It’s a Special Year for the Mendoza Line

Language is rich with words and terms that recognize the contributions of historical figures. This can be a good thing, but also a bad one, depending on what’s being commemorated. You’d rather go down in history as the namesake of a popular sweater (like James Brudenell, 7th Earl of Cardigan) or a certain type of legal protection (Ernesto Miranda) than for those traits by which Nicholas Chauvin or Ned Ludd are best remembered. In baseball, former utility infielder Mario Mendoza belongs to the latter category. Thanks to some creative but cruel teammates on the 1979 Mariners, Mendoza’s name has become synonymous with hitting futility. To fall below the Mendoza Line is to record a batting average below .200.

For a hitter both to qualify and to finish below the Mendoza Line actually represents a notable feat of ineptitude. One must not only fight the influence of the Regression Gods attempting to pull the hitter into the respectable company of the .200s, but also to play sufficiently well otherwise not to lose his job. It’s something Mario Mendoza himself never actually even achieved, coming closest in the black-magical 1979 season, but falling short due to manager Darrell Johnson’s mercy: Mendoza was frequently pinch-hit for in his third time up, was pinch-hit-for five times in his second plate appearance, and lost significant playing time to Larry Milbourne late in the season.

Since 1901, which leaves out the wacky 19th century for a number of very good reasons, only 25 qualifiers have finished the season below the Mendoza Line.

Qualifiers Below the Mendoza Line, 1901-2017
Rank Player Year BA
1 Dan Uggla 2013 .179
2 Rob Deer 1991 .179
3 John Gochnauer 1903 .185
4 John Gochnauer 1902 .185
5 Eddie Joost 1943 .185
6 Bill Hallman 1901 .185
7 Monte Cross 1904 .189
8 Bobby Byrne 1908 .191
9 Ivan DeJesus 1981 .194
10 Pete Childs 1902 .194
11 Frankie Crosetti 1940 .194
12 Joe Dugan 1918 .195
13 Jim Levey 1933 .195
14 Tom Tresh 1968 .195
15 Chris Davis 2014 .196
16 Charles Moran 1904 .196
17 Carlos Pena 2010 .196
18 Monte Cross 1901 .197
19 Carlos Pena 2012 .197
20 Mark Reynolds 2010 .198
21 Gair Allie 1954 .199
22 Jim Sundberg 1975 .199
23 Curt Blefary 1968 .200
24 Don Wert 1968 .200
25 Zoilo Versalles 1967 .200

You’ll no doubt notice a few .200 hitters here. I’m including the players who round up to .200 as well: just as hitting .2997 isn’t really hitting .300, so too does a .1996 mark fail to reach the Mendoza Line. I knew there was no way all you fine people out there would let me escape making that shortcut!

But what’s extra fun is the 2018 season. With batting averages around the league dropping to .248, the lowest figure since 1972, conditions have almost never been better for Mendoza Lining. At the same time, baseball’s love affair with batting average has waned considerably since the early 1970s, and we’re down to few, if any, front offices that can be categorized as batting-average obsessives.

There haven’t been three Mendoza achievers since 1968, but the 2018 campaign has a real chance of equaling that feat or perhaps even surpassing it. Three qualifying batters currently stand below .200, with another three hitting .205 or worse.

Worst Batting Averages, 2018
Rank Name BA WAR
1 Chris Davis .161 -2.1
2 Joey Gallo .192 1.5
3 Logan Morrison .193 -0.4
4 Alcides Escobar .201 -1.4
5 JaCoby Jones .204 0.3
6 Adam Duvall .205 0.6
7 Jackie Bradley Jr. .212 1.2
8 Carlos Santana .220 1.3
9 Yoan Moncada .220 1.1
10 Jason Kipnis .222 1.2

I’ve left WAR in the table here simply to illustrate how surprisingly adequate some of these low-BA players have been overall. Joey Gallo and the bottom final four players on this list are heading toward league-average seasons, or somewhere in that vicinity. I would hope the Emperor of Threetrueoutcomia, Rob Deer, would smile at how his dynasty thrives.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-members

At .161, Chris Davis is pursuing an even more hallowed goal. The official record for lowest qualified batting average is Rob Deer’s mark of .179 in 1991. Currently, my ZiPS projection system only has him making it up to .173, giving Davis a 62% chance at setting a new record, with the largest obstacle perhaps being the O’s shutting him down in September. Now, the “true” record really isn’t .179, but Adam Dunn at .171 in 2011. While Dunn actually hit .159 for the year, he fell below the 502 plate appearances he needed and MLB doesn’t “add” a hit in every at-bat for negative records the same way they add hitless at-bats for players that fall short. With six hits in six more at-bats, Dunn finishes at .171. Davis has a projected 45% chance of worsting (I know that’s not a word, but I like it!) Dunn as well.

