Los Angeles Angels Top 24 Prospects

Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the Los Angeles Angels. Scouting reports were compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as our own observations. This is the fourth year we’re delineating between two anticipated relief roles, the abbreviations for which you’ll see in the “position” column below: MIRP for multi-inning relief pitchers, and SIRP for single-inning relief pitchers. The ETAs listed generally correspond to the year a player has to be added to the 40-man roster to avoid being made eligible for the Rule 5 draft. Manual adjustments are made where they seem appropriate, but we use that as a rule of thumb.
A quick overview of what FV (Future Value) means can be found here. A much deeper overview can be found here.
All of the ranked prospects below also appear on The Board, a resource the site offers featuring sortable scouting information for every organization. It has more details (and updated TrackMan data from various sources) than this article and integrates every team’s list so readers can compare prospects across farm systems. It can be found here.
| Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nelson Rada | 18.7 | AA | CF | 2027 | 50 |
| 2 | Nolan Schanuel | 22.2 | MLB | 1B | 2024 | 45 |
| 3 | Caden Dana | 20.4 | AA | SP | 2025 | 45 |
| 4 | Barrett Kent | 19.6 | A | SP | 2028 | 40+ |
| 5 | Denzer Guzman | 20.3 | AA | SS | 2026 | 40+ |
| 6 | Capri Ortiz | 19.1 | A | SS | 2027 | 40 |
| 7 | Dario Laverde | 19.2 | A | C | 2027 | 40 |
| 8 | Ben Joyce | 23.6 | MLB | SIRP | 2023 | 40 |
| 9 | Camden Minacci | 22.3 | A+ | SIRP | 2026 | 40 |
| 10 | Joel Hurtado | 23.3 | A+ | MIRP | 2026 | 40 |
| 11 | Francis Texido | 19.1 | A | MIRP | 2028 | 40 |
| 12 | Joswa Lugo | 17.3 | R | SS | 2030 | 40 |
| 13 | Jack Kochanowicz | 23.4 | AA | SP | 2024 | 40 |
| 14 | Walbert Urena | 20.3 | A+ | SIRP | 2026 | 40 |
| 15 | Juan Flores | 18.2 | A | C | 2028 | 40 |
| 16 | Davis Daniel | 26.9 | MLB | SP | 2024 | 35+ |
| 17 | Caleb Ketchup | 22.3 | A+ | SS | 2028 | 35+ |
| 18 | Felix Morrobel | 18.6 | R | SS | 2029 | 35+ |
| 19 | Adrian Acosta | 19.0 | R | SP | 2028 | 35+ |
| 20 | Guillermo Zuñiga | 25.6 | MLB | SIRP | 2024 | 35+ |
| 21 | Keythel Key | 20.6 | A+ | SIRP | 2027 | 35+ |
| 22 | Jadiel Sanchez | 23.0 | A+ | RF | 2025 | 35+ |
| 23 | Alberto Rios | 22.1 | A+ | LF | 2026 | 35+ |
| 24 | Joe Redfield | 22.6 | A+ | CF | 2026 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
Tweener Outfielders
Bryce Teodosio, OF
Anthony Scull, CF
Werner Blakely, CF
Jorge Ruiz, OF
Teodosio is a speedy, backwards-profiled (bats right, throws left) 24-year-old outfielder undrafted out of Clemson. His hitting hands have some thump to them and he’s performing well at Salt Lake, but his feel for contact is suspect. Scull, a 20-year-old Cuban outfielder, has been a slower burn in rookie ball and is as tweenery as tweeners get. He’s smaller but twitchy, and a little too aggressive at the plate for someone who isn’t a center field lock. Blakely, 22, was drafted as a toolsy, high-upside high schooler, but he’s made bottom-of-the-scale rates of contact as a pro. He has moved from third base to center field. He would do sensational things at the hot corner at times, while having issues with throwing accuracy at others. It’s feasible his athleticism could translate to center in a big way, enough for Blakely to reach the bigs. Ruiz is about to turn 20 and has a pretty good bat-to-ball track record in the low minors. He’s on the smaller side.
