Jac Caglianone Joins the 120 Club

Peter Aiken-Imagn Images

Somewhere in my list of article ideas, I have a theoretical question tucked away. What’s the longest distance you could hit a baseball? Not what’s the longest distance a really strong player could hit a ball, but what’s the longest distance that it’s possible to hit a baseball? I haven’t gotten around to it because I’d need to interview a physicist or a materials scientist or both, but I’m excited about this question. Say you’re an infinitely strong batter with an infinitely fast swing. The distance you can hit the ball isn’t infinite. At some point, you’ll hit the ball hard enough that your bat will shatter, reducing the efficiency of the energy transfer. Or maybe the ball will be the weak link, and you’ll hit it so hard that it will deform into a less aerodynamic shape or explode into a thousand pieces. There’s a limit somewhere.

I will write this article one day (so please don’t steal it), and it will be fun to discover the answer through math and logic, but theory isn’t the only way to solve a problem. Last Thursday, Jac Caglianone tried to find the answer through pure experimentation, which is to say that in the top of the fifth inning against the Diamondbacks, the Royals right fielder turned on a Yilber Díaz fastball and ripped it into the right-center gap at 120.2 mph. The missile made Caglianone just the eighth player to gain entry into the 120 MPH Club in the 11-year history of Statcast.

It’s the hardest-hit ball of Caglianone’s career (officially, anyway; we’ll return to that later). It’s also the hardest-hit ball of spring training, and it’s far from the only fireworks display he’s put on in the past week. With a 116.5-mph double on Saturday and a 115.2-mph homer on Tuesday, Caglianone now owns three of the 10 hardest-hit balls of spring training. More importantly, it’s the 30th-hardest ball ever recorded by Statcast at any level. Thankfully, Statcast is now in every spring training ballpark, or we never would have grasped just how special Caglianone has been this spring.

Caglianone is not exactly a surprising addition to the 120 MPH Club. In his write-ups of Caglianone as a prospect, Eric Longenhagen awarded a 70/80 present/future grade for power, variously describing it as elite, top-of-the-scale, otherworldly, and nutty. He also noted, “His thighs are practically bursting out of his pants.” When asked how Caglianone looked during the Arizona Fall League during a chat, Eric replied with just one word:

It’s also not surprising because Caglianone has done this before, just not officially. Last April, Kenny Van Doren of MLB.com wrote that in Caglianone’s first Double-A at-bat, he lined a single the other way 120.9 mph, though the pitch was measured by the less-accurate Trackman system.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

So news that Caglianone can hit a baseball really hard is not exactly going to stop the presses. All the same, Thursday’s blast pushed him into a different tier. It’s exciting stuff. The game wasn’t broadcast on television, so the footage of the play came from a lower-quality camera behind home plate, but just look how quickly this ball makes it to the wall.

The lack of a television cameras and special parabolic microphones pointed at home plate is also the reason that the ball doesn’t sound like a shotgun blast. What you’re hearing there is the radio feed. To get a sense of how loud it is, let’s put it side by side with Luken Baker’s three-run homer, which came just two innings later. I did not do anything to the audio here. Baker’s 109.5-mph home run sounds like a pop gun compared to Caglianone’s explosion.

We should be sure to give Yilber Díaz, whose name is just begging to be spoonerized, some credit here, too. His pitch came in at 96.8 mph, and while pitch models aren’t everything, this might be a good place to note that his four-seamer graded out as one of the worst in the majors last year according to Stuff+. You know how some people say that home runs aren’t hit, they’re thrown? This is what they’re talking about.

In a way, this almost qualifies as a success for Díaz, whose command has been his biggest issue as a prospect. His Location+ was also right at the bottom of the majors last year, but that right there is a perfect draw right to the button. It’s a four-seam fastball, mid-(gigantic)thigh, directly over the center of the plate. It’s the platonic ideal of a meatball. This is what it looks like when a baseball is begging to be put out of its misery. I’m surprised that little red dot isn’t holding a little sign that says “YIKES!” like Wile E. Coyote.

We’re in early March here, and we’re not supposed to read too much too much into one batted ball, or even the entire sample. Caglianone is 6-for-15 with five walks this spring. That’s a .400 batting average and a 25% walk rate. He also has a 15% strikeout rate, and his three massively hard-hit extra-base hits pushed his wRC+ to 229. Now let’s pour some cold water on that, shall we? He’s one of a whopping 62 qualified players with a wRC+ above 200, alongside renowned thumpers like Akil Baddoo and Brandon Lockridge. His 66.7% hard-hit rate is tremendous, but it’s not even tops on his own team, as Bobby Witt Jr. and Carter Jensen are both above 70%. The one thing we’ve always known about Caglianone is that he possesses absurd power. The questions were always about his contact rate, his ability to lift the ball, and his outfield defense, and it will take more than a week to answer them.

