Madison Bumgarner Is Getting Better

Yesterday, the Giants’ 2017 season started much like their 2016 season ended, with a questionable bullpen blowing a late lead. Despite their $62 million investment in Mark Melancon over the winter, the team’s bullpen remains mediocre, and the Giants are going to have to hope that the rest of their team is good enough to overcome this weakness.

But despite the Opening Day loss, there was some good news for the Giants. Because, once again, it looks like their ace may be getting better.

Madison Bumgarner was already plenty good, of course. He’s coming off back-to-back +5 WAR seasons, and his regular-season consistency paired with his postseason dominance have established him as one of the game’s elite starting pitchers. But yesterday, Bumgarner showed flashes of another level, suggesting that perhaps he hasn’t fully realized his potential just yet.

The story of the day for Bumgarner yesterday was velocity, on both sides of the ball. On the mound, Statcast had his fastball averaging 93.3, his highest single-game velocity in two years. Last year, his fastest single-game velocity was 91.5, so this is up a couple of ticks from where he was sitting on his best day in 2016.

But while we often talk about velocity in terms of fastball speed, perhaps the more notable change was on his breaking ball. Yesterday, his curveball sat at 78. For reference, here’s a chart of his offspeed stuff from last year, with yesterday’s breaking ball on the far right.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

At the beginning of last year, Bumgarner was a guy sitting 91 with a curveball in the low 70s. Yesterday, Bumgarner was sitting 93 with a curveball in the high 70s. And when you add in that high 80s cutter/slider thing, this was a nasty repertoire of pitches that the Diamondbacks had no answer for.

In his seven innings of work yesterday, Bumgarner struck out 11 of the 27 batters he faced, but because he was constantly ahead in the count, the whole outing only took him 88 pitches. Double-digit strikeouts with fewer than 100 pitches thrown is a pretty neat trick, but fewer than 90 pitches is something else entirely. Last year, only three pitchers managed to strike out 11 batters while throwing fewer than 90 pitches in a game, and two of them (Mike Leake and Jon Gray) did it against the Padres.

Bumgarner’s always been a relatively efficient worker, but he hasn’t always been a dominant strikeout guy. That’s changing, though.

While strikeout rate has been ticking up across the game, Bumgarner’s year-by-year improvements are outpacing the league’s changes. And if his stuff really was playing up a few ticks yesterday — it’s possible that Arizona’s radar readings were a bit “hot”, as Mark Melancon was also up two mph over last year, and guys like Tom Wilhelmsen, Hunter Strickland, and Derek Law were all up one mph over last year — and that sustains itself, Bumgarner is going to be even tougher to hit than he already was.

So, yeah, Madison Bumgarner was already a really good pitcher. Yesterday, he looked like a great one, maybe throwing harder than he has recently and destroying hitters with top-shelf stuff. And his pitching performance was actually the least impressive thing he did yesterday.

In his first at-bat, Zack Greinke got ahead of him 1-2, but then Bumgarner showed some pretty decent discipline, laying off pitches out of the zone, and ended up drawing a walk. Bumgarner drew 10 walks last year, so this wasn’t unprecedented, but he has a career O-Swing of 31%, and was near 40% in 2014 and 2015, so laying off pitches out of the zone hasn’t really been the thing for which he’s been notable at the plate. Yesterday, though, against a guy with good command, Bumgarner took two-strike pitches out of the zone, and worked his way on base.

Then, in his next at-bat, he did this.

And then, in the bat after that, he did this.

Those aren’t just home runs; those balls were absolutely crushed. In fact, those were the two hardest hit balls in the air yesterday, across all three games. His first homer was 113 mph, and his second one was hit 112 mph; the only other player to hit a ball over 110 mph yesterday was Gary Sanchez, who grounded out to Chris Archer on the play.

Being able to hit a ball 110-plus mph in the air isn’t just something you fluke your way into. For reference, Madison Bumgarner hit as many balls in the air at 110-plus yesterday as Adam Jones did last year. Among the players who hit fewer air balls at 110-plus in 2016 than Bumgarner did yesterday: Robinson Cano, Andrew McCutchen, Jay Bruce, Daniel Murphy, and Carlos Beltran.

Only 20 hitters in MLB hit 10 airballs this hard all last year, and they’re the kind of elite sluggers you think of when you talk about guys who can really crush the baseball. Hitting a ball this hard with regularity takes some serious raw power, and it’s pretty clear at this point that Bumgarner has Major League thump in his bat.

Of course, there’s more to good hitting than just turn-on-a-mistake power. Avisail Garcia is one of the 20 guys who hit a ball 110-plus in the air at least 10 times last year, for instance, and he’s not a good hitter. And Bumgarner, like most of these sluggers, has a pretty serious contact problem. Since the start of the 2014 season, when Bumgarner started driving the ball with regularity, he’s run a contact rate of just 62%; for reference, Chris Carter is at 65% for his career.

Bumgarner’s swing is all-out, designed to crush mistakes, but without the kind of bat control that lets him make enough contact to be an actual good big leaguer. But low-contact sluggers with thump can be roughly average hitters if they don’t chase everything thrown at them and hit the mistakes they get, and over his last few hundred plate appearances, that seems to be what Bumgarner is turning into. He got his O-Swing down to 24% last year and his overall swing rate down to 45%, so he’s not just wildly hacking at everything throw anymore.

