Nearly eight months ago, I asked you to predict the future. Here are the words I used to introduce that piece:
In 2017, the fastball rate fell again. It’s been falling for some time now, but in 2017 it fell again, from 56.7% in 2016 to 55.6% last year. There’s some reason to think that the drop in the fastball rate is linked to the increase in baseball’s increasing swinging-strike rate, which in turn is linked to the rise in strikeouts and hit batsmen, and on and on and on. Baseball is a complex system of action and reaction, and small changes can grow large quickly.
So this year, I want to know: what do you think will happen to some of baseball’s key stats, league-wide, in 2018? Maybe you think home-run rates will go up and strikeouts will fall. Maybe you think if home-run rates go up then strikeout rates have to fall. Maybe you think it’s the other way around. I don’t know. But I want to hear from you, and most of all I want to hear why you think certain changes are linked, and others aren’t.
Below are a series of tables featuring 10 years’ worth of data for a few key metrics. I’ve also included percentage changes year over year. Below each table is a poll which asks you to indicate whether you think a given statistic will increase or decrease — and, if so, by how much. Answer each poll, if you wish, and then also indicate in the comments why you voted the way you did on one statistic and not others. In a year or so, I’ll come back to this and we’ll talk about it as a group. Maybe it’ll be interesting. Maybe it won’t! We’ll see.
A lot has happened since I wrote those words: I’ve gotten married, my wife and I moved from Boston to Seattle, and I became a telecommuter (in my day job; this one has always been virtual-only). Oh, and the 2018 season came and went. The future I asked you to predict is now a part of the history books. Let’s see how good you were at reading ahead.
Note: a reader of the March post suggested he/she was unsure if answers should be submitted in percent or percentage point. It’s possible, as a result, that a few ballots could distort the overall results. Because I presented all the original deltas in the form of a percent, however, that is how I have once again presented them here. Fortunately, none of this matters at all!
Fastball Rate
Fastball Rate, 2008-17
| Year |
FB% |
FB% Delta |
| 2008 |
60.7% |
n/a |
| 2009 |
59.7% |
-1.65% |
| 2010 |
58.7% |
-1.68% |
| 2011 |
57.8% |
-1.53% |
| 2012 |
57.6% |
-0.35% |
| 2013 |
57.8% |
0.35% |
| 2014 |
57.7% |
-0.17% |
| 2015 |
57.7% |
0.00% |
| 2016 |
56.7% |
-1.73% |
| 2017 |
55.6% |
-1.94% |
You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage

The bar graph above — and the others like it below — present your expectations of the
percentage (again, not percentage point) change you expected for each given statistic between 2017 and 2018. Nearly three in four of you (74.2%, to be precise) looked at the data presented in the table above and decided the fastball rate in 2018 would decline by somewhere between zero and two percent between 2017 and 2018 — about on par with declines between 2015 and 2016 and between 2016 and 2017. And you know what? You were right. The fastball rate in 2018 was 55% even — a decline of 1.1 percent . Good job, everybody. You got this one right. And that pesky fastball rate just keeps dropping.
Walk Rate
Walk Rate, 2008-17
| Year |
BB% |
BB% Delta |
| 2008 |
8.7% |
n/a |
| 2009 |
8.9% |
2.30% |
| 2010 |
8.5% |
-4.49% |
| 2011 |
8.1% |
-4.71% |
| 2012 |
8.0% |
-1.23% |
| 2013 |
7.9% |
-1.25% |
| 2014 |
7.6% |
-3.80% |
| 2015 |
7.7% |
1.32% |
| 2016 |
8.2% |
6.49% |
| 2017 |
8.5% |
3.66% |

There was actually some disagreement about this one. Eight months ago, most of you (58%) thought the walk rate would jump this year — but you weren’t sure how much: 26 percent of you thought it would jump modestly (0%-1%) while 16% thought it would jump somewhat more dramatically (2%-5%). Another 28% of you thought the walk rate would drop, though modestly. And then there were the 14% of you who thought the walk rate would stay unchanged.
Those people were right. The walk rate in 2018 was 8.5% — exactly the same as it was in 2017.
Strikeout Rate
Strikeout Rate, 2008-17
| Year |
K% |
K% Delta |
| 2008 |
17.5% |
n/a |
| 2009 |
18.0% |
2.86% |
| 2010 |
18.5% |
2.78% |
| 2011 |
18.6% |
0.54% |
| 2012 |
19.8% |
6.45% |
| 2013 |
19.9% |
0.51% |
| 2014 |
20.4% |
2.51% |
| 2015 |
20.4% |
0.00% |
| 2016 |
21.1% |
3.43% |
| 2017 |
21.6% |
2.37% |