As for finding three Mendoza-achievers in 2018, I ran the probabilities for the players most likely to actually finish the season below .200. You already have two players above 50% in Davis and Joey Gallo, giving MLB a real fighting shot at three or even four Mendozites.

ZiPS Projections, Mendoza Probability
Player <.200 Probability
Chris Davis 99.1%
Joey Gallo 72.7%
JaCoby Jones 34.5%
Logan Morrison 26.2%
Alcides Escobar 11.1%
Adam Duvall 10.7%

I won’t run an exact probability overall, simply because I think the willingness of a team not to bench a player under these circumstances is something that a model can’t really answer all that well — except for the Royals, that is, who seem determined to play Alcides Escobar and max out his incentive clause for some bewildering reason. That said, you have five players with a real shot, while Adam Duvall is far less likely to qualify for the batting untitle with the Braves than with the Reds.

But before we go, it would probably be fair to do some kind of league-and-park adjusted Mendoza line. Hitting .200 in 1930 or in Coors is simply a more difficult feat than doing so in 1999 Coors Field is different than in 1968 Dodger Stadium. So I took each qualifying player’s batting average and at-bats to calculate the probability of a league-average player in their park finishing below the Mendoza Line. As one can see, Chris Davis’s 2018 is more than just a historical bat-melding of ineptitude with league environment.

ZiPS Projections, Mendoza Probability
Player Year BA 1-in
Jim Levey 1933 .195 1,370,905
Bill Hallman 1901 .185 642,419
Frankie Crosetti 1940 .194 104,684
Rob Deer 1991 .179 62,846
Monte Cross 1901 .197 42,293
Art Scharein 1933 .204 41,775
Jim Levey 1931 .209 41,173
Dan Uggla 2013 .179 28,366
Heinie Sand 1928 .211 24,253
Leo Durocher 1937 .203 15,945
Heinie Sand 1923 .228 12,496
Chris Davis 2018 .161 10,063
Boze Berger 1938 .217 9,708
Eddie Joost 1943 .185 7,463
Mark Reynolds 2010 .198 5,394
Herman Long 1901 .216 5,292
Monte Cross 1904 .189 5,209
Rougned Odor 2017 .204 4,924
Pete Childs 1902 .194 4,443
Ralph Young 1922 .223 3,384
Gair Allie 1954 .199 3,166
Wally Gerber 1927 .224 2,812
Skeeter Newsome 1936 .225 2,534
Rabbit Warstler 1936 .228 2,237
Jackie Hayes 1937 .229 1,792

The real hero of lousy hitting may not be Mario Mendoza but Jim Levey of the St. Louis Browns, who hit .195 in a league hitting .273. The 1933 season was truly the one in which pitchers threw down to the Levey and the Levey went dry. One Hall of Famer even made an appearance in the top 100, in the form of Ron Santo at 94th, hitting .227 for the 1962 Cubs.





Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

41 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
tb.25
8 years ago

“The 1933 season was truly the one in which pitchers threw down to the Levey and the Levey went dry.”

I’m thinking of a great New Year’s article for you… best sentences of 2018.

radivel
8 years ago
Reply to  tb.25

I legit loled.

Kevbot034
8 years ago

Man, poor Crush Davis. How did the Orioles not see this coming though?

radivel
8 years ago
Reply to  Kevbot034

They did see it coming, and they even offered him a contract that was more suited to his actual value than the ongoing comedy bit that the actual contract is. Unfortunately, in the end, they were outbid by the Orioles.

Baron Samedi
8 years ago

Russell Martin’s .197/.336/.347 line deserves an honourable mention

ballsteidheMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  Baron Samedi

He’s got no chance at getting to the qualifier, though. So he’s not relevant to our cause.

