Jeff Sullivan FanGraphs Chat — 12/16/16
9:11 |
: Welp okay
|
9:11 |
: Hello friends and welcome to delayed Friday baseball chat
|
9:11 |
: Hello, friend!
|
9:11 |
: Hello friend
|
9:12 |
: Where’s my burrito? Where’s my burrito? Where’s my burrito?
|
9:12 |
: at the store
|
9:12 |
: Is there a word to describe how one should feel when one’s favorite team signs a player who hasn’t pitched in the majors in 7 years and hasn’t been good in over a decade?
|
9:12 |
: The optimist in me would submit the word “intrigued”!
|
9:13 |
: When there’s so little clear reason for a team to have done something, I think that’s when you have to reconsider your own assumptions. Obviously they see a glimmer. That’s weird! And it’s different!
|
9:13 |
: It’s worse when your favorite team signs players who are obviously bad for conventional reasons
|
9:14 |
: In 708 plate appearances spread over parts of eight seasons Jason Bourgeois has produced 0.1 fWAR & 0.0 bWAR. Is the fact that his career has been so proletariat in nature a good indicator that there is indeed some sort of Cosmic Humour?
|
9:15 |
: damn
|
9:16 |
: Don Money had a 16-year career. 36 WAR! So some things balance out
|
9:17 |
: More impressive: Chris Neil and his 1,000 games or Don Kessingger, his 2,000 games and 8 WAR?
|
9:18 |
: Chris Gomez topped 1,500 career games, and he managed a career WAR of -2.2!
|
9:19 |
: Alternatively, there’s the case of Doug Flynn. Just 1,309 games, but -8.3 WAR
|
9:19 |
: In 8 of his 11 seasons, he performed below replacement-level
|
9:19 |
: Second-round draft pick!
|
9:20 |
: Article idea: for each team, identify the best ever player outright released by that team (who then went on to have an amazing career somewhere else)–i.e. Mets and Justin Turner
|
9:20 |
: Probably a few articles, given the work that would require, but I like it. Enjoyable!
|
9:21 |
: Although it’s worth noting Turner was non-tendered, not released
|
9:22 |
: Maybe that would be easier to research. Best players ever non-tendered
|
9:23 |
: Is 8y as a top 10 team preferable, by baseball FO consensus, to being a top 5 team for 4 years?
|
9:23 |
: Probably yes. The dream is to build a consistently competitive product. They’ll always tell you the goal is a championship, and they all *want* a championship, but they also know it’s basically random. As long as you’re always pretty good, you’re doing a solid job
|
9:24 |
: Do the Cubs have any more moves up their sleeves? Have they done enough this offseason to stay atop the NL? Are they better than last year (with Schwarber without Fowler/Chapman)?
|
9:25 |
: As far as I can tell the Cubs and the Dodgers are basically even. They’re the two best teams in baseball, probably, and I don’t know how they could reasonably separate from one another. So early odds are for an NLCS rematch. If the Cubs do anything else, it’s probably to get a cost-controlled starting pitcher, as has been expected all offseason
|
9:26 |
: It would be difficult for me to say they’re better than they were a year ago, when they were one of the better teams in recent memory. That’s a crazy-high bar. But they do have a shot if they stay healthy enough; the talent level is extreme
|
9:26 |
: If you had been running a team the last 10 years, what would have been your most disastrous signing and trade?
|
9:27 |
: “Disastrous” is strong but I used to obsess a little over Ryan Doumit before I knew anything about framing and catcher defense
|
9:28 |
: The Mariners basically made my own most disastrous signing when they grabbed Chone Figgins
|
9:30 |
: This is a really interesting question that I wish I could answer better in the moment
|
9:30 |
: For some reason I’m having trouble pulling names off the top of my head. But I would have screwed up an awful lot!
|
9:32 |
: Some chance I might’ve been willing to trade Mike Trout as a prospect or a rookie, if I had him in my system
|
9:33 |
: The Rockies lose 3 OF(Cargo, Blackmon, Parra) over the next 3 years, they have 3 OF in the Pipeline(Dahl, Patterson, Tapia) all are LHH, Desmond is a career 129wRC+ against LHP and is good IF depth is 14m AAV really that crazy?
|
9:35 |
: I don’t think it’s crazy to give Ian Desmond $14 million a year, and I don’t have a strong qualm against $70m/5yr. It’s reasonable for someone with his athleticism. It gets worse when you consider that the Rockies don’t have a great way to use him yet, and they’re probably not good enough to compete yet, and they gave up the most valuable draft pick that could have been forfeited this winter
|
9:35 |
: That last part, I really don’t like.
