Jeff McNeil Hit His Way to a Four-Year Extension

The modern game of baseball is defined by power and strength. You can turn on any game at any time and watch a guy swing his behind off as he launches a 100 mph fastball 450 feet. Of course, that wasn’t always so common — a lot of players used to swing for contact instead of the fences. Today, that skill set is more of a rarity, though there are still a few hitters who choke up on the handle and spray the ball from line to line. Jeff McNeil is perhaps one of the best in this category. Fresh off a batting tile, McNeil was due for a raise in arbitration. Instead, he and the Mets agreed to a four-year, $50 million extension.
The deal buys out McNeil’s two remaining arbitration years and two potential free agent years, taking him through his age-34 season. There’s also a $12.5 million club option for the 2027 season, giving the extension a chance to max out at five years and $62.5 million. On the surface, that seems like a bargain for a player coming off a 5.9 WAR, 143 wRC+ season that also saw him play the best defense of his career according to OAA. However, the free agent market doesn’t tend to be particularly generous to players who are over 30 or rely on contact as much as McNeil does. I asked Dan Szymborski if he could cook up a ZiPS estimate for a McNeil extension and as it turns out, the contract he signed isn’t as much of a bargain as I initially suspected. Including the discounts for the two cost-controlled arbitration years, ZiPS would have offered McNeil a five-year, $69 million extension. That is only $6.5 million more than the maximum the Mets offered when you include the club option. Dan also provided me with McNeil’s projected performance for the life of the contract:
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | DR | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | .289 | .353 | .419 | 485 | 64 | 140 | 31 | 1 | 10 | 59 | 37 | 63 | 3 | 116 | -2 | 3.3 |
| 2024 | .284 | .351 | .409 | 464 | 60 | 132 | 29 | 1 | 9 | 55 | 36 | 61 | 3 | 113 | -3 | 2.9 |
| 2025 | .278 | .344 | .398 | 442 | 55 | 123 | 27 | 1 | 8 | 51 | 34 | 59 | 3 | 108 | -4 | 2.3 |
| 2026 | .271 | .338 | .385 | 413 | 50 | 112 | 24 | 1 | 7 | 46 | 32 | 56 | 2 | 102 | -4 | 1.8 |
| 2027 | .263 | .330 | .366 | 377 | 44 | 99 | 21 | 0 | 6 | 40 | 29 | 53 | 2 | 95 | -4 | 1.2 |
If McNeil performs like that, the Mets will be very pleased! Having a sure-thing above-average hitter on your roster is great, and at only $12.5 million per year, it’s a no-brainer. And as we saw in 2022, he has the potential to be even better than that if he can sustain a BABIP between .330 and .350. That’s tough to do year in and year out, but if he does, the Mets will have themselves a potential five-win player. From McNeil’s point of view, the deal gives him security into his mid-30s. That isn’t an easy feat for non-superstar players nowadays, let alone those who are as reliant on contact as he is.
So far, this all seems mutually beneficial, but there’s an additional reason the Mets would be motivated to finalize a deal like this: payroll certainty. Knowing what you have on the books is very important when you’re potentially trying to retain stars such as Justin Verlander, Max Scherzer, or Pete Alonso, or pursuing future superstar free agents such as Shohei Ohtani and Juan Soto. For a club like the Mets that can play in deeper payroll waters, the more certainty, the better.
Now, we must consider the question that comes up with every extension: how will the player’s skills age? That question is particularly pertinent with a player like McNeil, who has less room for error since he isn’t much of a masher. If McNeil’s hit tool falters, his floor is what we saw in 2021. How do we know that won’t happen again? Will McNeil’s current skill set and mechanics age well as he moves into his mid-30s?
