Is Bobby Dalbec’s Improved Plate Discipline Sustainable?

Given his rise from dark horse to odds-on NL MVP favorite, it’s not a huge surprise that Bryce Harper has been the best hitter in baseball since August 1. Through Sunday’s action, he slashed.346/.464/.795 in 198 plate appearances, good for a 216 wRC+. That performance has catapulted him to the very top of the race, moving ahead of Fernando Tatis Jr. in betting markets as of Monday. A lot thus has been said about Harper, but much less has been written about the second-best hitter over this stretch (among the 251 players to amass at least 100 plate appearances). That hitter, as you could probably guess from this piece’s title, is Red Sox infielder Bobby Dalbec, whose .316/.409/.737 line nearly matches Harper’s, though it has come without the associated fanfare.

That’s understandable given Dalbec’s start to the season. Unlike Harper, who posted very good numbers before his recent stretch of sheer fire, Dalbec nearly found himself without a spot on Boston’s roster following the team’s trade for Kyle Schwarber. Through July 31, Dalbec was slashing just .216/.260/.399, with a 4.4% walk rate, a 37.5% strikeout rate, and 11 homers in 296 trips to the dish. That, coupled with less-than-stellar defense (it’s still rated as a negative), gave the Red Sox every reason to option him to Triple-A. Indeed, as Peter Abraham at The Boston Globe wrote on September 12, “That Schwarber was on the injured list at the time may have been what kept Dalbec on the roster.”

The hot start to Dalbec’s career last season — a 152 wRC+ and eight homers in just 92 plate appearances — seemed unsustainable given the small sample size, 42% strikeout rate, and .394 BABIP. As a result, ZiPS projected him for a 91 wRC+ this season, though Steamer was more bullish at 103. The poor start and the hot stretch since have resulted in season stats — a .245/.306/.497 slashline and 111 wRC+ — roughly in line with what I’d peg as his true talent level.

But what’s interesting to me is the jarring change in Dalbec’s plate discipline since August 1. Strikeout and walk rates don’t need that many plate appearances to stabilize; that he so quickly shifted from being a low-walk, high-strikeout player to a high-walk, low-strikeout player seems truly incredible. The samples are still unequal, but this current stretch seems to be more than just an aberration, at least in the plate discipline department:

Bobby Dalbec’s Season in Two Parts
Date PA AVG OBP SLG BB% K% wOBA wRC+
4/1-7/31 296 .216 .260 .399 4.4% 37.5% .282 73
8/1-9/19 132 .316 .409 .737 11.4% 25.8% .468 198

To put this in perspective, Dalbec has now walked more times since August 1 than he did from Opening Day through the end of July. That seems to indicate a change under the hood. And yet when we take a look at Dalbec’s plate discipline metrics, there isn’t anything that immediately jumps out as the basis for his much-improved walk and strikeout rates:

Bobby Dalbec’s Season in Two Parts, Swing Metrics
Date O-Swing% Z-Swing% Swing% O-Contact% Z-Contact% Contact% Zone% SwStr%
4/1-7/31 33.2% 69.6% 48.8% 48.5% 71.7% 62.6% 42.9% 18.2%
8/1-9/19 32.9% 76.9% 51.6% 53.0% 73.4% 65.9% 42.5% 17.6%

You can see some changes if you squint, but none that appear to explain Dalbec’s surge. His contact rates are up, but that wouldn’t explain the increase in his walk rate, or a decrease in strikeout rate of this magnitude. His O-Swing% and his swinging strike rate are both relatively unchanged. Is Dalbec just a case of extreme noise in the discipline department? Maybe, but it’s worth checking the count-specific data to see if an approach change in two-strike counts can explain these results. Maybe Dalbec is generally the same hitter in non-two-strike counts, but has tried harder to avoid the strikeout when faced with one directly. That’s basically what he told Abraham in that September 12 story when he said, “I’m comfortable taking strikes in the zone knowing that’s not the pitch I want. Then just battle with two strikes.”

Indeed, Dalbec’s contact rate on swings with two strikes has jumped by more than 11 percentage points from the first stretch of his season (up to July 31) to the second (August 1 and on). In all other counts, it has actually gone down. Similarly, his swing rate in non-two-strike counts has jumped by about five percentage points, while his swing rate in two-strike counts has dipped slightly. Here’s what all of that looks like in a table:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-members
Bobby Dalbec’s Season in Two Parts, Swing Metrics by Count
Date Swing%, 2 Strikes Swing%, Other Contact%, 2 Strikes Contact%, Other
4/1-7/31 63.5% 42.5% 60.9% 60.2%
8/1-9/19 60.1% 47.5% 72.1% 57.4%

That all seems good, but of course, there’s still the question of chasing: Is Dalbec swinging at fewer two-strike pitches outside of the strike zone, resulting in these higher contact rates? What’s odd is that his two-strike chase rate hasn’t dipped much between the two stretches: From 39.7% in stretch one to just 36.0% in stretch two. Perhaps when coupled with an increase in his in-zone swing rate in two-strike counts, from 88.2% to 93.2%, we can begin to put together a picture of what is happening. Dalbec is making better swing decisions in two-strike counts, thus yielding more contact and, as a result, fewer strikeouts.