|
9:35 |
: Kicks Desmond up to the equivalent of, say, $80 – 85 million over five years. For an average player? Ehh
|
9:36 |
: What do you see for Cory Spangenberg’s 2017 role and PT?
|
9:36 |
: I should hope that this is something I never sit down and think about
|
9:37 |
: If Solarte had been moved, the door would be open for Spangenberg to bat like 400 times. But with the Angels out of the market that’s gotten harder to pull off
|
9:37 |
: Who do you see as most enticing of the Dodgers young bounce back candidates? Thompson, Ryu, kike Hernandez?
|
9:38 |
: Have to think Ryu, just on the slim off chance his shoulder works again
|
9:38 |
: career 81 FIP-. Forgotten now but he was very good!
|
9:39 |
: What prospects do you think the Dodgers should realistically offer for Dozier? And should that be good enough for the Twins to pull the trigger now, or should they wait and test Dozier’s market at the trade deadline?
|
9:39 |
: Something built around De Leon should work, as should something built around Verdugo and change. I don’t think Dozier’s value is likely to increase at the deadline. The premiums mostly go to ace starters and high-leverage relievers
|
9:40 |
: How many feelings do you have about Joe Blanton. And what are they?
|
9:40 |
: Three. I have three feelings
|
9:41 |
: I feel like he’s had an entertaining career trajectory
|
9:41 |
: I feel like he’s underrated now because of how disappointing he used to be as a starter
|
9:41 |
: And I feel like we probably wouldn’t be very good friends
|
9:42 |
: Does DeLeon, Calhoun and Stewart get the Dodgers Dozier, Kinsler, neither or either?
|
9:43 |
: I think that package gets you either, but I also would see it as an overpay, because I am quite fond of Brock Stewart
|
9:43 |
: How much chance does Chance Sisco have at regular ABs this year? timing of take-over?
|
9:44 |
: Two catchers would have to really flame out in front of him. I don’t think Sisco is a major factor until at least May of 2018
|
9:44 |
: As effective as he just was in Double-A, he’s still 21 years old, and catchers require a lot of time to get polished
|
9:44 |
: What does it take for the Dodgers to get Dozier? And what kind of reliever can they get after that trade?
|
9:45 |
: Scroll up!
|
9:45 |
: Which 2016 surprise is more for real – Cotton or Perdomo?
|
9:45 |
: Cotton
|
9:45 |
: Cotton is good
|
9:46 |
: Perdomo gets credit for the sinkerball-y nature, but I think Cotton will be a No. 2 or No. 3 before long
|
9:47 |
: Does the Phillies’ extension for Herrera at such a cheap price instantly catapult them into discussion for the best offseason so far? They hadn’t done much else, and they hadn’t needed to do much else, so extending their young core should be their main goal, and they seem to have achieved that goal better than one would have expected.
|
9:47 |
: I can’t give them that much credit just for one extension. They already had Herrera for four years and he wasn’t going to cost them a fortune, almost no matter what
|
9:48 |
: The Phillies haven’t screwed anything up, and they’re on the right path, but they’ve been quiet, not outstanding
|
9:48 |
: In terms of expected cost and projections, who do you see as the better target at this point: DeScalafani, Smyly, Odorizzi, Kazmir
|
9:48 |
: Kazmir could break down tomorrow
|
9:49 |
: Smyly, I like, and he’d be easier to get than Odorizzi
|
9:49 |
: I don’t know what they could realistically package to get DeSclafani, since he still has another four years of control, on a rebuilding team that needs decent starting pitching
|
9:52 |
: is Max Schrock the next Jose Altuve?
|
9:52 |
: I’m not sure Carson is going to stand down from the Josh Donaldson comp any time soon
|
9:54 |
: Do you expect Houston to trade Evan Gattis and what can they realistically expect to get for him. Thanks.
|
9:54 |
: I do not, and, not very much
|
9:54 |
: He has a certain small amount of value, but there are still bat-first players available all over, and he isn’t that good
|
9:55 |
: How precisely do the dodgers fix their 2nd base situation? And what’s the max package you would part with for said 2nd baseman?
|
9:55 |
: Dozier is beginning to feel somewhat inevitable
|
9:55 |
: The needs there are aligned and the Dodgers have so many young players they could afford to give up
|
9:55 |
: Plus, Dozier could probably push the Dodgers a little in front of the Cubs, probability-wise
|
9:56 |
: How would you project Ivan Nova going forward? I’m intrigued but very, very, very skeptical
|
9:56 |
: In my head I have trouble imagining a more league-average-y starter
|
9:58 |
: He’s kind of what he was in 2012. Similar stuff, similar approach. Give him a good framer and he can make the JA Happ thing happen
|
9:59 |
: Will Wilmer Flores ever be freed to regular ABs?
