Shift Data!

We now have data on Shifts dating back to 2010, courtesy of our friends over at Baseball Info Solutions. All the shift data is now available in the leaderboards, and splits pages.

There are currently four splits available for Shifts and the data includes Balls in Play Only:

Shift – All : This breaks out all shifts, traditional or non-traditional.

No Shift : This breaks out all non-shifted plays.

Shift – Traditional : This breaks out all plays where a traditional shift is employed.

Shift – Non Traditional : This breaks out all plays which would not be considered a traditional shift.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Traditional / Non Traditional shifts are classified as follows by Baseball Info Solutions:

Traditional Shifts:

1) If there are 3 infielders playing on one side of the infield, we consider that a Full Ted Williams Shift.

2) If two players are positioned significantly out of their normal position, we consider that a Partial Ted Williams Shift.

3) If one infielder is playing deep into the outfield (Usually the 2B 10+ feet out into right field), we consider that a Partial Ted Williams Shift. If the 2B is only a few steps into the outfield, that does not count.

Non-traditional shifts are situational shifts not covered under the definition of traditional shifts.

To view which team has employed the shift most frequently, you should look at the pitcher leaderboards by team.

If you look at the batting leaderboards by team, you will see which team has been shifted against the most.





David Appelman is the creator of FanGraphs.

22 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Cool WHIP
10 years ago

As if I weren’t unproductive enough at work already…

Damaso
10 years ago

this is why I’ll always love you no matter what, fangraphs.

Ivdown
10 years ago

This is unrelate to the topic, but is there something up with pitching WAR so far? I know it’s crazy SSS, but why are all pitchers either 0.1 or 0.0 in fWAR this season? I would have expected at least 0.2 fWAR for Kershaw’s 7 IP 9 K 0 HR 1 BB performance the other night, but he’s at the same value right now as Scherzer who has a 5.77 FIP in the same 7 IP. Heck, even Greinke with his 4 IP at a 12.69 FIP is at 0.0.

The only reason I even think something is up is because I’ve seen pitchers lose or gain more than 0.1 for similar starts last season during the year. Just kind of odd.

Damaso
10 years ago
Reply to  Ivdown

believe it has the same source cause as the fact there is no fip- data yet.

Ivdown
10 years ago
Reply to  David Appelman

Awesome, thanks a lot for looking into that!

David PalardyMember since 2022
10 years ago

Thanks again, Fangraphs and BIS!

AC_Butcha_AC
10 years ago

It is unfortunate that in the shift-data walks, strikeouts and home runs are excluded.
Of course a HR wasn’t affected by the shift in a driect way but what about changes in approach that led to a HR? For example a hitter tries to lift the ball over the infield. Same with strikeouts where a hitter might wait longer in an attempt to go the other way and gets blown away. This would have been the really interesting caveat here.
Display complete shift-data for all events. All PAs where a shift was employed, whether it was put in play or not. That’s the way to see if the shift works in decreasing offensive output. The BABIP may even go up with a power hitter but his power decreases thus possibly yielding the defense a net benefit.

JoserMember since 2021
10 years ago

Now this is cool. Thanks!

If we look at the top 20% of teams employing the shift, half (three of six — Astros, Angels, and Rangers) are in the AL West. You’d think that would mean they’d be shifting against each other, but only one AL West team is in the top 20% of teams shifted-against (the hapless Mariners, whose roster construction presumably made themselves easy victims of their division rivals). On the flip side, the Yankees and Jays are the two top shifted-against teams, yet only one of the top-shifting teams (Rays) share their division. Fun!

I sense a fascinating Tony Blengino batted-ball-outcomes-modified-by-team-defense article could emerge from this….

Dustin
10 years ago

This is really great. I feel like there’s a counting stat that could indicate how much value teams are getting out of the shift. It appears some teams are shifting often, but not limiting offense much, and other shift rarely but get good results..

DavidBowser
10 years ago
Reply to  Dustin

My gut was simply to compare pitching staff wOBA for Shift-all and No Shift. That should give a rough “good shift – bad shift” list.

2015 numbers

Good Shift (>0.02 wOBA diff):
Padres (+0.037)
Cardinals (+0.021)
Rangers (0.021)

Bad Shift (>-0.02 wOBA diff):
Mariners
Yankees
Nats
Angels
Reds
Mets
Dodgers

I am not really sure what to make of this, since at first blush, it doesn’t seem to correlate (I did not analyze) to pitching or defense.

Maybe this is indicative of the effectiveness of the coaches?

strycal
10 years ago

Unrelated to the topic, but is there any way to get old Baseruns data on Fangraphs (2002-2015)? I’m looking for the data for a school project.

Bernie Sanders
10 years ago

You have made this self-proclaimed democratic-socialist feel like a 60 year-old again!

JS7
10 years ago

This is awesome!

Mark Davidson
10 years ago

Thank you fangraphs!

raws
10 years ago

Thank you, Dad.

Bobby MuellerMember since 2016
10 years ago

When I select “No Shift” I get no results; it’s just blank.

KwisatzHaderachMember since 2016
10 years ago

Anyone have any thoughts on what exactly are the non-traditional, situational shifts being used? Does that just refer to shifts being used in some counts, and not others? I haven’t seen an infielder play rover in shallow CF yet, but I’m sure it’s been tried!

Paul22
10 years ago

I’ll give credit to Fan Graphs for continually improving the stats. Unlike B-Ref which seems to have stood pat since the sale several years ago (except the ridiculous DFS addition)