Mike Trout’s Third MVP Is His Latest Step Into Elite Company

When I was a little kid, I used to love reading Guinness World Records books. My childhood bookshelf at my parents’ house reflects this admittedly odd curiosity: There are several of the, I don’t know, adult(?) versions of the book from the mid-2000s — the ones that are text-heavy and include bummer-ish topics like war and crime. But then there are the “kids” versions, the ones whose pages are filled with large portraits of record-breakers, with little bar graphs in the corner to show what their performance looks like against the competition.

One of those kids’ books I had included a page dedicated to “Most MVP Awards” won in baseball. I remember seeing Barry Bonds‘ big smile, resting vibrant next to one of those graphs that showed just how transcendent he was. He’d won seven by the time this book published; the other names listed had won just three each. I knew Bonds, because I’d watched him often. The other names, I knew only from history books — names like Mantle, DiMaggio and Foxx. Pujols and Rodriguez hadn’t yet joined this class of three-time winners, hadn’t gotten the privilege of being immortalized as one of those short, stubby bars next to the tall structure looming above Bonds’ name on the tiny illustration intended to tell me who was the best ever at playing my favorite sport.

At the time I picked up this particular 2005 edition of my beloved book series, Mike Trout was just 13 years old. On Thursday, at the age of 28, Trout received the honor of joining this very silly-looking bar graph:

You might be surprised to learn that, at the age of 10, I had no idea how little this graph was telling me about who the best players in baseball history truly were. There is no Babe Ruth, or Willie Mays, or Honus Wagner. There is no mention of Jackie Robinson, perhaps the most important athlete in American history. It’s just a tally of trophies — trophies whose recipients were decided by voters who have sometimes based their decisions upon faulty information, understandably unaware of what measures of evaluating performance would become commonplace in future decades, or unwilling to adapt to changing times.

At the same time, however, no one flukes their way into three MVP awards. Hardly anyone would dispute that the names above were all transcendent players in the game’s history, and now, Trout’s name is among them. The jump from two-time MVP winners is more significant than you might think — a total of 31 players have won the award twice, but Trout became just the 11th to add a third to his tally.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

It’s as tangible of a leap as we’ve seen the center fielder take from mere “all-time great” to “inner-circle Hall of Famer,” and it’s fitting that this is the year he made such a jump. He entered the 2019 season ranked 90th among position players in career wins above replacement. Now, he ranks 47th. At just 27 years old, Trout came into this season having provided more value than 97.7% of all players to ever play major league baseball. Then, he nearly cut the number of players ahead of him in WAR by half, passing legends like Derek Jeter, Reggie Jackson, Willie McCovey and Barry Larkin, and doing so without even playing a full season.

That last part nearly cost Trout this award. A week into September, the final leg of the American League MVP race seemed as though it would be a brisk jog for the best player of his generation. Trout led all other big leaguers in WAR by a full win, while also leading all players in walk rate, isolated power, on-base percentage, and wRC+, and was tied with Pete Alonso for the lead in homers. Trout had been the best player in baseball for much of the decade, but he’d never quite dominated across the board offensively like this, and even as his Los Angeles Angels spiraled toward another season of irrelevancy, there seemed to be virtually no competition for Trout to claim his spot as the most valuable player in his league.

Then, an injury to his foot forced him to sit out almost 10 days before the Angels announced he would undergo season-ending surgery, capping his year at 134 games played and exactly 600 plate appearances. That left only three weeks left for his challengers to overtake him in the MVP race, and unfortunately for Trout, Houston Astros infielder Alex Bregman was more than up for the challenge.

Already one of baseball’s best players over the first four months of the season, Bregman was utterly dominant for the last two months, hitting .372/.486/.750 after August 1, and compiling 4.2 WAR in just 51 games. That included a major league-best 208 wRC+ in the 19 games he played after Trout’s injury, with seven homers and nearly three times as many walks as strikeouts. He was practically as good as any player could possibly be when chasing down Trout, and in the end, he still came up just short, losing the WAR battle to Trout 8.6-8.5.

