Kansas City Royals Top 42 Prospects

Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the Kansas City Royals. Scouting reports were compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as my own observations. This is the third year we’re delineating between two anticipated relief roles, the abbreviations for which you’ll see in the “position” column below: MIRP for multi-inning relief pitchers, and SIRP for single-inning relief pitchers. The ETAs listed generally correspond to the year a player has to be added to the 40-man roster to avoid being made eligible for the Rule 5 draft. Manual adjustments are made where they seem appropriate, but I use that as a rule of thumb.
A quick overview of what FV (Future Value) means can be found here. A much deeper overview can be found here.
All of the ranked prospects below also appear on The Board, a resource the site offers featuring sortable scouting information for every organization. It has more details (and updated TrackMan data from various sources) than this article and integrates every team’s list so readers can compare prospects across farm systems. It can be found here.
Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Maikel Garcia | 23.3 | MLB | SS | 2023 | 50 |
2 | Nick Loftin | 24.8 | AAA | 2B | 2024 | 45 |
3 | Alec Marsh | 25.1 | MLB | SP | 2023 | 45 |
4 | Javier Vaz | 22.8 | A+ | 2B | 2024 | 45 |
5 | Carter Jensen | 20.0 | A+ | C | 2026 | 45 |
6 | Frank Mozzicato | 20.0 | A+ | SP | 2026 | 40+ |
7 | Ben Kudrna | 20.4 | A | SP | 2026 | 40+ |
8 | Gavin Cross | 22.4 | A+ | CF | 2026 | 40+ |
9 | Asbel Gonzalez | 17.5 | R | CF | 2029 | 40+ |
10 | Austin Charles | 19.6 | A | 3B | 2028 | 40+ |
11 | John McMillon | 25.4 | AA | SIRP | 2024 | 40+ |
12 | Chandler Champlain | 23.9 | AA | SP | 2024 | 40+ |
13 | Freddy Fermin | 28.1 | MLB | C | 2023 | 40+ |
14 | Tyler Gentry | 24.4 | AAA | RF | 2024 | 40+ |
15 | Cayden Wallace | 21.9 | A+ | 3B | 2026 | 40+ |
16 | David Sandlin | 22.4 | A+ | SP | 2026 | 40+ |
17 | Will Klein | 23.6 | AAA | SIRP | 2024 | 40+ |
18 | Jonathan Bowlan | 26.6 | AAA | SIRP | 2023 | 40 |
19 | Christian Chamberlain | 24.0 | AAA | SIRP | 2024 | 40 |
20 | Diego Hernandez | 22.6 | AA | CF | 2024 | 40 |
21 | Andrew Hoffmann | 23.4 | AA | SP | 2025 | 40 |
22 | Luinder Avila | 21.9 | A+ | SP | 2026 | 40 |
23 | Noah Cameron | 24.0 | AA | SP | 2025 | 40 |
24 | Steven Zobac | 22.7 | A | SP | 2026 | 40 |
25 | Samad Taylor | 25.0 | MLB | 2B | 2023 | 40 |
26 | Beck Way | 23.9 | AA | SIRP | 2025 | 40 |
27 | Mason Barnett | 22.7 | A+ | MIRP | 2026 | 40 |
28 | Hayden Dunhurst | 22.8 | A | C | 2027 | 40 |
29 | Asa Lacy | 24.1 | AA | SIRP | 2025 | 35+ |
30 | Daniel Vazquez | 19.2 | A | SS | 2025 | 35+ |
31 | Angel Zerpa | 23.8 | MLB | MIRP | 2023 | 35+ |
32 | Austin Cox | 26.3 | MLB | MIRP | 2023 | 35+ |
33 | Anthony Veneziano | 25.8 | AAA | MIRP | 2024 | 35+ |
34 | T.J. Sikkema | 24.9 | AA | MIRP | 2024 | 35+ |
35 | Roni Cabrera | 17.9 | R | LF | 2028 | 35+ |
36 | Jacob Wallace | 24.9 | AA | SIRP | 2024 | 35+ |
37 | James McArthur | 26.6 | MLB | SIRP | 2023 | 35+ |
38 | Jonah Dipoto | 26.8 | AAA | SIRP | 2024 | 35+ |
39 | Steven Cruz | 24.0 | AA | SIRP | 2024 | 35+ |
40 | Samuel Valerio | 21.7 | A | SIRP | 2025 | 35+ |
41 | Anderson Paulino | 24.8 | A+ | SIRP | 2025 | 35+ |
42 | Yunior Marte | 19.8 | R | SP | 2028 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
More Relievers
Eduardo Herrera, RHP
Yefri Del Rosario, RHP
Noah Murdock, RHP
Eric Cerantola, RHP