Still, it’s hard to imagine Caglianone doing much more to prove himself in a single week. He has now exceeded 115 mph three times in a week and gotten his fickle batting average to twice the Mendoza line. It could very well be nothing more than spring training noise, but we should be paying attention. And regardless, a 120.2-mph batted ball is worth stopping what you’re doing just so you can take some time to marvel. It only happens a couple times a year.





Davy Andrews is a Brooklyn-based musician and a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @davyandrewsdavy.bsky.social.

31 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ArathornMember
4 months ago

As a Royals fan, I can’t help but hope this is meaningful.

As an (amateur) analyst and realist, I know it isn’t meaningless. But it’s closer than I’d like.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 months ago
Reply to  Arathorn

It’s certainly better than not doing that, but I don’t think there’s any way to “prove” anything in spring training.

Last spring training some of the big breakout names were Pete Crow-Armstrong, Jeremy Pena, Hunter Goodman and Curtis Mead. Three of those guys actually broke out in the regular season, and then there was Curtis Mead.

In 2024, the big breakout names were Nick Pratto, Mauricio Dubon, Dane Myers, and Hoy Park. Dubon and Myers did sort of break out, but Pratto and Park’s successes didn’t even carry over to AAA and they never got a shot in MLB.

In 2023 the big breakouts were Mike Brousseau, Jake Cave, and Hanser Alberto…all of whom had negative fWAR that year.

You’d rather see this than him scuffling but we have no idea if this is going to turn out like Daniel Palka or Matt Olson.

jdbolickMember since 2024
4 months ago
Reply to  Arathorn

It is meaningful because he is crushing the ball while having elevated his launch angle. The latter was his problem last season, as he was mashing balls into the dirt instead of the sky. He had the 12th best EV90 in baseball for anyone with at least two hundred plate appearances. Going from a 4.1 LA in 2025 to 15.2 LA this spring while maintaining elite exit velocities is something meaningful to be very excited about.

AnonMember since 2025
4 months ago
Reply to  Arathorn

Complete list of guys to clear 120MPH, both regular season and ST (with total # of 120+batted balls):

Stanton 17
O Cruz 6
G Sanchez 1
Acuna 1
Vladito 1
Judge 1
Jac 1
Shohei 1

that’s pretty good company . . .

formerly matt wMember since 2025
4 months ago

As the spoonerism guy–I sent Grant Brisbee Ken Hunt–Yilber Diaz is maybe a 50, 55 spoonerism. He’s not even the most spoonerizable guy in this article (Luken Baker). The best spoonerisms are the ones that sneak up on you, like Mickey Stanley.

Speaking of small sample size spring stats, check out Vance Honeycutt’s line.

Last edited 4 months ago by formerly matt w
Brian ReinhartMember since 2016
4 months ago

Brusdar Graterol
Drew Storen
Daylen Lile
Bubba Chandler
Bobby Witt
Kyle Tucker

neuronicMember since 2021
4 months ago
Reply to  Brian Reinhart

Chubba Bandler is a 70-grade spoonerism

raregokusMember since 2022
4 months ago

Great, now Stickey Manley is gonna be wedged in my brain for the next ~decade

sandwiches4everMember since 2019
4 months ago

When scout types talk about the ball sounding different off of a bat, that’s what they mean.

muenstertruckMember since 2024
4 months ago

Smarter Every Day and How Ridiculous have both created baseball hitting machines that have cleared 700ft. They’re essentially helicopters with bats instead of blades.

formerly matt wMember since 2025
4 months ago
Reply to  muenstertruck

I would guess that the theoretical theoretical maximum will involve catching an extremely strong wind.

OlanMember since 2020
4 months ago

Yeah, look up disc golf distance record video

Ostensibly RidiculousMember since 2020
4 months ago

“Seems good.” might be my all time favorite Fangraphs article tagline.

AlbyMember since 2025
4 months ago

Great, so he’s the Steve Dalkowski of hitters.

TKDCMember since 2016
4 months ago

If we are only talking about rhetorical possibility, I’d be very surprised if you couldn’t create a legal bat that when striking a ball perfectly would not pulverize the ball. I think the balls structural limitations are really what answers this question.

That’s also better. The shapes and sizes of potential bats are infinite, where as the specifications for a ball are the same. You would have to contend with the fact that while the specifications of baseballs are uniform, the reality is that they are not all actually identical.

sandwiches4everMember since 2019
4 months ago
Reply to  TKDC

 shapes and sizes of potential bats are infinite,

Not if you’re talking about game-legal bats, not at least in the colloquial sense of infinite (since we’re talking continuous physical qualities, any object has an infinite shape and size, depending on how small your measurements are).

Rule 3.02(a):  The bat shall be a smooth, round stick not more than 2.61 inches in diameter at the thickest part and not more than 42 inches in length. The bat shall be one piece of solid wood.

Theoretically, it could be as heavy as you want, but realistically the material specified (solid wood) is going to have an upper maximum based on the diameter and length.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 months ago

Can’t ever give up on 80 raw.