John DiFool2
8 years ago

I’ll just note that Gary Sanchez is currently sitting at .188, but with his injuries doesn’t qualify (even with the “imaginary” hit thang)…

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago

As baffling as the Royals’ affection for Escobar is, he has one thing going for him: He’s not Yuniesky Betancourt.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
8 years ago

Eddie Joost offers hope to all Levey Liners as one who was basically a scrub for 11 years averaging a half Win per season before a mysterious transmogrification to All-Star and MVP candidate over the next six years, becoming the greatest shortstop in the intermittently glorious history of the Philadelphia Athletics of the American League.

burts_beadsMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

Wow, what a bizarre career. Never heard of him before, thanks for bringing him to my attention!

signedepsteinsmother
8 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

He went down to the levey to pray….
Maybe now we know the year ‘greenies’ were invented.
When the levey breaks (out)

WerthlessMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

Evidently, the A’s taught him about launch angle and swinging hard.

Famous Mortimer
8 years ago

Surely Dexter Fowler is on pace to qualify, and he’s hitting .180. Unless I’m not understanding something?

jcrazy84
8 years ago

He broke his foot and will be out for ‘several weeks’. There is only ~7 weeks left in the season, and he would need about 200 more AB’s to qualify. So, say that several weeks is anything more than 3, that’s 200 AB’s in a month. That isn’t happening.

Famous Mortimer
8 years ago
Reply to  jcrazy84

Fair enough, I probably ought to have done the calculation myself 🙁

AndyMember since 2016
8 years ago

Two thoughts: 1/Zoilo Versailles was an MVP just 2 years before the line listed here. 2/I had NO IDEA that MLB added hitless AB’s to players who fall short of the qualifying title. Need to know where I can find out more about that. I mean, to what end? If somebody was short PA’s and won the award that way, wouldn’t everybody be in a frenzy over that? I’d love to know of an example where this was done.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  Andy

It’s to avoid the frenzy of some guy winning the batting title with a .301 mark while someone else hits .427 in 501 PA. In this instance the latter competitor is clearly the greatest batsman in that base ball league.

AndyMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

I get why they’d do it, but lets be realistic. Way more likely that the spread in avg and PA is closer than your case. A guy hits .301 over 640 PA. A second guy who hit .323 in 470PA (152 hits) has his average drop to .3028 adding in 32PA’s. No way does MLB give the 2nd guy the batting title. Can you imagine the uproar!

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  Andy

The uproar thing was more for when anyone cared about the batting title. It’s only really worth the uproar for the wRC+ title.

oozyalbies1
8 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

Will you care about the batting title when JD Martinez is chasing it, along with the Triple Crown, down the stretch? Even if he’s still only 10th in wRC+?

Da Bum
8 years ago
Reply to  Andy

They would give him the batting title. It’s how it is calculated and has been for awhile.

Hank G.Member since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  Andy

Tony Gwynn, 1996.

WoundedSprinterMember since 2018
8 years ago

I noticed (with interest) the appearance of Ivan de Jesus Senior in these unhallowed halls. Is it possible that the Mendoza can be passed on through genetics, I wondered? Of course, this involves an even more unlikely set of circumstances — the Junior has to be good enough to reach the majors, but inept enough to reach his full unpotential.

Turns out that Ivan de Jesus Jr showed Mendoza promise at an early age: 17 games in 2011 for the Dodgers, with the remarkable slash line of .188/.235/.188. I think he should get a Rookie Double Mendoza for that.

However, de Jesus Jr has regressed very creditably towards the mean since:104 games for the Reds in 2016 produced a utilitarian .253/.311/.312. And he’s added positional skills across the diamond as he’s gone on, so it looks like the Mendoza gene may not be hereditary.

If Chris Davis manages the feat twice, however, it will be … a thing. Not necessarily of beauty, and right now not of shock, but definitely of awe.

WoundedSprinterMember since 2018
8 years ago

I think a Three True Outcomes Mendoza guy would be surprisingly valuable, if taken to the max. I’m going to assume the straight Mendoza for batting average (.200) and a stupendous ability to sit on the ball you can hit out of the park.

So, let’s say 500 PA, If every one of your hits goes for a home run, that’s 100 home runs, giving a SLG of .800. Obviously you’re going to be in a lot of 3-2 and 3-1 counts, so you might walk a bit, let’s say .250 for OBP. That gives you an OPS of 1.050.