Higher Profile Guys
Kyren Paris, SS
Kenyon Yovan, RHP
Jordyn Adams, CF
Victor Mederos, RHP
Paris looks very lost at the dish early in 2024 (he’s striking out at a 40% clip), and while he’s fine at shortstop at times, his defense there isn’t consistent enough to be the driving force of his rosterability. Yovan was a good two-way amateur prospect who began his pro career as a hitter and has now reached Triple-A as a reliever. He sits 93-94 and has a fairly nasty cutter/slider. We hoped Adams might make a late leap as a center field defender and be good enough to hold down a defensive specialist/pinch-runner role, but he still presents a dicey look out there at times. Mederos has become a prime example of the importance of fastball shape. He’s been a mid-90s/breaking ball bully since high school, but his heater just doesn’t play.
Lefty Specialists
Nick Jones, LHP
Eric Torres, LHP
Jones (Georgia Southern) and Torres (Kansas State) were both part of the Angels’ 2021 Pitchers Only draft class and have reached the upper levels. Jones is a funky lefty who creates tough angle, while Torres has more of a vertical fastball/curveball combo.
Sleeper 2023 Draft Hitters
Cole Fontenelle, 3B
Rio Foster, OF
John Wimmer, SS
Fontenelle hopped from the University of Washington to McLennan Community College (TX) to TCU in his three college seasons and was a seventh rounder last year. The Angels have already pushed him to Double-A. He has explosive hitting hands and would be our top pick of the entire Honorable Mention group, but his swing is pretty grooved for a corner guy. Foster is a 2023 Day Three pick out Florence Darlington Tech in South Carolina. He’s a well-built outfielder with a pretty, inside-out style swing. Wimmer was a $400,000-bonus high schooler from 2023 whose bat looks very raw in the early going of his pro career.
Hard Throwers
Brady Choban, RHP
Jose Fermin, RHP
Jared Southard, RHP
Choban is a 2023 undrafted free agent who spent five years in college — three at Marshall and two at University of Rio Grande, an NAIA school. He topped out at 98 this spring and has prototypical power reliever size at 6-foot-5, 240 pounds, but his delivery is very stiff and kind of odd looking. He’s leapt to High-A. Fermin is a fairly stiff 250-pound 22-year-old righty with big arm strength. He’s an open strider with a high slot, the combo of which is somewhat deceptive, and was sitting 93-97 this spring with 30 control. Southard, a 2022 12th rounder from Texas, sits 95 and has a 45-grade slider.
Funk and Deception
Hayden Seig, RHP
Jorge Marcheco, RHP
Seig is a super weird undrafted arm (St. Joe’s) from 2021 who has performed into the upper levels of the minors. He’s a 6-foot-5 low-ish slot guy who produces a downhill fastball because of his height and upright delivery. He fills the zone with his funky sinker/slider combo. Marcheco, 21, sits in the upper-80s, but he’s had A-ball success because of his long-armed delivery’s deception and extension. He has the low release height du jour, and a rise/tail fastball and sweeper combo.
Injured Pitchers
Kelvin Caceres, RHP
Sadrac Franco, RHP
Mo Hanley, LHP
This is a pretty self-explanatory group. Caceres was in the big leagues for a second last season. He has upper-90s arm strength, elite curveball spin rates, and 20-grade control when healthy. Smaller Panamanian righty Sadrac Franco, now 23, was a rookie ball arm of note way back in 2019, but the pandemic and injuries cost him 2020-2022. He moved to the bullpen last year and had a velo spike (sitting 96 with an occasionally good slider), but he’s back on the 60-day IL to start 2024. Hanley looked like an exciting dev project coming out of Adrian College, but he’s nearly 25 year old and has thrown single-digit innings as a pro due to injuries.
System Overview
There is an alternate reality in which the 2023 Angels decide to proactively trade their departing/aging stars rather than make an ill-fated effort to support them. Even if they had only moved Shohei Ohtani, the return might have made a meaningful difference not only to the quality and depth of this system, but probably to their big league roster’s talent as well. In the latter portion of the Ohtani era, the Angels’ decision-making was consistently geared toward immediate contention. They prioritized player polish and proximity in the draft, high-floor/low-ceiling types who aren’t as likely to bring impact, in order to put talent around Mike Trout and Ohtani. This has come in the form of (theoretically) quick-moving pitching (Reid Detmers) and college hitters considered to be polished (Zach Neto, Nolan Schanuel). We’d count Detmers and Neto (who’s struggling, but is only 23, and who we still think will be a good player) as hits of this sort, but the plan to race a bunch of college arms to the big leagues before Ohtani left has fallen flat.