Guys with 80 raw have a huge margin for error.

Of course when someone with 80 grade power struggles as much as Jac did last year they’re a lot more likely to turn into Jordan Walker than Aaron Judge. But sometimes out of the ashes of a terrible season you get a star anyway like Byron Buxton or Chris Davis, and more raw power certainly gives you a better shot.

sandwiches4everMember since 2019
4 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

It’s worth remember just how much Aaron Judge struggled in 2016 — it certainly looked pretty fugly.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 months ago

I was always skeptical of him as a prospect because he was a bit older and his hit tool looked iffy. Then after 2016 I thought he was never going to make it. And then he stopped trying to hit the ball hard and started just trying to make contact and it turns out that was enough—he has so much raw power he just has to get the bat on the ball and let the rest take care of itself.

The lesson I learned here is: Don’t give up on 80 raw.

steveo
4 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

It was 95 PA in 2016 as a rookie lol.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
4 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

The other big thing with Judge is that he’s a three sport guy who grew up in East Jabip.

The closest thing we have to a framework for Judge is Josh Allen…which is a good reminder that most players in their mode are going to have Locker/Richardson careers, with a Trubisky/Gallo as a 90th percentile outcome.

And I will say…Dave Winfield (the closest baseball comp I can figure) kept hitting till he was 40!

A Salty ScientistMember since 2024
4 months ago

Winfield is the closest comp, but Judge is even larger. There have been very few hitters Judge’s size, and those within that small sample have tended to not have long careers. Comps are very useful for projecting, but we’re in the wilderness when it comes to unicorns. Judge has done so well improving his K rate that I do think he’ll age well barring injury.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
4 months ago

…and how many players have been Winfield’s size, haha?

Seriously – what’s the list of players at least 6’5 who have started 200 games in CF?

GoodEnoughForMeMember since 2024
4 months ago

I, too, believe I could join the 120 club. If you had me stand in the batter’s box against a 100mph, I believe I would spin out of there at 120mph before the windup is even done.

PC1970Member since 2024
4 months ago

or if I hit a flyball at the exact moment an F5 tornado touched down 50 feet in front of me & the tornado moved in the same direction as my hit… or with the wind of a category 5 hurricane at my back (I would need to be sheltered by a concrete barricade or something), I’m sure I could pull it off.

Left of Centerfield
4 months ago

Who knew Jon Kruk was a Fangraph’s member?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GxeRtir0oA

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 months ago

I knew exactly what that link was going to be.

It’s probably a coincidence because Kruk had a lot of health problems that cropped up around the same time but starting with the second half of 1993 his power deserted him completely. I’d like to think he was never the same after facing Randy Johnson.

millvillemeltdownMember since 2026
4 months ago

davy, i know there are smart people like vivienne pelletier and dr alan nathan and the prof emeritus out of sydney i’m forgetting, but i am also imagining a world where you fall headfirst into, like, fluid mech and perturbation theory in trying to find the answer. i say this as a rank amateur physicist (were i longenhagen, i’d give myself a high-variance 35 fv) who has now been nerd-sniped by your lede, and is delaying working on a couple very important other tasks to think about baseball and giggle.

edited to hide a mathless pass at an approach, so davy doesn’t get mad and ban me
my initial thoughts on an approach with the very limited tools i have at my disposal (i.e. very little) would be that we need a robust model of ball flight considering drag, spin + spin magnus efficiency, etc. because we know that backspin matters a lot for range. with a set input velocity, i think optimizing for spin rate, launch angle, etc. will give a good ballpark (wink) for, say, maximum distance for an observed exit velo (oneil cruz?). since magnus lift is ultimately velocity dependent (and weird things happen when you spin too fast) i imagine we’d see a peak somewhere within the realm of real things that can happen to baseballs on impact with a bat. it’s also quite possible that reaching peak rotation sacrifices collision efficiency so much as to not be worth considering, so that’s a shortcoming.

we could also set this to happen in different atmospheric conditions; clearly a tailwind in thinner atmosphere (hello, coors!) is most favorable, but it has to be standardized to be meaningful…

i’m completely ignoring bat-ball dynamics and myriad other concerns, but again, limited toolset. i have never done simulations, materials science is far beyond my knowledge, and wood is weird. i figure the pros will be more helpful in that aspect. my starting point would just be to find a good spin-angle combination, and reverse-engineer a bat-ball collision to produce something similar, see what happens to the bat, then increase bat speed to failure. there are probably more elegant ways to solve, but this one is mine.

Last edited 4 months ago by millvillemeltdown
Envy AngelMember since 2017
4 months ago

So in the Savant image, that’s one red dot for where he hit the ball as it crossed the plate, and another red dot for where it landed?

raregokusMember since 2022
4 months ago

Hey Davy, I’m a physicist. Happy to speculate wildly on the record if more informed sources fall through

Shirtless George Brett
4 months ago

“Such a mighty wallop” – Apu Nahasapeemapetilon