It’s Time to Buy into Daniel Murphy

Yesterday, Daniel Murphy went 4-5, hitting his fourth home run of the season in the process, and driving his batting line for 2016 up to .398/.449/.663. His 192 wRC+ ranks third best in the big leagues, and he’s behind only Manny Machado, Dexter Fowler, and Mike Trout on the WAR leaderboards. In the aftermath of yesterday’s hit barrage, I sent out the following tweet.

Many of the responses argued that Fowler is ahead in that race, which is certainly a reasonable argument given what he’s done for the Cubs thus far. A bunch of other responses were essentially along the “small sample size” lines, though. Like this one, for instance.

In general, the premise of this tweet is mostly correct. When you have a large sample of a player’s career performance, you shouldn’t overreact to a 25 game hot streak, and believe that the most recent performance cancels out the longer history the player has provided for evidence of what he’s capable of doing going forward. In Murphy’s case, though, we’re well past the point of this being a 25 game hot streak. For most of the last year, Daniel Murphy has been one of the best hitters in baseball.

Let’s make use of one of my favorite tools here at FanGraphs: the past calendar year leaderboard. By using this drop-down filter, we can look at how players have performed over the most recent 365 days. And if you sort by wRC+ over that last year, you’ll find Murphy at 135, in a three-way tie for 22nd, right there with Carlos Correa and Shin-Soo Choo. The guys just ahead of him? Kris Bryant and J.D. Martinez, at 137. This is some pretty nice company that Murphy is keeping.

But there’s one flaw with looking at Murphy’s most recent 365 days via the past calendar year leaderboard; it only includes regular season data. But of course Murphy played in the postseason last year, and his playoff power spike was one of the most notable stories of October.

There’s no reason to ignore postseason performance when trying to gather information about a player’s abilities, especially when that performance comes against some of the best pitchers alive; remember that Murphy hit playoff home runs against Clayton Kershaw (twice), Zack Greinke, Jon Lester, Jake Arrieta, Kyle Hendricks, and Fernando Rodney. With the exception of the last name on that list and the underrated Hendricks, that’s a short list of Cy Young contenders. The fact that he was able to launch the ball against them is useful information.

So let’s take a look at Murphy’s actual line over the last 365 days, once you include the postseason performance as well.

Daniel Murphy’s Last 365 Days
Season PA BA OBP SLG ISO BABIP wOBA wRC+
Regular 544 0.317 0.358 0.510 0.192 0.320 0.367 135
Post 64 0.328 0.391 0.724 0.397 0.316 0.464 205
Combined 608 0.318 0.361 0.533 0.214 0.320 0.377 142

In total, Murphy has played 144 games since May 5th, 2015; during that span he has come to the plate for 608 plate appearances, hit 23 home runs, and struck out just 56 times. That isn’t a guy riding a 25 game hot streak; that’s a player with some of the best contact skills in baseball also hitting for significant power at the same time.

During Murphy’s postseason run last year, Tony Blengino noted Murphy’s elite contact skills, comparing him to a guy like Bill Mueller, who had a terrific second half of his career as a high-average hitter with enough power to be useful, including a 2003 season that looks an awful lot like what Murphy has done over the last year.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
Murphy and Mueller
Season PA BB% K% ISO BABIP wOBA wRC+
Murphy 608 6% 9% 0.214 0.320 0.377 142
Mueller 600 10% 13% 0.214 0.350 0.401 145

Mueller walked and struck out more than Murphy, especially once you adjust for the average strikeout rates of the times they played in, but the comparison has some legs. However, it’s also worth considering that since Tony wrote that piece — and suggested that the power spike wasn’t going to last — that Murphy has just kept crushing the baseball, and there are reasons to believe that Murphy might be even more improved now than he was back in October.

Mike Petriello wrote an excellent breakdown of Murphy over at MLB.com a few weeks ago, so I’m going to just borrow liberally from his piece. To illustrate what Mets batting coach Kevin Long did with Murphy’s stance, Petriello included three images in this tweet.

