Javier Baez Is Doubling Down
The player by whom I’m most fascinated in the major leagues is Javier Baez. It might be because, the first time I saw him, what popped into my head was “Alfonso Soriano.” It might be because Baez, despite being able to do this, and this, and this, has yet to post even a 2.5-win season. I admit to thinking, after Baez’s 2013 season, that he was going to be a superstar. It hasn’t happened yet. But the tools are so loud that I’ve never stopped looking for signs that a breakout might be coming.
If Baez were to break out, it would probably resemble his effort over the first three-plus weeks of the 2018 season. Including Sunday’s game, Baez has produced a 187 wRC+ and 1.2 WAR in 80 plate appearances. Both figures place him among the top 10 qualifiers in the majors. His .444 isolated-power mark is first among that same group.
Of course, it’s always best to view March and April statistics with three shakers of salt and a heavy dose of skepticism. Accordingly, when looking further into how Baez has succeeded this season, I expected to find a good bit of luck. Turns out, there might very well be something here.
Last week, Travis Sawchik posted an update on the fly-ball revolution which heavily featured Baez. But Baez’s numbers, so far this season, are very different beyond just an increased propensity for hitting fly balls. Consider the following:

It’s hard not to notice that one of these years is not like the others, small sample size notwithstanding. So far, Baez has walked more often than ever before and also struck out less often. To put it a different way, consider: Baez has drawn six walks so far this season. He drew 15 walks in all of 2016. Baez has struck out 17 times in 19 games this month. He struck out 21 times last April in 17 games.
Now, let’s get one thing straight at the outset. Of Baez’s six walks, four have been intentional. So it’s not like Baez has suddenly become Joey Votto. And yet… all of Baez’s walks last April were intentional. Two walks may not be a lot to go on, but this April fits a pattern which has been developing since last year’s All-Star Game. Before the break last year, he had 13 walks and a 5.0% BB rate. After the break, he had 17 walks and a 6.9% BB rate — and, more importantly, less than half of those post-break walks were intentional.
But of course, dear reader, you know that walk rate isn’t everything. Other metrics suggest that a trend might be present, however. Last year, Baez recorded 7.6 weighted runs above average against the fastball, an improvement from 4.9 the year before. This year, he’s already at 8.3. That’s pretty remarkable. It’s less remarkable, however, than his improvement against curveballs. After posting negative marks every year against curveballs, Baez is at +3.1 weighted runs above average against the curveball this year. His home run off German Marquez yesterday was off a curve, as well.
https://gfycat.com/UnsightlyAgileDove
Overall, Baez has recorded positive numbers against fastballs, sliders, curveballs, and cutters. It’s the first time in his career that he’s fared better than average against more than three pitches in the same year — and the first time since 2015 he’s been in positive territory against more than two in the same year.
So is Baez seeing pitches better? Perhaps. The book on Baez has always been that he lacks discipline, swinging too often, especially out of the strike zone. Entering play Sunday, his out-of-zone swing rate (O-Swing%) was at 44.0%, right around last year’s 45.1%, so he doesn’t seem to transformed much in this regard. And yet, his in-zone swing rate (Z-Swing%) is at a career high, and it’s not close. Baez entered Sunday swinging at 81.2% of pitches inside the strike zone, an increase from last year of almost nine percentage points. What makes that more impressive is that Baez is seeing only 38.9% of pitches inside the zone. And Baez’s hard-hit rate is a career high, at 40.4%. Paired with a career-best 0.8 GB/FB and 40% fly-ball rate, and Baez is dwarfing all his previous power numbers. Even better, Baez is absolutely torching the ball: his average exit velocity as of Sunday morning was nearly 93 mph, sandwiched between Anthony Rizzo and Gary Sanchez.
Now, it’s not all sunshine and roses. Baez has plus power, but he’s unlikely to continue hitting 30% of his fly balls over the fence. He’s also posting a career-high infield-fly rate. That could be a drag on his batting average if his K rate spikes back to more normal levels; remember, his swing rate overall hasn’t really changed.
However, there’s reason to believe that real improvement is present here. First off, based on the fly-ball and pop-up rates, it looks like Travis was right: Baez made a swing adjustment to hit the ball in the air. And so far, it seems to be working. But Baez, it seems, has made one more adjustment: he’s hunting pitches in the strike zone. Instead of being more patient, Baez has actually been more aggressive in a way. The natural counter to this will be when pitchers, who are already throwing him strike sparingly, go even farther away to see if Baez will chase. But Baez is seeing more three-ball counts this year (26.0% entering Sunday) as compared to last year (19.5%), which suggests he may already be adjusting back.
