Intro to Splits

As you’ve probably noticed, David unveiled split data as the newest addition to the site yesterday. This is something that has been in the works for quite a while, and David worked long and hard on getting this on the site. For the first time, we’ll be able to really break down how a player performs against different pitcher types, as things like xFIP by handedness of batter have not previously been available.

However, as RJ noted a bit this morning, we do want to encourage wise use of split data, because these are the types of numbers that can be abused at times. In practicality, any split is going to be a smaller subset of a larger sample, and when you reduce your sample size, you increase the amount of noise in the number. There’s no way around that.

In fact, you can slice and dice numbers enough ways to always find some way that a player performed abnormally. Whether it’s batting average against lefties on Tuesdays or FIP in alternating months, these are the kinds of numbers that really mean nothing. They are the kinds of splits that give rise to things like the “lies, damn lies, and statistics” cliche. When looking at split data, we’d suggest limiting your conclusions to effects that are well known – platoons, parks, pull or opposite field results, etc…

Finally, you also want to keep the overall performance of the league in a specific situation in mind when looking at split data. We’ll get league averages by situation on the site in the not too distant future, but here’s a sneak peak at some batted ball league averages (2002-2009), so that you can compare players against a baseline for each type of struck ball:

Bunts: .376/.376/.377, .336 wOBA
Grounders: .231/.231/.253, .214 wOBA
Flies: .217/.212/.602, .328 wOBA
Liners: .727/.723/.974, .734 wOBA

It really is stunning how important hitting line drives is. Unless you’re regularly pounding fly balls over the wall, any other batted ball type is just not very productive. In fact, when you look at the BABIP split for fly balls, you see that 87 percent of non-HR flies result in outs. Line drives are where it’s at.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

We’ll have more on the proper way to use split data over the next few days. Enjoy them, find interesting nuggets hidden away, but also remember to use them judiciously. You don’t want to voluntarily cut your sample size in half if you don’t have a reason to.





Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.

21 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
B N
16 years ago

(Head scratch) I’m clearly missing something here as far as a minor detail. For Flies and Liners, do we know why the OBP is less than the AVG? Is this counting plays where guys are getting thrown out when going for an extra base or something of that sort?

Pete
16 years ago
Reply to  B N

Sac flies.

Fresh Hops
16 years ago
Reply to  Pete

Apparently sac liners as well… Scorers can be kinda dumb some times.

BS
16 years ago

I’ve always been curious about this, but how are flies and liners distinguished? Is it arc angle? Ball flight height? Or is it a more subjective determination?

Zach SandersMember since 2020
16 years ago
Reply to  BS

Completely subjective. Colin Wyers took a look at this issue at THT:
http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/when-is-a-fly-ball-a-line-drive/

Hit f/x should help somewhat with this problem.

David AppelmanFanGraphs Staff
16 years ago
Reply to  Zach Sanders

Well, our batted ball data is of the BIS variety, so it would not be impacted by press box height. There are actually two other categories of batted ball data, Fliner-Fly balls and Fliner-Line drives, which I just lump into fly balls and line drives. The fliners are the ones that are in-between and can be hard to judge, but generally their BABIP and other characteristics match up much better with their Line Drive/Fly ball counterparts.

Lucas A.
16 years ago

The league averages would be an amazing addition.
Dave, is there any chance of defense-independent pitch value statistics based on batted-ball type making way onto the site?

Sky KalkmanMember since 2020
16 years ago
Reply to  Lucas A.

tRA?

Lucas A.
16 years ago
Reply to  Sky Kalkman

Yes, but for individual pitch types.

don
16 years ago

.376/.376/.377 – okay, who has a video of the extra base bunt?

suicide squeezeMember since 2016
16 years ago
Reply to  don

Apparently, it’s happened a few times:

http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/2099

don
16 years ago

It didn’t make the archives! Of all the plays. Maybe next season… it looks like they average about one a year.

https://secure.mlb.com/multimedia/tp_archive.jsp?c_id=la&ym=200907

glassSheets
16 years ago

Joe Mauer’s batted ball’s by pull-center-opposite are great fun to look at

Detroit Michael
16 years ago

It’s be nice to have a refresher about the level of platoon persistance. I know the research has been done before but did the statheads reach consensus on whether a batter who clobbers LHP with an exceptionally large historical observed platoon split can be expected to do that going forward. Or should one just project his overall batting ability and expect a normal platoon split?

Pip
16 years ago

Super addition!

As as future improvement, I humbly request pitcher splits by role (starter, reliever).

Joel
16 years ago

Dear Eric Van, …

went9
16 years ago

Thanks for the splits Dave. It’s cool to have lefty/righty splits at your fingertips. It just keeps getting better here.
Again, thanks much.

labe
16 years ago

here is just something i was thinking about….
this may be exactly what tra* does, so i’m not sure if it’s anything new.
knowing the average slugging percentages per ball in play allows us to create a babip sort of idea for “isolated power against”.
using regressed batted ball % i calculated what a pitchers expected iso against should have been. just to name a few pitchers, some chosen because i expected a large difference…
expected iso iso diff
kershaw: 109 82 -27
volstad: 115 201 +86
u.jimenez: 98 97 -1
nolasco: 126 174 +48

labe
16 years ago

so it’s easier to read:
………….expected iso…..iso…..diff
kershaw: 109…………….82…. -27
volstad: 115…………..201… +86
u.jimenez: 98……………97…… -1
nolasco: 126………… 174….. +48

FireOmar
16 years ago

any chance we could get day/night splits? had to go over to mlb.com for those. Miguel Cabrera day game hangover related.

Dan
16 years ago

Any plans to add these to the “leaders” pages so they can be sorted, etc?
Keep up the great work.