There is no denying that McNeil can flat out hit. There may have been concerns after the aforementioned 2021 season, when he dropped to a 92 wRC+ following three great seasons to start his career, but he calmed those nerves pretty quickly in 2022. He hit the ground running, posting a 153 wRC+ in the first month of the season. From there, he just kept hitting no matter which spot he occupied in the lineup. In a year where the league batting average was at a historic low for the modern era, McNeil still hit .326 in 589 plate appearances, leading the majors; he ended the season with a .326/.382/.454 slash line. Earlier this winter, I wrote about Michael Brantley’s return to Houston, and the ways he uses his body and bat to be accurate with his barrel at different heights of the strike zone. McNeil has the exact same skill. Let me show you what that looks like:
April 25
May 28
August 9
August 23
Away and off the plate, low and in, up and away, and under the zone. Four different locations and heights, all resulting in extra base hits. That is impressive barrel adjustability. He may not be drilling the baseball or lighting up the exit velocity leaderboards, but McNeil is giving himself a chance to get his barrel on the ball no matter where the pitch is thrown. In the first swing, he delays his rotation as long as possible, makes deep contact, and elevates the ball down the line. He stood tall knowing he couldn’t get his barrel in this location without an upright posture. The next swing is the exact opposite. He starts his rotation as soon as he recognizes the pitch inside. He then gets his barrel far out in front of the plate by tipping it almost perpendicular to the ground and manages to yank a laser down the line while keeping the ball fair. That isn’t something many hitters can do.
The next two swings both entered the strike zone on the outer third, but at different heights. Let’s take the swing from August 23 first. Since McNeil can spray the oppo gap well, and that is the largest part of Yankee Stadium, Harrison Bader was shaded that way. That left a lot of space for McNeil to play with in the pull-side gap. Against a pitcher like Frankie Montas with a diving sinker, McNeil was able to sell out on being early because he knew it meant he could match the plane of the ball and elevate it. He didn’t crush this one either, but it was still an easy double because of the unoccupied space out there. Similarly against Mike Minor, McNeil took an early hack on a fastball moving across the top of the zone into the meaty part of his bat. What differed between this and the swing against Montas was that he held his posture up nice and tall.
These four swings are all perfectly representative of how McNeil uses his 80-grade contact ability to maintain a high level of performance despite not having much power. If he continues to do this, he will age fine. This is a unique skill that will provide value even if his raw abilities drop off as he ages. And I haven’t even touched on his improving plate discipline around the edges of the strike zone, or as Statcast calls it, the shadow zone. After consistently grading negatively in terms of run value in the shadow zone during his career, McNeil finally turned it around last season by taking more than he ever has around the edges.
Improving plate discipline and an incredible hit tool are the perfect pair of skills for McNeil to age well as he enters his mid-30s. The Mets showed they are willing to bet on that skill set, and now McNeil will remain in New York for the next four seasons while hoping to be a key contributor to a World Series winning team.
Esteban is a contributing writer at FanGraphs. One of his main hobbies is taking dry hacks every time he sees a bat.
Don’t have much to say about this beyond how ecstatic I am that McNeil got extended and boy did the Mets get a bargain. I figured McNeil would get around 55-60 mil on a four year extension instead if the Mets pick up the fifth year option he’ll make 63 mil on the deal. McNeil is an elite player, when healthy especially at second base and with his versatility to play the OF is someone needs a break or gets hurt. I remember some saying McNeil should go to free agency, but given that he’ll be 33 when he becomes a free agent, and that he’s been hurt a lot since turning pro and that he’s only made five mil in his career, and that it is life changing money it makes sense for him too. I would love to see Alonso extended as well but that’ll be much harder, and Alonso has more leverage, and has more reason to hit free agency as he’s making double what McNeil would have made in arbitration.
I would bet on McNeil beating zips projections on every year btw. McNeil not hitting .300 ever again,and only going over three war one year seems awful conservative to me. Jeff was a near three war player in half a year in 2018 and outside of 21 has killed it I bet he has at least a few more 4+ war seasons.