It doesn’t take a scout to notice that change; Murphy got closer to the inside edge and no longer stands as upright as he used to, as he’s now focusing on trying to pull pitches in the air to right field instead of spraying the ball around the field. And as Petriello noted, it’s working.

murphy_pull_percentage_2013_2016_nl3pglh0_0wwrnceo

Murphy has regressed back towards a more normal Pull% over the last few weeks — he’s at 47% now — so the right-hand column would be slightly smaller if we made a new chart, but the point is the same; Murphy has gone from a guy who rarely pulled the ball to a guy who is pulling the ball at one of the highest rates in baseball. In 2013, Murphy ranked 138th out of 140 qualified hitters in Pull%; this year, he ranks 29th out of 196.

But Murphy has also added a new change this year; instead of just pulling the ball more, he’s also learning to get under it. For his career, 43.5% of Murphy’s balls in play have been hit on the ground, and even last year, it was 42.8%. To start 2016? 26.7%, tying him with Yoenis Cespedes for the seventh-lowest GB% in baseball so far. And because Murphy doesn’t have Chris Davis‘ power — or even Khris Davis‘ power — he’s elevating line drives instead of just hitting sky-high fly balls. This is basically the ideal outcome for a guy like Murphy, as squaring everything while elevating allows him to rack up extra base hits without having to rely on fly balls to clear the fence. That’s how Murphy is running a .265 ISO without any kind of huge spike in his HR/FB rate; lots of line drive doubles work plenty well too.

Murphy’s postseason home run barrage wasn’t a sign of him turning into a classic slugger, but he’s also very clearly a different kind of hitter than he was earlier in his career. And this isn’t a 25 game hot streak. His 142 wRC+ over the past year makes him the equal of Buster Posey and puts him just a few spots away from Ryan Braun, Anthony Rizzo, and Brandon Belt. For over 600 plate appearances, Murphy has hit at an elite level, and the trend over that time is pointing upwards.

He’s still a 31 year old middle infielder, of course, so there’s some inevitable age-related decline coming. And anyone running a .427 BABIP is due for some natural regression. Murphy probably just had his Bill Mueller in 2003 season, and we should expect something more like above-average production than elite offense going forward. But Murphy has been crushing the ball long enough, and has made clear structural changes to his game, that this no longer qualifies as an example of a guy riding the good waves of fortune in a 25 game stretch. Over the last year, Daniel Murphy has been the best second baseman in baseball; he probably won’t keep that up, but he’s done enough to be recognized as a good player now.





Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.

48 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
cmarts cups
10 years ago

Counterpoint: no, it’s not.

Bat
10 years ago
Reply to  cmarts cups

Dave, you wrote:

Over the last year, Daniel Murphy has been the best second baseman in baseball.

But wouldn’t it be more accurate to say:

Over the last year, Daniel Murphy has been the best HITTING second baseman in baseball.

You don’t mention Murphy’s defense – or that of any other 2B – in the article?

sabrtooth
10 years ago
Reply to  Bat

You two must be super-fun at parties.

Bat
10 years ago
Reply to  sabrtooth

Murphy’s defense has always been below average; at times his defense really slumps and he is well below average.

My point in writing the above comment was not to be overly critical of Dave but rather to speculate that Murphy, while the best hitting 2B over the last year, may not be the best 2B once defense is factored into the equation.

Not sure how I am not fun at parties when I politely suggested slightly different wording that I think *may* be more accurate.

Emphasis on *may* because it is possible that even if defense is considered, Murphy’s stellar hitting overshadows the consistently mediocre defense and still results in him being the best 2B rather than just the best hitting 2B.

jianadaren
10 years ago
Reply to  sabrtooth

You read fangraphs comments at parties?

Dick Monfort
10 years ago
Reply to  sabrtooth

Who doesn’t?

Cyril Morong
10 years ago

Great analysis. His BAbip is only .029 above his season AVG of .398. This year and last year for the entire NL, there is about a .050 gap.

His highest OPS ever for a calendar month was .912 before this year. He had only one other calendar month over .900 and that was in a different year. With his OPS at 1.112 this year over about a month, he his way above his norm.

Spartacus
10 years ago

I really don’t like him. And it’s irrational. But I’ll let someone else to the buying.

