Is Baseball Ready to Love Dick Allen?

This is Shakeia Taylor’s fourth and final piece as part of her April Residency at FanGraphs. Shakeia is an avid baseball fan and baseball history enthusiast. Her main interests include the Negro Leagues and women in baseball. She has written for The Hardball Times and Complex. She hosts an annual charity bartending fundraiser for Jackie Robinson Day, all of tips and raffle proceeds of which are donated to the Jackie Robinson Foundation. Though not from Baltimore, she’s still an Elite Giant. Shakeia can also be found on Twitter (@curlyfro).

“I believe God Almighty hisself would have trouble handling Richie Allen.”

–Phillies interim manager George Myatt, 1969

Despite a somewhat itinerant career and a relative lack of notoriety, there’s some evidence to suggest that Richard Anthony Allen was among the best players of his era. From the moment he debuted, Dick Allen made an impact, nearly helping the Phillies win their first National League title since 1950 in his rookie season. His professional baseball resume features a .292 career batting average, including seven seasons of .300 or better. He won the 1964 Rookie of the Year award and the 1972 MVP award. He posted a .534 career slugging percentage, which ranks second best among qualified players during his career. During the period in which he was active, Allen also produced the eighth-highest WAR among all position players — more wins than Hall of Famers Lou Brock or Willie McCovey or Willie Stargell recorded during the same timeframe, despite all benefiting from more plate appearances than Allen.

While Allen was noted for his talent, he also developed a reputation as one of the most controversial players in the game. He arrived for games hungover and would smoke in the dugout. He was often fined for showing up late or not showing up at all. He was known as a “divisive clubhouse guy.” His attitude would shape future perceptions of him, changing the way fans viewed him as a player.

As the years have passed, though — and as his Hall of Fame case has been evaluated and re-evaluated — those perceptions have shifted, giving way to a more complete understanding of what he endured. Many attribute his “bad attitude” to the racism and mistreatment he suffered in the minor leagues, an unfortunate trend that would follow him to the Phillies clubhouse.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Allen suffered through more unfortunate chapters that I can recount here, but perhaps the defining one came before a game on July 3, 1965, when Allen got into a brawl with Phillies teammate Frank Thomas. According to late Daily News writer Bill Conlin, the fight stemmed from an incident a week earlier when Thomas jokingly asked Allen, “Hey, boy, can you carry my bags to the lobby?” The fight solidified Allen’s bad reputation; his life in Philadelphia became hell. The city was still dealing with the effects of the 1964 racial riots and many white people sided with Thomas. The team put Thomas on irrevocable waivers. Fans began to boo loudly after Thomas, in a radio interview, said that Allen should’ve been punished, too. Allen’s left shoulder was injured in the fight with Thomas, making it difficult to play third base. He was moved to left field. The booing turned to death threats, which turned into fans throwing things at Allen on the field. He began to wear a helmet in the outfield to protect himself from further injury.

Remembering Allen just as an angry ballplayer — even a very good angry ballplayer — does little justice to the person as a whole. He was also, for example, a soul singer. In the 1989 book Crash: The Life and Times of Dick Allen, co-author Tim Whitaker mentions that Allen had a love of doo-wop music. “Back in his playing days, he would often harmonize before a game in the clubhouse with the grounds crew to get loose,” Whitaker describes.

In 1968, he formed a doo-wop group called The Ebonistics. The group performed in night clubs all over Philadelphia. Their song “Echoes of November” became a hit in the Philadelphia area. They even performed at halftime of a Philadelphia 76ers game in January 1969. A review of the performance by the Philadelphia Inquirer read:

“Here came Rich Allen. Flowered shirt. Tie six-inches (152 mm) wide. Hiphugger bell-bottomed pants. A microphone in his hands. Rich Allen the most booed man in Philadelphia from April to October, when Eagles coach Joe Kuharich takes over, walked out in front of 9,557 people at the Spectrum last night to sing with his group, The Ebonistics, and a most predictable thing happened. He was booed. Two songs later though, a most unpredictable thing happened. They cheered Rich Allen. They cheered him as warmly as they have ever cheered him for a game winning home run.”

