Luhnow’s First Astros Draft Class Has Arrived

At a time not very long ago — actually, just a single month and a few days ago — viscount of the internet Rob Neyer wrote at Just A Bit Outside about how the Houston Astros, then as now a first-place team, had been winning games with negligible contribution from any players drafted by General Manager Jeff Luhnow. Quoth Neyer:

The 2012 draft has, so far, produced two major leaguers: pitcher Lance McCullers and hitter Preston Tucker. McCullers and Tucker have combined for zero wins and one home run (granted, the homer was a big one Thursday). The 2013 and 2014 drafts haven’t produced any major leaguers.

The final sentence of Neyer’s paragraph remains, as of this writing, true. But, in a testament to how rapidly things are changing down in Houston, the first two sentences of Neyer’s paragraph have already become dramatically obsolete. Please recall that Neyer’s post is barely one month old.

Below is a chart that shows the playing time and WAR contributions that MLB teams have received so far from their 2012 draft classes, using Baseball-Reference’s handy draft page and FanGraphs WAR. This chart only includes players who are playing for the team that drafted them (i.e., Addison Russell is excluded), and only includes players who are currently on a 25-man roster (i.e., Eddie Butler is excluded) or on the disabled list (i.e., Marcus Stroman is included). The teams are listed by alphabetical order of mascot name, but each column can be sorted by clicking on the top row:

Team WAR # Active PA IP
Angels 0.7 1 0 74.0
Astros 2.6 3 195 40.1
Athletics -0.3 1 84 0
Blue Jays 3.0 1 0 130.2
Braves 6.1 2 0 357.1
Brewers 0 0 0 0
Cardinals 5.0 1 0 260.0
Cubs 0 0 0 0
Diamondbacks 0.6 1 215 0
Dodgers 1.3 1 0 85.1
Giants 1.8 1 279 0
Indians 0 0 0 0
Mariners 1.6 1 886 0
Marlins 0 0 0 0
Mets 0.1 1 132 0
Nationals 0 0 0 0
Orioles 2.5 1 0 178.0
Padres 0 0 0 0
Phillies 0 0 0 0
Pirates 0 0 0 0
Rangers 0.8 2 77 30.2
Rays 0 0 0 0
Red Sox 0 0 0 0
Reds 0 1 0 11.2
Rockies -0.8 1 0 27.1
Royals 0 0 0 0
Tigers 0 0 0 0
Twins -0.1 1 35 0
White Sox 0 0 0 0
Yankees 0 0 0 0

Even at this date, more than three full years after the 2012 draft took place, most MLB teams have received negligible contributions from their draftees. Nearly half the league — 14 teams — have received zero contributions whatsoever. As of May 6, the date when Preston Tucker was called up from Triple-A, the Astros were another team with zero contribution from the Class of 2012. In less than two months, the Astros have gone from tied for last in WAR, all the way up to third place, and looking to go higher.

As it goes with, so it feels, all things Astros these days, Houston’s position begins to look more and more advantageous upon closer inspection. The three teams who lead the Astros in WAR from their Classes of 2012 have done so on the shoulders of a single pitcher drafted from college. For the Toronto Blue Jays, their guy is Marcus Stroman; for the St. Louis Cardinals, Michael Wacha; and for the Atlanta Braves, the unlikely current leader of the whole draft class in WAR, #85 overall pick Alex Wood. (Atlanta also received positive contributions from Shae Simmons in 20 relief innings last season before his 2015 was lost to T.J.) The Baltimore Orioles, who are basically in line with the Astros — for the moment — have also had their contributions come from a collegiate pitcher, Kevin Gausman.

And so: Stroman just turned 24 on May 1; Wacha’s 24th birthday is on July 1; and Wood turned 24 over the previous winter. For the Astros, while Tucker is about to have his 25th birthday in a few weeks, the generous majority of their production is coming from McCullers, in his age-21 season, and Carlos Correa, who will turn 21 in the final weeks of the regular season.

One will also notice that the Astros are the only team to have graduated three players from the Class of 2012. I’m not sure of the significance of the following, but: they are also one of two teams to graduate both a pitcher and a position player. (The Texas Rangers have seen contributions from both Joey Gallo and Keone Kela.)

