Interleague Attendance Lagging in Season’s First Five Weeks

Major League Baseball introduced interleague play in 1997, in part to boost interest in the game after the 1994 season was cut short by the players’ strike. More than 15 years after the first interleague game between the Giants and the Rangers at The Ballpark at Arlington, MLB continues to boast about attendance at interleague games. Last season, the average attendance at interleague games was 34,693, the highest since 2008, when 35,587 fans, on average, attended interleague games.

Going back to 2007, interleague attendance has outpaced overall attendance, as follows:

Year Average Interleague Attendance Average Overall Attendance
2007 34,905 32,785
2008 35,587 32,528
2009 33,351 30,330
2010 33,253 30,183
2011 33,606 30,362
2012 34,693 30,895

MLB points to the interleague match-ups as the reason for the attendance bump. But many are skeptical, and note that until this season, interleague games were largely played in June and July, when kids are out of school and the weather has warmed up — two factors that traditionally boost attendance regardless of the opponents. There’s also the matter of weekends: more than 60% of interleague games were played on weekends, when attendance, on average, is higher than on games played Monday through Thursday.

This season, we have interleague games from start to finish, not just in the summer and not just on weekends. And even though the season is only five weeks old, there are early indications that the skeptics of interleague’s attendance boost were right.

Here’s a chart showing the ten  twelve interleague series to date, the average attendance during the series, and the average attendance for the home team for all games this season (the chart below has been corrected from the one that appeared when the post first published. Thanks to comments from Evan in pointing out my error):

Interleague Series Weekend (Y/N) Interleague Series Average Attendance Home Team Average Attendance
LAA v. CIN N 34,073 25,690
KCR v. PHL Y 41,413 37,321
CWS v. WSH N 24,588 31,812
NYM v. MIN Y 26,270 27,731
KCR v. ATL N 24,709 29,235
TEX v. CHC N 26,270 32,252
ARI v. NYY N 34,836 37,414
LAD v. BAL Y 37,775 26,398
MIA v. MIN N 24,508 27,731
ATL v. DET Y 37,170 34,611
PHL v. CLE N 11,785 15,167
TBR v. COL Y 32,858 29,489

The only non-weekend interleague series with a higher average attendance than the home team’s overall average attendance was the first series, which pitted the Angels against the Reds. But the first game of that series was also Opening Day, when 43,168 fans bought tickets to Great American Ballpark. By the next game, the attendance had dropped to 35,257, and in the third game of the series, only 23,795 fans came out — below the Reds’ overall average per-game attendance. The next series between the Kansas City Royals and the Philadelphia Phillies started on Friday, the Phillies’ home opener. Attendance for that game was 45,307. Saturday and Sunday saw a drop to 39,745 and 39,457, respectively. That’s still above the team’s overall game attendance but may very have reflected the weekend bump.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

For the other eight ten interleague series so far, the weekday games saw attendance below the home team’s game average while the weekend games saw attendance above the home team’s game average. In addition, in four interleague series, there was at least one weather-related postponement: Sunday’s game between the Mets and the Twins, Wednesday’s game between the Rangers and the Cubs, Friday’s game between the Dodgers and the Orioles, and Monday’s game between the Marlins and the Twins. Only the Dodgers-Orioles game was made up by a Saturday doubleheader. Weather may very well have played a role in suppressing turnout in Minneapolis, Chicago, and Baltimore. Indeed, many have complained about this season’s schedule, which saw 18 games postponed in April due to bad weather — the four interleague games and 14 others.

But weather-related attendance issues fits in perfectly with what skeptics have been saying for years: that the interleague attendance boost was really a summer-good-weather-weekend-game attendance boost.  So far this season, interleague games have averaged 29,815 30,623 in attendance, compared to 28,872 for all games, a difference of less than 2,000 tickets sold per game. And the 29,815 30,623 figure lags significantly behind the numbers for interleague games from 2007 to 2012.

As the weather warms up, and interleague series feature more interesting matchups than the Marlins and the Twins, we may begin to see more of an attendance bump. Or we may not. We’ll just have to wait and see how it plays out.





Wendy writes about sports and the business of sports. She's been published most recently by Vice Sports, Deadspin and NewYorker.com. You can find her work at wendythurm.pressfolios.com and follow her on Twitter @hangingsliders.

23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Eric R
13 years ago

“So far this season, interleague games have averaged 29,815 in attendance, compared to 28,872 for all games, a difference of less than 1,000 tickets sold per game. ”

I guess we’ll have to see how things go as we get deeper into the season– my estimate was around 100 extra tickets, per game, if not for the fan-friendly interleague schedule. Thus far it is about ten times that, which might suggest that fans *do* prefer interleague to at least a small degree.

I had +0.4% while the league was promoting a +10-12% bump. The data presented here has it as +3.3% thus far, so at least I was a little closer than they were 🙂

Evan
13 years ago

Wendy,

It looks like you omitted two series: Royals @ Braves (4/16-4/17) and Diamondbacks @ Yankees (4/16-4/18).

Eric
13 years ago

The headline on this should have been Fewer people go to baseball games in bad weather than in good weather. Details at 11

Eric
13 years ago
Reply to  Wendy Thurm

The bad headline makes it look like you’re trying to say the opposite. I get it however

Will
13 years ago
Reply to  Wendy Thurm

Wouldn’t it make sense to compare past interleague attendance to average home attendance of the same month/day? Just like comparing summer to total distorts, so too does making comparisons in a five-week snapshot. Also, it could be true that when interleague was concentrated and more rivalry-based, it did boost attendance (i.e., because it was a special event). In other words, going to a revolving schedule could wind up diluting the appeal of interleague, not disproving past claims of fan interest.