Let’s put this another way. Here are two players, one of whom is Baez.
| Name | O-Swing% | Z-Swing% | GB/FB | BB% | K% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player A | 44.0% | 81.2% | 0.80 | 8.1% | 18.9% |
| Player B | 36.0% | 75.9% | 0.75 | 5.2% | 17.2% |
Player A is Baez. As for Player B, I gave away the answer in the lede, but it’s… Alfonso Soriano in his breakout 2003 campaign. And if you squint, you can see that there are, at least, some superficial similarities. This type of player profile can work. Baez’s 44% O-Swing, though is probably still too high — even Soriano couldn’t survive swinging outside the zone that often.
Steamer projects a 102 wRC+ from Baez the rest of the way, and that would mean Baez’s first career above-average offensive season. But I think Steamer might be underestimating Baez here. Baez, it seems, has decided to double down on being himself — instead of seeing more pitches, he’s actually just become more aggressive about swinging at pitches he can drive. If Baez becomes a latter-day Soriano, the Cubs would have a special player indeed.
Sheryl Ring is a litigation attorney and General Counsel at Open Communities, a non-profit legal aid agency in the Chicago suburbs. You can reach her on twitter at @Ring_Sheryl. The opinions expressed here are solely the author's. This post is intended for informational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice.
Moving him up in the order should help him see more strikes. Let’s hope he keeps going.
Is your suggestion based on the belief that lineup protection exists? Because that’s been widely debunked.
Widely? I hear a lot of condescending comments like this, but that’s about it. I am sure I could debunk the study if I had nothing better to do. I can’t imagine what the methodology looked like. If that is the “conclusion”, then it was wrong. Ex – every player who his in the two hole didn’t have their stats increase by 10% or something along those lines. I don’t doubt that people have “proved” what they wanted to prove – there is certainly heaps of data to chose from. I wouldn’t expect it to show up in mountains of data as most teams don’t even have a real heart of the order except in name, but it certainly happens on a per case basis.
If you think hitting in front of Kris Bryant as opposed to whoever is pitching that day is irrelevant, then the problem is on your end. If you actually care, please take a look at the careers of Rich Aurillia and Jeff Kent – exceptional situations are where it happens. Nobody is getting anything out of the Marlins lineup. Notice how well the Nats offense works when Bryce is hitting? Its there if you want to see it, but its easier just to point out choice facts.
I’m really surprised at all the negative hits here. It’s the people here at FG and more specifically Dave Cameron who has stated over and over that lineup protection does not exist. I wonder what your responses would be if Dave wrote this. I enjoyed Dave a lot and wish him well. But lineup protection almost certainly exists. Especially moving from #8, in front of the pitcher and #2 in front of Bryant and Rizzo. How many intentional walks has he received in the two whole?
Yeah these down votes are quite surprising. Maybe I took some liberties with the use of ‘widely,’ but there are studies out there saying that it does not exist.
Just because a lot of people say something exists, doesn’t mean it does. Lots of people believe in a god, but I (nor literally anyone else on earth) have ever seen evidence supporting such a claim. If you want to say lineup protection exists, fine: prove it. If you want to continue making claims without providing evidence, you can join the billions of people have done so before you.
Hmm, I’ll play, Mike. You are making a claim that literally nobody on earth has seen evidence supporting the existence of a god…there’s no way in hell that claim is based on evidence. (It also manifestly assumes what constitutes evidence is an ahistorical truth, which is probably not a position you want to argue…at least the evidence provided by the history of science contradicts it.) I see your comment as evidence that we sometimes see evidence for whatever we want to see.
What I’ve seen “widely” is that lineup protection doesn’t seem to help overall production in terms of linear weights, but does change the shape of it. Specifically yes they will throw more strikes if the next guy is a big home run hitter. They accept the added chance you’ll HR on a juicy pitch, in exchange for lower chance you’ll walk and be on for the slugger. The SLG versus OPB relative value shifts.
For a player like Javy, who will hack at anything and is prone to waste a swing or six on a given day I would think it would be huge.
He seems to be hitting the ball the other way a lot more. I feel like this approach is helping him with all the outside pitches and sliders. I’d like to see a spray chart for his season so far.
