Mark DeRosa Retires
Mark DeRosa announced his retirement Wednesday, after a 16-year career in which he played for eight teams, played six positions, hit exactly 100 home runs, and made approximately $29 million.
DeRosa was not a great player — he was worth 10.5 WAR in 16 years, basically all of it between 2006 and 2009 — but he was good enough to hang around for long enough to surprise Carson Cistulli, and one of the greatest Ivy Leaguers ever. He’s the kind of player who rarely gets written up when he retires. So I’m writing about him.
Mark DeRosa was a 7th round draft pick by the Atlanta Braves in 1996. That was a famously awful draft: the first six picks were Kris Benson, Travis Lee, Braden Looper, Billy Koch, John Patterson, and Seth Greisinger. The most successful player taken in the first round was Eric Chavez, whose career was greatly diminished by injuries; it says something that he was the least snakebit player taken in 1996.
DeRosa was the Braves’ eighth pick of the day, after their first-round bust A.J. Zapp and their supplementary round pick, Jason Marquis. (By WAR, the Braves’ most successful player from the 1996 draft was a draft-and-follow taken in the 53rd round, Marcus Giles.)
A Penn graduate, he’s one of the best Ivy Leaguers ever. Don’t laugh: in the early decades of the 20th century, two Columbia students became two of the best players ever, Eddie Collins and Lou Gehrig. Since then, the Ivy League has fallen on harder times, but DeRosa’s career still stacks up well against those of other graduates from Brown, Cornell, Yale, Harvard, Dartmouth, and Princeton.
Only two Ivy League schools have produced multiple quality major leaguers in recent years: Princeton and the University of Pennsylvania. Columbia, Brown, Cornell, and Harvard have not graduated a player of note in recent decades. Dartmouth’s best recent graduate was reliever Mike Remlinger, and Yale’s was Ron Darling. (Craig Breslow and Ryan Lavarnway both went to Yale, but it remains to be seen whether they will both be quality major leaguers.) Princeton has produced Chris Young the Pitcher, Will Venable, and recent Braves draftee David Hale. Penn produced Doug Glanville and Mark DeRosa.
DeRosa was also his college’s starting quarterback. Successful college quarterbacks rarely become successful major league hitters. It’s easy to remember notable failures like Drew Henson and notable successes like Todd Helton, but a list of quarterbacks drafted by major league teams compiled by Baseball America’s Conor Glassey in 2012 shows just how rare pro success has been for these players. Charlie Ward was a Heisman Award winner who became a pretty good NBA point guard. Mark DeRosa was a pretty good Division 1 quarterback who became a decent hitter. There aren’t many athletes who have been able to do that.
DeRosa’s 16-year career included a lot of false starts and part-time work. He only played 1241 games and collected 4094 plate appearances in 16 years. He got his first cup of coffee with the Braves in 1998, but didn’t collect his 50th major league at-bat until 2001. The Braves handed him the starting third base job in 2004, replacing Vinny Castilla (who had displaced Chipper Jones to left field), but he hit .223/.276/.317 through the Braves’ first 60 games, and they gave the job back to Chipper Jones, who held it until his 2012 retirement.
DeRosa moved to the bench, got non-tended in the offseason, and signed with the Texas Rangers for $500,000. It was a terrific signing on their part. His power numbers bounced back in 2005, and in 2006 he had his first good all-around year, logging significant time at second base, third base, and right field, while hitting 13 homers with 40 doubles. It was his first of four years as a good player, and he had a chance to ply his trade in a number of different places. The Cubs signed him in 2006, then traded him to the Indians for Chris Archer in 2008, then the Indians traded him to the Cardinals for Chris Perez in 2009.
Injuries slowed DeRosa. He sustained DL stints in 2002, 2006, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012, undergoing four surgeries (two on his wrist, one on his knee, and one listed as “general medical”) and missed a total of 541 days and 395 games.
DeRosa was a hell of a Division Series player. He made a total of six division series — the 2001-2003 Braves, 2007-2008 Cubs, and 2009 Cardinals — and went 19-53 with four walks, eight extra-base hits, and a 1.057 OPS. (He went 0-4 in four pinch-hit appearances in the NLCS.)
In his 16 years, DeRosa only had 400 plate appearances four times, in his four good seasons from 2006 to 2009. The rest of the time, he played far less. He was a part-time player who at his peak was good enough to hold down a starting job for a few years, thanks to a broad base of talents: defensive flexibility and just enough offensive potency to make his bat play wherever his team put him.
Mark DeRosa wasn’t a great player. But he was a good one for a long time.
Alex is a writer for The Hardball Times.
Go Quakers
Thanks for the write up.
Interesting tid-bit: DeRosa was the best man at Chipper Jones’ wedding.
Where ever mark DeRosa goes, he’s the best man! Great guy
Love these retirement pieces for players who may not have gotten a whole bunch of spotlight during their careers. More like this, please.
Jorge de la Rosa just retired and nobody is covering it.
You’re joking, right?
