10.8
Jacoby Ellsbury 1587 7% 14% 0.128 0.316 0.282 0.336 0.410 0.327 104 22.4 28.9 18.6 10.7

Over the last three seasons, Span has essentially been Ellsbury’s equal. They walk the same amount, and while Ellsbury has a tick more power, Span strikes out a little less. Their slash lines are almost identical, and once you adjust for the offensive environments they’ve played in, Span’s wRC+ is actually a point higher, even with less power. Ellsbury’s a better base stealer, but UZR and DRS like Span’s defense a little more. They aren’t perfect clones, but the differences are small, and the overall value has been very similar.

They’re basically the same age — Span was born in February of ’84, Ellsbury in September of ’83 — and have the same general set of skills. Ellsbury’s additional power allows one to see him as a player with a bit more upside — his 2011 season did happen, after all, when he hit as many home runs that year as Span has in his career — and he’s been a slightly better player over his entire career. If you look at their whole big league resume, Ellsbury is at +27 WAR in 3,800 plate appearances, while Span is at +22 in 4,000 plate appearances. On a per-600 PA basis, that gives Ellsbury roughly a +1 WAR advantage.

But the entirety of that difference comes from one year (which occurred four years ago), when Ellsbury was maybe the best player in the game while Span dealt with symptoms from a concussion. That season happened, and it counts, but we’re now on year three of Span and Ellsbury being basically the same player.

The Nationals have a crowded outfield, and the assumption has been that they may look to trade Span this winter. But he’s going to make $9 million next year, and the market just valued a very similar player as a $22 million per year player on a long-term deal. It might be easy to think that Span is a replaceable part, given the team’s depth, let’s not underestimate Span’s impact on the Nationals, and assume that he’d be so easy to replace. Denard Span is really good.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.




Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.

22 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
David
11 years ago

I think the assumption that he’d be traded was from early in the year. Most Nationals’ reporters seem to think it’s a foregone conclusion that his option will be picked up and that he will be back next year (not traded). Adam Kilgore even reported it as such.

Interesting comparison.

LHPSU
11 years ago
Reply to  David

Nationals will have to be clinically insane to not pick up his option. A trade is possible, but not probable.

Brian
11 years ago

I’m pretty sure the Twins are at or around 0 WAR from their CF’ers since that trade. Sure seems like it anyways. They also traded Revere that offseason.

screamin_jay
11 years ago

everything always works itself out for the least deserving fanbase ever

Douchey Cards Fan
11 years ago
Reply to  screamin_jay

They’re definitely not the Best Fans In Baseball.

PersonMember since 2024
11 years ago

And this year the Nats are paying him, what, $7M for 4 WAR?

He should be back next year. If Souza or Taylor had hit better in their limited time in the majors this year, maybe you consider trading Span, but it sure looks like they’ll want Span back next year.

Andrew R
11 years ago
Reply to  Person

Souza is ready, Taylor is not. But Span has been soooo good in the second half that he’s earned next year’s spot himself. Now what to do with Souza???

JCCfromDC
11 years ago
Reply to  Andrew R

Souza is the 4th OF/RH bench bat for an outfield full of players that have had injury problems. Essentially he slides into the Scott Hairston role, only Souza can actually play defense. Nats OF in 2015 will be the same three starters (I’m guessing Werth and Harper switch corners with Harper moving to RF), Souza as RH bench bat and McLouth as LH bench bat. Taylor, Brian Goodwin and (if he gets through the Rule 5 draft) Destin Hood man the OF in Syracuse.

One of the OF may be included in a package for an impact second baseman, but unless that happens the Nats run pretty deep tehre.

screamin_jay
11 years ago

another amazing win for the nationals. most blessed sports franchise and fanbase on earth. no troubles ever, proceed straight to utter domination of mlb

AC
11 years ago
Reply to  screamin_jay

No troubles ever? The Expos/Nationals franchise? Like two consecutive 100-loss seasons all of five years ago? Like about to have its third EVER playoff appearance (second for the Nationals)? That franchise has been the most blessed? I don’t think that word means what you think it means.

Or do you mean DC fans are the luckiest ever because of that whole 30+ years with no team at all, or because of how Washington won the World Series only 90 years ago?

JCCfromDC
11 years ago
Reply to  AC

Plate discipline, AC. Don’t swing at the trolls.

screamin_jay
11 years ago
Reply to  AC

maybe i just need more education on how BAD that 2005-11 stretch was. NATINALS OMG. JIM BOWDEN OMG

yeah that really balances out having more 80 win seasons than the o’s had for FOURTEEN YEARS IN A ROW. but you guys had it SO BAD

Cool Lester Smooth
11 years ago
Reply to  screamin_jay

The fact that the O’s were irrelevant for 20 years doesn’t mean that the Nationals didn’t have it bad.

It just means that the 90s/2000s Orioles were a joke of an organization. Everyone already knew that.

Jake
11 years ago

And imagine if you guys didn’t have him as a -.5 WAR defender this year…

Ben Revere
11 years ago

Thank you Dave. Maybe folks will confuse him with Ellsbury now instead of always confusing him with me.

Nobody can get as much batting average out of their wOBA as me. Span simply can’t touch me there. Ain’t gonna happen.

Curious
11 years ago

How does Span have a higher wRC+ but a lower Off WAR input?

DavidJMember
11 years ago
Reply to  Curious

OFF includes base running.

cass
11 years ago

BsR. That’s not included in wRC+ anymore. Both BsR and wRC+ go into Off.

Astromets
11 years ago

That’s still a 0.6 WAR/600 PA difference over the past 3 seasons, so their difference is not entirely due to that one season. Still closer than one would expect

Andrew Weiss
11 years ago

I wish there was a way to measure the value of taking good routes to balls in the outfield. Span is absolutely one of the best. He is rarely, if ever out of position to make a play, and when he makes a spectacular play it is not usually the result of having to make a play that should have been routine if the proper route had been taken (see Revere,Ben)

Cool Lester Smooth
11 years ago

Ellsbury subluxated his shoulder two weeks into the 2012 season and never really recovered. It’s just as much of an outlier as his 2011 season.

I love Span, but it’s silly to throw out Span’s 2011 because he was playing through an injury while including Ellsbury’s 2012.

corey
11 years ago

I agree…Span is extremely underrated. has always been