The big league roster isn’t totally barren for the long-term — in addition to Detmers and Neto, Logan O’Hoppe is a foundational piece, Taylor Ward is only entering his arb years, and Jo Adell is showing signs of life — but the farm system is in a pretty rough spot. It’s devoid of high-ceiling talent on both sides of the ball (we like Nelson Rada, but we’d be surprised if he hit for star-level power) and might be the shallowest system in baseball.
Clearly, we like the players on this list, but even the ones we’re most excited about realistically project to be utility guys, back-end starters, or middle relievers.
Outside of signing Rada in 2022, the Angels’ last few international classes have come up short in terms of producing anyone significant bat-wise. Players like Denzer Guzman and Capri Ortiz project to be quality role players whose skill sets are headlined by their up-the-middle profile on defense rather than multiple water-carrying offensive traits. That said, the international group has had some success in finding highly intriguing, low-cost arms, with guys like Joel Hurtado, Francis Texido, and Walbert Urena all signed for $250,000 or less.
The Angels’ domestic scouting department is one of the more shorthanded groups in the sport. They’ve had to utilize their few pro scouts to cover the blind spots of their thinly staffed amateur group due to how few scouts ownership has on payroll.
It’s safe to assume the Angels will be in sell mode leading up to the trade deadline, and it will be interesting to see how Perry Minasian and Co. navigate a market where their goal isn’t just to support their big money guys. Aside from the Brandon Marsh trade, most of Minasian’s deals have been for multiple depth-type pitchers at a time.
I’m going to relish all the Caleb Ketchup jokes.
I don’t know if I am. The broadcast teams are going to have the worst jokes.
He will be the king of Dad jokes from announcers.
He put a little mustard on that one..He couldn’t ketchup to the high heat…etc, etc
…. but we’ll relish the opportunities to see him on the field.
His family’s original name was Catsup, but the person at Ellis Island couldn’t pronounce that so they had to change it
Woof
Yeah, this was a depressing read. It’s really bleak when your top 7 prospects have hopeful someday dreams of maybe being like LaMonte Wade, Omar Narvaez, Diet Willy Adames, or a setup reliever. No disrespect to any of them, of course. But imagine being a fan of this org and saying to yourself, “We might have an Omar Narvaez of our own some day!”
This has to be the worst system in baseball right? No impact players and so little depth.
It’s the farm system equivalent of packing…the business end of a thumbtack (to put it the crudest way possible).
It’s the total package
This has to be the worst system you’ve ever rated, right?
In the 2019 lists there were two teams (Boston and Kansas City) without a single FV50 or higher prospect rated. In the end, Boston’s system did okay (Casas, Duran, Brayan Bello, Tanner Houck) and Kansas City’s did not (Brady Singer and maybe Kris Bubic someday). Same story with the 2022 White Sox–no FV50s at all.
That said, I am not at all convinced that these three systems from the past are worse than this one here. I would nominate Washington’s 2021 system for that honor. Cade Cavalli inexplicably got an FV50 despite some glaring red flags and the rest of the system was pretty terrible.
For what it’s worth IMO Nelson Rada is overrated at 50 FV and Schanuel’s overrated at 45 FV.
A few lower guys seem overrated too (ie Kochanowicz at 40 FV w/ 35 grade FB, no plus pitches, 50 FV command, and 6.53 ERA and 6.11 FIP at AA last year and 9.00 ERA this year as 23-yo w/ mediocre BB rates and awful K rates).
Disagree on Rada. Plus defender with a great approach. He added good weight in the off season and his swing looked stronger in ST. He’ll add enough strength over the next two years to get to 45 power and could be a high-OBP bat with good wheels.
Pretty easily a 50 with a chance for more.
