It Is Time for Mike Trout To Be Less Patient
Folks, it brings me no pleasure to report that Mike Trout is broken.

Okay, I’m kidding. He’s still great at baseball. He owns a 138 wRC+ with 10 homers and a .309 ISO that is right in line with where he’s sat the last few seasons. Trout’s power output, specifically since the birth of his first child on July 30, has been the subject of many comments about his new “Dad Strength.” But when you hear people describe what it’s like to become a parent, you usually don’t encounter them saying they can suddenly knock the snot out of a baseball. They describe gaining other virtues, such as patience. In baseball, one can display patience by drawing walks. If we truly wished to go to the silly trouble of speculating on what a milestone in one’s personal life could do for their on-field abilities, the idea of a hitter being more relaxed in the batter’s box after he has been made wise and humble by fatherhood seems like a natural step to take.
That brings us to the above graph. It’s weird, right? Of all the flukey small-sample stuff that can show up in the first few weeks of a season, you’d expect walk and strikeout numbers to begin sorting themselves out by the time a player accumulates 126 plate appearances. The Angels are halfway through their 2020 season and Trout is walking half as often as he did just one year ago while striking out more than he has since 2014. For someone who has a reputation for getting better every year, that’s a surprising development. Changes like these can be the result of a breakdown in plate vision and bat control, but fortunately for Trout, that doesn’t seem to be the case.

Trout’s chase rate? Lower than ever. His contact rate? Just a point under his career average. Trout has the same swing behavior he always has, which means he should be getting similar results. Since that’s obviously not the case, the next logical step is to examine pitcher behavior.

I’d say we have something here. In 2020, Trout is seeing more pitches in the strike zone than any other qualified hitter in baseball. This comes after years of him fitting squarely in the back half of baseball in terms of zone rate, seeing more or less the same number of strikes every year. In fact, the jump he’s seen in zone rate is the largest of any player to log 50 plate appearances this season (all numbers here are through Monday).
| Name | 2019 Zone% | 2020 Zone% | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Trout | 40.1% | 48.2% | 8.1% |
| Jarrod Dyson | 43.1% | 51.0% | 7.9% |
| Dexter Fowler | 39.7% | 47.3% | 7.5% |
| Enrique Hernández | 40.0% | 47.3% | 7.3% |
| José Iglesias | 40.6% | 47.5% | 6.9% |
| Corey Seager | 41.9% | 47.8% | 6.0% |
| Shohei Ohtani | 39.6% | 45.0% | 5.4% |
| David Dahl | 40.1% | 45.2% | 5.1% |
| Amed Rosario | 40.3% | 45.4% | 5.1% |
| Eduardo Escobar | 38.6% | 43.3% | 4.7% |
That’s a rather broad assortment of hitters. Behind Trout are slap-hitters like Dyson and real thumpers like Seager, guys in stacked lineups and weak offenses. It’s notable, however, how some of the other players here have adjusted their respective approaches in response to the aggressiveness of the pitchers they’re facing. Seager, for example, has raised his swing rate by nearly eight points and is having the best offensive season of his career. Each of the three players ranked directly behind Trout have also raised their swing rates. Trout’s swing rate, meanwhile, has actually gone down.
That’s how pitchers get away with pouring in strikes — Trout takes a lot of them. His in-zone swing rate this season is just 57.5%, the 12th-lowest in baseball. He’s particularly passive early in counts — since the start of 2019, only five hitters have swung on a lower percentage of first pitches.
| Name | FP Swings | PAs | FP Swing% |
|---|---|---|---|
| David Fletcher | 69 | 795 | 8.7% |
| Eric Sogard | 70 | 523 | 13.4% |
| Xander Bogaerts | 112 | 806 | 13.9% |
| Brett Gardner | 88 | 616 | 14.3% |
| Albert Pujols | 94 | 625 | 15.0% |
| Mike Trout | 110 | 718 | 15.3% |
| Joe Panik | 84 | 537 | 15.6% |
| Austin Meadows | 107 | 671 | 16.0% |
| Jose Ramirez | 112 | 673 | 16.6% |
| Alex Bregman | 132 | 797 | 16.6% |
This approach has worked for Trout in the past, but as evidenced by the first-pitch strike jump indicated earlier, pitchers may be using it against him now. After all, it isn’t as if Trout has always taken the first pitch simply because they weren’t good offerings. The last time I wrote about Trout, I covered the interesting way in which he stood out on Baseball Savant’s new Swing/Take leaderboard, which examines how many runs a hitter or pitcher credited or debited his team by taking or swinging at a pitch in what Statcast outlines as the heart, shadow, chase, and waste zones in and around home plate. Trout’s production on pitches in the “shadow” of the plate led his peers by a wide margin, while he was the 14th-most productive hitter on “chase” pitches and 19th-most productive on “waste” pitches. On pitches over the heart of the plate, however, Trout was worth -3 runs — 375th in baseball — largely due to the fact that his swing rate against those pitches was just 66%, seven points lower than league average.