|
9:59 |
: Not as long as he struggles so much against righties
|
10:00 |
: But because he’s still only 25 it stands to reason someone will give him a starting job at some point before he’s 30
|
10:00 |
: Who are some good young #3-SP’s or near-ready SP prospects with that kind of ceiling that TEX could legitimately acquire this offseason?
|
10:00 |
: Well, it’s no accident they’ve been in so much contact with the Rays
|
10:00 |
: But because I mentioned his name earlier: Brock Stewart! Someone should go get Brock Stewart
|
10:02 |
: Feels like given both the state of the market for starters and relievers, and the trends in starter-to-dominant-reliever conversion, it might make a lot of sense for some of the fringey backend starters to start marketing themselves as shutdown relievers, once say Hammel and Nova sign. Most good teams are fairly set on starters but the top-end relief drawer is rapidly emptying, and pretty much every good team still needs more bullpen help.
|
10:03 |
: I don’t know how, say, Colby Lewis could market himself as a great reliever. Or Doug Fister. Or Brett Anderson or whoever. Pitchers need to prove themselves in the bullpen before they’ll be paid to be great in the bullpen. Teams don’t just throw out that big money on spec
|
10:03 |
: What would your HoF ballot look like?
|
10:03 |
: It would have 10 players, and it would be similar to the saber-community consensus
|
10:03 |
: Yes to Bonds, yes to Raines, yes to Edgar, etc
|
10:05 |
: Do you see Archie Bradley taking a step forward this year at all?
|
10:06 |
: Terrible against lefties, no quality out-of-zone whiff pitch. The arm speed is there but I’d bet on him remaining mostly the same
|
10:08 |
: The Rays took a converted INF in the Rule 5 draft who has 50 innings in A ball. KATOH loves him and all reports I’ve heard have been glowing on his control and numbers. What’s the thought process for the other 29 teams here? Do other teams not expect him to stick/have room or do MLB teams not notice unranked converted players barely at A level? I also read a comment that the Mariners didn’t promote him to try to keep him more of a secret before the draft–is that a thing?
|
10:09 |
: Gadea pitched at such a low level
|
10:10 |
: Nothing at Triple-A, nothing at Double-A, nothing at High-A
|
10:11 |
: He wasn’t even with Clinton until the middle of July, so any promotion would’ve given him hardly any time at the next level anyway
|
10:11 |
: Part of it is just that Gadea is unknown, and teams can’t cover *everybody*. But he was also so far away that it’s easy to look at his numbers and feel like they aren’t exceptional, as projecting 2017 big-league performance goes
|
10:12 |
: I like him as a grab and I really hope he sticks. Relievers can move awfully fast
|
10:12 |
: What was your favourite album of 2016?
|
10:13 |
: King Charles, Gamble for a Rose
|
10:14 |
: Shouldn’t the Yankees approach me about an extension? I am clearly the best free agent pitcher available next year ( assuming I opt out)
|
10:15 |
: Tanaka would be opting out of $67 million over three years, which is not nothing. Legitimate concerns do remain about his elbow, and those concerns are shared league-wide. Teams still figure Tanaka will blow up at some point; it’s how things usually happen
|
10:16 |
: That being said, I would expect some conversation. The Yankees won’t let him go for nothing. But if the Yankees don’t make a strong push to keep him, that’s going to be because they know more about his medicals than anyone else
|
10:17 |
: What do you see as Jorge Polanco’s floor and ceiling? Which is more likely?
|
10:18 |
: I actually see a lot of Ketel Marte in there
|
10:19 |
: Polanco is way more of a fly-ball hitter but he’s a fly-ball hitter who strikes me as under-powered, which isn’t a great combo
|
10:19 |
: If he gains just a little more strength or consistency, the extra homers make him a legitimate starter, and maybe he even becomes pretty good. But the present package would have him as a below-average regular middle infielder
|
10:20 |
: Half-season rental of David Price netted DET TOR’s #1 SP prospect at the time (according to FG) Daniel Norris along with Matt Boyd. What could TEX get for a half-season rental of Darvish at the deadline? Need good young SP’s/near-ready SP prospects big time.