Mack Anglin, RHP
Emilio Marquez, LHP
Herrera is a converted infielder who was acquired from Arizona in a deal for Nick Heath a couple of years ago. The undersized 23-year-old sits 96, with an average curveball and 30 control. Del Rosario, one of the Braves prospects cut loose in the Coppolella scandal, is now 23 and having a bat-missing rebound after struggling in 2022. He’s sitting 95 and will flash an above-average slider. Murdock, 24, is a 6-foot-8 righty who finally moved to relief this year. He’s sitting 96 and flashes a 55-grade slider, but he has 30 control. Cerantola and Anglin are similar to Murdock — they were stuff-heavy college arms who haven’t polished their feel to pitch in pro ball. Marquez is a diminutive lefty with a riding upper-80s fastball that has missed bats through the mid-minors.
Notable Names
Luca Tresh, C
Brewer Hicklen, OF
Brennon McNair, 3B
Tresh has a backup catcher’s skill set except for his struggles controlling the run game; he’s allowed nearly 90 stolen bases at an 87% success rate so far in 2023. Hicklen, a former two-sport guy, is hitting with power at Omaha, but he looks like a left field-only fit on defense and isn’t making enough contact to hold down a long-term role. He deserves to wear a big league uniform at some point this year, though. McNair, 20, is an athletic infield prospect with a lift-heavy swing and undercooked feel to hit.
Hit Tool Sleepers
Milo Rushford, OF
River Town, OF
John Rave, OF
Rushford is a medium-framed 19-year-old outfield prospect from Tucson who signed for just $125,000. He’s shown precocious feel for the zone and bat-to-ball feel so far on the complex. Town and Rave are both performing as old-for-the-level hitters, especially Town, who has one of the lowest swinging strike rates in the org.
If Only They Could Play Up the Middle
Tyler Tolbert, SS/CF
Dairon Blanco, OF
Peyton Wilson, 2B
This whole group has interesting tools, but they aren’t great fits at premium positions. Tolbert plays SS/CF but isn’t really a fit at either spot. He and Blanco (who lacks feel for center field) are both plus-plus runners who could be end-of-the-bench specialists. Wilson is hitting pretty well and plays defense with a ton of effort, but he isn’t especially skilled.
DSL Bats
Daniel Lopez, OF
Tony Ruiz, OF
Angel Acosta, 3B
Jorge Hernandez, C/3B/1B
Lopez is a very projectable lefty-hitting outfield prospect who signed for nearly $500,000. Ruiz signed for over $1 million and has big power, but he’s striking out at a concerning rate early on. Acosta is the opposite — he’s making lots of contact but is physically mature. Hernandez is an interesting multi-positional defender who tracks pitches well and sprays the ball to all fields.
Fringe Bats
Omar Hernandez, C
Lizandro Rodriguez, INF
Omar Florentino, INF
Hernandez has plus contact rates, but he’s in his third year of A-ball and is only a fair defensive catcher. Rodriguez’s hit tool seems flimsy to me — he doesn’t actually have precise bat control despite his early-career K rates. Florentino is a versatile infielder who hasn’t gotten much stronger in pro ball.
Below-Average Heat, One Plus Pitch
Ryan Ramsey, LHP
Ben Hernandez, RHP
Shane Panzini, RHP
Ramsey is a lefty with a plus changeup taken on Day Three of last year’s draft out of Maryland. Hernandez was a high-profile prep signee who has had trouble staying healthy. He’s sitting in the low-90s and has a good changeup. Panzini is sitting 90-92 and has an above-average slider.