A vague stab at WAR, assuming you are a DH, which I think you most certainly are, gives you 0.2 WAR, which might not reflect the fact that you are an outlier who has just driven in 100 runs and single-handedly destroyed several baseball records.

I would quite like to see a player like this … although, given that skill set, I suspect there are better ways to go about your business.

The Other DougMember since 2016
8 years ago

The year after Adam Dunn hit .159, he hit .204 with 41 HR, 105 BB, and 222 SO, the latter two figures both leading the majors. (Some Miggy guy won the triple crown that year with 44 HR, so Dunn was just a few HR away from winning the TTO triple crown.) My friend and I were irate when he sat out the last game of the season, presumably to avoid breaking the strikeout record (223) set by Mark Reynolds three years earlier. He posted an .800 OPS, a 115 wRC+, and 2.0 fWAR.

signedepsteinsmother
8 years ago

More incredible is that Ivan Sr. was a major part of the trade that brought Ryne Sandburg to the Cubs in ‘82.

JimMember since 2016
8 years ago

You are not only a good writer, but a confident writer. “Worsting” and “Levey?” Wow, that takes guts.

jtricheyMember since 2021
8 years ago

This will truly show my inner geekdom, but originally the Mendoza line did not mean a .200 batting average. For those old enough, the SUnday sports section in the newspaper would list all the hitters stats ordered by batting average. Some awesome writer (I don’t know who) coined the term by seeing Mario Mendoza always near the bottom of the listing but not necessarily at the bottom. Everyone underneath Mendoza was “under the Mendoza line” (and it was certainly meant as a slur). So the Mendoza line could shift around due to the exploits of the real Mendoza. Of course he doesn’t play anymore and the Sunday Sports section is much different anyway.

I always thought this was an extremely clever term and I think about it every time that it gets misused now.

Mahoney
8 years ago
Reply to  jtrichey

Great story – I never knew that.

So, can we establish a “Trout line” for anyone who’s about Mike Trout in a WAR listing? 😉

zaxellMember since 2020
8 years ago

You do not want to go down in history like Ernesto Miranda.

We remember the legal precedent set when the Supreme Court overturned his rape conviction. We tend to forget that he was retried (without the inadmissable evidence) and convicted again. Also, he was kinda a jerk in general.

Herb Tarlek
8 years ago

He may not qualify, but Bob Uecker hit about exactly .200 for his career (technically it’s .1997). It sure makes more sense to call it the Uecker Line than the Blefary Line (or the Mendoza Line, for that matter).

rockbardMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  Herb Tarlek

I support this change, although it will be hard to change the phonetically sound “Mendoza Line” with “Uecker Line”.

Paul G.Member since 2016
8 years ago

Not to be too quibbling, but the name is Ernesto Miranda, and I do not think being the namesake is as positive as you might think. The Miranda Warning came about due to his conviction of armed robbery, kidnapping, and rape (of an 18-year-old). After the Supreme Court set aside the verdict, Arizona tried him again without the excluded evidence and he was convicted again. After his parole, he died in a bar fight a few years later. To put it mildly, he was not a nice person.

I suppose as far as criminals go, “Miranda Warning” is about as nice a namesake as you could get.

HandsomeBoyModel
8 years ago

“Mendozaaaaaaaa!!!!!!”

-McBain

Free Clay Zavada
8 years ago

Carlos Pena was a low batting average OG – 105 wRC+ in the season he hit .196.

Llewdor
8 years ago

It’s a shame Player A (aka Scott Spiezio) didn’t get more plate appearances in 2005. That would have been an epic achievement.

baubo
8 years ago

Mendoza was simply ahead of his time. A sub-.200 hitter before it became cool to hit below .200.

JohnThackerMember since 2020
8 years ago

But “worsting” *is* a word. It means to defeat someone, as in battle or in argument. Seems as though it has a rich history (including showing up in Tolkien, natch) according to Language Log:
http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=4602

blueberra
8 years ago

I believe no discussion on offensive futility is complete without mentioning Bill Bergen. Although he never qualified for the batting title in his 11 year career (he did, however, have 6 years with 300+ plate appearances), his ineptitude with the bat is unequalled.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/b/bergebi01.shtml