|
10:20 |
: Yeah, you can be guided by the Price deal, or by the Johnny Cueto deal
|
10:21 |
: Darvish will need to show he’s totally healthy, but if he’s great and the Rangers aren’t, then come July, Darvish would be at the top of the market. He’s perceived as a game-changer
|
10:22 |
: If Andrelton Simmons or Billy Hamilton played 1B what would the defensive metrics show?
|
10:22 |
: The best defensive season at first base since 2002 comes in around 20 UZR/150 games
|
10:23 |
: Now, we’re talking about very different skillsets. Simmons would adjust well, because of his hands, but his range and arm would be of little use. Hamilton’s speed would mean almost nothing so he’d be a near-total waste
|
10:24 |
: You’d probably see Simmons around +15 runs or so. First base takes some getting used to. I’m not even sure Hamilton would be better than 0 – +5. He’s perfect in the middle of the outfield
|
10:24 |
: I heard Adam Ottavino on a radio interview yesterday. He mentioned that he regularly visits this website. Conceivably, then, he knows that his employer (the Colorado Rockies) is clueless. No question here, just, awkward!!!!!
|
10:24 |
: I don’t think the Rockies are clueless. And just looking at them generally, they’re in a good spot, with a lot of young players established or arriving
|
10:25 |
: They just don’t act optimally, or close to it. Maybe they can’t, because of where they play.
|
10:25 |
: Which is more likely: Harvey as top 3 CY voting or traded by the deadline?
|
10:25 |
: The former
|
10:25 |
: If Harvey’s good, the Mets are probably good, and there’s no reason to trade him. If he’s bad, no one will want to trade for him
|
10:28 |
: Any scenario where White Sox can get both Rodgers and Dahl back from the Rockies for Quintana? Perhaps include Jones? Quintana + Jones for Rodgers, Dahl, Pint, Murphy + 3 other pieces.
|
10:29 |
: Something built around Quintana/Jones and Rodgers/Dahl is not too lopsided either way. But I do hesitate to believe the Rockies would want to push forward like that, especially with Dahl lined up to help right away. I don’t know how much they’d believe Quintana would fit in that ballpark, and that would be a very heavy investment
|
10:30 |
: If Colorado played elsewhere, the equation would be different. But Quintana in Coors could be a particular risk
|
10:30 |
: He is, after all, mostly a contact pitcher
|
10:30 |
: I’m a big Reds fan. It seems like they would have to have every one of their young, talented players to perform near the top of the potential to be able to compete with an unbelievably strong Cubs organization even by 2019. Do you agree? If you’re the GM what would you do at this point?
|
10:30 |
: It’s almost impossible for me to imagine the Reds catching up to the Cubs within three years
|
10:31 |
: Their rebuild is going slowly. They need to hit on a number of their young pitchers and there’s not much left for them to sell. If I’m the Reds I just invest heavily in player development and I poke around for my own new equivalents of Keon Broxton
|
10:31 |
: (who I love)
|
10:31 |
: Why is everyone asking about the Sox trading Abreu? He’s coming off a subpar year and he is only getting older. I don’t think teams would be too interested. What say you?
|
10:32 |
: He’s a power-hitting regular with three years of affordable team control left, and the White Sox have no reason to keep him around given the complete and total teardown
|
10:32 |
: Teams would be very interested, but maybe more in July, when there are fewer similar players available
|
10:32 |
: Right now, guys like Bautista, Encarnacion, and Napoli are still free agents
|
10:33 |
: My fourth grade son just asked me what “WAR” means- which i guess now shows up on baseball cards. Have a simple talk track?
|
10:33 |
: Are you sure he was asking about WAR
|
10:33 |
: are you sure he wasn’t asking about war
|
10:33 |
: It’s easier to explain the first one than the second one
|
10:33 |
: Steamer projects heavy regression for Odubel Herrera, falling to a 97 wRC+ and just 2.4 WAR. That would make his extension seem much closer to fair than it seems. But do you really think he’ll fall that far? He does have a high BABIP, but also has the profile to sustain one.
|
10:34 |
: I don’t think he actually has that profile — he doesn’t, for example, sting the ball consistently, or avoid pop-ups
|
10:34 |
: The smart money would be on Herrera to regress at the plate. But I think he has proven himself to be an average or better-than-average regular. He continues to improve and he still gets the job done in center field
|
10:35 |
: is austin barnes a 2b option for the dodgers? the bat seems to play at mi and he’s *very* slight of frame behind the plate; any reason he can’t man 2b full time and act as the #3 catcher? i’d be loathe to deal from verdugo/de leon/bellinger for dozier.
|
10:35 |
: They like him too much as a backstop
|
10:35 |
: Good morning Jeff. Curious where your favorite ballpark to watch a game in person is located?