I find this little development intriguing. Dalbec was in the second percentile in two-strike contact rate through July 31. Since, he’s jumped to the 22nd percentile. He’s done it without sacrificing quality of contact, which may not necessarily stick going forward. Baseball is a game of trade-offs, and selling out for contact may reduce one’s power output. (I wrote about this with respect to Dansby Swanson earlier this year.) That dynamic could still come for Dalbec.

Thus, I wonder how sustainable all of this is. While some hitters have a propensity to increase their contact rates with two strikes, the relationship is pretty noisy and may not be a skill that is sustainable year-to-year. In fact, there’s a much stronger association between a hitter’s overall contact rate and their strikeout rate (R-squared of 0.796) than their two-strike contact rate and their strikeout rate (R-squared of 0.258). That’s because a foul ball, while counting as having made contact, doesn’t do much to help a hitter avoid a strikeout since the count does not change. On the other hand, putting the ball in play avoids strikeouts by definition. But given what we know about hitters’ abilities to control their spray angles, being able to specifically avoid fouls and focus solely on putting balls in play might be really hard to for the hitter to control.

Ultimately, my conclusion here appears somewhat unsatisfying. I’m not sure there has been enough of a change in Dalbec’s swing metrics to contend that his recent hot stretch is anything more than noise. Even though he’s had a 25-game stretch with a strikeout rate as low as 20.5%, other strikeout-prone types have done the same. Joey Gallo had a 25-game stretch with a strikeout rate of 24.3% this season; Javier Báez is currently in the midst of a sub-25% strikeout rate stretch; and Tyler O’Neill had one as low as 21.0% in July. Sometimes, even the players who are the most inclined to strike out crush everything and avoid the whiff, but mean reversion eventually runs its course. While it’s been fun to watch Dalbec have so much success, some of his underlying numbers demonstrate that he’s only made slight changes to his swing decisions. As with most players, his full-season stats describe him best, making this stretch likely just a small blip.





Devan Fink is a Contributor at FanGraphs. You can follow him on Twitter @DevanFink.

17 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Mahoney
5 years ago

Has he been seeing a different mix of pitches since 8/1? If not, is there a particular pitch that he’s gotten much better results with?

My gut is that whatever he’s doing right right now is likely something that will go away once pitchers adjust. He could still settle in as a Mark Trumbo type if all goes well, but this past month has just been too much above his true talent level, imho.

OddBall Herrera
5 years ago

Agreed that this looks like a hot stretch. Put simply I don’t know how an 18% SwStr and 60% contact rate adds up to an average strikeout rate, unless you are going through a stretch of odd distribution of batted ball outcomes.

ajake57Member since 2019
5 years ago

I’ve been waiting for this post for a few weeks, but it has now inspired me to examine his heat maps. There’s definitely some interesting things when you look at those for his swing and contact rate maps. I’m a novice at this, but it looks to me like he’s making a conscious decision to be more aggressive in the middle and outer thirds of the zone at the expense of laying off of some inner third pitches.

Joe WilkeyMember since 2016
5 years ago

So, I actually published an article regarding plate discipline using StatCast metrics about a month ago. The three inputs I use and the xK%/xBB% for Dalbec are listed below:

Before 8/1:
Shadow/Whiff%: 9.17%, Shadow/In Play%: 6.63%, Chase/Take%: 15.5%, xK%: 31.0%, xBB%: 7.93%

After 7/31:
Shadow/Whiff%: 10.2%, Shadow/In Play%: 7.37%, Chase/Take%: 17.6%, xK%: 31.4%, xBB%: 10.0%

His numbers are remarkably similar in the two time frames, and tell a story that is somewhere between the two. I think the walk rate should be roughly league average, certainly higher than where it was in the early part of the season, but the strikeout rate should be pretty high. I think the Trumbo comp is reasonable.

Travis Dube
5 years ago
Reply to  Joe Wilkey

Question, given the research you’ve mentioned, about velocity. Anecdotally, it seemed like Dalbec was getting killed by velocity in the first half of the season. His home runs seemed to come on breaking balls; fastballs ate him alive. Since August 1, he seemed to be doing much better with velocity. Obviously, I’ve written some version of the word “seem” more than once and have only limited observations to go by.

Do the numbers show any better performance on high velocity during his hot streak? I’d tell you his set up and load appear quicker, but that would be an amateur observation on my part and potentially loaded with confirmation bias.

Joe WilkeyMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  Travis Dube

I would actually say he’s done worse against fastballs since 8/1. Before August, he saw 310 fastballs in the shadow zone and whiffed on 56 of them, which is an 18.1% whiff rate. Since the calendar turned to August, he has seen 155 fastballs in the shadow zone and whiffed on 37 of them, for a 23.9% whiff rate. The average velocity for all fastballs in both time frames is roughly the same, actually higher (92.9 mph) earlier than later (92.5 mph).