I am not so sure they’re going to be trading much or changing direction. This is probably owner-driven but this team is almost as bad at the White Sox as knowing themselves and what they are capable of. They probably see themselves as having a foundation of young-ish guys so I don’t think they’re trading anyone with multiple years of team control. The guys outside of that core are mostly untradeable due to their contract, injuries, performance, or all of those things. The guys that are left are a handful of okay-ish relievers on expiring contracts.
If I were the Angels, though, the guy I would be shopping is Luis Rengifo. He has an extra year of team control and he’s hitting very well. But he’s not much on defense, he’s outperforming his xwOBA by 90 points, and he’s hitting way above his career norms. I don’t know who is willing to trade good prospects for a guy like that since the Angels can’t trade him to themselves and the White Sox and Rockies are definitely not buyers.
(I would also consider blowing it up and trading absolutely everyone with value except Neto and Schanuel, but I’m not sure yet)
So…O’Hoppe, Detmer, Sandoval, Ward and maybe Estevez? And I guess Trout.
Probably also Adell and Rengifo and Thaiss too. And the relievers.
Would anybody take the Trout contract without moneys from Arte’s tight fist? I mean, basically for free (prospect-wise).
I think there was a conversation about this in the offseason–how much money would Moreno have to chip in for it to be value-neutral if you traded him for a bag of baseballs? The guy will hit at 40% above league average but you’d probably have to DH him in order to keep him healthy, and it still might not keep him healthy. That’s probably a 3.5 win player or something, over a full season right? Maybe you weigh the injury risk against the fact that there are 30 teams looking for DHs instead of 15 so the positional adjustment is too harsh. A standard 0.5 deduction on WAR per year would get you to something like $120M over six years instead of the $222M or so he’s owed after this year.
My estimate is that Moreno would have to pick up close to half the tab just to unload the other half of the deal.
Right now, probably too much money and still not getting much in return. Even as a large market team, I wouldn’t take him with $100m in tow. Maybe $120m.
I think Trout as a free agent could still demand a high AAV from a team that talked itself into believing it could keep him healthier, maybe like 2-3 years at $30m each.
But he would not get close to what he’s owed. What he’s owed is probably around what he would get in free agency if he had no real health concerns instead of a buttload of them.
I really have to wonder when the Angels come to him and say “you’re the DH. We’ve had enough. This is not a negotiation.”
Why DH? Why not LF or 1B?
Maybe first base, if he’d actually be a defensive upgrade there over whoever would otherwise be the DH.
Playing the outfield just requires a lot of running and then of course the beating you take any time you leave your feet, at full speed oftentimes.
Trout still seems to be at least close to the same hitter he always has been, and if you could actually get 140 games at DH out of him, he’d probably be worth 4-5 WAR for the next several years.
Remember when the Dodgers wanted to trade Joc Pederson, Ross Stripling and Andy Pages to the Angles for Luis Rengifo – and the Angels pulled the deal because Arte Moreno got annoyed at how long the Betts trade was taking to complete?
reading this is violence
I think the biggest thing they’re shopping is the team.
That would be the actual best thing for the franchise’s overall direction, but who knows. Last time Moreno did that he basically announced it publicly.
Ouch. Accurate, but still ouch.
I don’t know, I think that’s underselling Trout too much. Yes, the downside is significant but the upside is still huge. He was playing at a 6 WAR pace just a couple weeks ago. Arte would certainly have to eat some of that salary but if he was healthy by the trade deadline, I could see him ‘only’ eating $50-75M.
This makes NOT trading Ohtani for Caminero (plus 2 other Top 10 Rays prospects) all the more puzzling.
AND the Halos traded away Quero and Bush at the deadline.
The moves (or non-move in Shohei’s case), have crippled the future for this team.
Complete lack of self awareness within the organization.
Legitimately bleak. Between the big league club and the farm system, this might be the least talented org in baseball (especially with Trout injured).
It’s bleak but I’d still take the Angels org talent over the White Sox and Rockies. Sox and Rockies have better (averagish) farms, but Rockies have zero major league assets and Sox are down to only Robert (who’s really good but hurt so much i’m not even convinced he nets a huge prospect haul).
Angels have some legit young major league talent in O’Hoppe, Neto, Ward, Detmers, and maybe now Adell. Put another way, I bet the Angels would have the best farm of the three if they traded all these guys.