This is for true. Hitting the ball the other way involves mechanical changes. You can’t blow out your hips and hit the ball the other way well. When Javy embarrasses himself he indiscriminately opens his hips immediately. He shoudl try to maintain this middle approach – he can pull the ball from there as well. Anecdotally, I think he uses the middle of the field when he is going well generally – not just this year. Let’s hope he doesn’t get greedy and try to revert back to his dead-pull ways.
Just from the way it looks, he seems to letting the ball get a little deeper in the zone before swinging compared to previous years.
He’s waiting a split second longer to swing, which translates to more opposite field hits and less swinging over the top of the ball (would explain the lower GB rate also)
^This – jwa.
There is a different look to his swing, so far, this year. The violence in his swing hides what he also has, elite bat speed. Looks like he finally is doing exactly what you said, what we have been waiting for.
Here you go:
https://www.fangraphs.com/spraycharts.aspx?playerid=12979&position=2B/SS&type=battedball
To go on an even smaller sample size, I want to note that in the first four games of the season, Baez went 1-15 (including an 0-7 game) with a HBP and an IBB for an OPS of .310. The last 15 games his OPS is 1.307.
This is unrelated but it does involve a second baseman and doubles. So…
Jose Ramirez has zero doubles so far this year in 85 PAs. This, after leading the majors in doubles the year before with 56 (7 more than second place finisher Jed Lowrie). And finishing 3rd in 2016 with 46.
He does have 7 homeruns (with an 8th robbed by Ichiro) so it’s not like he’s lost his power.
Weird…
Both traded in their doubles for hrs
and batting average
And smaller sample sizes!
Smaller sample sizes for everyone!
That wasn’t a curveball Marquez threw, that was a hanger. What a terrible pitch!
Good ol’ Colorado curve (or lack thereof) right down the middle of the plate.
This post is anecdotal, but I recall that Baez was intentionally brought up to the majors while CHC were in Colorado as opposed to earlier or later, at a stadium he’d played at in a futures game? and had already hit well at. I think he hit 2 homers in that series. He’s commented that he loves hitting there, for whatever that’s worth.
Funny you say that as he just looks like he loves it.
Is there anybody that doesn’t love hitting in Colorado?
Although Baez’s O-Swing% hasn’t changed much, I think a more granular look at it swings at pitches outside the zone would show that he’s chasing fewer really bad pitches (those sliders REALLY low and away). You can see this in his O-Contact%, which was 52.7% last year and is 60% this year (career high of 62.4% in 2016). If he can spit on the really bad pitches – the ones he’ll never hit – he can be a really good player even without being highly disciplined.
As a Cubs’ fan who’s watched a TON of Baez, it does seem like he’s swinging at fewer unhittable (Think at the ankles/above the neck) pitches. He still swinging at everything else, but if you take away the tool of being able to get him to swing at any ball thrown his direction and instead have to deal with him *only* swinging at piches within 6 inches of the strike zone, he’s shown a very solid ability to foul things off or make contact. This could translate to an actual + offensive player to combine with that flashy defense.
He did just get engaged, let’s see if he can also commit to this offensive style *rim-shot*.
The elephant in the room is that Baez is not hitting in front or behind the pitcher this year. That will go a long ways towards getting better pitches to hit and it has. I know that lineup protection has been debunked, so you can save that comment to which I scoff at, but it seems like that should be something that we are pointing at. When you hit in front of the pitcher, the pitcher doesn’t have any reason to give you anything to hit, which has caused Javy lots of problems – “disciplined” is never a word I have heard in the same sentence as Javy Baez. This is also the fist year that Baez isn’t fighting for PT in the field. For the first time in his career, the Cubs are putting him in a position to succeed and he is doing so early on. Over the years, the Cubs have done everything they can to float Schwarber’s and Russell’s value at Javy’s expense. To Baez’ credit, I think he is always trying to improve K and BB rates, but this article should probably be about lineup position although that doesn’t mesh with sabermetric narratives. All of his walks last April were intentional? That wasn’t a coincidence.
Hitting behind the pitcher doesn’t matter matter. Hitting in front of the pitcher does, in that it inflates walk rates. Protection doesn’t so much exist for hitting in front of real MLB batters (e.g. 2nd vs 5th in the order), but it does for the guy hitting in front of the pitcher. 8-hole hitters get intentionally walked all the time to get to the pitcher-batter, and unintentionally-intentionally walked because the opposition pitcher isn’t terribly worried about put a base runner on in front of the pitcher-batter.
