Mike Trout’s Never Won a Playoff Game and It’s Weird

In one form or another, the majority of posts at this site are based on some type of leaderboard. Highest average velocity among qualified pitchers, lowest ground-ball rate among qualified batters: these are the sort of distinctions that attract the attention both of writers and readers — and even illustrate the game’s trends towards one pole or another.
Generally speaking, when Mike Trout appears on a leaderboard at FanGraphs, it’s because he’s exerted his excellence in yet another way. Currently, for example, Trout possesses the top batting line among all active players and also the second-most baserunning runs among active players and the second-highest WAR total among all major-league batters ever through age 25.
One capacity in which Trout hasn’t been able to exert his excellence, however, is team success. During his time in Anaheim, Trout has made the playoffs on just one occasion. It was in 2014, and his Angels were swept out of the playoffs promptly. The Angels have had some decent seasons during Trout’s career — they won 89 in 2012, 85 in 2015, and they also currently have a winning record. Odds are, however, that Trout is about to finish his sixth full season as the best player in baseball, and he’s never won a single game in the playoffs. That’s odd.
We know that baseball is a team sport, and even when one-third of teams make the playoffs every year, one player can’t do it alone. Every player is very much reliant on his team. Even Mike Trout.
If it seems unusual that a player of Trout’s stature has failed to win even a single postseason game, that’s because it is. To provide a little context before taking a more historic approach, below is a table featuring the best position players by WAR since Trout exhausted his rookie eligibility in 2012. I’ve also included the total number of postseason games each player has won during that time.
| Name | PA | WAR | Playoff Wins |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Trout | 3883 | 52.9 | 0 |
| Josh Donaldson | 3522 | 36.5 | 14 |
| Joey Votto | 3504 | 31.7 | 2 |
| Andrew McCutchen | 3969 | 31.6 | 3 |
| Buster Posey | 3582 | 31.3 | 25 |
| Adrian Beltre | 3578 | 31.2 | 1 |
| Paul Goldschmidt | 3804 | 31.0 | 0 |
| Robinson Cano | 4033 | 29.8 | 3 |
| Miguel Cabrera | 3741 | 28.0 | 12 |
| Bryce Harper | 3242 | 27.9 | 5 |
| Manny Machado | 3326 | 26.5 | 3 |
| Giancarlo Stanton | 3072 | 26.4 | 0 |
| Jose Altuve | 4038 | 25.5 | 3 |
| Kyle Seager | 3972 | 25.5 | 0 |
| Freddie Freeman | 3595 | 24.7 | 1 |
| Anthony Rizzo | 3702 | 24.4 | 15 |
| Dustin Pedroia | 3517 | 23.8 | 11 |
| Jason Heyward | 3391 | 23.6 | 13 |
| Matt Carpenter | 3584 | 23.2 | 20 |
| Evan Longoria | 3698 | 23.0 | 2 |
This is one of the few bad leaderboards on which Trout’s name appears. Since becoming an MLB regular in 2012, Trout has recorded double the WAR of all but 10 players. Of those 10 players, Paul Goldschmidt is the only one (besides Trout) not to win a playoff game. Arizona will get an opportunity this season to address that issue — and, of course, Goldschmidt himself recorded two playoff with the Diamondbacks in 2011. Of the top-20 position players since 2012, the only others not to win a playoff game are Giancarlo Stanton and Kyle Seager. With expanded playoffs, good players generally get opportunities to appear on a winning club at some point, and reaching a playoff series generally means winning a playoff game.
That hasn’t always been the case, of course. It’s a lot easier now to reach the playoffs and win a game than it was before divisional play began in 1969. Also, prior to free agency, a player had little power to choose his employer. A talented player on a bad team might remain on that team forever.