Of course, everything with a pitcher’s hitting numbers are tiny samples, with fewer than 100 plate appearances each year. We can’t say with any kind of serious determination exactly what Bumgarner would be as a big-league hitter if he gave up pitching to focus solely on his offense. But the power isn’t something you can fake, and yesterday, he did a good job of taking Greinke’s balls and swinging at the strikes he was thrown. If that transformation continues, that’s the makings of an average-ish hitter, even with the serious contact problems.

And if Bumgarner’s anything close to a league-average hitter, that adds roughly +1 WAR to his overall value, given what most pitchers hit like. Toss in the dominant pitching and the chance that he might still be getting better on the mound, and it’s not impossible to think that Bumgarner’s overall package could have him challenging for title of best pitcher in baseball at some point. He’s not there yet, mainly because Clayton Kershaw is still a thing that exists, but Bumgarner just keeps trending upwards.

The Giants bullpen might have made Opening Day a disappointment in San Francisco, but their ace made the day memorable, and gave them reasons to think that they might not yet have seen him at his best.





Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.

16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Monsignor Martinez
9 years ago

I know this won’t last long, but it’s kinda fun to see a SP leading the league in homers and BA.

Fachmann
9 years ago

I think it was on the ESPN broadcast of this game that they said MLB was changing the way they tracked the speed of the pitch to ‘straight out of pitcher’s hand’, which they said was going to result in higher pitch speed reads. (They said this right after Greinke threw a 92MPH fastball.) Not sure if this is the real reason for his higher velocity. (And not arguing that he doesn’t seem to be getting better..)

Jon L.Member since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  Fachmann

Any chance this affects batters’ exit velocities as well? Just thinking about those 112+ mph home runs off a pitcher’s bat and wondering.

BipMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  Jon L.

I don’t think so because I think as long as we’ve had public exit velocity, the source of that has been statcast.

Swfcdan
9 years ago

Nice piece I noticed the increased velo immediately too. But come on: “So, yeah, Madison Bumgarner was already a really good pitcher. Yesterday, he looked like a great one”
Bum already is a great pitcher not very good, and could be getting even better. If he’s not great then I don’t even see how Kershaw is,when you add in very different postseason resumes.

pitnick
9 years ago
Reply to  Swfcdan

I agree Bumgarner is already a great pitcher, but I don’t understand your last comment. Kershaw has been much, much better across almost every statistical category, and ~100 postseason innings don’t change the math that much, especially given the advanced metrics suggesting those performances weren’t all that different, despite the different results.

Swfcdan
9 years ago
Reply to  Swfcdan

Very good piece about his hitting though. So cool to be actually talking about a pitchers hitting metrics like his O-swing% and it almost resembling an average hitter. No question the 2nd most valuable starting pitcher in baseball right now.

johnforthegiants
9 years ago

It wasn’t just that the fastball was faster. The slutter was also faster (around 89, as opposed to 86 last year). But the truth is that the biggest impression i took away from his pitching yesterday was he’s pitching like samardzija–lots of speed and stuff but he completely lost his concentration for a few batters in the 6th and suddenly gave up a 3-run lead.

david k
9 years ago

“lost his concentration” is just an excuse for giving up 3 runs on at least 2 very-well squared up hits (I forget what the middle hit in the sequence was, but I know Mathis and Pollack’s hits were solid. Yes that lousy inning was sandwiched between some extremely good pitching, but it still counted. There is obviously no evidence that he “lost his concentration”, but clearly this was posted by a biased Giants’ fan.

kbn
9 years ago

As much as I strongly prefer the DH, I love the idea that Bumgarner materially increases his WAR (which is already impressively high!) through his bat. He’s like the anti-Lester. I used to (and technically still do) love Greinke for the same reason. It’s just fun looking at his OPS and thinking “that’ll play if he’s a catcher or maybe a power-hitting middle infielder” and then remembering he’s actually a pitcher.

AnonMember since 2025
9 years ago

Bumgarner since the start of 2014: 259 PA, 234/284/459, .319 wOBA, 105 wRC+, 3.8 WAR. Traditional stats: 14 HR, 29 R, 35 RBI. 2nd most HR is 4 (Syndergaard, Arrieta and Leake). He also has the most 1b with 30 and the 2nd most 2b with 10 (Wainwright has 11).

To be fair, he also has by far the most PA with 259 – 2nd is Cueto with 209. Actually, Cueto makes for an interesting name there because Cueto has been awful with the bat over that time – 131/155/131, .131 wOBA, -27 wRC+ and -0.3 WAR. Just MadBum’s bat has been worth something like 1.25 WAR per year over Cueto’s. 1.25 WAR is a lot.

Johnston
9 years ago

I think MadBum should DH against AL teams if he is not starting that day.

TKDCMember since 2016
9 years ago

So who is the best hitting pitcher in the NL West, this guy or Christian Bethancourt?

TapeyBeerconeMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Interesting Career Comparison:
Bumgarner: 524PAs, .187/.236/.327 55wRC+
Bethancourt: 482PAs, .223/.253/.318 54wRC+
I’d take MadBum. Plus when he’s not swinging he knows how to chug!

http://www.sbnation.com/lookit/2014/10/17/6992993/madison-bumgarner-chugs-six-beers-after-giants-nlcs-win

John Autin
9 years ago

Do I really see a graph showing his “season K%” with a giant spike for 2017?

One game, folks. One game.

jwblue
9 years ago

If it turns out Bumgarner hasfringe credentials as a pitcher for the Hall of Fame, his hitting will put him in.