I don’t know if he can sustain that BABIP but I’d absolutely expect that McNeil’s particular skills would allow him to run a consistently high BABIP. There’s sort of an interesting sideline argument with him about the “advanced” hitting stats, or at least the way they get communicated to players. McNeil has been pretty open about his contempt for xBA and other EV/Statcast-derived batted-ball stats, and honestly I think he’s more or less right — at least as they concern his hitting. If you are a near-Ichiro-level elite contact guy with the ability to place the ball around the fielders, a lot of your “expected” hitting stats are absolutely going to be junk.
The “hit them where they ain’t” thing works until it doesn’t.
That said, this isn’t the only part of his profile. He has great plate discipline too, so it’s not like he’s useless if he plays to his xBA.
I don’t really know what the first thing means but I agree with the second thing.
It’s not an entirely sustainable skill. It is partially sustainable, but some years you get more of it than others. I would expect he will generally beat his xwOBA, but quite frequently will do it by less than he did this year. Which is fine; he can regress quite a long way back from a 143 wRC+ and still be very good at his job.
It’s going to be interesting to see how the infield shift ban affects McNeil. It seemed like twice a week in 2022 he was deliberately poking the ball softly down the third-base line, to the point where the Mets broadcasters frequently said stuff about opponents’ positioning like “Are they not watching the tape? Do they not know he does this?” Presumably that specific opportunity will not present itself so frequently anymore, and by itself that should make the expected stats converge with reality a bit better.
I strongly agree, and actually think that a number of players with comparatively low power who benefitted from spraying the ball all over the place are going to seem like they’re doing worse this year on something like wRC+ which is league-normed. McNeil, Andres Gimenez, Xander Bogaerts, and Jake McCarthy all stand out to me as guys who probably won’t be helped by the reduced-shift world, and so their league normed stats will seem to fall.
Luis Arraez. Tim Anderson. I’m sure there are more.
I don’t have access to what percentage of AB’s he was shifted against but I don’t think it was excessive. I think the defensive alignments he will face in 2023 will be similar to 2022.
So imagine a world where there are only two hitters: Jeff McNeil and Rowdy Tellez. Every single hitter is a clone of one of those two guys. Ending the shift only has an effect on Rowdy Tellez and his clones. His OPS will jump by, I don’t know, 100 points? That’s probably on the high end, but this is just an example. So now in order to maintain an average of 100 for wRC+, you have to calculate out the new mean. And because the rest of the league is better and Jeff McNeil and his clones are the same guy, his wRC+ will fall.
It’s the same reason why Scott Rolen had a .357 OBP and .503 slugging percentage and only had a wRC+ of 127 in 2002, while Kyle Schwarber in 2022 can put up the same slugging percentage, an OBP that is 35 points lower, and have a wRC+ of 128.
I doubt the Mets are concerned with retaining Scherzer and Verlander past 2024
McNeil is such a fun player to watch hit, especially given his contrast with most of today’s good hitters. He very clearly adjusts his approach and swing in ways that most contemporary players don’t, and his ability to get the barrel on the ball allows him to succeed in a very un-modern style. I feel like if he played the late 90s/early 2000s, he’d be running yearly batting averages of like .380 lol. On top of that, he plays terrific defense everywhere they put him, hustles his heart out when he smells a base hit, and is even a better baserunner than you’d expect given his non-elite speed. He’s the kind of dude a fan is so pumped to have on their team, and also the kind of dude that opposing fans find so so so irritating. He’s the kind of player old timers watch and exclaim, “now that’s a ballplayer!” Glad to see him get the bag.
Agree on all fronts here. He’s the guy I want up late in the game with runners on base.
McNeil’s zips projections are kind of ridiculous, in a bad way. A guy with a wRC+ over 130 for 4 of his 5 years and a career 4.8 WAR/600, including a 6 WAR 143 wRC+ last year, should not be immediately projected to plummet to a 116 OPS+ and 3.3 WAR next year. Such a drastic, immediate dropoff makes no sense when systems are supposed to be using the player’s past performance. It’s not like he’s 40 or just turned into a pumpkin.