|
10:35 |
: It’s Seattle, but I haven’t been to that many ballparks
|
10:35 |
: What does Houston still need to add? Frontline SP to go with Keuchel?
|
10:35 |
: Yep. No. 1 or No. 2 starting pitcher
|
10:36 |
: And that’s almost literally it
|
10:36 |
: Does Buccholz have significant trade value?
|
10:36 |
: Heavens no
|
10:37 |
: How much better can I get? Can I cut down on the K’s? SB was an anomaly correct?
|
10:37 |
: Somewhat surprisingly, Myers just ran a better-than-average contact rate. Where he struggled was with taking a whole bunch of called third strikes. So Myers could stand to improve his two-strike approach and discipline, which would make him more offensively complete
|
10:38 |
: I don’t think he’s coming close to 30 steals again, but I do definitely buy Myers as a strong baserunner
|
10:38 |
: FG projects the Mets for only 84 wins, even though they have accomplished what they’ve wanted to this offseason. What should the Mets do in the short and long term to get into the 90-win range (where the Nats are)?
|
10:39 |
: I think the Steamer projections are underrating them, but they could beef up the bullpen some more
|
10:39 |
: Our projections are stronger when we finally fold in ZiPS, which remains some time away
|
10:39 |
: It seemed like much of the value for the Nationals in the Adam Eaton deal was that his team-friendly contract allowed the club to go out and spend somewhere else. Now that they missed on Kenley, do you see the Nationals making another move? Or will they stick with Zimmerman at 1B and develop a Closer from options already in their bullpen?
|
10:39 |
: Wouldn’t be a shock to see them in on David Robertson
|
10:40 |
: failing that, Brad Ziegler could work
|
10:40 |
: Unless Ziegler has signed during the course of this chat…
|
10:40 |
: He has not!
|
10:41 |
: How old is Fangraphs, and can you briefly describe its origins? Just a couple of guys shooting the shit and it went from there?
|
10:42 |
: The poor framing of the White Sox catchers is well documented. I believe this impacted Robertson significantly given he relies more on control than a big arm. If the Sox eat some of his salary what is a realistic return? Any chance at Robles from the Nats?
|
10:42 |
: Robles is unrealistic. Maybe if the White Sox paid every last penny
|
10:42 |
: Even then I’m not sure
|
10:43 |
: Easier for the Nationals to just sign a free agent or two
|
10:43 |
: Great article on Odubel. Better than Austin Jackson in 5 years or also toast?
|
10:43 |
: I’d never project the weird-ass Austin Jackson path
|
10:43 |
: But I’d be comfortable projecting Jackson’s overall five-year performance
|
10:43 |
: Travis Shaw or wilmer Flores?
|
10:43 |
: Flores
|
10:44 |
: AL/NL Rookies of the year will be ___________.
|
10:44 |
: Benintendi is eligible, right? Andrew Benintendi in the AL
|
10:45 |
: In the NL, I’m feeling some JP Crawford
|
10:45 |
: how do i talk the wife out of buying a trampoline?
|
10:46 |
: Go to the nearest trampoline gym and observe the customers for one hour
|
10:46 |
: Alternatively, go to the nearest emergency room and survey the patients for one hour
|
10:46 |
: Sometimes I get scared thinking how close we came to electing a person who once used a private email server.
|
10:47 |
: I send all of my correspondence by bird. Try and stop me, communists
|
10:48 |
: Care to predict the starting pitcher the Ms bring into the fold to round out their offseason?
|
10:48 |
: Someone boring
|
10:48 |
: Jason Vargas again? Sure, why not
|
10:49 |
: So you’re saying I should save my pessimism for when the Orioles resign Trumbo to a four year contract?
|
10:49 |
: Bidding against themselves!
|
10:49 |
: Twice is nice!
|
10:50 |
: Looking back, was there anything in Odubel Herrera’s profile in the minors that hinted towards him becoming the (currently, at least) quite good player he is today?
|
10:50 |
: He hit well and ran fast between High-A and Double-A in 2014. With speed and limited strikeouts, you could already easily imagine a half-decent floor. He’s exceeded defensive projections, and he’s grown into some improved power
|
10:51 |
: When Herrera really gets a baseball, he kills it. There’s more pop in there than his minor-league record would suggest
|
10:51 |
: True or False: David Peralta and Michael Conforto will help teams this year?
|
10:51 |
: True
|
10:51 |
: Hell, guaranteed to be true!
|
10:51 |
: If you’re not helping your own team, you’re helping your own team’s opponent
|
10:51 |
: Technicality!
