Josh Willingham: Honoring the Hammer
Someday, an up-and-coming SABR scientist should try to measure the psychic effect that losing has on ballplayers. As everyone knows from watching “The Natural,” losing is a disease — as contagious as polio, syphilis and bubonic plague. Attacking one but infecting all, though some more than others. And no other major leaguer over the past decade, among hitters, lost as frequently as Josh Willingham did.
Willingham, 35, recently announced his retirement after playing nine full seasons and parts of two more. What a relief it must have been for him to finish as a part-timer with the Kansas City Royals, who made it to the seventh game of the World Series. Only once before had Willingham played significant time for winning team (with the Florida Marlins in 2008), and never had he played in the postseason. Cross it off the list, call it a career. And it was a good one, aside from all of the losing.
Overall, his teams went 503-644 in Willingham’s appearances, producing a .439 winning percentage, the worst among anyone who recorded at least 4,000 plate appearances since he broke into the majors in 2004. It usually wasn’t Willingham’s fault that his team lost; he was the best hitter on the Marlins as a rookie, after Miguel Cabrera, and he was better than Hanley Ramirez. He was the fourth-best hitter in ’07, the third-best in ’08 — and in ’09 and ’10 after being traded to the Washington Nationals. He was the best hitter on the Oakland Athletics in 2011, and the Minnesota Twins in 2012. It’s just that Willingham’s teams lost anyway.
Let’s take a look at the lowest career winning percentages of players with at least 4,000 plate appearances whose careers began in 2004 (Willingham’s first season) or later:
| Player | Pct. | W-L | WAR | Misery Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Willingham | .439 | 503-644 | 17.6 | 7.72 |
| Jose Lopez | .448 | 464-572 | 5.2 | 2.32 |
| Shin-soo Choo | .455 | 444-532 | 23.7 | 10.78 |
| Billy Butler | .459 | 535-631 | 9.6 | 4.41 |
| Yuniesky Betancourt | .464 | 536-620 | -0.8 | -0.37 |
| Nick Markakis | .468 | 639-726 | 22.6 | 10.57 |
| Ryan Zimmerman | .471 | 564-634 | 35.3 | 16.62 |
| Alex Gordon | .471 | 486-546 | 26.8 | 12.62 |
| Jeff Francoeur | .475 | 588-649 | 5.8 | 2.76 |
| Edwin Encarnacion | .477 | 576-630 | 19.2 | 9.15 |
| Kelly Johnson | .485 | 561-596 | 16.8 | 8.15 |
| Alexei Ramirez | .486 | 521-551 | 19.9 | 9.67 |
| Hunter Pence | .487 | 593-625 | 29.2 | 14.22 |
| Adam Jones | .490 | 541-564 | 22.4 | 10.98 |
| Troy Tulowitzki | .491 | 472-489 | 34.0 | 16.69 |
| *Misery Index is winning pct. multiplied by WAR |
This is what Willingham said about losing, right after the Royals won the American League pennant:
“I think it kind of wears on you being on losing teams a lot,” Willingham said. “But definitely, this is a lot more fun. Sure, I thought about it. That’s the goal when you sign up this: Everybody wants to make it to the postseason. I always wondered if I would, so now that it’s come true, it’s really nice.”
Regardless of how most of Willingham’s teams performed, he personally produced 17.6 WAR, a stat weighed down by a poor defensive rating as an outfielder. That deficiency, along with periodic injuries and a late start to his career (Willingham didn’t get a full-time shot in the majors until he was 27 years old) rendered him a shade below a 2-win player. No matter, hitting 195 homers in the majors is not bad for 17th-round draft pick in 2000 from the oxymoronically named University of North Alabama.
A professional at 21, Willingham always had the look of a ballplayer, according to reports at the time, and he hit like one, too. But, as John Sickels pointed out, evaluators worried that the small-time competition against North Alabama was skewing his results. Willingham had some power, and he threw well, but he didn’t have a set position. He transitioned from outfield to third base in his second pro season. Two years later, the Marlins tried turning him into a catcher. An injury the next season, along with a lack of significant progress behind the plate, delayed his ascension to the majors despite obvious progress as a hitter.
Eventually — obviously — he made it. Never an All-Star (though he did win a Silver Slugger as designated hitter with the Twins), Willingham posted a career .359 wOBA and a .212 ISO (better than Vladimir Guerrero, Justin Upton, Adrian Beltre and others), along with a walk rate in Jayson Werth’s neighborhood. Plus, he was good enough to earn the simplistic but effective nickname of “Hammer.” (Although, while we’re on the subject, Willingham actually could have been a real-life “Whammer,” even if his personality isn’t much like that of Joe Don Baker’s “Natural” character.)
Back in July, Willingham said the biggest factor in keeping his baseball career going beyond 2014 wasn’t winning, losing, playing time, health or even money. It was his family. The sight of Willingham’s wife, Ginger, toting their three young boys, ages 2 through 7, around the Kauffman Stadium during the fun times in Kansas City is one that’s easily remembered and relatable. More than once, Mrs. Willingham mentioned how she didn’t want to lose track of the “Li’l Hammers.” (It could have been the “Li’l Whammers,” which isn’t as good as “Hammers.” And THAT’S why you don’t mess with a man’s nickname.)