If hitters are going to let you steal strikes down the heart of the plate, pitchers are going to pounce on that opportunity — even if the guy at the plate is the best player in baseball.
| Name | Heart Pitches | Total Pitches | Heart% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Garrett Hampson | 119 | 350 | 34.0% |
| Jake Cronenworth | 108 | 331 | 32.6% |
| Ender Inciarte | 99 | 312 | 31.7% |
| Mike Trout | 160 | 512 | 31.3% |
| J.T. Realmuto | 109 | 352 | 31.0% |
| J.P. Crawford | 155 | 501 | 30.9% |
| Danny Mendick | 95 | 314 | 30.3% |
| David Fletcher | 168 | 655 | 30.3% |
| Charlie Blackmon | 134 | 443 | 30.2% |
| Shogo Akiyama | 99 | 329 | 30.1% |
A year ago, just 24.3% of the pitches Trout saw were in the heart of the plate. This season, that number has climbed by seven points. On the first pitch of any given plate appearance, Trout is now seeing a far greater percentage of obvious strikes than the average hitter.

In a vacuum, Trout’s 2020 season isn’t necessarily all that strange. Joining him on the above table of players seeing the highest percentage of pitches over the heart of the plate were good hitters like J.T. Realmuto and Charlie Blackmon. The top 10 hitters in zone rate this season include Seager and Mookie Betts. Trout isn’t getting pitched to all that differently than a few of the game’s other top-tier hitters, in part because many of the game’s best hitters are roughly as patient at the plate as he is, which means pitchers need to come into the zone more often to keep the at-bat from getting away from them.
What’s so striking about Trout’s season is the sudden, dramatic difference in the way pitchers are attacking him. It isn’t as though he was a hotshot rookie last year who’s experiencing the league adjusting to him for the first time. He’s been the best player in baseball for nearly a decade, and throughout that time, he’s shown a very consistent approach — always possessing one of the lowest swing rates in the game, particularly on pitches inside the strike zone.
This is who Trout has always been, yet pitchers had never really changed the number of strikes they’ve thrown him. Now that’s changed, and the early returns indicate there’s little reason for pitchers to turn back until Trout forces them to. He should have no problem doing that given the stability he’s maintained with his eye for the zone as well as the pop in his bat. It’s just going to require a greater willingness to seek out early mistakes in the middle of the plate.
Trout’s ability to produce elite walk rates in the past without also accumulating a lot of strikeouts is part of what has pushed his overall production above every other power hitter in the game. Those plate discipline numbers have been turned on their head this year, and as counter-intuitive as it sounds, patience isn’t the solution to that problem — it’s the cause of it. Before this season, the fear of Trout’s bat was enough to nudge pitchers out of the zone. That fear has subsided. It might be time for him to remind everyone what made them so afraid to begin with.
Tony is a contributor for FanGraphs. He began writing for Red Reporter in 2016, and has also covered prep sports for the Times West Virginian and college sports for Ohio University's The Post. He can be found on Twitter at @_TonyWolfe_.
I for one can’t wait to see the devastation left in Trout’s wake once he catches on to this and starts mashing those pitches coming down the pike
He’s adjusted to every change in the past. Gotta think if he sees this, he can probably belt out another 4-5 first pitch HR this week easy.
He hasn’t been getting better every year. His peak was 2015-2018. That’s when he was a consistently good Centerfielder, that’s when he was still consistently stealing a significant number of bases, that’s when he was still consistently playing almost every game, that’s when his average WAR was the highest. Even then, he wasn’t getting better every year. He no longer steals a significant number of bases, he no longer consistently plays Centerfield well. His time as the no doubt best player in baseball is over.
The last sentence is true only in the sense that it will probably always be true. There’s no way to know for sure that Trout remains the best until a season or two has elapsed from the moment we’re looking at the question. But to suggest there was a meaningful loss of peak form in 2019 seems weird to me.
What we are basically seeing so far is a one-year fluctuation (he’s at 162 games from last year plus this year now). Last year was a lower WAR year than 2015-2018 (2017 prorated to a full year) but it was also his highest ever ISO and SLG, with a wOBA and BB% that exceeded 2015 and 2016. He also had career highs in line drive, fly ball, and pull rates, suggesting someone who was crushing the ball as well as ever. And while his steals total fell off, his baseruns actually increased from 2017-2018. He was a better baserunner, not worse.
He was worth more WAR in 2012 and 2013 than he was in any season from what you say is his peak. Immediately after that his walk rate fell, he stole fewer bases, and he turned in a negative defensive season.
Then he rebounded, and ta-da! The peak.
Maybe it happens again or maybe it doesn’t. Maybe this 2020 blip will turn out to be an actual drop-off, or maybe he adjusts and is unbeatable again. But nothing he’s doing now other than the walk rate is different from things he’s done before. And as hard as he’s hitting the ball while still keeping it off the ground really well—coupled with his demonstrated ability to adjust to what pitchers are doing—I’d bet on a recovery over a decline.
He’s also at the age where decline should be expected. He’s nearly 30.
