Kenta Maeda Needs to Bring Back the Sinker

Yesterday, we examined pitcher in Los Angeles who’d switched from a pretty ordinary four-seam fastball to a more dynamic two-seamer and found success in the process. JC Ramirez does throw in the high 90s, but his was the story you want to tell.

What we might be seeing with Kenta Maeda is the opposite, or close to it. Because, right now, despite a strikeout minus walk rate that looks familiar, Maeda’s ERA is more than twice his 2016 version. The difference between the two years? Home runs, seven of them already. The fastball might be the key to avoiding those going forward.

Before we rush to a diagnosis regarding pitch types, we should probably establish that the problem facing Maeda isn’t simply a loss of stuff or velocity. Confirming that sort of thing isn’t actually such an easy feat these days, with park-to-park calibrations a little off right now. So it’s more difficult, but it’s also not impossible. Because consider: Clayton Kershaw shares a home park with Maeda and, like Maeda, he’s also recorded a start at Colorado. Comparing their numbers between the parks, we can get a sense of Maeda’s stuff so far.

Kenta Maeda Changes vs Clayton Kershaw Changes
Pitch Horizontal Move Vertical Move Velocity
Fourseamer -1.0 (-0.8) -0.2 (-0.4) +1.2 (-0.3)
Sinker -1.9 -0.7 +0.6
Change -2.6 (-0.9) +0.2 (+1.7) +0.9 (-1.9)
Slider -0.6 (+0.3) +0.5 (+2.2) +1.5 (+1.5)
Curve +1.4 (+0.1) +1.4 (+0.5) +1.3 (+0.2)
SOURCE: Brooks Baseball
Vertical movement plus means more ride, negative means more drop
Horizontal movement plus means more fade, negative means less fade
Clayton Kershaw’s changes in parentheses

It’s hard to use the horizontal numbers much because you want different things from different pitches, but just look at the magnitude of each. There’s only one thing that stands out a bit — namely, that Maeda has lost 2.6 inches of fade on the changeup and Kershaw’s deltas don’t feature a similar magnitude. Let’s store that away.

When it comes to velocity, Maeda actually seems to be up. When it comes to drop, he’s lost only a little. Doesn’t look like enough to sound the alarm bells. Given the amount of change Kershaw has seen, I’d say only the changeup stands out.

So, about the changeup. When Maeda came to America, he was surprised to find the different ball here led to more movement on the changeup. That was something that Hisashi Iwakuma had pointed out before, so it wasn’t the first time we’d heard this. Has Maeda lost that extra movement in his second year? Maybe.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Here’s why we can’t blame the changeup, though: it has a higher whiff rate and a higher ground-ball rate this year — and has once again not been responsible for a single home run. It’s the other pitches that have given up all the homers.

What if those modest changes to his breaking pitches are a big deal? It’s possible that a slightly higher release point has changed the movement on his breaking pitches and that’s been a big deal. He’s certainly hung a few curveballs this year.

Eh. Let’s not worry too much about the vertical differences on Maeda’s breaking pitches. 538’s Rob Arthur just showed today that the new system is having a rougher time transitioning when it comes to vertical movement numbers. And those changes are relatively small, and within that new band of error.

Those changes also pale when you consider this simple, radical change that Maeda has undergone since last year. Changes that happened in a bigger sample.

Kenta Maeda Fastball Mix over Time
2016 2017
Four-Seam 30% 43%
Two-Seam 12% 5%
SOURCE: Brooks Baseball

Last year, Maeda threw two four-seamers for every two-seamer. This year, he’s throwing eight four-seamers for every two-seamer. This isn’t quite the reverse Ramirez, since Maeda gets three times the whiffs from his four-seamer than his two-seamer, but there is something to this: his four-seamer has given up five times the homers as his two-seamer over his career. In very related news, Maeda’s whiffs are up and his fly balls and homers are up too.

Maeda has been significantly worse against lefties this year, and those added four-seamers have not been located in ideal spots.

The up and away is not as up and away, and the up and in not as up and in. And then there’s the matter of those pitches down Broadway. Those should probably be sinkers. In the past, they were sinkers. Why aren’t they sinkers now?

Well, it’s possible they are sinkers — that they’ve just flattened out and are being recorded as four-seamers. If that were the case, you might expect the movements on his fastballs to move towards each other, meshing as the systems fail to separate them well. That isn’t the case, though, on average. The difference between his four-seam and two-seam last year was a little over three inches; this year, it’s a little less than three inches. Still different pitches.

More likely, it seems that, for whatever reason (hopefully not injury), Maeda is throwing his four-seamer too much and his sinker too little. Maybe he thinks he needs the whiffs. Throwing that pitch too much has led to putting it in bad places, though. Places he should put his two-seamer. The good news is, that seems like a somewhat simple fix.





With a phone full of pictures of pitchers' fingers, strange beers, and his two toddler sons, Eno Sarris can be found at the ballpark or a brewery most days. Read him here, writing about the A's or Giants at The Athletic, or about beer at October. Follow him on Twitter @enosarris if you can handle the sandwiches and inanity.

10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
mikejuntMember
9 years ago

I was hoping for something like this, Maeda didn’t seem to be having control or velocity issues but has been wrecked. This makes a lot of sense.

Kershaws place on the contact rate list has a lot to do with his start at coors, his first in at couple years, where a bunch of curves acted like normal human curveball instead of kershaw curveballs and got belted so hard fangraphs pitch values still think his curve is a negative value pitch this year.

showerdeer
9 years ago

Posting a Maeda article right before a start.

Bold move.

Respect.

johansantana17Member since 2026
9 years ago

Looks like he read this article.

drew_willyMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  johansantana17

Pitchf/x gamelog data says he threw a bunch of FC against PHI Friday, though he’s never thrown that ever in any other game in his career. Am I to take”FC” too mean cutter and understand the truth to be that those were sinkers that pitchf/x mislabeled?

tranceMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  drew_willy

They were definitely cutters. Check out DodgersDigest, there’s an article there titled “Kenta Maeda Has a New Toy” which contains gfys.

drew_willyMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  johansantana17

Maeda gave up four of his homers in one game at Arizona in which his rate of fastballs and specifically four seamers were both down relative to 2016 and 2017 season rates. That’s really ironic, isn’t it? If I’m understanding correctly, the poor guy uses a pitch mix that ought to be better than what he does in the other 2017 games and happens to get his mistakes mashed for homers.

Put another way, I take Eno to be saying “Maeda should stop this elevated rate of four seamers because they get homered more often than his two seamer. See what has happened here in 2017: greater rate of four seamers has led to more frequent homers.” But the game in which Maeda got shelled for four homers is the one where his rate of four seamers was actually down. Albeit the homers did come off bad four seamers.

drew_willyMember since 2020
9 years ago

“The up and away is not as up and away, and ***the up and in not as up and in***.”

Can somebody help me understand the heatmaps, then? It sure looks to me like the 2017 one shows larger percentages in the up and in regions, even the extreme up and in, than those shown in the same regions of the 2016 heatmap. I do also see more pitches in what I would think is the not-so-up-and-in regions of this year’s map, which I take are pitches that missed their targets. Is that all that is meant?

I would take from the maps shown the following: Maeda has been aiming up and in a lot more this season and aiming up and away noticeably less this season while also missing more often this year with the intended up and in pitches. Does that sound correct?

mikejuntMember
9 years ago
Reply to  drew_willy

I think Eno is referring to how his up and in in the zone is up, but his in off the plate and up above the zone are way down, and that’s generally where Maeda tries to throw those pitches. He’s missing towards the plate as evidenced by the fact that none of the up or in boxes are remotely red on the 2017 heat map, but are in the 2016.

What’s interesting is the Dodgers say Maeda has not been pitching down in the zone enough but these maps suggest he is pitching a lot lower in the zone in general.

drew_willyMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  mikejunt

Thanks for the reply, it seems I must be misunderstanding something but I’m trying to correctly understand what is being said.

“his up and in in the zone is up” – yeah, this I can see, as I take this area to be within the black border.

“but his in off the plate and up above the zone are way down” – they are? For some reason I’m having trouble recognizing that on the map. I must be having a mental lapse. So if I look in the region in the upper left most part of each map, in 2016 I see 0.7%, while in 2017 I see a larger value of 1.2%. Now I get that that particular region isn’t where a pitcher would want to put the ball, but I’m thinking that the regions immediately adjacent to that one are where a pitcher would want to put it (and where you are describing). Yet in most of those adjacent regions I see larger values in 2017 than in 2016. I don’t doubt that you are correct, so what am I stupidly missing? It looks to me like nearly every region immediately above the zone and immediately off the inside edge of the zone hold greater percentages in 2017 than in 2016. That’s throwing me off. What am I misunderstanding or misreading here? I have got to be an idiot.

The more I write the more I feel idiotic, so last attempt. If we ignore the outermost regions of the heatmaps, we’ve got an 8×8 grid for each year. Then we could refer to each of those 64 regions by an (i,j) coordinate pair with i being the row number and j being the column number such that the upper left region (1,1) = 0.5% in 2016 and (1,1) = 1.2% in 2017. It looks to me like (1,1), (1,2), etc. through (1,8), which I take to be just above the zone,each contain larger values in 2017 than in 2016. This makes me think Maeda is putting pitches just above the zone more frequently in 2017 than he did in 2016. The same goes for most of the values running down column 1, like (1,1), (2,1), and (3,1). What am I getting wrong here? I feel so dumb.

AA1989
9 years ago
Reply to  drew_willy

Nothing you said is wrong. It just appears that the author misspoke.