Is Grant Dayton an Elite Reliever?
Two weeks ago, when I was examining the New York Yankees, I noted that they were the only American League team to feature multiple relievers projected by our depth charts (which are powered by Steamer for now) to record at least 1.5 WAR in 2017. Only seven AL pitchers cleared that mark overall. Looking over at the National League, we find that even fewer pitchers hit that mark, though there is still a single team with two of them: the Los Angeles Dodgers.
One, as you can probably guess, is Kenley Jansen. The other, though, might come as a surprise. It’s Grant Dayton. Unless you’re a big Dodgers fan, the first time you probably met Dayton was in last year’s National League Division Series, when he coughed up the two runs, prompting LA manager Dave Roberts to call on Jansen in the seventh inning — and to bring Clayton Kershaw into the game in the ninth to close things out. So, in a certain sense, perhaps we should thank Dayton. If he escapes that seventh inning unscathed, we might not have been treated to Kershaw vs. Daniel Murphy with a runner in scoring position and the season on the line.
Now, if that game was your only frame of reference for Dayton, you might not understand why he’s being projected for such a strong 2017 campaign. Just so we’re clear, here’s the list of relievers who are projected for 1.5 WAR or better next season:
| Player | Team | WAR |
|---|---|---|
| Andrew Miller | Cleveland | 2.7 |
| Aroldis Chapman | Yankees | 2.5 |
| Dellin Betances | Yankees | 2.4 |
| Kenley Jansen | Dodgers | 2.4 |
| Zach Britton | Orioles | 2.1 |
| Edwin Diaz | Mariners | 1.7 |
| Wade Davis | Cubs | 1.7 |
| Ken Giles | Astros | 1.7 |
| Grant Dayton | Dodgers | 1.6 |
| Craig Kimbrel | Red Sox | 1.5 |
That’s pretty good company, don’t you think? Especially when you consider that the pitcher in question didn’t reach the majors until his age-28 season. And especially when there’s a couple of big warning signs in his 2016 stat line.
With regard to those warning signs: the first, obviously, is that he only tossed 26.1 innings (or, if you prefer, faced just 101 total batters). That’s not much to go on, at least at the major-league level. Second, he allowed only a .196 BABIP. Of the 511 pitchers who tossed at least 20 innings last season, only three — Carl Edwards Jr., Steve Geltz, and Brad Peacock — allowed a lower BABIP than did Dayton. If you expand that list to include the last five seasons (2011-2016), we get 2,931 pitcher seasons with at least 20 innings pitched. Of them, just 28 allowed a lower BABIP than did Dayton in 2016.
On the other hand, his 15.0% swinging-strike rate (SwStr%) ranked 26th of the 511 pitchers who tossed at least 20 innings last year. The two pitchers directly above Dayton on that list? Kimbrel and Roberto Osuna. Among the pitchers just below him? Jeurys Familia, Sergio Romo, and Koji Uehara. That’s some pretty decent company. In addition, Dayton’s 14.3% infield-fly percentage was well above the league average of 9.7%. He didn’t generate very many ground balls, but he had the luxury of playing behind a great outfield defense. LA’s outfielders logged a 10.2 UZR in 2016, good for 10th best in the majors and second best in the NL. Their +24 DRS was sixth best in baseball and also second best in the NL. That’s a recipe for a bulletproof BABIP if I’ve ever heard one.
As for the lack of major-league experience, there’s no getting around that, but it is mitigated by the fact that he had really phenomenal minor-league numbers. In talking to Jared Cross about Dayton’s Steamer projection, Cross notes that Dayton’s MiLB work last season was equivalent to a 2.14 kwERA in MLB. When you combine the minor- and major-league work, you have 78 superb innings on the docket. And obviously 78 is more than 26.