Compounding the degree of difficulty for the Astros’ draft, Houston had only two picks in the top 50 (1, 41) — this year the team had four picks in the top 50 (2, 5, 37, 46). And this was all done in a year that underwhelmed the industry. ESPN’s Jerry Crasnick wrote at the time:

True, it’s not the greatest year to try to make a splash. One American League scouting director said the 2012 crop has the potential to be “one of the worst drafts ever.”

Here is a look, for grins, at a chart similar to the one above, except for the 2011 Draft. While Luhnow directed the 2011 Draft for the St. Louis Cardinals, he would in a matter of months begin overseeing the Astros’ prospects. To the surprise of probably nobody, both the Astros’ and Cardinals’ drafts look good compared to the rest of the league even with the disruption in continuity:

Team WAR # Active PA IP
Angels 0 0 0 0
Astros 3.8 1 639 0
Athletics 7.5 1 0 384.2
Blue Jays 2.1 1 516 0
Braves 0 0 0 0
Brewers 0.4 1 0 18.0
Cardinals 4.6 2 779 168
Cubs 0 0 0 0
Diamondbacks 0.8 2 0 86.1
Dodgers 0 0 0 0
Giants 5.2 2 756 0
Indians 3.3 3 36 206.2
Mariners 5.6 2 267 38.0
Marlins 5.7 1 0 224.1
Mets 0.1 1 0 11.2
Nationals 8.4 1 1157 0
Orioles 0 0 0 0
Padres 1.4 3 295 75.2
Phillies 2.1 3 810 83.1
Pirates 7.0 1 0 351.0
Rangers 1.2 2 147 224.2
Rays 0 0 0 0
Red Sox 4.2 4 1195 0
Reds 1.5 1 0 196.1
Rockies 0 0 0 0
Royals 0 0 0 0
Tigers 0.4 1 188 0
Twins 0 0 0 0
White Sox 0 0 0 0
Yankees 0 0 0 0

It would appear that the Astros’ takeover will continue whether one wants it to or not.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.




Miles Wray contributes sports commentary to McSweeney's Internet Tendency, Ploughshares, The Classical and Hardwood Paroxysm. Follow him on Twitter @mileswray or email him here.

25 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
John Mozeliak
11 years ago

None of this is a surprise to me.

Well-Beered Englishman
11 years ago

Miles, you’re really on a roll this week. Keep it up.

Cave Dumberon
11 years ago

Rays had 69 draft picks in 2011 and none have made the majors for them (Derek Dietrich has for Florida)

Cave Dumberon
11 years ago
Reply to  Cave Dumberon

Whoops, Dietrich was 2010. But Mikie Mahtook does have 20 AB for the Rays (-0.2 WAR)

Jacob DaBomb
11 years ago
Reply to  Cave Dumberon

lol 69!

69
11 years ago
Reply to  Cave Dumberon

Nice

Vlad
11 years ago

midway through the 2015 season is entirely too early to evaluate the 2012 draft class or make any generalizations. Any team that went HS heavy is thrilled if those players are in AA at this point.

Kris
11 years ago
Reply to  Vlad

Well, Correa and McCullers were HS kids in 2012 and they’re in MLB right now. I think that’s the point of the analysis.

peopletocakeratio
11 years ago
Reply to  Vlad

i think that’s the point. miles isn’t trying to evaluate the 2012 draft class, he’s evaluating the value the class has provided at the major league level to date.

he says : “Even at this date, more than three full years after the 2012 draft took place, most MLB teams have received negligible contributions from their draftees. Nearly half the league — 14 teams — have received zero contributions whatsoever.”

implicit in that statement is the idea that three years isn’t enough time to tell whether a draft was successful.

i believe the point he’s making is that it’s a great sign because of the success the team is already having in 2015. there’s still a lot of time for the rest of the 2012 draft class to make an impact at the major league level, which bodes well for houston’s success in the coming years.

Neil
11 years ago

Phillips and Heinenman will probably join Correa and Tucker. I don’t see a pitcher that will make a significant contribution, maybe Ballew.

gh
11 years ago
Reply to  Neil

Mark Appel will be brought up shortly after the All Star Game. McCullers, Valasquez and Appel are hard throwing bona fide major league pitchers to be.

Jon Strikeouton
11 years ago
Reply to  gh

Appel was signed in 2013. The subject of this article is the 2012 draft, which included Brett Phillips & Tyler Heinenman.