This was about as much success as Dick Allen’s musical career yielded, but it offers a microcosm for the public’s fickle relationship with the player and man, alternating between between boos and applause.

Even years after the episode with Thomas, some Philly fans’ reaction to Allen remained rooted in their biased perception of the fight. “I don’t think there’s any question the Thomas affair was a turning point in Allen’s career,” Larry Merchant, former Daily News columnist said. “It revealed some sensitivities in him that perhaps he was able to mask. When you hit home runs, it takes care of everything. But nobody hits home runs every day. When the difficulties came, he really didn’t know how to cope.”

Four years after his fight with Thomas, Allen was traded. The Phillies weren’t very good and his behavior didn’t improve. Despite the MVP award in 1972, he bounced from team to team, including a second shot with the Phillies, but by 1975, Allen’s professional baseball career was over. He was 35. The injuries, the mysterious absences, and the controversy from the fight had lingered on, cutting short the career of a man who was known for his hitting in an era when pitching dominated.

“I still love baseball, I do,” Allen told Sports Illustrated in 1993. “But once you’re done with the game, the game is done with you.” Almost 20 years after his departure from professional baseball, Allen was seemingly still dealing with the anger and bitterness that had plagued him during his career. He said that, after the death of his daughter in 1991, he approached several teams about getting jobs, but was told to send a rèsumè. He balked at the idea that he should need a rèsumè when teams could simply look at the back of one his bubblegum cards.

But as time has gone on, opinions of Dick Allen seem to have softened. Or perhaps fans and writers have become more understanding of what he dealt with during his playing days. In 1994, Allen began working for the Philadelphia Phillies as a fan development and community representative. In 2012, 38 years after leaving Chicago, Allen was welcomed back when the Chicago Baseball Museum had a tribute to the 1972 White Sox team. The Phillies made Allen a club ambassador after the 2017 season.

Stories of his mentorship of Mike Schmidt and his camaraderie now sit next to accounts of the fight and Allen’s troubled moods. A broader context exists for his experience; analysts and fans acknowledge just how difficult the time was, the indignities and threats, small and very serious, which he suffered. We remember that he liked doo-wop, and came to reach out to the community on behalf of the club he once demanded to leave. He was more than just angry, though he was also justified in that anger in a way writers of the time didn’t recognize or acknowledge. He was a star who swung a 40-ounce bat, only his time refused to celebrate him as one.

Though eliminated from annual consideration by baseball writers in 1997, and narrowly missing the vote for the Hall in 2014 when he was considered by the “Golden Era” Veterans Committee, Dick Allen may still have a chance. In 2016, the Hall restructured the committee into two voting groups: Modern Baseball (1970-1987), which voted in 2017, and Golden Days (1950-1969), which won’t vote until 2020. Allen’s career splits between both voting groups. Even though he did not make the modern baseball’s vote in 2017, there is a chance he could make the Hall with the Golden Days’ 2020 vote.

Maybe the game isn’t done with Dick Allen just yet.





Shakeia Taylor is a writer based in Chicago. Her work focuses on the intersection of Black culture and sport in America.

66 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Brian ReinhartMember since 2016
8 years ago

Thanks for this one. This has been an amazing FG residency and I enjoyed every story. It’s a great model of how the residency can help open up the site to new angles and new ways of looking at & learning about & loving the sport.

Now, here is an important audio clip, captured by our own Cistulli, of Dick Allen and Bob Uecker singing a duet: https://www.fangraphs.com/not/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Uecker-and-Allen1.mp3

adrock75Member since 2018
8 years ago

Great piece.

It was a secondary aspect of the article, but my goodness, Philadelphia sports fans were the worst. Maybe their recent successes will help them move on from being so terrible. One can always hope.

Tea_Wreck
8 years ago
Reply to  adrock75

It will simply reinforce their behavior since they’ll think they’re being rewarded.

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
8 years ago

Oh, precocious resident writer! Baseball (writ large) may not be ready to love Dick Allen, but the great and former NotGraphs has had a well documented love affair with him for years!