Jeff Sullivan also made this point in a piece back in August, just after Dayton made his major-league debut. He combined minor- and major-league numbers to put together a K% and K%-BB% leaderboard, on which Dayton appeared at the top. With more major-league time under his belt by the end of the season, he would indeed finish the season at the top of those leaderboards at strictly the major-league level (sixth in K%, fifth in K%-BB%), but I also wanted to look at these leaderboards broken out with just left-handed pitchers. Observe:
| Name | IP | K% | BB% | K-BB% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew Miller | 74.1 | 44.7% | 3.3% | 41.5% |
| Grant Dayton | 26.1 | 38.6% | 5.9% | 32.7% |
| Aroldis Chapman | 58.0 | 40.5% | 8.1% | 32.4% |
| Dario Alvarez | 26.2 | 36.3% | 6.2% | 30.1% |
| Clayton Kershaw | 149.0 | 31.6% | 2.0% | 29.6% |
| Sean Doolittle | 39.0 | 29.0% | 5.2% | 23.9% |
| Brett Cecil | 36.2 | 28.7% | 5.1% | 23.6% |
| Zach Britton | 67.0 | 29.1% | 7.1% | 22.1% |
| Rich Hill | 110.1 | 29.4% | 7.5% | 21.9% |
| Madison Bumgarner | 226.2 | 27.5% | 5.9% | 21.6% |
Better than Aroldis Chapman is pretty good, in case you were curious.
Again, I’m not saying Dayton is officially now one of the best 10 relievers in baseball. There are another seven pitchers who clock in at 1.4 WAR, literally a hair below 1.5. Let’s add them to our table.
| Player | Team | WAR |
|---|---|---|
| Andrew Miller | Cleveland | 2.7 |
| Aroldis Chapman | Yankees | 2.5 |
| Dellin Betances | Yankees | 2.4 |
| Kenley Jansen | Dodgers | 2.4 |
| Zach Britton | Orioles | 2.1 |
| Edwin Diaz | Mariners | 1.7 |
| Wade Davis | Cubs | 1.7 |
| Ken Giles | Astros | 1.7 |
| Grant Dayton | Dodgers | 1.6 |
| Craig Kimbrel | Red Sox | 1.5 |
| Sean Doolittle | Athletics | 1.4 |
| Roberto Osuna | Blue Jays | 1.4 |
| Seung Hwan Oh | Cardinals | 1.4 |
| Shawn Kelley | Nationals | 1.4 |
| Adam Ottavino | Rockies | 1.4 |
| Kelvin Herrera | Royals | 1.4 |
| Nate Jones | White Sox | 1.4 |
Even with these pitchers added to the mix, we can say that Grant Dayton is projected to be one of the five best relievers in the National League this season, at least by Steamer. We’ll see how ZiPS stacks him up against his peers when all those have been zipped into the projections, but in the Dodgers ZiPS projections, Dayton came out well: best reliever on the Dodgers after Jansen, 73 ERA- and FIP- (the 73 FIP- would be identical to his 2016 FIP-) and slightly better K% and BB% projections than Steamer gives him. In other words, there are no major disagreements on Dayton between the two systems.
Grant Dayton is a 29-year-old reliever who has faced only 119 batters in the major leagues — and he has done so with a fastball that averages 92 and tops out a hair below 95. That’s not typically the type of pitcher one would guess is elite. And yet, here we are, staring his excellent projections in the face, without much evidence to cast aspersions on it other than the fact that he hasn’t yet pitched through a whole major-league season. He’s about to though, and if he’s as good as the projections say, you’ll be hearing his name a lot more in the future.
Paul Swydan used to be the managing editor of The Hardball Times, a writer and editor for FanGraphs and a writer for Boston.com and The Boston Globe. Now, he owns The Silver Unicorn Bookstore, an independent bookstore in Acton, Mass. Follow him on Twitter @Swydan. Follow the store @SilUnicornActon.
Is Grant Dayton…Joe Flacco?
Is Joe Flacco Grant Dayton?
They’ve never been seen in the same room…. so I’d lean towards yes.
He remains the lone bright piece from the Dee Gordon trade..
Different trade. Chris Hatcher was in the Dee Gordon trade.
Oh, my bad
yeah dayton was picked up in a separate deal for… ex-first-rounder chris reed
#FreeAustinBarnes
I know they really like him as C but are you surprised (like me) he didn’t/doesn’t/hasn’t got/get a crack at 2B (while still being available to be the backup C)? Between Barnes, Taylor and Hernandez, do you see = value (while considering what was given up) than running Logan out there everyday? All 3 pieces being RH doesn’t hurt as much considering the problems as a whole team vs L’s. Just seems like went away from what I considered a team strength, depth. Didn’t they have the serviceable pieces to = Logan, w/o giving up…..anything?