Ian
11 years ago

This post is going to sound harsher than I want it to. I don’t want it to sound like I hate Lunhow or the Astros. I’m just a bit of contrarian and posts like this set me off a bit.

Joe Posnanski once noted in an article on Kenny Williams that some GMs seem to be more in the “look at me” camp and others are pretty quiet. The media tends to overrate/forgive the “look at me” type and ignore the others. (“I’m losing on purpose!” media- “He’s a genius!”) Lunhow, Ryan and Hoyer all took over at the same time. All three now have winning records yet Lunhow gets a lot more praise (esp at fangraphs) than the other two, despite having worse farm systems than those two teams (and others). Hoyer has managed to install 4 top 20 prospect this year but most of the acclaim goes to Epstein. Ryan has the Twins winning and most of his big prospects still to come up. Lunhow did a scorched earth on his team and isn’t significantly ahead of either of those yet gets far too much credit.

The Astros might be on their way to their first winning season since 2008 but a lot of that is also because of good moves of the prior GM.

gh
11 years ago
Reply to  Ian

Luhnow hired AJ Hinch; made acquisitions off the waiver wire like pitchers McHugh and Harris and Sipp. He traded for Gattis who is leading the team in RBIs. Luhnow has made other trades that have secured pitching prospects like Martes and Bostick; centerfielder Marisnick came over in a trade. Leading HR hitter Valbuena came over in a trade. Rasmus was a free agent acquisition. The rebuilt farms system is just part of the story. As for the scorched earth policy, you have to factor in the ownership change that resulted in a TV rights deal snafu; the Astros has zero TV money for over two years.

Ian
11 years ago
Reply to  gh

And I’m not trying to suggest that farm systems are the only measurement but that seemed to be what that article was about. Clearly, Lunhow has made some good trades and acquisitions (and he’s made bad ones too). And you are right, ownership is a bigger headache than fans tend to think and he probably had special issues he had to deal with that most teams didn’t.

Joe
11 years ago
Reply to  Ian

The Cubs get as much if not more credit than Astros for their recent decision making. If your only concern is that the credit gets split between Theo and Jed, well who cares? That’s always what will happen if you have two rock stars execs at the top. Luhnow just doesn’t happen to have one of those type of guys above him. The important thing is that the organization itself is getting credit. If its diffuse between a bunch of guys in the org, or centered on one guy, it just straight up doesn’t matter.

You’re right about the Twins, but honestly the jury is still out on the them, while the Cubs and Astros have seemed ordained to break out for a few years now. Give the Twins another year of sustained success and prospect movement and Ryan will get his due.

Toal
11 years ago
Reply to  Ian

You don’t want your post to sound like you hate Luhnow or the Astros except it’s quite obvious you do since you are the poster ‘Gunnarthor’ from SB Nation. Here is what he wrote earlier this year about Luhnow:

” I actually think this is a “narrative” issues and not a baseball one. Former White Sox GM Williams was quoted by Posnanski saying something to the effect that he didn’t talk up all his moves and let people think they were dumb, he’d win in the end. Some GMs wanted the world to know how smart they were while he didn’t care so long as ownership knew what was going on (that might have been a rip at Jack Z at the time of the article).

I think it’s interesting to compare Ryan to Lunhow, with the Astros. But any measure, his run with the Astros has been a disaster. He (or people close to him) was/are always talking about how smart his plans are so some people have bought into that and giving him more rope than maybe he deserves. The Astros were the smart team using defense stats to outsmart the opponents (stats say they were the worst defense in baseball), he was going to trade vets, tank the season and create a top farm system (farm system is middle of the road), he signed aging vets with bad defensive numbers and moved them up the defensive spectrum, etc. But there are some very strong defenders of Lunhow who would easily rip Ryan b/c, essentially, Lunhow talks a good game while Ryan doesn’t share much of his process.”

My favorite part is where you say Luhnow’s tenure with the Astros has been a disaster by any measure. This is the same guy who used to troll Astros sites letting them know how dumb and cheap Luhnow was for drafting Correa over Buxton.

Nice try, mate. If only you talked as good of a game as Luhnow.

francis
11 years ago

I don’t know what I’m supposed to take away from the point being made that it is no surprise that the Astros draft that preceded Luhnow’s arrival in Houston was a good one.

Why is that no surprise ?

Is it because Luhnow had no effect on the Astros drafting capability ? If so, what’s the point of this article ?