This makes me think that ZIPS has an issue projecting for players who are outside of the traditional mold in the current offensive environment. However Luis Arraez’s, the most obvious close comp, barely gets dinged at all in the offensive department, ZIPS’d for a 115 OPS+ despite a career 120 wRC+ and a 130 wRC+ last year (a career high). Is age really doing this much heavy lifting?
Projection systems always have a hard time with outliers. Takes a long time before an algorithm will believe that a player really has .330 BABIP talent. Arraez also relies on a high BABIP, but his K and BB rates are both even better than McNeil’s.
And the projections haven’t forgotten about 2021, when McNeil wasn’t so great. Over the last two seasons McNeil has hit at a 122 OPS+ clip; projecting him to decline from there to 116 next year is pretty reasonable.
It’s either that or Szymborski just really hates McNeil. Coin toss, really.
I think you nailed it. Weird career trajectory + age is my guess for the lower-than-expected projection. Before seeing ZIPS I would have thought something in the 120-125 OPS+ range. 116 feels a little low but nothing egregious.
Personally, as a non-Mets fan, I hope he beats the projection. Such an awesome player that you can’t help but root for. Loving watching the guy play.
There’s something kinda ineffable about guys who succeed without elite athletic skills — no elite sprint speed, no elite exit velo, just an ability to flat out hit. Obviously the elite skill is the barrel-to-ball skill, but that’s harder to *see* without watching day in, day out. It makes guys who succeed in this way feel kinda like weird unicorns — guys who don’t LOOK or FEEL special (at first) but who are actually all-stars.
Often these guys are still quite exceptional. I remember talking to someone about how they enjoyed watching Pedro pitch much more than Randy Johnson because he was a normal size, but Pedro still had massive hands, in fact an extreme outlier for his height (iirc Russell Wilson is another example of this).
McNeil was a known golf prospect an amateur – which you can tell from his bat skills and some of his low ball swings – and he’s in fact quite spry and runs decently well for a guy his size, aspects that have helped him run a positive defensive value every year of his career despite projection systems never believing in it.
Every time McNeil gets up and uninterested wife happens to be in the room, I point out to her that we were at the game where he got his 1st major league hit (she now anticipates me saying it). The Mets took a while to bring him up despite McNeil tearing up the minors. He’s been a great Met already and I hope he finishes his career with the team. And I’m with everyone else: I’ll take the over on those ZIPS projections.
Jeff McNeil is one of my favorite players. Besides his obvious ability, it is how he overcame the stigma that the baseball industry stuck on him during his minor league career that has led me to follow him closely, and appreciate how good he is. Despite raking at every level he was still playing the majority of his age 25 season in A ball. How many players who spent any time at all in A ball at age 25 have ever led the league in batting average? He had to hit .342 with 19 HR’s in only 339 AB’s between AA and AAA in 2018 to finally force the Mets to call him up. A puzzling stat is that twice he has hit over 20 HR’s. In 2018 with three teams and his modern stat line in 2019 is an awesome .318/.385/.531. This man can play!
Just about everyone whose carrying tool is bat to ball ability and not striking out is a blast to watch. I hope MLB can find a balance that makes those skills more correlated to winning.
I don’t think there was a stigma against him, he had a ton of injuries at the start of his pro career in the lower minors.
I don’t know if McNeil makes the majors in a past era as he would have failed every traditional scouting report, but today no team is going to ignore putting up a 150 wRC+ in the minors
Not enough guys like Him and Arraez in baseball. From my perspective better to watch a guy successful at accomplishing his goal 33% of the time than guys hoping to be successful 3% of the time and doing next to nothing the rest of the time. If you are Judge by all means go for it. But there are not a lot of guys even half as successful as Judge at hitting it over the fence.
I don’t think there are many players running .030 OBPs