|
10:52 |
: Your Kevin Pillar/Joey Votto article was awesome. Has anyone ever analyzed that idea of average v. peak exit velo before? Seems like a very useful tool for projecting younger players, no?
|
10:52 |
: I think it’s a fun way of thinking about fairly standard ideas. “Raw power” is not a new concept. And efficient hitters are mostly line-drive hitters, who we mostly already know about
|
10:53 |
: There’s ground to be gained, but probably not that much. I just like new thought processes
|
10:53 |
: So in some of the Fangraphs chats, and sometimes in Keith Law’s chats, the phrase “Player X isn’t good” will be tossed out. Then I’ll look at some of the stats and think, hmm, this guy seems at least semi-good. A guy might have 30 HRs, have a decent OPS (.820) etc., and while the flaws can be easily identified (low OBP, high strikeouts), he’s called “not good.” I’m just wondering what the baseline is for “good” or at least not bad.
|
10:53 |
: People have their own different definitions of “not good”
|
10:54 |
: It has a very negative connotation. A lot of the time, people interpret “not good” as “bad”! But what it really means is not good — that being average or worse
|
10:54 |
: I’d say that, as an overall baseball player, Mark Trumbo is not good. But I’d just mean I don’t think he’s a 3+ WAR player
|
10:55 |
: And of course, as always, good or not good is in comparison to the other people who are the very best at this in the entire world
|
10:55 |
: The worst major-league baseball player is impossibly good at baseball
|
10:55 |
: Is this Josh Hamilton’s last chance?
|
10:55 |
: I don’t even think there really is a chance
|
10:55 |
: He just can’t seem to stay together. Burned bright, burned fast
|
10:56 |
: Why don’t the mets keep bruce and trade grandy? I know they need him in cf but other teams prefer granderson so why not get a better return for him and save a couple mil? bruce is good for over 25 homers and 90 rbis, and lagares should get a chance to play more consistently.
|
10:56 |
: Granderson is better, and the Mets don’t want to get worse
|
10:56 |
: Chapman says he doesn’t agree how Maddon used him in the playoffs. Was he actually treated badly? I know he said he’s not comfortable pitching in non-traditional save situations, but this playoffs in particular it seemed more to be a trend in reliever usage that Maddon picked up on rather than a case of the Cubs abusing a rental (but maybe it was both).
|
10:57 |
: It was a trend, and the whole league is picking up on it, but that doesn’t mean Chapman has to like it. He prefers what he prefers. Miller, Jansen, Allen — they’re more open-minded than Chapman is on this
|
10:57 |
: I’ve yet to read any research on the synergies between good/bad pitchers/catchers as it relates to framing, but would love to hear your thoughts. Do good command pitchers see a bigger impact with good framers than bad command pitchers? Is it more linear? What does Jeff’s gut think?
|
10:58 |
: I haven’t seen an exhaustive study, but the way I figure, good command + good framing work exceptionally well together. Look at Hendricks or Lester on the Cubs. A good-command pitcher can make a bad framer look better; a good framer can’t do much for a pitcher who’s wild
|
10:59 |
: In short, pitcher identity is probably quite important for determining the strike zone he gets. Catchers need to have a chance, and if a pitcher misses his target by two feet, that would make even Buster Posey flinch
|
11:00 |
: How do you feel about paying RPs nearly $20M?
|
11:00 |
: I wouldn’t want to do it, but I would feel more comfortable giving $20 million to Kenley Jansen than $15 million to Mark Melancon
|
11:00 |
: Jeff. It pains me greatly to say this, but Curt Schilling is a HoFer. Tweets, ugly as they may be, should not change this. How do you feel about 8 writers so far invoking the “character clause” to keep him out?
|
11:01 |
: I totally understand trying to find a reason to keep Schilling out, but I don’t understand actually believing and sticking to that reason. You can vote and hold your nose. It’s what so many of us are hoping for voters to do with PED guys
|
11:02 |
: Schilling belongs. His performance deserves that honor. His personality deserves criticism elsewhere
|
11:03 |
: UZR Considers Chase Headley to be about .5WAR better on defense better than Nolan Arenado. DRS says Nolan is about 4WAR better than Headley in the same stretch. Knowing what you know which way do you lean?
|
11:03 |
: I think that UZR is closer to the real answer
|
11:04 |
: The actual separation is probably somewhere around 20 runs
|
11:04 |
: Should the Phillies be locking up any other members of their young core, or do they all have too short or inconsistent track records to commit real money to?