Synovia
13 years ago
Reply to  Will

“Wouldn’t it make sense to compare past interleague attendance to average home attendance of the same month/day? ”

This. Its an apples to oranges comparison, and not that useful.

Sparkles Peterson
13 years ago

To be expected when interleague is no longer so focused on classic rivalries like Tigers-Pirates and Mariners-Padres.

ABravesFan
13 years ago

Hardly surprising since the old interleague schedule was in the midst of the summer when there is typically no school and the weather is nicer.

Dubmonk
13 years ago
Reply to  ABravesFan

It’s almost as if that’s exactly what the article said.

Tim
13 years ago

Why do the Indians have such an attendance problem? Only 15k a game and 30th in the MLB? I understand the kids in school and the weather isn’t great yet, but the team has been pretty respectable so far. Also the Browns haven’t been relevant in forever and Cavaliers have been terrible since Lebron left, yet both these teams draw a lot better than the Indians. I don’t really get it, I don’t live near Cleveland but there’s no reason the Indians should be last in the MLB in attendance by nearly 3000 fans a game.

Josh M
13 years ago

interleague baseball sucks, always has, always will

I Agree Guy
13 years ago
Reply to  Josh M

But does it suck enough to make you burn your baseball equipment?

adohaj
13 years ago

I like Wendy’s articles, they are a good change of pace from the typical fangraphs articles

J Church
13 years ago

Is it possible the reason for the decline in attendance across interleague series is in part attributable to none of this year’s series being a ‘rivalry’ series to date? I have to imagine that NYY/NYM, CWS/CHC and LAD/LAA in particular (and maybe even SF/OAK) would drive the interleague attendance numbers higher. It’d be interesting to see what the stats look like for interleague series 2007-12 minus rivalry games, versus 2013 interleague series to date.

BalkingHeads
13 years ago

Poor Cleveland.

Jason B
13 years ago

“The only non-weekend interleague series with a higher average attendance than the home team’s overall average attendance was the first series”

Part of that, though, is that you’re then left comparing non-weekend interleague series to the team’s overall average attendance, which INCLUDES weekend series. It might be more useful to see non-weekend interleague series compared to non-weekend intraleague series, and weekend interleague series compared to weekend intraleague series.

David
13 years ago

I think the AL/NL divide is unhealthy for basbeball. It’s in MLB’s best interests to cultivate a culture of baseball fans and not fans of just one league, or worse: one team. That isn’t to say that I think it’s bad that people prefer one league over the other or are a fan of one team, but I think it’s good that MLB promotes the entire league equally to fans. Premier games like interleague games and primetime games should be between two good teams and not old rivalries. You can’t guarantee a particular team will be good before the season starts but you can always shuffle the national (plus Canada!) TV schedule if a team is performing worse than expected.

Jason B
13 years ago
Reply to  David

I would argue the complete opposite – I think fans generally prefer their divisional rivalries most, then intraleague games, and now interleague games are just kind of a curiosity or an annoyance. As a Jays fan I would rather watch them play the Red Sox or Rays, and then any other AL team, including those that aren’t traditional rivals like the A’s or Royals; when they play the Mets or Rockies, it’s just kind of odd and I don’t have near the investment in it.

But hey, at least interleague play is now a season-long annoyance or curiosity, rather than being confined to a few specific weekends!

Matt P
13 years ago

But this is simply stupid.

You can’t seriously compare interleague weekday games to total attendance and note that since average attendance is greater then interleague attendance that there’s no bump. Especially since your data show that there is a bump when it comes to the weekend.

What you could do is look at historical data and compare interleague to regular attendance once you control for day of week and month. If you do that, then we see a 4% bump.

But there are some teams like the Red Sox, St Louis, Giants, Angels, Phillies and Yankees that sell out all or nearly all of their games. If they always sell out then of course you won’t see much of a difference.

If you split the teams into three categories (high attendance, medium attendance, low attendance) then you see the following.

The teams with high attendance see a bump of .1%. This is because they’re already selling out those games anyway. Teams with medium attendance see a bump of 7.2%. And teams with low attendance see a bump of 11.9%. This is controlling for month and day of week.

You’re right that interleague play won’t do much for the Yankees attendance but it sure does help the Orioles.

This is why historical data is our friend and why using the current season might be small sample size.

tylersnotes
13 years ago

worth noting that the kcr vs phl game with 45k in attendance was the PHL home opener.

i’d love to see a follow-up to this after the all-star break, to see how 2013 attendance compared to what would have been the normal interleague week in may/june of past seasons. And then get a 3rd article at end of season analyzing the whole impact. Would also be interesting to note how this might impact tv ratings; i’d especially be interested in knowing how many interleague games receive national broadcast on fox/espn compared to non-interleague games.

Mr Punch
13 years ago

Carl Everett was right (!): interleague play was done wrong BECAUSE of the rivalry games – that is, it was set up to highlight “subway series” in the two-team metros (NY, Chicago, LA, SF/O), rather than to allow fans in one-team areas to see teams and stars from the other league. Neither approach really works though, because most teams don’t have natural rivals in the other league (Boston-Atlanta? Really?), and most teams don’t have any big stars.