#KeepNotGraphs
8 years ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

We need someone to take up a sequel: “Be Your Own NotGraphs”

stanMember since 2019
8 years ago

I’ve long thought that Dick Allen belonged in the hall ahead of a few of his peers (not to mention Edgar Martinez) and I’d heard that his poor clubhouse demeanor was likely the thing keeping him out. His stats don’t make him a lock though, and if you’re borderline, you’d better be a nice guy (like Stargell, Perez, Edgar, Santo to name a few borderline cases).
I also have to add: Everyone had struggles, especially in those days. Whatever Allen experienced, it doesn’t excuse him for the poor behavior that followed in my book.

Tea_Wreck
8 years ago
Reply to  stan

I take most any reporting that any athlete, and in particular concerning black men, has an attitude problem with a boulder-sized grain of salt. The correlation between “bad attitude” and “doesn’t give access/interviews/respect-to-the-reporter” isn’t 1:1, but it’s close enough for government work.

Johnston
8 years ago
Reply to  Tea_Wreck

I was there at the games. His attitude was awful.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  Tea_Wreck

In the 1960s and 1970s it was definitely true. Definitely. Probably more than 1:1.

Jetsy Extrano
8 years ago
Reply to  Tea_Wreck

You know the experiments where they send out the same resume with either a “black” or a “white” name on it, and see how responses compare? It would be interesting if you can do that with fictional news stories describing an athlete’s actions.

(Caveat that this would only be looking under the streetlight — bigger effect is probably in what story gets written in the first place. )

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  Jetsy Extrano

That’s an audit study, although I don’t know that you could do that in the real-world audit context that unless you somehow got an editor to agree to randomly print some articles in error. You’d probably have to do it with a vignette experiment instead. Would still be interesting.

Jetsy Extrano
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Cool, thanks for the terminology to check out.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  Jetsy Extrano

No prob. For reference, this is about audit studies:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3024262

I don’t have a good reference handy for vignette methodology, but this is an open-access discussion of some of the limitations of vignette methodology (although it’s still far, far better than a simple survey question):
http://www.pnas.org/content/112/8/2395

Johnston
8 years ago
Reply to  stan

“Whatever Allen experienced, it doesn’t excuse him for the poor behavior that followed”

Bingo. There’s no excuse for what he said and did.

hopbittersMember since 2020
8 years ago

Is it four already? I hope we hear more from you.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago

Thank you for the wonderful article about Dick Allen. Dick Allen has gotten a raw deal in retirement, although he got a worse deal when he was playing. Virtually every teammate and manager has vouched for him, he dealt with an enormous amount of pressure (there were actual protests against him while he was in Little Rock in the minors, people left death threats on his car, etc) and he was an absolute monster at the plate. He was #6 in position-player WAR from 1964 through 1977 which covers his whole career, including the decline phase at the end (and of the top 14, twelve are in the Hall of Fame, and the other two are Pete Rose and Dick Allen). He had the second-highest wRC+ during that period with a minimum of 2500 PAs (just behind some guy named Frank Robinson, and just ahead of a guy named Hank Aaron). So the guy was a beast.

The reason his career numbers aren’t up with the best of them was because of his fielding numbers. There are two reasons for this: 1) When he won the 3rd base job in 1964, he had never actually played 3rd base before, being primarily an outfielder, and 2) He completely shredded his hand trying to push his car out of a ditch in 1967, leaving him unable to throw accurately. And yet, despite severing tendons and permanently losing some feeling in two of his fingers near the end of the prior season, he had a wRC+ of 159 in 1968. Because Dick Allen was a beast.

Richie
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

“Virtually every … manager has vouched for him”?!? Well, at least we don’t have to wonder about where you’re coming from.

csw117
8 years ago
Reply to  Richie

What does this even mean?

John Autin
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Good post. A quibble: “1964-77” doesn’t *quite* cover his whole career, which began with a ’63 cameo. For 1963-77, he’s #8 in fWAR, which is still great, of course.