Now, this is only in the shadow zone, but I’ve found that whiffs in the shadow zone are very strongly correlated with K%.

Travis Dube
5 years ago
Reply to  Joe Wilkey

So there it is, I should never trust my intuition! Thanks for the follow up. Great information on the shadow zone area. Now I need to dig around to look for his slugging% per pitch type and if it correlates with league averages.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago

He can handle some regression and still be a decent player if he plays third base. Anyone who is striking out 5x more than they walk (which is what he’s done on the year overall) is not a player who can play every day unless the overall K rate is also pretty low; once you are striking out that much and walking that little virtually everyone’s offensive profile collapses.

But if Dalbec keeps the walk rate from this stretch and his K rate goes back to the 33% range or so (what it is right now) there’s a role for a TTO-type guy at third base. Part of the reason he rates so badly at first base is because his defensive value was always based on his 70-grade arm, which he’s now not using. The best case scenario for the Red Sox is probably them trading Dalbec for a more consistent offensive performer at first base or left field, moving Verdugo back to right field, and then that team can play Dalbec at third base without bumping Devers. Maybe with a team whose name rhymes with Boo Dork Yets?

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

The change that Dalbec has made since August 1st is that he is simply hitting balls when he has 2 strikes that he was missing during the first 4 months of the season. As one who watches every game, live or on delay, I don’t have a clue why he looks like a completely different hitter now than he did for 4 months but he does. Is it just a hot streak or has he figured something out? It is a fool’s errand to make wild guesses as to why. All we do is watch, see how long it continues, and then find out. The claim that everything can be quantified, and predicted, has no validity between the lines. What this means regarding his future is another complex question. Since August 1, his play has been that of a star. Tristan Casas, only a 1st baseman, is joining the mix, probably as early as next season, and that closes 1st base to Dalbec and Devers. Renfroe, an absolute revelation, is controlled, and cheap, through 2023. I can’t see the Red Sox trading either Dalbec or Renfroe off of what they have shown. Too many good players isn’t bad and a replay of Jeff Bagwell for Larry Anderson is not something Red Sox Nation would care to see repeated.

Mahoney
5 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

Just to be clear, you’re making the Bagwell analogy about Casas, right?

mlo3912
5 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

Devers to 2nd, Bob to 3rd and Casas at first next year.

Rogers Center HornsbyMember since 2017
5 years ago
Reply to  mlo3912

Xander is going to need to move sooner than later, I’m not sure that set up particularly helps make up for his range while he’s still holding on to the SS title.
Ideally they are able to talk him into moving over and take advantage of the SS market this offseason. Devers strikes me more of a first bagger than a 2B anyways; Casas or Dalbec to LF?

Mahoney
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

He’s walked a decent amount in the minors, so there’s a real chance that his low BB% pre-August came from a bit of pressing at the plate (given all the talk about Boston looking to upgrade at first before the trade deadline).

If he can stay at third, he looks to be like Patrick Wisdom, minus some glove but plus some plate discipline. Not sure how much trade value that would provide, nor do I think he sticks in Boston with Devers at third and Casas likely ready by this time next year.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

I’m pretty skeptical that Wisdom is going to keep doing this, but the sort of guy I outlined looks a lot like Pedro Alvarez before the yips destroyed his ability to play third base. That’s a guy who you could start at third and wouldn’t necessarily try to replace (2.5-3 wins). The best version of this type of player winds up looking a lot like Brandon Lowe, or if you really crank up the walks, Adam Dunn (on offense, neither of those guys play third base). Slightly less successful versions bounce around the league like Mark Reynolds, having a couple good years on offense but mostly being average at the plate despite the extreme profile. Others are like Mike Zunino, who yo-yo between pretty good on offense and complete zeroes.

Of course if he stops walking again or his strikeouts go back to the high 30s or low 40s it’s all moot.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Right field is already in very good hands.

Manco
5 years ago

It is clear he didn’t change much of his plate discipline. This hardly matters. As one of the easiest ways to lower strikeouts is to hit the ball in play. And the walks are there because pitchers aren’t challenging him anymore, showing newfound caution that is leading to favorable counts and walks.

JimmieFoxxalorianMember since 2020
5 years ago

We are only just scratching the surface of who Bobby D may be. Is he the fella who walked at a decent clip and outshined his competition in his early 20s, or is he something in between what we saw last season and this season? We’ll have a pretty good idea by next summer as to whether his 2nd half improvements are sustainable or still sounds noisy. Right now I am simply enjoying the ride, whatever the duration.

Funny how it feels like Harper’s been around forever, yet he’s only 2 years older than Dalbec.

In addition to his hitting, although the data may not support it yet I think Dalbec’s defense has improved. Seems to get a little better with the glove each game. At least to my eye, anyway, at Fenway games I’ve attended. He’s gotten visually smoother around the bag, appears to have more confidence in his on-field demeanor vs. earlier in the season, and on more than one occasion has genuinely robbed a hit. With greater consistency he could demonstrate some value defensively over time.

He’s rumored to be a hard worker, and is likely one of the reasons why Cora kept rolling him out there, even amid his earlier struggles.