That razor-thin margin in value could tell you that this award was a coin flip, and because Bregman played 22 more games than Trout, which amounted to 90 more plate appearances, that could be the difference-maker for an MVP voter. That’s without even mentioning the idea of prioritizing the player whose team made the postseason — something you definitely should not do! — or the human impulse to give the award to someone who hasn’t won before, instead of handing it to the two-time winner. But to say the award belongs to someone who played the entire season would be to ignore the fact that there was someone else who played just a few weeks short of a full season, and who was better in nearly every measurable category:

Trout vs. Bregman, 2019
Player WAR wRC+ WPA HR BB% K% OBP SLG BsR Def
Mike Trout 8.6 180 5.62 45 18.3 20 .438 .645 7.1 -0.3
Alex Bregman 8.5 168 4.99 41 17.2 12 .423 .592 -2.1 4.8

Bregman’s ability to avoid striking out was genuinely remarkable, and his season as a whole was exceptional. But in the time they had on the field, it’s difficult to argue that Trout wasn’t the better player, especially if you value underlying batted ball data:

Trout vs. Bregman Statcast, 2019
Name xwOBA xBA xSLG Brls/PA%
Mike Trout .455 .311 .669 11
Alex Bregman .378 .272 .471 3.8

Even if you still believe there was hardly any difference between these two players, and that deciding the AL MVP was truly a toss-up, wasn’t Trout deserving of winning one of these coin flips? In 2012, he was nearly three wins better than MVP winner Miguel Cabrera, but lost in large part because Cabrera secured the triple crown. He was 1.6 WAR better than Cabrera in 2013, but again, the Tigers’ slugger won the MVP, outhitting Trout by nearly every measure, but falling well short in baserunning and defensive value. Trout again held a small WAR edge in 2015, but had the MVP award slip into the hands of Josh Donaldson.

He has had an excellent case to win the award five times before this season, and had only won twice. In many ways, it was his turn to emerge victorious in one of these coin flip decisions, and that’s about what this was — out of 30 ballots, 17 gave first place votes to Trout, and 13 gave first place votes to Bregman. Those that didn’t award first place to Bregman voted him second place, and vice versa. Marcus Semien earned third place in AL voting, while D.J. LeMahieu finished fourth and Xander Bogaerts finished fifth.

Trout’s MVP ties a bow on one of the best three-year runs of offense we’ve seen in decades.

Best Three-Year wRC+, 1969-2019
Name Start Year End Year wRC+
Barry Bonds 2001 2003 231
Barry Bonds 2002 2004 230
Barry Bonds 2003 2005 221
Barry Bonds 2000 2002 218
Barry Bonds 2004 2006 193
Barry Bonds 1999 2001 191
Barry Bonds 1992 1994 189
Mark McGwire 1998 2000 188
Mark McGwire 1996 1998 185
Mike Trout 2017 2019 184
Jason Giambi 2000 2002 184
Barry Bonds 1991 1993 182
Dick Allen 1972 1974 181
Frank Thomas 1992 1984 181
Mike Trout 2016 2018 180

Mark McGwire spent the final few years of the last century breaking baseball, and Bonds spent the first few years of this century doing the same. How’d they do it? Guess we’ll never know. Besides them, if we go back through the last 50 seasons, only Jason Giambi has pieced together a three-year span of hitting as impressive as Trout’s. Only six total players have cleared the 180 wRC+ mark. It’s an incredible achievement, one that’s been slightly overshadowed by a sudden proneness to injury, along with a few offensive breakouts by hitters like Mookie Betts, Aaron Judge, and José Altuve.

If Bregman had won the award, there wouldn’t have been any riots in the streets, or thinkpieces about how the voting system is broken. It would have simply been another season in which Trout was thought of, perhaps mistakenly, as only the second-best player in baseball, and there’s hardly any shame in that. On the other hand, stretches of brilliance such as this are extremely rare. If Bregman had gotten the extra first place votes he needed, it likely would have made for a bit of head-scratching decades down the line, when people wondered how three years that could very well represent Trout’s prime came and went without him winning an MVP. But we don’t need to have that conversation. Trout is the best player in the sport, and for the third time in his young life, he’s officially been recognized as such.