Dave42
10 years ago

If you buy into the “Kevin Long effect”, what would reasonable projections be for Murph for the season? .320/.380/.500? 20 HR? Each of those would be career highs other than his first 49-game cup of coffee in 2008, even including minor leagues.

For my part, I’ve always been a big fan of Murph, was sad to see the Mets make no effort to re-sign him and wish him well with the Nats. Just not too well…

paqza
10 years ago
Reply to  Dave42

Can’t really blame the Mets for using it as an opportunity to get rid of deadweight (Jon Niese) while acquiring a 1 year stopgap until Herrera is ready (Walker) and two draft picks (1 for Murph, 1 for Walker). So no, I don’t think Daniel Murphy is better than Neil Walker, two draft picks and roster flexibility. If Wright weren’t playing this year, I’d disagree, since Murphy a) is a better 3B than 2B and heck, could probably even hit enough to stick at first if we didn’t already have Duda there.

Dave42
10 years ago
Reply to  paqza

They could have instead traded Neise for a prospect similar perhaps to who they’ll draft next month – a low-a ball prospect with some upside. I believe if the Mets had offered 3 and $36 or so in November he’d have jumped to stay. And while Wright has been fine more or less, I hardly expect him to play 130-140 games this year. I’d be surprised if he tops 120. Of course I always have a preference for home-grown guys over trades or free agents.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
10 years ago
Reply to  Dave42

Murph was a guy I enjoyed rooting for as well, and I basically wish him well as a player and a person (though I hope he’ll reconsider his homophobia) — but for the Mets, not matching the Nats’ offer seems like as big a roster construction no-brainer as you will ever see. A 1-year deal might’ve made sense; but considering the Mets’ needs in other areas and huge organizational depth at 2B, a multiyear deal would’ve been ill-advised to say the least. Loyalty aside, there just wasn’t a fit there in the least.

bglick4
10 years ago

Homophobia? I don’t follow everything he’s said, but I did see an interview with him in regards to a homosexual he talked with. He said he disagreed with his lifestyle, but said he respected his honesty. That seems like a pretty tolerant guy to me. By all accounts, he’s great teammate. This isn’t a John Rocker or even a Torii Hunter situation. (I guess someone could have an issue with calling something “a lifestlye” that they want to believe is hard coded genetic, but that’s still just semantics)

Anyway, it’s hard to argue with the numbers. His weak glove is less of a concern on a team with strikeout pitchers. All around, it was a good signing, though the Mets decision to release him was completely defensible. The Mets are at the top of the win curve and Walker represented more a of a sure thing. To Dave’s point, they maybe should have seen Murphy differently, but it hard to change your mind about a player after seeing him one way for several seasons.

Blastings! Thrilledge
10 years ago
Reply to  bglick4

It has just been decreed on some things that there’s no such thing as rational disagreement, only an irrational “phobia,” something perhaps that counseling and therapy could cure.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
10 years ago
Reply to  bglick4

Oy vey, guys, it’s the universally accepted (among non-lunatics) single word for anti-gay bigotry, it doesn’t commit anyone to an account of the psychology of such bigotry.

pfranz94
10 years ago
Reply to  Dave42

I would say .290-.295/.340-.350/.440-.450 with 15-18 homeruns is about what I would expect from him. I think he’s going to have a very good year, and see his #’s increase a bit above his career norms, but let’s not go crazy.

gdiguy
10 years ago
Reply to  Dave42

I’m in the same position as you; if Walker was a disaster I’d be apoplectic, but since he’s been great as well I can just sit back and say ‘good for you, Murphy’.

He didn’t fit into the Mets long-term plans (especially defensively), and I didn’t expect him to take a 1 year deal when he’s never really gotten a serious payday, so I’m happy he appears to have turned a corner and may have a career resurgence. It’s a shame it had to happen in-division, but *shrug*

wilkie
10 years ago

I believe the power increase is sustainable. First of all, he hit 21 home runs last year. Can’t ignore the postseason. And perhaps more importantly, his average FB/LD exit velocity in 2015 was 93.3 MPH, and so far this year it’s 93.6. That is well above average, and could translate into an above-average HR/FB rate.