GoNYGoNYGoGo
8 years ago

Shakeia,

Helped put the player and the man in context. Great job and much thanks.

However, despite the wonderful OPS (912) and OPS+ (156) Allen had too short of a career and was too poor of a fielder to get into the Hall. He totaled less than 1900 hits (1848) and the Hall has not admitted any position player with <2,200 hits in more than 30 years. His dWAR of -16.3 is cringe worthy and one of the worst in history.

Allen's bWAR of 58.7 is below normal HoF standards, as is his fWAR of 61.3.

His most similar batters include good but not Hall of Famers such as Reggie Smith, Berkman, Ellis Burks and Fred Lynn. Baseball fans should reconsider how they remember the man, but voters should continue to keep him out of the Hall.

Anthony CalamisMember since 2024
8 years ago
Reply to  GoNYGoNYGoGo

Yes, he was a catcher, but Mike Piazza got in with 2127 hits just two years ago. Did you mean <2,000 hits?

GoNYGoNYGoGo
8 years ago

Anthony, My fat-fingered mistake. Apologies. Yes, 2,000 hits, but my comment also should have said writers, as the various committees elected Lombardi, Lazzeri and Joe Gordon.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  GoNYGoNYGoGo

Ellis Burks? Reggie Sanders? Please tell me those were automated comps, because they are 15-20 fWAR lower than Dick Allen’s. Lance Berkman is probably a closer comp.

The argument about Dick Allen really starts with his peak. Jay Jaffe has a pretty good write up on his statistical case using bWAR here:
https://www.si.com/mlb/2014/10/31/hall-of-fame-golden-era-ballot-part-1-dick-allen-gil-hodges

IMO, I think that the counting stats thing is overrated compared to a peak. That is especially true with numbers like hits. His career fWAR (a composite counting stat) is higher than other position players like Ryne Sandberg, Dave Winfield, Andre Dawson, and Tony Perez. I wouldn’t call Dick Allen a slam-dunk case because some people believe that you can’t be a HoF position player with an fWAR below 70 or something like that (which would also disqualify Willie Stargell, Roberto Alomar, Ernie Banks, Robin Yount, Harmon Killebrew, Craig Biggio, and Paul Molitar), but he’s not that far off and definitely deserving of a debate.

GoNYGoNYGoGo
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

sadtrombone: It was Reggie Smith, not Reggie Sanders. I took the names from Dick Allen’s baseball-reference page, so they are algorithmic comps. Lance Berkman, Reggie Smith and Ellis Burks (none a HoFer) were the top 3 most-similar comps.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  GoNYGoNYGoGo

Hah, clearly I can’t read. Smith, Sanders…tomatoe, tomatoh…

GoNYGoNYGoGo
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

No harm, no foul. 🙂

Jetsy Extrano
8 years ago
Reply to  GoNYGoNYGoGo

Those Bill James similarity scores are a fun toy, they’re not a way of really characterizing a player, much less making a HOF case. He’s definitely a peak over career case, but if you like peak he’s got a good one.

But I really appreciate the discussion of him as a ballplayer and as a person, so I’ll stop getting sucked into the HOF vortex!

jgrub7
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Some other really interesting comparisons. There are only 4 players in MLB history with at least 7000 PAs and playing 30% of their games at 1B and 30% at 3B.

1) Miguel Cabrera
WAR = 67.6, wOBA = 0.400, SLG% = 0.553, wRC+ = 149
2) Harmon Killebrew
WAR = 66.1, wOBA = 0.389, SLG% = 0.509, wRC+ = 142
3) Dick Allen
WAR = 61.3, wOBA = 0.400, SLG% = 0.534, wRC+ = 155
4) Darrell Evans
WAR = 61.2, wOBA = 0.355, SLG% = 0.431, wRC+ = 120

Cabrera and Killebrew seem to be better comparisons with Allen because of the hitting numbers since all were fairly poor fielders.