|
11:04 |
: I’d probably see how open Aaron Nola is to a long-term extension
|
11:05 |
: He’s the one I like the most
|
11:05 |
: Doubt there would be a point in extending Hernandez
|
11:06 |
: Thoughts on the A’s potentially signing Edwin? I like it, kind of a ballsier re-do of the Butler deal, which would have been fine if Butler wasn’t both awful and lazy.
|
11:06 |
: He’d work better on the Indians, who in theory should have no less flexibility. A’s should be less incentivized to go after a player who’s at his best right now, but then the A’s did charge hard for Chase Headley back when he was an FA. I don’t think it would be horrible if they got Encarnacion for something reduced
|
11:07 |
: Is it relatively reasonable to expect Robbie Cano to live up to or at least approach the value of his mega contract? If we assume an average of about $8mil per win over the 10 years, he’ll need around 30 total wins, and he’s almost half way there. Projections are down on him, but if the first half of 2015 stomach issue never comes back, it seems like a reasonable contract. Agree?
|
11:07 |
: Cano is due $168 million over the next seven years
|
11:08 |
: He projects to be worth something like $122 million
|
11:08 |
: To this point he’s been “worth” $104 million over three years
|
11:09 |
: 104 + 122 = $226 million. His actual contract is for $240 million. That’s close enough
|
11:09 |
: Long and short of it: Cano is on track to be worth almost exactly the commitment
|
11:09 |
: It’s just, well, the best years have gone to non-playoff teams. Bummer
|
11:09 |
: What would it take to pry Michael Conforto from the Mets?
|
11:09 |
: A good and cost-controlled center fielder
|
11:10 |
: Why do some teams (Mets, Blue Jays?) seem to always load up on pitching prospects when position players are more valuable?
|
11:10 |
: It’s only equivalent position players who are more valuable than pitchers. Maybe they’re just finding better pitchers. And certain organizations and coaching staffs just have a preference for strong arms. Look at the Braves
|
11:10 |
: Does Blake Swihart ever become an all star catcher?
|
11:10 |
: Probably not
|
11:11 |
: What metric best aligns to baseball player’s perceived talent of one another? In other words, are players themselves good at subjectively valuing their peers (from a scouting-type perspective)?
|
11:12 |
: It really does vary player to player. Some players are very thoughtful. Others still think about batting average and ERA. By and large I’d say the veterans are pretty good at scouting, but I heard not long ago one of the smarter players in baseball still doesn’t think Kyle Hendricks is particularly good. So there are blind spots!
|
11:12 |
: Should the Rockies trade away Brendan Rodgers for a pitcher like Quintana?
|
11:13 |
: That would depend on how much more it took, but I don’t love Quintana in Colorado, by gut feeling
|
11:13 |
: Steroid guys have to get into HOF this year right? at least Bonds and Clemens, Friggen Bud Selig is in the HOF and he needed steroids in baseball more than anyone, which is why it was allowed for so long.
|
11:13 |
: It’s going to happen. Maybe not this year, I don’t know, but it’s going to happen
|
11:14 |
: Early indications are positive for Bonds and Clemens
|
11:15 | : They’re already +5 votes |
11:15 |
: Seeing as you’re the Angels cheerleader this offseason, are there any moves they could realistically make in order to help make your outlook on them a reality?
|
11:15 |
: I think they could really use bullpen help. Blanton?
|
11:16 |
: What do you think about the murmurs re Zack Wheeler to the bullpen?
|
11:16 |
: Going to have a strict innings limit anyway, and the bullpen could use some depth, especially with Familia likely to be suspended for a month+
|
11:17 |
: Who do you see as the highest upside arms in the Dodgers system? And I’m sure you’ve done an article, but can you explain what entices you about Stewart? Thanks!
|
11:17 |
: The Brock Stewart thing is really simple. Last year, between Double-A and Triple-A: 119 strikeouts, 17 walks, 110 innings
|
11:17 |
: Straight-up scouting the stat line, but you basically can’t do that and suck
|
11:18 |
: I can’t really speak to upside — I’m not a thorough organizational talent evaluator. But I really like De Leon, and I quite like Stewart
|
11:19 |
: Should Derek Holland have worn a Greg Holland mask and marketed himself as a closer? Seems like that is where the money is this offseaon. Would he be able to succeed as a closer?