Pouring one out for “Dumpmaster D”…
Stanford is the Ivy of the West (and better than most of the Ivies of the East) and has produced in recent memory: Jack McDowell, Mike Mussina, Jeremy Guthrie, Jed Lowrie, Drew Storen, Mark Appel.
Stanford has far better sports programs than any of the Ivies. (Remember, that’s why Jonathan Martin went there.) In recent years, Penn has generally had the best athletes among the eight Ivies.
Historically, the Ivy League was not a collection of the best schools in America: it was a football league, and its schools were among the earliest schools to play football. But they are all terrible at football now. This is basically because they do not give out athletic scholarships. Stanford does give out athletic scholarships. So there’s that.
Of course, I still plan on watching The Game and rooting against Harvard.
And I plan on going!
They most definitely do give out athletic scholarships, though they aren’t as willing to waive academic concerns in order to secure the less-than-scholastically inclined. They also have a tendency to do well in other sports. Rowing for instance.
Sure, and raquetball.
But no, they don’t give out athletic scholarships. More generally, they don’t give out merit scholarships. They are willing to allow coaches to influence the admissions process, but their scholarships are need-based.
Well, there has been report in recent years that Harvard and many no-athletic scholarship schools are up-notching their sports program.
http://deadspin.com/5892921/is-harvard-now-behaving-like-any-other-college-basketball-juggernaut
Just one of them. They use financial aids and other perks to attract top athletes to enroll. Not to mention their overseas program that combined sports and used those to make more money.
I might have made that list if I chose baseball instead. But I can’t complain about how football turned out.
I wonder how Henson feels. Just looked at his Wikipedia page. Brutal. Didn’t know he gave back most of his bonus so he could suck at football, too.
How does it feel to define yourself as an “Ivy” of the West? Lots of rich history out there I’m certain…
Whenever someone says “we’re the ‘Harvard of the [blank]’!” I can’t help but think less of that person and school.
I was a huge fan of DeRosa’s during his two seasons with the Cubs – arguably the best two years of his career. (2007) .293/.371/.420 and (2008) .285/.376/.481
Cubs fans lamented the trade that sent him to Cleveland for years.
Still sad the Giants paid DeRosa $12 million for -0.7 WAR and about 200 PA. He was a good cheerleader I guess?
I feel that DeRosa’s devastating handsomeness should have been mentioned.
It was nice to see DeRosa retire after a season where, after years of weakness, he regained his power and character at the plate. Indeed, if he’d had a little better BABIP luck, his batting line would have looked even better. It was a pleasure to see him contribute this year.
‘DeRo’ is the “Everyman” kind of player that makes me love Baseball more than any other Pro sport. To me his character, intelligence, work ethic and willingness to pack several gloves and be the penultimate 25th NL roster player is endearing.
I cannot relate to a 6’11” point guard or a 300 lb+ NFL tackle with ballerina like grace …. both seem like genetic mutants to my oh-so-average frame. But a player like Mark DeRosa I can relate to and almost place myself in his shoes and think “I could have …”
That fantasy, that illusion carried forward 45 years after I played little league keeps me watching and reading Baseball 365 a year.
(sigh) about the only sport left for me to really have a chance at is Curling
So, if you are reading Mark – congratulations on a nice career and good luck at MLB Network! I think you will flourish there.
A tangent but I think you are being unfair to Craig Breslow. He’s had a good career thus far and would play in most bullpens.
Can’t forget Princeton’s Ross Ohlendorf. It’s still a short list.
Was about to say the same thing. He should be considered of note, after all he does have an immaculate inning on his resume and few pitchers Ivy League or not can say that.
Ohlendorf’s more or less a replacement-level player, which is why I didn’t mention him. Likewise Columbia grad Gene Larkin, who was the first player to go from Columbia to the major leagues after Gehrig’s retirement — but in seven years as a first baseman and outfielder for the Twins in the late ’80s and early ’90s he didn’t really do much of note, other than winning two World Series rings.
Brad Ausmus anyone?
IIRC, DeRosa did not lose the 3B job midway through the season because of his struggles, but he actually tore his ACL.
Not that it matters. Just random thought from OCD Braves fan.
I had actually forgotten that. What a horrible season for him.
” Successful college quarterbacks rarely become successful major league hitters.”
I feel like you could replace the first 3 words with almost anything, and it would still be true.
Becoming a successfull major league hitter is a very rare thing.
True!
http://www.theonion.com/articles/weird-child-pretends-to-be-utility-infielder-mark,29807/
Also, dibs on Henry Blanco if he retires.
Although his brief stint in Washington has not been directly mentioned yet, I will fondly remember DeRosa with the Nats in 2012. Not for his on-field play, of course, but for stories about him being seen “as the team dad, mentor, an additional hitting coach, team comedian and a friend”, which culminated in his “Teddy F’ing Roosevelt” speech before game 4 of the NLDS.
(My apologies if this link does not work.)
– I of course do NOT fondly remember game 5. –
DeRosa wasn’t the best player, but I always feel like he could have been pretty good if he hadn’t gotten a million injuries, and he seemed like a cool guy. Plus, I like him in MLB: The SHow 11. Goodbye, DeRosa!