Also another side note, of all players with with at least 7000 PAs (n =433), only 29 (6.7%) have a career slash line of 0.290/0.375/0.530 — Allen and Cabrera are both on that list. Of that 29, 20 are currently in the Hall of Fame, 2 are currently active and are both getting in (Pujols, Cabrera), 4 have solid cases (Allen, Berkman, Walker, Helton), and 3 are linked to steriods but would otherwise be in (Bonds, Rodriguez, Ramirez). And lastly, of those 9, Allen’s 155 career wRC+ is second only to Bonds’ 173.

WARrior
8 years ago
Reply to  GoNYGoNYGoGo

Some of us think Reggie Smith belongs in the HOF, at least he does if Kirby Puckett does.

TKDCMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  WARrior

I’m a big hall guy, but we can’t let everyone in who was better than Kirby Puckett.

Mahoney
8 years ago

I guess for HOF voters, a career prematurely ended by an unearned bad rap is worse than a career ended by, say, glaucoma.

Paul G.Member since 2016
8 years ago

Purely based on his numbers, I would vote for Dick Allen for the Hall of Fame.

The problem with Mr. Allen’s candidacy has always been is attitude. Unfortunately, I have no first person experience to fall back upon and therefore I am reliant on the testimony of others. The reports vary from he could be a bit prickly but was generally an okay guy with a few outbursts to he was effectively locker room cancer who would manipulate his teammates into hating each other. It is very difficult to reconcile all this. If the worst reports are true, it is arguable that he made his team worse than without him.

It would be nice to know the true story.

Johnston
8 years ago
Reply to  Paul G.

He was cancer. And maybe worse than that.

csw117
8 years ago
Reply to  Johnston

What’s worse than cancer? Was he locker room diabetes?

Knoblaublah
8 years ago
Reply to  csw117

Alzheimer’s is worse than cancer, but I’ve never heard anyone be referred to as “locker room Alzheimer’s.”

Adam C
8 years ago

Dick Allen was on the 2014 Golden Era Hall of Fame Hall of Fame ballot. There were 16 voters and 12 voted was requires for election. Allen missed election by one vote. Bob Watson was originally one of the voters but was ill and couldn’t make to the meeting to vote. He was going to vote for Allen. But the person who replaced Watson didn’t vote for Allen!

Johnston
8 years ago

Allen was a very good player, but he was also a total jerk. You may not have been there to see what a total jerk he was, but I was there, and he was just awful. He was almost as bad as Albert Belle and Barry Bonds.

Lest anyone stupidly mistake that comment for racism, three of my five favorite baseball players i ever watched play are Willie Mays, Hank Aaron, and Bob Gibson.

Tea_Wreck
8 years ago
Reply to  Johnston

Thank God that the HoF bars baseball players who were jerks.

Funny you mention Belle and Bonds. Belle wasn’t a great neighbor and a bad ex he’s probably no more of a “bad person” than Kirby Puckett. Yet Belle was notorious for his dislike of the press and Puckett was always accessible. It’s also funny how, while Bonds was always a jerk, his reputation as a player and teammate didn’t get torpedoed until Jeff Kent disliked being over-shadowed and started going off-the-record with the SF press.

We are, literally, less than a year after it was confirmed that much of the media covering the entertainment industry was actively engaging in protecting the reputation of men committing shocking abuses and trashing the reputation of their victims. Are you really so very certain that your perception of a person isn’t being, maybe a bit, colored by the self-serving actions of the people telling you how awful someone was?

Johnston
8 years ago

Here’s an idea – why not write an article about Hank Aaron, a well-loved baseball superstar who was and is a great gentleman, and who had his home run record stolen from him by a chemistry set.

Or doesn’t that fit your agenda?

pedeysRSox
8 years ago
Reply to  Johnston

Well, people also are drawn to “bad guys”. As a result, people are more interested in someone who is known for being bad than a guy who’s quiet and not as noteworthy.

csw117
8 years ago
Reply to  Johnston

Here’s an idea – if you want that article write it and submit it yourself instead of casting aspersions on others’ perceived ‘agendas’.

Psychic... Powerless...
8 years ago
Reply to  Johnston

Black person writing one article about Dick Allen = agenda.