System Overview
This is one of the three worst systems in baseball at present, though if we did a “young talent” ranking rather than just the farm system, the Royals would look much better because of the Bobby Witt Jr./MJ Melendez/Vinnie Pasquantino group (and others) that graduated last year. The inability to develop pitching has resulted in many high picks stagnating at their pre-draft skill level. Since 2020, the Royals have spent $9 million in bonus pool space on high school pitching and none of those players have made any kind of leap so far.
It’s difficult to conceive of a way this system can improve quickly. With Aroldis Chapman already out the door, there are still a few veteran arms who might fetch something before the deadline, but probably not the kind of impact prospects who would elevate the overall quality of the system. It’s going to take success via the draft and international amateur market, and that usually takes a while. The Royals do have four of the top 75 picks in the upcoming draft, which is a start.
There are some individually exciting prospects in this org (especially Austin Charles), but it’s mostly comprised of pitchers with bottom-of-the-roster utility. It’s tough to be confident that the arms with real upside (anyone in the 40 FV tier and above) will actually improve given Kansas City’s recent track record, but as always, I try to veer away from “predicting” and toward “scouting” with these write-ups. Still, it is much more common for pitchers in this system to get worse than to get better. That position is always going to be subject to attrition because of injury, but the Royals have performed below expectation.
Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.
An org that, like the Rockies, has fallen way behind the times in pitching dev and preaches things that don’t work anymore. It’s actually stunning how similar these two orgs are from the outside looking in, down to the “values” thing.
As with the Tigers, there has been so much damage done thanks to the prior regime that fixing this is going to take a few years of misery at the big league level. An entire generation of Royals pitchers has not developed, which is absolutely brutal both to win games and to trade from. The Rockies would apply here too, but in their case there really doesn’t seem to be a change in regime, so…
I don’t get what your big deal is on the whole “values” thing. We don’t believe you can boil a player down to a number “value”, you got to look at the whole person and how he gets you to the number of wins to improve upon what you did last year. Isn’t that all anyone can ask of anyone?
Totally, Mr. Monfort. How silly of me! I’m sure a new Rooftop to sell beer from will also be a key part of the values that help us win games!
I’m not sure you can consider this a change in regime either considering their “new” head of baseball ops has been there since 2006. I think the Rockies comp is absolutely spot on. They are the two most directionless franchises in baseball currently
Oh… I didn’t remember it was an internal hire.
Nevermind then lol
The White Sox would like a word. And so do the A’s.
huh? The Tigers are 2024 contenders.
It is becoming increasingly obvious that most effective front offices have regular infusions of people from outside of the system to get new ideas and processes, and maybe even just to break up groupthink. Only a few organizations don’t do this and are successful–I think only the Rays, Yankees, Cardinals, and Guardians, and the Guardians look like they could use an infusion of ideas for scouting and developing hitting anyway (and the Cardinals for pitching). There are a lot of good ideas floating around there and if you’re not hiring people from outside the organization you’re going to miss out on a fair number of them.
Meanwhile, if you look at a list of organizations that have fallen behind it’s almost all organizations where the current leadership and all of their lieutenants have been in the system for a very long time. The Rockies, Royals, White Sox, and Athletics all fit this description. It might also be true for the Nationals, I’m not as certain about them. These teams are notable because usually when a team is doing badly and there is a change in leadership it’s an opportunity to get new blood in from outside of the organization but for various reasons, they haven’t.
I’d love to know how much this applies to the Reds right now. It seems like they’ve somehow gotten a leg up on identifying top amateur talent over the past few years, but I also wonder if this is a bit of a “small sample <=> potentially just luck” issue.
I don’t know if they have changed their scouting but they have dramatically overhauled their player development team from outside sources. Their pitching coach came from the Brewers and they had Kyle Boddy in the organization for a while too. That had some trickle-down effects to the scouting, at least on the pitching side, they started emphasizing certain types of movement a lot more than in the past. It’s pretty interesting because as far as I know, most of the very top guys in the front office have been there for a while.