Pujols fell off big time around that age. Griffey Jr fell off big time around that age. Rodriguez fell off big time around that age. Trout will never again post 10 WAR and I think he will average 5-6 WAR for the next 5 seasons.
What did trout do to hurt you? No, trout is not going through a pujols like decline. Trout is in much better physical shape and doesn’t have the injury baggage and age questions that pujols had. Which Rodriguez are you talking about? I hope not A-Rod because he was just fine at 29 years old and had several productive (and PED aided) seasons left
Saying Trout will perform at All Star level during his 30s- better than close to 99% of players that age- is obviously not a personal thing against Trout. He’s not going to keep posting 9-10 WAR seasons with any regularity, if at all. He will decline just like everybody else, and he is entering the point in his career where it is very likely to happen. He’s no longer a good Centerfielder and his BA/OBP have fallen off a cliff. I also never said he is going through a ‘Pujols like decline’, otherwise I wouldn’t have predicted that he would perform at All Star level well into his 30s.
Yes, I was referring to A-Rod, and I said ‘around that age’- I didn’t say exactly 29. Griffey declined big time before 29. Rodriguez was fine at 29, then he entered a downward spiral, other than his one final MVP level season at 31.
Ok, just about everything you’ve said is wrong and completely based on your clearly biased and subjective opinion.
But you do you, boo. The rest of us will enjoy watching trout.
“Just about everything you’ve said is wrong”
Easy and lazy way out- just attack the entire posts in a very general way. Lazy and stupid. Much of what I wrote is factual and not subjective at all.
“You do you”
You come across as an idiot talking that way.
“Boo”
That’s just awkward- bringing sexual terminology into a baseball conversation.
“The rest of us…”
Claiming to speak for all people- again you come across as an idiot.
“…will enjoy watching trout.”
Right, because predicting that he will perform at an All Star level well into his 30s, which is very rare, means I don’t enjoy watching him play.
Obviously I’m not replying to a well-adjusted person. My mistake, carry on
Hahaha. You criticize the posts in a lazy, stupid, inaccurate manner. Then you bring sexual terminology into a baseball conversation. Then you attack the poster in a general way. Your intellectual inadequacy is on full display.
This is classic cherry-picking. Griffey and Pujols are two of the worst cases of decline in history. Predicting Trout will follow that path is about as pessimistic as you can possibly be. ARod didn’t fall off big-time, he declined. He was All-Star or near All-Star level every year from 30-35, and won MVP one of those years. He was an above average hitter, usually well above average, every year till his last, at age 40.
My understanding is that the concept of “lineup protection” has questionable empirical support, but could pitchers’ sudden shift to attacking Trout in the zone be at least somewhat attributed to having Rendon (who is having another excellent year at the plate) hit behind him? It seems hard to believe that wouldn’t play at least some role.
The concept of protection is questionable because having a good hitter behind a batter makes the pitcher more likely to try to pitch to the batter as effectively as possible. In other words, having Rendon bat after Trout likely will help the Angels score more runs, but it isn’t going to make Trout perform better.
Its also not like Trout has had scrubs hitting behind him until now. Its mostly been some combo of Pujols (when he was still an good hitter), Upton and Ohtani.
While Rendon is probably the best guy he has ever had behind him its not like he had John MacDonald “protecting him” until Rendon came along.
Apparently he read on twitter that he had the worst jump in the MLB and fixed it. Now he will probably read this and adjust. Thanks for the article (for Trout).
I think he needs to stop being patient with the angels organization, and he needs to be a little more vocal about how unacceptable their product is. I guess he has no one but himself to blame for hitching his future and career to a dysfunctional franchise, but you have to question his commitment to winning as another season passes by where his brilliance is squandered and he seems to be just going through the motions with the rest of that team
If Trout never gets to have even one good playoff run with the Angels you know he’s going to spend the rest of his life regretting being loyal to them.
Did you see the contract they signed Rendon to? They’ve called up top prospects. They’ve attempted to trade for pitching.
Out of his 8 full seasons in MLB…
– #1 in WAR in 4 of them
– #2 in 2 of them
– Top 6 in WAR in the other 2
Yeah, he’s just “going through the motions” and “you have to question his commitment to winning.” What an a$$hole.
After reading the headline, I was partially convinced this article was gonna be about Trout needing to demand a trade from the Anaheim’s hapless franchise.
How does the jump look if you control for opposing pitching? Check out the Team Pitching Zone % Leaderboard for this year; my guess is that he looks a lot less extreme in this season of extreme schedule imbalance.
Tony Blengino wrote an article last year that said that Trout’s launch angle indicates decline, that we’ve seen his best already. My worry is that his prediction is proving true – certainly, his launch angle is even higher this year, and he seems to literally golf those low strike zone pitches out of the yard. I haven’t seen Fangraphs address this issue and would love to hear your take(s).
That said, perhaps Trout’s most impressive trait is his ability to adjust. He’s done it many times: the league figures out how to pitch to him, he slumps, but then adjusts and starts mashing again. Hopefully we’ll see more of the same going forward.