Accordingly, we might expect to find quite a few historical players who produced fairly illustrious careers without anything to show for it. We know about the players like Ted Williams or Ernie Banks who never won a World Series. Are there more great players who never even won a single postseason game? Yes. But not as many as you might think.
| Name | WAR | Primary Team/notes |
|---|---|---|
| Paul Waner | 74.7 | Pirates/Swept in 27 WS |
| Luke Appling | 72.7 | White Sox |
| Ron Santo | 70.9 | Cubs |
| Harry Heilmann | 64.2 | Tigers |
| Ernie Banks | 63.3 | Cubs |
| Joe Torre | 62.3 | Braves/Cardinals/Mets |
| Buddy Bell | 61.7 | Indians/Rangers/Reds |
| Dick Allen | 61.3 | Phils/White Sox, Swept in 76 NLCS |
| Billy Williams | 60.4 | Cubs/Swept in 75 ALCS on A’s |
| Richie Ashburn | 57.4 | Phillies/Swept in 1950 WS |
| Bob Johnson | 57.0 | A’s |
| Mike Trout | 53.6 | Angels |
Mike Trout has risen quickly up the overall WAR Leaderboards. He already ranks 131st by that measure among all position players over the last 100 years. So, despite having not even yet completed his age-25 season, he already rates as one of the top players never to have won a single postseason game.
He’s joined by Paul Waner, Luke Appling, and three Cubs Hall of Famers. There are a few players who bounced around on competitive teams, but simply weren’t there in the right years. The Tigers, for example, won a World Series about five years before and five years after Harry Heilmann was there.
Given his talent and youth, Trout is likely to ascend this leaderboard quickly, but probability suggests he won’t remain on it forever. At some point, he’ll make the playoffs and win a game. There are simply too many opportunities and the Angels seem too likely to spend. If nothing else, Trout himself will have the opportunity to pick a new employer in a few years’ time.
While Trout might escape the confines of that leaderboard, we can go a little further to see how Trout compares specifically to those players who’ve competed since playoffs expanded. The table below shows all active position players with at least 50 WAR, total playoff games won, and total playoff games won during their first six seasons.
| Name | G | WAR | Playoff Wins | Playoff Wins Through Six Full Seasons |
WAR Through Six Full Seasons |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Pujols | 2563 | 89.3 | 40 | 29 | 47.7 |
| Adrian Beltre | 2806 | 84.3 | 12 | 1 | 25.3 |
| Miguel Cabrera | 2222 | 67.7 | 28 | 11 | 27.1 |
| Carlos Beltran | 2580 | 67.3 | 27 | 6 | 29.0 |
| Chase Utley | 1842 | 64.2 | 33 | 27 | 45.6 |
| Ichiro Suzuki | 2627 | 58.4 | 7 | 4 | 32.7 |
| Mike Trout | 914 | 53.6 | 0 | 0 | 53.6 |
| Joey Votto | 1419 | 53.2 | 2 | 2 | 33.2 |
| David Wright | 1583 | 53.2 | 14 | 6 | 35.0 |
| Robinson Cano | 1987 | 52.1 | 25 | 20 | 17.2 |
| Matt Holliday | 1872 | 50 | 37 | 7 | 25.6 |
| AVERAGE | 2038 | 63.0 | 20 | 10 | 33.8 |
Here’s where we observe just how rare Trout’s situation is. Outside of Trout, the 10 active players with at least 50 WAR all recorded at least one playoff win over their first six seasons. The good news for Trout is that most players increased their playoff-win total after those first six seasons, as well, doubling the previous total on average. Even if we drop the threshold to active players with 40 WAR, we find that only Hanley Ramirez and Joe Mauer went without playoff wins in their first six seasons. Only Mauer has still failed to record one, with the Twins sporting an 0-9 record in the playoff games in which he’s participated.
Now, none of these players were as good as Trout has been over the last six years, so if you were looking for comps in that sense, we just aren’t going to have any. Only Albert Pujols and Chase Utley are anywhere near Trout, and David Wright is the only other player even within 20 WAR. We can go back a bit further, though, and find a group of players more comparable to Trout, even if Trout is still head and shoulders above.
The table below features all those players who recorded at least 50 WAR through their age-30 seasons since 1969. Trout still has five more seasons to add to his total, but generally speaking, these are players who are going to be on something close to an inner-circle Hall of Fame track. Again, we will look at playoff wins in their first six seasons and beyond.