This reminds me of the depths of the 2018-2020 Nationals system, and maybe a view into where that system would be without the direct (Abrams, Wood) and indirect (Crews, House) results of deciding to bottom out and trade stars.
The Nats trading Soto vs. the Angels holding Ohtani are about as stark an A/B test as you can imagine.
…and yet if Stephen Strasburg was just a little bit healthy you could cast him and Corbin in the Trout/Rendon roles and WAS would likely be in the same predicament today.
It’s crazy that the Nats basically chose between Strasburg and Rendon and made the wrong choice, and the right choice would have been Rendon! Putting aside the obvious correct choice of “neither.”
Never bet on pitching
The correct choice would have been Harper
If we can just make it anyone, then I think Soto would have been the correct choice, but signing him in 2018 right before his major league debut.
How much would it have taken to sign him to a 20-year deal at that point in time?
If they had signed him for Tatis money they still would have been able to sign Harper. Ah hindsight.
I hope Strasburg gives a cut of his contract to Trent Grisham, If he never boots that ball in the Wild Card Game, the contract for Stras is probably a lot smaller.
I think projecting for Schaunel to reach for 40 game power is a stretch. We are talking about a guy with 180 batted balls. Not only does he only have a hardhit % of 28.3 (league average 36.3), he also only has 5 barrels, and yet to hit any baseball at a 105+ exit velo. Everything about him screams 30 power.
I didn’t understand his first round pre draft projection and still don’t. he’s not a major leaguer if his skillset doesn’t evolve, but he seems to have been fully formed out of college.
As much as I hate the Angels’ attempt to circumvent their lousy scouting and development program by picking near-MLB ready players in the draft and think it will blow up on them, and as much as I thought Schanuel was a huge reach at #11, a present value 45 is probably not far off the actual value for the 11th pick in the draft. I would have picked Troy, Shaw, or Teel there but you could do worse than having a 1-win first baseman in the majors already. Once you get out of the top tier you’ve kind of run out of obvious choices.
Fair, but I also don’t think Schanuel is a 1 win first baseman, at least not in his current state
Even with how awful he’s been early this year, I’m surprised that Kyren Paris can’t make the top 24. He put up a 123 wRC+ in AA last year at 21 and plays up the middle. I don’t have any confidence in the hit tool, either, but the bar to make the list is pretty low (35+ FV).
I agree. He’s off to a horrid start this year, seems like the cup of coffee he got last year messed him up, but you have to imagine he figures it out as some point. He’s too young and talented to throw the towel in on now.
And now for some reason they have called him back up again. This doesn’t seem like a good plan for his development. There’s got to be a better option than a 22 year old struggling to the tune of a 39% k-rate, with an .091 AVG and a 6 wRC+ in AA.
Well, that was a light read….
Light on words, heavy on the heart.
Can that idiot Manfred banish this team to Las Vegramento instead of the A’s?
The Angels spend money and try to win (poorly). They are a much better franchise to have in the spotlight for fans than the A’s are.
Jo Adell should be allowed to petition for add’l time on this list
Strongly disagree with any reliever risk or projection on Dana. I think the preoccupation with FB path goes too far, and it’s more important to look at how it complements his slider and change than to be excessively doctrinaire about its modernity.
I think this severely underrates his future command. His pace and feel are extremely advanced, and he sequences extremely well for a guy his age. I was a little worried when he came to ST so jacked, but he hasn’t lost any fluidity in his delivery and his arm stroke is loose and smooth.
The last guy I disagreed this strongly on was Taj Bradley (who moved up a grade here the following year) and I may like Dana even more than that. I think he’s a good shot to be a #3 with #2 upside, and he could be a rotation piece for the Angels at 21 this time next year. The analysis here feels like overthinking. Sometimes you just have to believe your eyes.
Barring injury, of course, I’m going to take the over on Caden Dana. Dude just keep getting better and looks advanced to me in terms of knowing how to pitch rather than throw.
His focus this year is (apparently/reportedly) getting the consistency on the surveball. Hopefully the Angels help him develop that changeup next, because I see a strong #3 starter that might have some 2/3 seasons in his peak if he has even an average changeup to complement a plus (possibly future plus-plus) slider and plus curveball playing against a decent fastball.