Dave Brown recently joined Fangraphs and CBS' Eye on Baseball after seven years writing for Big League Stew at Yahoo Sports. He lives in Kansas City with his wife and young daughter — who appears to be a left-hander. Follow him on Twitter @AnswerDave.
Welcome, Dave — another fantastic FA signing by FG!
And props to Willingham for putting together a solid career despite it not being a particularly special or lengthy one. He strung together several seasons in the ~2-3 WAR range, and, honestly, there’s probably a good chance he’d still be more effective as a DH vs. LHP than Billy Butler and a few others (and at a fraction of the cost!). But can’t fault him for hanging it up.
I know it’s a joke, but shouldn’t Misery Index be (1 – W%) * WAR (i.e. better players are more miserable on worse teams)?
The formula he used is fine. The best players have the highest misery index while Yuniesky Betancourt is more ungrateful than we originally thought
You’re probably right — Misery Index was something I came up with midway through writing the post. I think it might be *something* fun to play with, but honestly I’m not sure of the best way to calculate it.
He is definitely right, you should just go ahead and correct it now
Eh, even if “corrected” it would need to be adjusted to account for careers length. Given that the Yankees won at about a .590 clip over Jeter’s 70+ WAR career, even the (1-W%)*WAR method would indicate that Jeter suffered far more than anyone else in that table despite near constant success.
(Losing%-Winning%)*WAR.
A player with lots of WAR on a losing team has a high one. It’s not perfect as it gives a negative WAR player on a winning team a positive value too, but then maybe knowing that everyone but you is contributing is bad too.
(.5-W%)*WAR
This sets a baseline “miserableness” at 0 for playing for a .500 team. If you think a player would be miserable with a career .500 you can adjust the baseline level up to .55 or .6 or whatever number you think means a player could no longer be miserable.
Why is the University of North Alabama an oxymoronic name?
Because it’s in the South. And is associated with said region. I guess you could say the same about North Carolina, but … it’s kind of like “(Born and raised in) South Detroit,” which would be Canada.
No. This is totally wrong.
Respectfully, I’m with Charlie. I get the playfulness, but North Alabama qualifies only Alabama and south Detroit is not Canada. Now “Northern South Dakota State” would be funnier.
Figwhip, here you go:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_State_University
I didn’t mean to vote on Figwhip’s reply. I think I downvoted. I don’t know what I’m doing. OK, now, what was I saying? …. Oh, “Northern South Dakota State” WOULD be funnier, if it existed. You could say that “Western Carolina” is funnier, because there’s no such state as Western Carolina. North Alabama, it’s just… Playfully speaking, one would think that Alabama wouldn’t want to have anything to do with “North.” And yet, there’s a college called North Alabama. I think it’s funny. Have I gone on too long?
I think he probably meant without the oxy …
That explanation is a stretch at best, and you know what they say about a joke if you have to explain it…
It’s like dissecting a frog: nobody’s happy and the frog dies.
My doctor said the frogs would stop dying if I kept my scalpel out of there.
You mean Cleveland?
The use of that adverb was below replacement level.
I took your comment to mean it was actually in Southern Alabama. That would have been kind of funny. As it is…well I liked the article. Always thought the Hammer was a bit underrated. Also, I feel like he just entered the league. Where have the last 8 years gone?
Always wanted to see the Hammer on the Buccos, until recently it could only add to his misery score.
Just to be curious: what’s Adam Dunn’s misery index?
Infinite. He must endure his own flatulence.
Depends if you include his pitching WAR figures…because there was no misery in that thing of beauty
Willingham ranks 51st in batting runs since 2004, sandwiched between Hunter Pence and Derek Jeter.
It’s funny that Hunter is only 2 spots behind Jeter when he didn’t play 3/10 years you included.
Hunter played 8 of the 11 years since 2004, and for practical purposes Jeter played 10 of them.
Any misery index should have a deduction for anyone who plays in the World Series and especially if that team wins it.ins the World Series. In other words, I doubt if Hunter Pence, or any MLB player, would consider Pence’s career to be miserable in any way shape or form.
Willingham should have been an All Star in 2010. In the first half he slashed 281/411/502 with 15 HR. His wOBA at the break was 399 which lead the NL. Who made the team ahead of him? Marlon Byrd 317/365/480 371 wOBA, 9 HR. Clearly inferior. Also, Michael Bourn 255/331/330 298 wOBA but 28 SB 8 CS.
Other Nats robbed that year:
Ryan Zimmerman should have made the team over Omar Infante(!).
Adam Dunn should have made it over Ryan Howard. I don’t care if Charlie Manuel was the manager.
And Strasburg should have been on the team but we don’t need to rehash old arguments.
Ernie Banks must hav had a misery index in the 100’s, and he still wanted to play two.
I know this does not add to the baseball conversation… but I feel the ned to point out that Ginger Willingham is an extremely attractive woman.
And thats after 3 kids!
maybe that’s WHY three kids
D-Bo!
Welcome to Fangraphs. We love you. We miss you. We’ll see you soon.
–Shaq
“Someday, an up-and-coming SABR scientist should try to measure the psychic effect that losing has on ballplayers.”
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=24608
Nice to see posts about mediocre players. Just to note, a lot of players don’t play on winning teams for 2 reasons: they aren’t good enough to make a difference, and they don’t do anything to make the team play better (leadership, team unity, focus). Good luck to Jish and his family.