In that respect, if he’s not batting 8th he will likely be getting better pitches.
Everything matters. Hitting behind the pitcher almost assuredly adds an out to the situation and the pitcher is almost certainly not in trouble – so it does matter some. Hitting with two outs and the bases empty is not idea for the hitter and he will be in that spot a lot hitting 9th. You can pitch around a guy pretty easily if there is no danger. Another reality is that (in the best case) the pitcher probably just sacrificed the runner over, in which case there is now an empty base to walk the 9 hitter to and at least 1 out – double play away. You can forget about sac flies from that spot in the order – which is a nice little slap in the face to go with few RBI opportunities. There is also the reality that these are humans. I am sure he was pissed every time he hit after the pitcher – its pretty insulting. I would wager that the frustration leads to a few more bad hacks. Anecdotally, when you are hitting in the back of the lineup, you kind of feel like you have to hit your way up – pressing never helps. I can talk realities all day, but that generally isn’t the Fangraphs interest. Addison Russell made an all-star team based on lineup placement!
Most #1 hitters in the NL hit after the pitcher.
And the entire point of hitting a pitcher 8th, when it happens, is because the nominal 8th batter is a secondary leadoff guy. No insult there.
Anecdotaly you can come up with all sorts of things. Logically you can think of many more. But every time someone does a study looking at lineup positions, and the effect on team runs or individual performance, the results are laregly inconclusive, outside of the increase in walks batting in front of the pitcher. That isn’t to say it’s non-existent. Rather that you can’t tease out “protection” from the vagaries of the game situation, the mental state of where a batter simply prefers to hit, and the overwhelming randomness of baseball.
It’s like Batter v. Pitcher matchups. There is undoubtedly signal in there somewhere, sometimes. But the noise is too great to say anything with certainty.
#1 hitters don’t strike a great deal of fear into anyone’s heart… especially the Cubs. In reality, the leadoff for the Cubs last year was generally Jon Jay, terrible Schwarber or bad Zobrist. Like I said, hitting 9th on that team was a bad spot. If you are hitting in front of Lindor, then it is not so bad… except for all of the lost at bats and run production opportunities. I have been involved in probably a thousand baseball games – everything I am pointing out is something and it all matters – to what extent is the only question. I can tell you for a fact that Javy didn’t want to hit last and play utility on defense. I don’t think we are too far apart on anything despite my tone.
That’s an easy narrative, but Javy had already taken off, while in the 8 hole. The change was apparent. It may be a chicken or egg, but for Cubs fans, Javy earned that 2 hole, as he should.
You thought that was easy? Easy is saying that lineup protection has been debunked by someone else. What I said took some effort.
I don’t agree with your take – Javy hasn’t been hitting 8th every game this year and he certainly hasn’t hit 9th. Furthermore, he was off to a terrible start and his numbers are way higher than they were now – before he was moved up to #2. What he was doing when he was moved up was similar to what he had done the past two years… worse actually. His improvement, which we are talking about here, is largely fueled by a dominant series in COL in the 2 hole. I don’t think he earned anything this year – Maddon/Theo just can only stand in his way for so long. I don’t doubt that he will come back to earth, but here are some realities, for Cubs fans.
hitting 9th – 0/1 – probably a pinch hit
hitting 8th – hitting .172
hitting 7th – hitting .182
hitting 6th – hitting .444
hitting 5th – hitting 1.000 – 1 AB
hitting 2nd – htting .429
If I had told you before the season started that Baez would have an 1.100 OPS on April 23, what odds would you have put on his BABIP being over .400?
It’s .292
Doesn’t power and walks fuel OPS? Those HR don’t even count in BABIP.
Error bars everywhere!
95% confidence intervals over 80 PA:
For 7.5% (observed BB): 2% – 16%
For 21% (observed K): 13% – 32%
So it’s still pretty hard to tell who he is this year by just looking.
http://statpages.info/confint.html
BTW, these intervals are not really answering “what should we expect” like a projection system. That needs to decide how to weight his track record, and I’m ignoring his track record.
These intervals are answering the “forward” question: if he did have a true 7.5% BB, what would we observe after 80 PA. Not the “backward” question, going from observed to true.
But it gives some idea how much slop there is between true and observed, as a function of PA and the specific probabilities — values nearer 0% and 100% are effectively harder to observe.