|
11:19 |
: I don’t see him there. His isn’t an issue of eliminating peripheral pitches; he doesn’t have one single standout pitch to boost him in relief
|
11:19 |
: Could you see a match for profar to the Dodgers? They have a lot of sp
|
11:20 |
: I don’t think they would like him much
|
11:20 |
: You going for the marathon chat today? Gold star for you
|
11:20 |
: I started slow and I feel guilty
|
11:20 |
: is it an inevitability that Brandon Moss signs with the Orioles and slugs 40 homers?
|
11:20 |
: He might go on the DL and end up at 30
|
11:20 |
: Who finishes last next year, and with how many wins?
|
11:21 |
: White Sox have a decent shot if they keep selling and move cautiously with their new prospects. But I’ll say Padres, 64
|
11:21 |
: The Reds will be close
|
11:22 |
: Based on some of your comments, I am struggling to figure out Quintana’s actual value on the trade market – his numbers lineup to put in him in the top 20 starters in baseball, but he is generally not perceived as an ace. Is a return of a top 25 prospect, a top 100 guy, plus 1 more in an organizations top 10 realistic?
|
11:22 |
: Quintana has a bunch of value. In this chat, there’s just been a focus on getting him to Colorado. That makes me uneasy
|
11:22 |
: Avi Garcia is not impossibly good at baseball.
|
11:22 |
: Oh he sure is!
|
11:23 |
: If you saw him playing ball at the neighborhood park, you’d be like, wow, that guy should not be playing ball here
|
11:23 |
: in a good way
|
11:23 |
: Has the hr surge lowered the value of power only guys (trumbo, Frazier)?
|
11:23 |
: I could buy that to a slight degree
|
11:23 |
: The thing they do best is no longer so rare
|
11:23 |
: Follow up on Quintana, so do you think the White Sox’s reported Musgrove, Martes, and Tucker ask is justifiable or shooting the moon?
|
11:24 |
: I think it’s justifiable, but I also think if they want a deal they would probably have to replace Musgrove with someone else
|
11:24 |
: Was the rumored asking price for Quintana from the Astros (Musgrove, Martes, & Tucker) a realistic haul? It seems like the Astros would be giving up too much.
|
11:24 |
: Further on this — by talent, it makes sense. But Musgrove looks like a big-league starter now. Astros already have rotation questions, so they wouldn’t want to subtract to add
|
11:24 |
: why aren’t angels a fit for quintana?
|
11:25 |
: Literally nothing to trade for him
|
11:25 |
: Who has the higher ceiling: Odor or Bregman?
|
11:25 |
: Bregman
|
11:25 |
: Odor next year might not draw a single walk
|
11:25 |
: Although he might curiously get beaned 20 times!
|
11:26 |
: If you could create a player whose tools are all 40 except for one 80 tool, how good would that player be? and what tool would you choose to be the 80 to make the best possible player?
|
11:26 |
: Well that’s basically Billy Hamilton, him having 80 speed.
|
11:26 |
: He’s been worth 3.6 WAR per 600 PA
|
11:27 |
: Someone with true 80 power would be valuable — like a better Mark Trumbo — but we already have the Hamilton skillset and it’s great
|
11:28 |
: If Dodgers have Kershaw, Hill, Urias, Maeda, Wood as their top 5 SP options, that leaves Kazmir, McCarthy, DeLeon, Ryu, Stewart, and Stripling on the outside looking in. Which ones are wearing a different uniform come 2017?
|
11:28 |
: I bet Kazmir and/or McCarthy get dumped
|
11:28 |
: A ridiculous question: how good is MLB at finding MLB caliber players? Are amateur players ever missed? If 100% of the population were forced to practice baseball with the same intensity as MLB players, what percentage of the population is suddenly capable of competing with the rest of the league?
|
11:29 |
: No idea on the second part. There are definitely good potential baseball players out there who don’t play baseball for whatever reason. But I have an example for the first part!
|
11:31 |
: The league as a whole is good, but teams just can’t know about everybody. I heard a story at the winter meetings — not long ago I wrote an FG post about Jae-Gyun Hwang. After that post, four different teams reached out to his agent
|
11:31 |
: Implying that, before that post, at least those four teams didn’t know about him, or didn’t think about him
|
11:31 |
: And he’s one of the best players from the KBO!
|
11:31 |
: So, there are blind spots
|
11:31 |
: And that’s how I’m going to wrap this up
|
11:32 |
: So thank you everybody for hanging out, and I’m sorry for what I didn’t or couldn’t address. We’ll do it again next week at the same time, and until then, be well and have great days
|
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.
No Proletariat in BRef, but swingman Mike “The Riot” Proly has Bourgeois beat with 8 WAR over 7 seasons and 267 appearances. (Nickname added…maybe.)
http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/p/prolymi01.shtml