| Name | PA | WAR Through Age-30 |
Playoff Wins | Playoff WIns Through Six Full Seasons |
WAR Through Six Full Seasons |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Rodriguez | 7774 | 81.5 | 37 | 7 | 42.9 |
| Albert Pujols | 6782 | 77.5 | 40 | 29 | 47.7 |
| Ken Griffey Jr. | 7319 | 73.9 | 7 | 0 | 34.9 |
| Barry Bonds | 6038 | 72.6 | 20 | 5 | 38.8 |
| Rickey | 6604 | 67.1 | 35 | 3 | 32.1 |
| Cal Ripken | 7092 | 65.8 | 16 | 7 | 38.3 |
| Andruw Jones | 7276 | 64.3 | 37 | 32 | 36.5 |
| Johnny Bench | 6059 | 60.0 | 26 | 12 | 35.5 |
| Mike Schmidt | 5158 | 58.9 | 15 | 2 | 40.5 |
| George Brett | 5863 | 54.9 | 18 | 5 | 33.0 |
| Mike Trout | 4018 | 53.6 | 0 | 0 | 53.6 |
| Miguel Cabrera | 7126 | 53.6 | 28 | 11 | 27.1 |
| Gary Carter | 5694 | 53.3 | 16 | 0 | 27.0 |
| Frank Thomas | 5502 | 51.7 | 5 | 2 | 41.5 |
| Wade Boggs | 4629 | 51.7 | 17 | 7 | 43.0 |
| David Wright | 5945 | 50.1 | 14 | 6 | 35.0 |
Again, nobody matches up with Trout when it comes to production in their first six seasons. Gary Carter was on some Montreal teams just before they got really good and actually won in the playoffs following his seventh season, before winning the World Series with the New York Mets in 1986. Many of players here competed during a time when only four clubs qualified for the playoffs — including Ken Griffey Jr., for example, who also won his first playoff game after his seventh season.
This Mike Trout situation is a real anomaly. It’s pretty clear that Mike Trout’s lack of a postseason win isn’t Mike Trout’s fault — and, if certain events in 2014 had unfolded differently, we might not even be talking about this. However, just because it isn’t his fault, that doesn’t mean that Mike Trout’s lack of playoff success isn’t a little bizarre. Mike Trout is the best player in baseball and has been for more than half a decade, yet he hasn’t won a playoff game. Almost all other players in his position throughout history have. It’s weird.
Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.
Oh, but that is going to change. Watch the Angels go on the most improbable of runs–first in the wild card game against the Yankees (winning on a Ben Revere homer, of all things), then the Indians, Red Sox, and Nationals. Trout is going to light up Scherzer in Game 1, but CJ Cron will be the MVP award winner for his Ortiz-like performance in the Fall Classic.
It will all happen just as Nostradamus foretold in 1555.
and yet things like this get upvoted…smh
Don’t take my word for it. It’s all there in The Prophecies.
TIL Matt Holliday has racked up 50 career WAR. Not bad for a guy who has been a below-average defender his entire career and hasn’t had a thirty home run season in a decade.
In his prime (05-11), Holiday was an above average LF. Not setting bar particularly high in LF, either, but still, adequate.
Probably an oversight or just a function of me reading this in my phone, but I love how the last table has full names for everyone except “Rickey”.
🙂
Just paying homage, I’m sure – if nothing else, Rickey was fond of Rickey.
Mike Trout is in his 6th full season with the Angels.
Seattle failed to make the playoffs in Ken Griffey Jr.’s first six seasons (1989-1994), during which he put up 34.9 WAR. They then won the division in his worst season since his rookie year.
The culprits responsible for the futility were of course Randy Johnson, who put up only 21.8 WAR in the same first six seasons, and Edgar Martinez, who put up only 20.9 WAR in his first five-plus seasons. And don’t forget just how bad Erik Hanson was, when he put up only 20.5 WAR from 1989-1993, his first five full seasons.
The lessons to take away are these:
1. In terms of pure length, Mike Trout’s record of futility isn’t any longer than Ken Griffey Jr and Randy Johnson’s.
2. Mike Trout has about as much WAR in his first six full seasons as Ken Griffey Jr. and Randy Johnson combined.
Randy Johnson sucked for like his first ten seasons…and the only reason they made the playoffs w/ Griffey….Jay Buhner…
That’s what I said…Johnson was so terrible, he only put up 21.8 WAR in those seasons.
3. Mike Trout has about as much WAR in his first six full seasons as Vlad Guerrero had in his entire career.
4. Mike Trout is #33 in WAR since he was potty trained (1992:
http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=y&type=8&season=2017&month=0&season1=1992&ind=0&team=0&rost=0&age=&filter=&players=0&page=2_30
While any Mike Trout post is inherently interesting, I feel like this completely missed the mark.