This one’s pretty simple. Nearly nine in ten of you (87%) thought the strikeout rate would rise this year, and it did. The 22.3% strikeout rate in 2018 represented a 3.2 percent increase over last year’s all-time record of 21.6% , and there’s no particular reason to think the strikeout journey is going to end any time soon. More strikeouts! More strikeouts! More strikeouts! Congrats to the nearly one in four of you who thought this rate would jump between 2% and 5%. You were right in a very precise way that matters very little to the order of the universe. But, nonetheless, you were right.
Out-of-Zone Swing Rate
O-Swing%, 2008-17
| Year |
O-Swing% |
O-Swing% Delta |
| 2008 |
24.9% |
n/a |
| 2009 |
25.1% |
0.80% |
| 2010 |
28.7% |
14.34% |
| 2011 |
29.9% |
4.18% |
| 2012 |
30.3% |
1.34% |
| 2013 |
30.4% |
0.33% |
| 2014 |
30.7% |
0.99% |
| 2015 |
30.6% |
-0.33% |
| 2016 |
30.3% |
-0.98% |
| 2017 |
29.9% |
-1.32% |

This is one of those stats that isn’t especially intuitive or much-discussed, so I’m not surprised that most of you looked at the last six years of data and said, “Yeah, that’s not changing.” Of all respondents, 86% predicted that this stat would vary by less than 1% from 2017’s figure. But here’s the thing: you were wrong. This year’s out-of-zone swing rate of 30.9% represented a 3% increase over last year’s mark and is the highest mark in that category since we started counting in 2002. Go figure. Apparently, 2018 was the year of expanding the zone.
Contact Rate
Contact Rate, 2008-17
| Year |
Contact% |
Contact% Delta |
| 2008 |
80.7% |
n/a |
| 2009 |
80.5% |
-0.25% |
| 2010 |
80.7% |
0.25% |
| 2011 |
80.7% |
0.00% |
| 2012 |
79.6% |
-1.36% |
| 2013 |
79.4% |
-0.25% |
| 2014 |
79.3% |
-0.13% |
| 2015 |
78.8% |
-0.63% |
| 2016 |
78.2% |
-0.76% |
| 2017 |
77.5% |
-0.90% |

I’m glad you all were consistent, at least. You thought the strikeout rate was going to go up, and you thought the contact rate was going to go down. That makes sense. It’s intuitive. And it’s exactly what happened. Of all respondents, 60% thought the contact rate would decline by between 0% and 1%, and it declined by 0.7% — to 76.9%. You guys should get a hobby.
Home-Run Rate per Fly Ball
Home-Run Rate per Fly Ball, 2008-17
| Year |
HR/FB |
HR/FB Delta |
| 2008 |
10.1% |
n/a |
| 2009 |
10.1% |
0.00% |
| 2010 |
9.4% |
-6.93% |
| 2011 |
9.7% |
3.19% |
| 2012 |
11.3% |
16.49% |
| 2013 |
10.5% |
-7.08% |
| 2014 |
9.5% |
-9.52% |
| 2015 |
11.4% |
20.00% |
| 2016 |
12.8% |
12.28% |
| 2017 |
13.7% |
7.03% |

This one was kind of all over the place. Of those who responded, 58% thought this figure would jump in 2018, 33% thought it would drop, and 9% thought it would stay the same. And you had
no consistency about how much you thought it would do any of those things. I’m not convinced you didn’t just throw a dart at your computer and pick where it landed (and then throw out your monitor). Anyway, the HR/FB rate was 12.7% this year, which is a 7% decline from last year. Congrats to the 3% of you who got that right.
*****
What have we learned? Well, first, I’m impressed that most of you got most of these right. I guess I shouldn’t be. You all watch a lot of baseball and can read tables reasonably well. You get the crowdsourced contracts generally right, too. I shouldn’t have doubted you.
That’s the first thing. The second thing I’d take away from this is that most of the trends that have made baseball baseball in the last few years — lots of power, lots of strikeouts, and declining contact — stayed the same or accelerated in 2018. Yeah, the home-run rate per fly ball dropped in 2018 — and the number of home runs dropped accordingly — but players still hit a lot of home runs: more by nearly 700, for example, than they hit in 2015, which was itself one of the highest totals of its decade. And we, once again, saw fewer fastballs and more strikeouts this year than we ever have before. So, thanks for reading, and thanks for getting this right. Come back and play again next year. I miss baseball already.
“And we, once again, saw more fastballs and strikeouts this year than we ever have before.” Didn’t the fastball rate go down, and not up?
I assume that’s a typo, and he meant to say fewer fastballs. There’s also a word missing in the first sentence after the big blockquote at the beginning of the article.
Both are fixed — thank you!
The out of zone swing rate increase and the HR/FB ratio decrease make a lot of sense to me, having watched a lot of baseball this year and especially the playoffs.
Taken together, I think this is a sign that the launch angle revolution is reaching diminishing returns. The guys who should be swinging for the fences almost all the time starting doing so a few years ago- now, lots of others with less power are doing so, leading to more swing and miss on low and outside sliders and more medium fly balls (the Dodgers flailing away in this manner during the WS exemplifies this approach)
The Dodgers approch worked well throughout the regular season as they were one of the best hitting teams in the league. Their approach was not what caused them to lose the series, they just didn’t have a good series. Nice try John Smoltz.
I would have guessed the HR/FB rate would drop if for no other reason than the effect of the mysterious “juice balls” have been lessened somewhat in recent years + the Chase Field humidor
To be fair the hr flyball rate is likely related to a slight de juicing of the juiced ball, nobody could have predicted that.
I was hoping this was going to be an article holding readers who post their predictions in the comments of “Bold Predictions” articles (often with snide commentary) to account. Would really love to see that!!