I can’t say for certain on the position player side but they do seem to have switched their emphasis from “older high school hitters who beat up on kids a year younger than them” like Hendricks to “polished college hitters” like India and McLain.
Yes, it is a problem for the Nats too. Rizzo and his main deputies haven’t changed in a decade. With that said, their quick fall from grace did spur some change, albeit far too late to arrest that fall. There’s a number of articles about how Rizzo disregarded advanced analytics for the Nationals’ best seasons, and they had one of the smallest teams working on this. There has been an improvement, particularly in their drafting in recent years, which was by far their weakest trait, having not producing a single major league player with a positive WAR for a decade since Anthony Rendon in 2011. This season alone 3 drafted players have reached the majors (Alu, Irvin and Willingham) all drafted in 2018-2019, though only Irvin has yet to post a positive WAR.
Complacency is a real issue, especially when you have 15+ teams that are actively seeking a way to develop an advantage against you. But I understand why it’s hard to keep things fresh. In the Nats (or Cardinals, Yankees or Guardians case) they were all successful for very long periods of time. How do you fire staff, when the big league team is consistently winning their division or the World Series? That could instill a pretty toxic working environment.
However the Royals and Rockies don’t have that as an excuse.
For a long time, the Athletics and Rays and Yankees (and to a lesser extent the Cardinals) had a culture of innovation where they were never resting on their laurels and always trying to stay one step ahead. That worked for them for a long time, and it is still working for the Rays and Yankees (and sort of for the Cards and Guardians).
But for the Nationals (and Dombrowski with the Tigers, and Brian Sabean with the Giants) they relied really heavily on just being smarter than anyone else. And that works for a while, but eventually the game passed Sabean by, and it sounds like the same thing happened to Rizzo. (Dombrowski is a weird situation, he went to the Red Sox and learned a lot from them and then got a chance to start over and bring in lots of new voices in Philadelphia).
The thing is that when a team needs a new leader, it is often a chance to start over with an overhauled front office team and get new and fresh ideas in there. This is what happened with the Giants under Zaidi, the Brewers under Stearns, and the Cubs under Hoyer. They all went out of their way to bring in a lot of people from other organizations. But the Rockies and White Sox and probably Royals have not taken those opportunities.
& Dombrowski’s time at the end of his Detroit tenure was colored by Mike Ilitch being close to death & the demand to win a WS for him before he died.The rumors were always that some of the moves (esp signing Verlander & Miggy extensions, Prince Fielder trade) were more Ilitch moves than Dombrowski moves.
Of course, they were up against salary & that led to some other bad moves- Trading Doug Fister while trying to win (of course DD got Robbie Ray back in that deal), not getting anything for Scherzer when it was clear he was going elsewhere & just letting him walk…trading Ray because he wasn’t ready for Shane Greene, who supposedly was, dumping Eugenio Suarez for Alfredo Simon (by far his worst trade, just awful..unless you need pitching NOW, which they did), etc.
& he got fired after starting the much needed reset where he got Fulmer, MAtthew Boyd & Daniel Norris for Price & Cespedes.
Detroit’s biggest issue was promoting Avila from within after firing DD..which, well see your post above about needing new voices. & Avila appeased ownership his first offseason by doing a quick rebuild by signing Upton & Jordan Zimmermann & kicking the can down the road…which, of course, Detroit is still waiting for. Harris seems like he COULD be good.
These regimes recognize that bringing in people from outside orgs would mean bringing in people who could run departments way better than the people who currently run them, and the people currently running them would rather keep their jobs and do a mediocre or poor job then allow other people to infringe on their “turf”. And ownership allows these department leaders to operate this way.
You’ll also recognize with all 4 of those orgs mentioned (COL, KC, CWS, OAK) there has been a ton of turnover with front office staffers at lower levels of the orgs. Again, the department leaders don’t want to cede any of their turf, even to people inside the organization, so these orgs have terrible inter-departmental communication and the staffers who recognize that their orgs operate worse than 3/4 of the league leave and either go to better run orgs or do something else.
I knew that about Oakland but not about the others. That’s really interesting. And also really bad for an organization!
I was looking up the recent Tigers history and they gave Gordon Beckham 240 PA in 2019???