Is it because Luhnow was helping the Astros draft before he joined them ? If so, that would be surprise. A huge surprise. A guy working for team A and helping team B because he’s going to join them soon. You can’t possibly be suggesting that, are you ?

francis
11 years ago

These 2 paragraphs are so ridiculous:

Compounding the degree of difficulty for the Astros’ draft, Houston had only two picks in the top 50 (1, 41) — this year the team had four picks in the top 50 (2, 5, 37, 46). And this was all done in a year that underwhelmed the industry. ESPN’s Jerry Crasnick wrote at the time:

True, it’s not the greatest year to try to make a splash. One American League scouting director said the 2012 crop has the potential to be “one of the worst drafts ever.”

1) Why is having only 2 picks in the top 50 “compounding the degree of difficulty” ? There are 30 teams, so 2 picks is above average. Second, when one of your above average number of picks happens to be the #1 overall pick, there is no degree of difficulty.

2) Here’s the 2012 draft:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Major_League_Baseball_Draft

Correa, Buxton, Wacha, Addison Russell, Heaney, Stroman, Corey Seager, Gallo, Gausman, McCullers, Giolito.

Using some quote as proof of how bad the 2012 draft was, when it is obvious that the draft was very good and the quote turned out to be wrong is really misleading.

Ben Cerutti
11 years ago

I think this article is a bit early as well (along with that Neyer article.) To say that the Astros 2012 draft class “has arrived” seems to imply that all of them have. He said it after 2 players, you’re saying it after 3 players.

Right now, their 2nd round pick is at AAA 3 years below league average age. All he’s done is have an OBP over .400 at every stop before AAA. Now he’s learning how to really hit there.

After that, there are several players having great years at their current level of ball as well. Among those are Brett Phillips, an outfielder with 42 XBH in 70 games; Brian Holmes, a starting pitcher with nearly 6 IP per start and 10.5 K/9 and a 3.26 K:BB; and Aaron West, a pitcher with a WHIP just above 1 and a K:BB just above 6.

That’s just looking at the first half of their draft because it’s all I have time for.

I think the article was well written and articulated, but the topic (maybe just the headline?) was a little off.

Kris
11 years ago

Luhnow gets more praise than Ryan and Hoyer???? LOL. He was public enemy #1 for the first few YEARS of his tenure, and now people have already forgotten about that.

This is the same guy that was getting ROASTED by anyone with a blog for a few years for a number of topics such as:

– Taking Correa over Buxton
– Taking Appel over Bryant
– Handling Appel with kids gloves
– Trying to make up injury issues with Brady Aiken to screw a HS kid out of money
– Forcing John Singleton to sign a contract
– Using the same Super 2 deadlines with George Springer that everyone else uses
– Trading away his best players for any young talent he could get, and then being accused of tanking because he no more MLB talent
– Using funny shifts
– Using tandem starting rotations in the minors
– Giving away JD Martinez, Delino Deshields, Jimmy Paredes and David Rollins for nothing
– Those few hours when he didn’t put Michael Feliz on the 40 man roster

The one complaint about this FO under Luhnow is I wish they were more under the radar. I don’t know if they got sick and tired of being blasted in the media that they had to start leaking out little bits of info just to show people that they know what they are doing, but I never understood FO personnel tweeting out proprietary stuff that they measured like exit velocity and trajectory years ago. I guess if they were tweeting it, they figured everyone else was doing it.

FMelius
11 years ago

The Twins drafts in the late 2000s / early 2010s must be remarkably unfruitful. Without looking it up to confirm, I’m willing to wager that the brief and terrifying reign of GM Bill Smith set the franchise back in dramatic fashion. Setting aside his MLB-level moves (not easy to do, given multiple fiascos like Matt Capps), the drafting and minors-level work leaves a ton to be desired.

FMelius
11 years ago
Reply to  FMelius

sorry – should be Twins’

Death To Flying Things
11 years ago

Another quality start for McCullers against the Royals last night (Monday). From the recap on MLB.com: “He’s now allowed one earned run or fewer in six of his first nine Major League starts and has at least six strikeouts in seven of those nine. The rookie finished June with a 2.11 ERA, the lowest for an Astros rookie in June since Darryl Kile in 1991.” Small sample size to be sure, but McCullers has already exceeded my expectations for contributing in 2015.