Part of the reason I enjoyed reading those Guinness World Records books when I was a kid was to keep track of which records got broken year to year. I liked watching how the names on the bar graphs shifted around, or how one of the smaller bars kept getting bigger and bigger, gaining ground on the tallest one. It felt like I was watching history change, right in front of my eyes. Throughout his career, that’s what it’s felt like to watch Trout. Right now, he’s simply another stubby three to Bonds’ seven, just like all the others. But he’s also just 28, the second-youngest ever to win his third MVP award, behind only Stan Musial. There is so much time to build his tower higher, to overcome even bigger droves of Hall of Famers on various leaderboards. This award is just another trophy to place on that special shelf in his house, next to Rookie of the Year award, his seven silver sluggers, his two All-Star game MVPs, and some pictures of his family and friends. But for some reason, it feels as though it represents much more. Advanced stats have positioned Trout as one of the very best players in baseball history for a while. Now, the hardware count makes that case too.





Tony is a contributor for FanGraphs. He began writing for Red Reporter in 2016, and has also covered prep sports for the Times West Virginian and college sports for Ohio University's The Post. He can be found on Twitter at @_TonyWolfe_.

34 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 years ago

“How’d they do it? Guess we’ll never know.” (snickers to self)

Mahoney
6 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

…and then he writes that “besides them,…only Jason Giambi has pieced together a three-year span of hitting as impressive as Trout’s.” AFTER the how’d they do it quip. 🙂

Shirtless Bartolo Colon
6 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Snickers??!!

FrancoeursteinMember since 2025
6 years ago

During the season, I check two box scores every single evening: my Braves and the Angels. He’s special and I’m honored to watch him throughout the entirety of his career. Really hope he can give us a full season next year with his elevated offensive output. It would be awesome to see an 11 WAR season.

Lanidrac
6 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

I check the Angels’ box scores, too (in addition to my Cardinals), but I’m personally more interested in watching Albert Pujols climb up the career home run and RBI leaderboards.

Mahoney
6 years ago

Simple Formula for Mike Trout MVP Voting:

100+ RBI: 1st
75-99 RBI: 2nd
<75 RBI: 4th

HandsomeBoyModel
6 years ago

Imagine if Trout knew when changeups were coming

RoyalsFan#14321Member since 2024
6 years ago

Maybe the Angels can use the Astros trash can.

emh1969
6 years ago

Wonder how many MVP’s Mays would have won had WAR been around back then? Using BR WAR, he was 1st in NL position player WAR 10 times and second twice. Yet only won 2 MVP’s.

Pepper Martin
6 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

Let’s take a look. With Mays, we’re generally talking about the 1954-1966 seasons, although he was certainly good through 1971.

1954: he won
1955: Roy Campenalla won; Mays finished 4th. Campanella had already won this award twice, so the voters clearly liked him; if WAR were a thing, though, the award probably would have gone to Duke Snider, who finished second in the actual voting for the Dodgers team that won the NL by 13.5 games and was only a half-win back of Mays.
1956: Don Newcombe won in a year where 3 of the top 4 vote-getters were pitchers. Mays tied Snider for the bWAR lead but wouldn’t have won this year; his numbers weren’t overly impressive by his standards and voters were clearly focused on pitching.
1957: Hank Aaron won; Mays finished 2nd. Mays led Aaron slightly in WAR, but the Braves were the story of the year, finally breaking through to win the pennant, and, well, it was close enough that Aaron still probably would have won the award.
1958: Ernie Banks won; Mays finished 2nd. Mays had 10.3 bWAR this year… but Banks had 9.3. Banks hit 47 home runs as a shorstop; off the top of my head, I believe that was the first time any shortstop had ever hit 40 home runs (I believe the closest anybody came was Vern Stephens with 39 in 1949). Banks would have won.
1959: Banks won again, and with 10.2 bWAR he still would have won.
1960: Dick Groat won, Mays came in 3rd. This is probably the season where the existence of modern standards and WAR probably would have made the most difference. Dick Groat and Don Hoak finished 1-2 in MVP voting, and while they were both good players that year, nothing about them jumps off the page at you other than Groat’s relatively empty batting title from the SS position. Pittsburgh won pennant, but they weren’t seen as a particularly exceptional or memorable team until Bill Mazeroski’s home run in game 7 of the World Series. I think Mays would have won this one.
1961: Frank Robinson won; Mays finished 6th. Hank Aaron actually led the league in WAR this year while finishing 8th in the MVP voting; I don’t think Mays would have won the MVP award this year, because the Giants vote would have been split with Orlando Cepeda putting up flashier offensive numbers. Robinson still would have won.
1962: Maury Wills won; