Lessons from Hollywood

(I am severely late to the party, but I’m here to talk about a movie that made its debut on the festival circuit in 2008, and was released sometime last May in the United States. But on the heels of yesterday’s Oscar nominations, I’m hoping you can see some tangential timeliness, if only to point to its glaring omission from the Best Original Screenplay category. I also think SUGAR can provide real lessons that can help us in our goal from Friday: finding ways to improve the existing Minor League development process.)

“It’s the same game we played back home.” It is this question — not the assurance, as it’s spoken in the film — that concerns the baseball element in “Sugar”, a story about assimilation into the United States told by fimmakers Anna Boden and Ryan Fleck (“Half Nelson”). The title character is Miguel “Sugar” Santos (newcomer Algenis Perez Soto), a right-handed pitcher from San Pedro, Dominican Republic, signed for $15,000 to the Kansas City Knights. Santos takes quite a journey in the film, traveling from his home country to Phoenix for Spring Training, then to Bridgetown, Iowa for his first minor league assignment, and to New York for a taste of the America he has dreamt about.

This is the baseball journey that we know about told through a lens we have only imagined. Boden and Fleck are unwavering in their pursuit to tell the Dominican story of playing baseball in America, from the playgrounds in the Bronx to the organizational facilities in the Caribbean. Sugar is good; at 19, the film opens as he begins to harness the ability that led to his signing. But the Knights realize what a bargain he is when Sugar quickly picks up a knuckle-curve that a visiting scout teaches him. From there, it’s onto Phoenix, as Sugar and his curveball are invited to the Knights’ Spring Training camp.

From here, the film begins a series of narratives that deal with the difficulty of the language barrier. Sugar arrives in America with enough English to play baseball with: his English classes in the Dominican consisted of “flyball,” “home run,” and “Take Me Out to the Ballgame.” Anything outside of this, like ordering food at a restaurant or understanding his coaches and teammates, is out of his league. “Donde está I-A?” he asks his friends before a plane ride sends him to his professional debut in the Midwest League. Middle America is not the stuff of Dominican dreams.

There are three principal relationships that a Minor League player has, and Boden and Fleck have done their due diligence to pursue each struggle in communication: the host family, the coaching staff and teammates. We can tell that Sugar, like so many Latin minor leaguers, is very smart, because he picks up the language very well. But a perfect storm of events strike midseason, as they so often do, and it drastically changes Sugar’s worldview in Bridgetown. He injures his ankle tripping over the first base bag, just when his lone Dominican teammate is released as the result of bad performance. His other friend on the team, a second baseman from Stanford, is promoted, and suddenly Sugar feels alone. When he returns and the inevitable slump hits, Sugar’s frustrations are read as make-up problems by his equally frustrated coaches.

This, I think, is the first lesson that we can take from the movie. I’m reminded of Hanley Ramirez, who had numerous suspensions in the Boston Red Sox organization for mis-conduct. Ramirez would often get in arguments with coaches and trainers, and was even demoted from High-A to Rookie League as punishment. I should preface this example by saying that Hanley’s own lack of maturity and ego were the central role in these problems. But I also can see that at no level in the Boston organization did he have a Latin coach, and thus, I find his immediate success in Latin-friendly Miami as something less than coincidence. I can’t help wonder if part of his anger outbreaks coincided with language barrier frustrations.

The film further reveals itself when Sugar travels to New York to visit the departed Dominican third baseman. There, he sees the Yankee Stadium he dreamed about as a boy in San Pedro, and finds a Latin community in the Bronx. It presents, to me at least, an interesting dichotomy: the biggest cities in America are home to our largest fanbases, but also are in the most Latin-friendly towns in America. Many of the minor league cities that players are assigned to, with the intention of developing them into Major Leaguers, are in towns with nothing to offer Spanish speakers.

Critics have credited Boden and Fleck for a niche look at the American dream, but they have also accomplished something that revered sports movies like “The Blind Side” and “Invictus” (both Oscar-nominated films) failed at: they delivered a universal message without dumbing down the sport serving as metaphor. In fact, I think “Sugar” raises issues that we need to pursue that could shine light on the ideal development process of a Latin player. What teams are best at developing these players? What do they do differently? Do players succeed in towns more accessible to Spanish speakers?

Is it really the same game they play back home?





25 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
scott
14 years ago

this is great. i saw the movie sometime in 2008 and loved it.

sugar actually reminded me a lot of jose contreras; spurts of ability and lots of “orgazational disappointment.” made me think about how many of these players exist in every organization, at every level. kevin goldstein recently told me that probably 75% will never make as much money as they do from their initial signing bonus.

the words aren’t really coming to me, but i think a lot of the issue is where the teams are. it’s impossible to send *every* latin american prospect that speaks little english to nyc, chicago, LA, miami, etc, but i think putting more minor league clubs in those areas could definitely help. chicago, for instance, has one mlb affiliated minor league team (kane county cougars, A’s), and even that is a 35+ minute drive from the city. the rest are at least 1.5+ hours away.

Bryan Smith
14 years ago
Reply to  scott

Right, or how about Brooklyn, which the Mets are affiliated with. What an opportunity for players there.

I’m not suggesting we send every latin american prospect to a big city, so much as I’m suggesting that teams have their low minors squads in Latin-friendly towns. But there’s research to be done before I make any definitive opinion.

Sandy Kazmir
14 years ago
Reply to  Bryan Smith

Wouldn’t it be easier to just hire a Spanish speaking coach that could act as a mentor/father figure for those fresh off the boat? Plenty of ex-ball players are Hispanic and could teach a thing or two about hitting or fielding a position. Not to get too general, but this seems like the spirit of the rule behind affirmative action. Nice read Bryan, this all but seals the deal that I need to view this sometime.

Mofo
14 years ago
Reply to  Bryan Smith

Wouldn’t incorporating more English lessons be the easier solution? I mean, isn’t part of becoming a professional assimilating yourself into the culture of said profession? This just seems like enabling at its worst.

And apologies if I sounded like Gerry Callahan just then.

Bryan Smith
14 years ago
Reply to  Bryan Smith

Mofo: Certainly to your first question. I reference in the article the silliness that Sugar’s English lesson only consisted of basic baseball terms. My guess is that some teams do (or have) operated this way, and that some go above and beyond.

But I hardly think it’s enabling to find a way for a business to improve upon itself. Are you not recognizing that Latin players have a more uphill climb than American players in assimilating into professional baseball? Yes, part of their duty is to work towards succeeding, but part of the onus has to fall on the organizations.

scott
14 years ago
Reply to  Bryan Smith

@Sandy. Do these players want a mentor/father figure? As a 19-21 year old, would you want a father figure by your side?

Sandy Kazmir
14 years ago
Reply to  Bryan Smith

It’s a valid question, Scott, one that I don’t have an answer for. I know that when I left home at 18 it was hard adapting to a completely different environment, and I spoke the language. My point was more of having someone to go to to ask advice, that grew up in the same culture as me, that had been through this same route to the Majors. It would seem that there would be an infinite (for all intents and purposes) supply of coaches, why not make it a point to have someone with a similar background to the commodity that organizations are trying to nurture from potential to impact?

scott
14 years ago
Reply to  Bryan Smith

i agree that it would be very worthwhile to have someone like that. i guess i just see the words “father figure” and think of joe nossek (sp) and shadowing josh hamilton everywhere he went.

there has to be some negative outcomes of a parentless, possibly-soon-to-be-rich, teenager going all frat guy freak out thinking he owns the show (hanley).