Baseball is not basketball, where one player can just dominate and will their team to victory, like LeBron. Seemingly no effort was made to try to grapple with the fact that Trout has been on shitty teams – which is really the only analysis that is relevant to this question, regardless of how interesting various tables of exceptional players (and trout’s dominance of them) happens to be.
I don’t know enough about which particular stats are applicable to which analyses, but I’d love to see some analysis of things like the aforementioned players and the win% and total WAR of their teams (to see if they were playoff worthy, and show how shitty the angels have been), the star player’s % of total team WAR (to show how much trout has accounted for any success they’ve had vs the other stars being surrounded by a reasonable supporting cast), and other things of this nature. I’m sure smarter people than me have better ideas for metrics.
This post just left me thinking, ‘hmm, interesting’ instead of the usual Mike Trout incredulity.
I didn’t even realize it, given how much the Angels get ragged on for dragging Trout down, but they were swept out of the first round of the 2014 playoffs… (I now see this was mentioned in passing near the start of the article). Trout’s contribution? 1 hr and 3 walks on 15 PA. How was this not mentioned at all?!
While extremely small sample (and lack of winning obviously not solely his fault), this leads to even more compelling analyses on star player win % in playoffs, clutchness, etc…
Again, so many interesting and useful things to be looked into…
Also, the first two games of that series went to extra innings, which means if Trout had driven in or scored just one run in either of those games, the Angels would have won the game, and certainly would have had a shot at winning the series.
But he was still vulnerable to the high pitch at that time, and Yost exploited that.
New HOF standard: Achieved half the WAR of Mike Trout while Mike Trout was playing
AL West pitchers only have to make 1/3 of Trout’s WAR given that they have to face him on a regular basis.
“also the second-most baserunning runs among active players”
Second-most among active players since he started playing. Amongst all active players, he’s ranked 12th.
The Angels should finally get some breathing room this offseason to try to add some pieces around Trout. Their commitment on the Josh Hamilton trade/dump ends and they have 9 FA plus 2 options they aren’t likely to pick up (Nolasco and Street). They only have 6 guys under contract – Pujols, Trout, Upton, Simmons Calhoun, and Valbuena. Everyone else is still in arbitration years with nobody there likely to break the bank.
Per b-ref, if they decline the options they only have $162M in salary next year which is down from $192M this year.
Interesting to see a Trout article with no mention of the fact that he’s enduring what I believe is his worst slump in two years, even while he’s lowered his K-rate to a career best.
He’s been stuck in the worst slump in his last two years and, yet, is still setting a career high mark for wRC+. It’s so hard to find a Mike Trout fact that doesn’t suggest he’s a baseball god.
Combine that with losing about 150 plate appearances to injury, he might set a career to date low of slipping down to merely top 5 in MVP voting.
Well, when Mike “small ball” Scioscia is your manager ain’t any player on that team winning a playoff game for awhile.
The weirdness I think is just the result of multiplying two small fractions: a) the % of players who haven’t won a playoff game through their first six years x b) the % of players who have a WAR through six years remotely close to Trout. Obviously, b) is a very select list, and whatever a) is, it’s certainly less than one.
The two fractions are more or less independent, since a great player has a relatively small effect on his team’s performance.
Per this site’s own playoffs odds pages there’s still an 11.9% chance he checks the box this season…
http://www.fangraphs.com/coolstandings.aspx?type=2&lg=wc&date=current
Looks like you’re limiting only for hitters? Felix Hernandez is right there with 51.6 WAR and no Playoff appearances, let alone wins. Would be interesting to see numbers for players who never even made the postseason
For his entire career, Adam Dunn had more than twice as many games (and PA) as Trout has now, racked up less than half as much WAR, and also never won a playoff game…except when he got to go up against a team of 25 Koji Ueharas.
#KeepNotGraphs
#TapeyBeercone
I know I should be rooting for Trout to win a playoff game, but I feel like Mauer deserves to win one first. Getting swept in all 3 of his playoff series is sad. It would be fun to see the Twins make a run after needing to power through the Yankees, Indians, and Red Sox/Astros to get to the World Series.
Agreed! … But since they’re 11-24 against those 4 teams, perhaps you’d settle for ONE win?
Small correction: The Tigers never won a World Series before Harry Heilmann. Perhaps you meant to say, won a World Series *game*.