Jeff Sullivan writing countless articles about Mike Trout = ?

bananas
8 years ago

Insufficient.

TKDCMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  Johnston

I’ve never heard of this Hank Aaron fellow. Why don’t you tell me more about him?

CheeseballMember since 2016
8 years ago

Great article. File lovingly under “Dick Allen Research Department”.

https://www.fangraphs.com/not/category/dick-allen-research-department/

tramps like us
8 years ago

Very good article from the Bill James online website, written by Dave Fleming in 2008, the link is copied and pasted at the bottom of this. My opinion; Dick Allen was probably one of the top 5 players in baseball from 1964 to 1973, and James says that as a hitter he was the BEST during that period. James also calls him “the 2nd most controversial player in history” in his Historical Review book.

From the article by Fleming: “Bill James once wrote that Dick Allen “did more to keep his teams from winning than anyone else who ever played major league baseball.” In his Historical Abstract, Bill added that Dick Allen was the second most controversial player in baseball history, behind Rogers Hornsby.” That’s some statement by one of baseball’s greatest writers.

I am troubled by an implication that his troubles were, in large part, due to his race. Pretty obviously, many great players of the era were black, and the great ones did what they did in spite of blatant racism. It’s how each player reacted to racism, Unless someone wants to argue that Allen had it worse than the other great players of the era? Clearly Little Rock, Arkansas left a horrible mark on him. Can’t the same be said for other black players of the era?

His talents aren’t in dispute. His career numbers are borderline, and the things that can tip them (defense and personality) both work against him. He did not have longevity on his side. I vote no. If you want to go by peak value, he belongs.

https://www.billjamesonline.com/article914/

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  tramps like us

I think a lot of the African-American trailblazers were unusually good at tuning out racism. Jackie Robinson, Willie Mays, Hank Aaron…they did something that seems (to me) to be impossible.

I think that realistically, the vast majority of people (when put in that situation) are going to be more like Bill Russell. They are going to be pissed off at the press and hyper-aware of racism. They will not be happy, cuddly-looking superstars like Mays or Aaron. They will be angry.

And then, you got Dick Allen. Dick Allen probably had it harder than anyone else in his era (I think it’s pretty clear that Jackie Robinson had it worse, and likely others before him). He was the first black player for Little Rock, ever. Philadelphia was a disastrous place for him to play. It’s also pretty clear that Dick Allen was not unnaturally good at tuning these things out. He definitely had demons, and it doesn’t sound like was able to cope in the way people like Bill Russell did.

I don’t know. It doesn’t seem like punishing Dick Allen for not being as unnaturally good at tuning out racism is fair. It mostly just shines a light on how remarkable Robinson, Aaron, etc were.

Jetsy Extrano
8 years ago
Reply to  tramps like us

“In large part” is a weird thing, right? If Allen had a different personality, that would have changed things completely. But if the society weren’t racist, that would have changed them too. It adds up to more than 100% that way.

It’s really a hell of a tough thing, to have the unbending pride and self-regard to make it to the bigs, and also the self-effacing flexibility to brush off disrespect. You have 70-grade baseball skills and 70-grade baseball mind, and on top of that you also need 70-grade sucking up racist bullshit?

If baseball players were teleported into minor leagues where white people were protested by the town, and then an authoritarian management style in a society that disfavors white people[*], how many of today’s white players could be meek and smiling enough to make it? I think not many. And they shouldn’t have to!

[*] don’t even start with me about how you’re living it bro

martyvan90Member since 2017
8 years ago
Reply to  Jetsy Extrano

Am I the only one who remembers him as Ritchie Allen? We never called any Dick without an article. Being an AL kid in New York he always seemed like what I deemed cool. Bill Russell was my basketball hero because my older brother was a Celtics fan, he was a winner, and he seemed like an intelligent guy. Obviously race factors into sports for some (maybe many people?) but I tend to become fans of players who win, respect the game, respect fellow players, and don’t seek and garner off the field attention (community service aside.)