JCCfromDCMember since 2016
10 years ago

As a Nats fan, I was hopeful that moving out of Citi Field would allow Murphy to maintain, or even slightly improve, his overall numbers from last year. If you look at his H/R splits, his numbers at Citi were pretty bad – playing up to 81 games a year there really held down his raw splits (obviously not OPS+ or wRC+, since Citi is hard on pretty much everyone). His bat has obviously been great, and his defense has been … not as bad as advertised, anyway.

No, he’s not going to maintain this pace – he’s on pace for a 10.8 fWAR season! That’s insane. But he’s likely to be a 4+ fWAR player, and a 5-6 WAR season is not out of the question. He could end up “paying” for his entire contract in his first of three seasons, which would be pretty crazy for any free agent deal.

Do I think that Murphy is a

JCCfromDCMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  JCCfromDC

Ignore the dangling sentence fragment. My kingdom for an edit function!

JimMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  JCCfromDC

Indeed, Murphy likes his new location; he’s closer to North Carolina than he was before.

Spartacus
10 years ago
Reply to  Jim

I really want to make a joke here, but my better judgement is telling me to let it go…

Jeff McNeil Truther
10 years ago
Reply to  JCCfromDC

Citi is a neutral park at this point–they’ve moved in the walls a couple of times most recently before last season. It definitely could’ve held back his power earlier in his career though.

JCCfromDCMember since 2016
10 years ago

Even last season he had pretty stark H/R splits:

.251/.290/.471/.707 at Citi Field
.310/.351/.480/.832 away from Citi Field.

Not as bad as his 2014 H/R splits (OPS of .652/.805), but still hard to ignore.

JR and the Off-Balance Shots
10 years ago

surely we can let the nats have their moment in the sun

Noah BaronMember since 2016
10 years ago

lol this is great

DomenicMember since 2025
10 years ago

That year-long breakdown is a bit skewed by his second-half surge, though. He hit .297/.346/.411 from May 1 through July 31; His ISO was .087 in May and .102 in July. The serious changes in his power production started in August, as did his more extreme pull hitting. His pull percentage was 36.6% from May through July, and then 44.4% the rest of the way.

That being said – this does seem to be something more than an extremely long hot streak. His approach has changed, his stance has changed, and he’s hitting the ball harder in general.

Dave42
10 years ago
Reply to  Domenic

I was thinking the same thing. August, September, October and April are the relevant months.

TKDCMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  Dave42

No, doing that is cherry picking. This seems more objective. I mean, does anyone really think Murphy is actually better than a 142 wRC+ guy going forward?

senor_mike
10 years ago
Reply to  Domenic

Not only did his pull% increase in August/Sept, but so did his FB%…both of which are trends he has maintained in the playoffs and in April.

That isn’t to say he doesn’t revert, guys get in their own heads all the time and tinker when they shouldn’t, but right now he really does appear to be a different hitter.

Dave42
10 years ago
Reply to  Domenic

If you look at his numbers from August 2 last year to today, including post-season he has hit .333/.374/.609 with 19 HR and 65 RBI in 98 games.

If you want to take out the post-season, his last 84 games in the regular season he has hit .334/.371/.583 with 12 HR and 54 RBI. As Domenic said, August began his new stance and his new hitting approach.

The period from 5/5/15-8/1/15 he hit .294/.341/.408 with 4 HR in 211 at bats. That is much more in line with his career splits of .291/.335/.430. Something definitely changed and you see the pictorial evidence of it in the article.

philosofool
10 years ago
Reply to  Domenic

If you throw out his three best months last season, Mike Trout had a wRC+ of 135 last year. See, Mike Trout isn’t actually good.

Dave42
10 years ago
Reply to  philosofool

the question is, did Mike Trout start doing something completely different at the plate to make him into an ordinary player? The point of the article is that Murphy has started doing something different and it turned him from an OK player into an excellent one, particularly over the last four months.

A similar if more pronounced transformation took place with Jose Bautista at the end of the 2009 season. I believe Murphy has always been a great hitter. He’s only just recently figured out how to maximize that ability.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
10 years ago

I think the argument here about Murph’s hitting approach is entirely right. But we ought to talk about his below-average fielding too. To me as a Mets fan who got used to years of watching Murphy butcher plays at 2B while repeating the mantra “the defensive stats show he’s just a little bit below average, he’s not really killing the team,” Neil Walker looks like an absolute revelation — even despite defensive stats that seem superficially almost indistinguishable from Murphy’s. Just in the past month of baseball I can’t count the number of balls I’d expected to see go past-a-diving-Murphy that Walker’s fielded, the number of DPs Walker completed that Murphy wouldn’t have turned.