(I hope it is much easier to read after the first sentence).
I am honestly curious here: how does a guy with the numbers Dayton put up in the minors not get a chance in the majors until he’s 28 years old?
Wasn’t highly touted out of college, lacked elite velocity. I believe I read somewhere last year that the Dodgers identified him as a target for acquisition because of his spin rate.
yeah. dayton and ryan buchter are practically the same guy in a lot of ways. lefty, 92mph fastball, not a heck of a lot else, great minor league numbers, great spin rate, teams didn’t believe their stuff would play in the majors, left them to rot in the minors for a few prime years without even giving them a shot to find out, bounced around, no one cared, someone finally gave them a shot last year, stuff actually did play in the majors it turns out
kind of funny that the dodgers were one of the teams to give up on buchter without trying him but then wound up with dayton. maybe they learned
this article about dayton’s fastball
http://dodgersdigest.com/2017/01/27/dodgers-grant-dayton-elite-fastball/
suggests that dayton’s success is less about spin rate and more about just fastball movement
still a lot of parallels with buchter. although buchter walks a lot of guys and dayton doesn’t (although iirc buchter says this is all part of his plan)
Because Marlins.
This prognostication will be closely watched by those who question the predictive value of some of the metrics used by the engines. If he does indeed turn into Andrew Miller Lite, there is only one of those, or even close, that will certainly be a coup. Using minor league innings is stretching credulity by quite a bit and 26 innings is definitely the proverbial SSS. I am not from Missouri but Show Me.
The Marlins really suck at utilizing their relievers, judging by how Dayton and Sam Dyson immediately put up elite numbers after being traded.
In the case of Dyson, the Rangers saw that he had a 98mph sinker that wasn’t being thrown as much as it should be. I wonder if the Dodgers saw something with Dayton that they could change, like pitch sequence/selection or something mechanical. I guess it’s hard to tell without PITCHf/x data from the minor leagues.
It’s also interesting from an economic perspective, because it shows that you don’t necessarily have to sell the farm (like the Cubs did for Chapman) to acquire a (potentially) valuable relief arm. The Rangers seem especially apt at this, as another pitcher they got in a low-profile trade, Dario Alvarez, also appears on the leaderboard in this article.
I don’t really buy into the old school definition of an elite reliever, but if I did, that NLDS game would basically be disqualifying. He almost coughed up a lead in the playoffs, and basically got a vote of no confidence from the manager.
It’s hard to avoid pattern-based thinking; that is, looking at past playoff performance to project future playoff performance. I try to avoid it, but I think Dayton needs one of those before he is perceived as elite. Unfortunately for the Dodgers, the only reliever they have that has managed to do that is Jansen.
i mean, i feel what you’re saying, and as a dodger fan watching that game i experienced many of the same internal phenomena. but i wouldn’t take one rough playoff outing by a guy with like 20 career big league innings as any kind of pattern. he’s not going to be perceived as elite until he repeats his regular-season performance level for a full year either. let’s cross that bridge first
“and basically got a vote of no confidence from the manager.”
He pitched the fifth inning of 1-1 game five of the NLCS in a tied series.
2/3 of an inning, stranding the inherited runner who had doubled, facing Rizzo and Zobrist.
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/an-inning-with-one-of-my-new-favorite-pitchers/
Jeff Sullivan’s article about Dayton was great.
Let’s keep the Dayton Hype chatter to a minimum, some of us are targeting him in an upcoming fantasy draft. Just kidding, but seriously.
Bahahah here’s a non-sequitur funny stat. Carl Edwards Jr’s stats from 2016:
36 IP, 2.87 FIP, 2.40 xFIP, and a .162 BABIP add up to an ERA of… an amazingly high 3.75 on the strength of a 59.8% LOB and 19% HR/FB. What a weird stat line.
Carl Edwards Jr.’s K%-BB% is very good (27.5%), which explains his low FIP, even though his 19% HR/FB goes along a 29.2% FB%.
Diaz, Edwards, and Dayton are three very exciting rookie relievers who performed in really shocking ways as rookies.