GoNYGoNYGoGo
8 years ago
Reply to  martyvan90

The Phillies called him Richie Allen from his rookie year until 1966. In 1967 the Philly writers started calling him Rich Allen.

Topps baseball cards had him as Richie Allen until 1970, Rick Allen in 1971, and Dick Allen after that.

John Autin
8 years ago
Reply to  tramps like us

This comment is a sad failure by someone who at least seems to be trying to be thoughtful.

Why should it have to be that Allen suffered MORE from racism than did his contemporaries before you will make ANY allowance for how that suffering affected his behavior?

If you ran a cruel social experiment in a group of 100 kids, randomly choosing 10 of them to be systematically insulted, abused, and denied opportunity throughout childhood, you’d probably find some of them (miraculously) able to keep it from warping their adult outlook. But would that mean the others deserved scorn for not being able to do so? I say no.

Angelsjunky
8 years ago

Nice article. I am reminded of Albert Belle, a more recent player who also got the “this black guy isn’t behaving as he should” treatment. But obviously there’s a historical double standard when players like Enos Slaughter are in the Hall of Fame. Slaughter was an inferior player to Allen, but a much bigger a$$hole. But we’re evolving as a culture so I imagine Allen will get in eventually.

More on how good Allen was: During his best years, 1964-74, only three players produced more WAR: Aaron, Yaz, and Santo, and his 163 wRC+ during that span was the highest. In other words, he was the best hitter in the game during his best years, a span of eleven years, when a lot of great players were in their prime. That alone = the Hall of Fame, in my book. He was basically Joe Votto, and Votto will get in if he plays just a few more years at a decent level.

bunslow
8 years ago

Dear Editors: it’s résumé, NOT rèsumè. The latter is just hilariously, horribly wrong as could be verified by a quick google.

(Not to take away from the substance of the article, but this particular style flaw is especially glaring to me since I’ve had some French education. It’s a bit analogous to e.g. psghetti instead spaghetti)

Jetsy Extrano
8 years ago
Reply to  bunslow

In Dwarvish it’s “rêsumê” you know.

Dr. DaveMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  bunslow

Seriously, people downvoted this? WTF?

If you want to just say “resume” and be all American, that’s fine. But don’t go out of your way to say “?êsümë” (repeatedly) and expect not to be laughed at.

TKDCMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  Dr. Dave

Are you a real doctor??

Dr. DaveMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Of spelling? No. Of something else? Yes.

Jim_Turvey
8 years ago

Man, you guys reallllllly gotta hire Shakeia on full time

IgnatiusJReillyMember since 2017
8 years ago

Great article – thank you!

JosephMember since 2016
8 years ago

Is baseball ready to love what? Allen?

RoyalsFan#14321Member since 2020
8 years ago

Seems like the kind of guy I’d call a HOF neighbor or friend, but totally a H-O-V-G in baseball terms…

Knoblaublah
8 years ago

Great article, great player.

It’s forgotten, but for half a season in 1973, it seemed like Dick (don’t call me Richie) Allen was going to single-handedly beat the loaded Oakland A’s, the defending World Series winner, until he broke his wrist. In one of Reggie Jackson’s best years, Allen was the most feared player in the league until that injury.

Re HOF, however, Allen may best be compared to Curt Schilling: great player whose personality damages his chances.

John Autin
8 years ago
Reply to  Knoblaublah

Whatever one thinks of the ’73 ChiSox’s chances, giving “single-handed” credit to Allen is an insult to Wilbur Wood.

By the end of June (when they fell out of first place for good), Wood had started 24 of their 71 games, logging 200 IP with a 2.65 ERA.

RadermecherMember since 2018
8 years ago

Great story on the Wampum Hammer Richie Allen.
He was a great player,in a pitchers era.
Much like Bill Freehan,his career is somewhat over looked.
Adjusted for the era,saber can point to the HOF,for both men hopefully.
Enjoyed Shakeias articles.

Christopher Schone
8 years ago

I just looked up Allen’s stats. He had three great seasons, but for his career he didn’t play enough for the HoF. Tony Oliva should be in well before Allen.