I have to say at this point that Murphy on defense is one of the starkest differences between the eye test and the stats that I’ve seen in a long time, and I am coming to think he’s probably much worse than the FG Def stat indicates, both at range and at making double plays. The bat probably makes most of it up anyhow, but it’s worth acknowledging and talking about if we’re thinking about whether to call Murph a star-level talent or not.

paqza
10 years ago

If he’s hitting well enough to play 1st base on a competitive team, the iron glove still plays. I think the Nats should strongly consider calling up Trea Turner ASAP, moving Rendón back to 2nd, and playing Murphy at 3B. That’s a much stronger infield than the current setup.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
10 years ago
Reply to  paqza

I completely agree, he plays a passable 3B (though still with poor range/poor arm accuracy) and is just fine at 1B, which means the total package is more than fine, since he’s basically hitting like a John Olerud-esque high-doubles/low-HR first baseman at this point. I just think he really looks like a significantly worse 2B than the numbers seem to suggest.

OutOfTheBox
10 years ago

How does Murphy’s change compare to Matt Carpenter’s change last year?

Dick Monfort
10 years ago
Reply to  OutOfTheBox

Neither of them has the change I do.

JR and the Off-Balance Shots
10 years ago

should i also mention that murph has yet to make a backbreaking misplay for the charmed-ass bullshit nats yet?

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
10 years ago

Nah, probably not

Concerned Reader John
10 years ago

Forgive the off-topic aside, but when looking at the past calendar year leaderboard, I couldn’t help but notice Trout had a 174 wRC+. His ability to seemingly be within 10 points of 170 at all times is incredible. Guy is a freaking metronome.

RonnieDobbs
10 years ago

Murphy was also banged up most of last year. I think he is a legitimately tough guy that plays through things that other guys wouldn’t. It is hard to figure that into last season, but for me, it is a factor in judging the true talent level. He is also 31, so health is not a given… but a healthy Murphy is a hell of an offensive player.

Swfcdan
10 years ago

I bought the power change last year, it was clearly another of Kevin Long’s “pull power” hitting mechanical changes.

What made it more funny and odd was that people were backing away from Murphy in drafts citing the postseason performance was a fluke. Why the hell was it a fluke, it was against some of the best pitchers in baseball so should be given more credence! To homer twice off Kershaw in a short series as a lefty is staggering enough as it is (no other lefties do that!) so it was clear as day that Murphy was improved yet people just didn’t want to believe it because “he’s still Daniel Murphy”.

Nats park is still tough on lefty power (not named Harper) so I don’t think the HR output will be much over 20, but his AVG and doubles should be great for leagues counting slugging/ops.

Daniel
10 years ago

Good thing Neil Walker hit home runs at a Ruthian rate in April, or we Mets fans would be inconsolable.

Vince Clortho
10 years ago

I love Bill Mueller and was happy to be reminded of him

mattMember since 2023
10 years ago

David Wright’s defense has been dreadful

bjoakMember since 2020
10 years ago

Everyone screamed sample size after the post-season last year, but I was basically making the same argument then. If you looked at six months including post, he had a damned impressive year.

spiralstairs
10 years ago

I was fully buying in to Daniel Murphy to start the season simply due to a 3 year sample size of his home/away splits:

http://www.fangraphs.com/statsplits.aspx?playerid=4316&position=2B&season=2015
http://www.fangraphs.com/statsplits.aspx?playerid=4316&position=2B&season=2014
http://www.fangraphs.com/statsplits.aspx?playerid=4316&position=2B&season=2013

When a player changes locations, its nice to review what affect their previous location had on them and what affect their new one might have.
His career line at Nationals park is an .809 OPS (.312 AVG) on 253 ABs. That is in line with his away-stats for the last 3 years, which would point to him having a very good projection for this year – at least that was my opinion even before this hot streak.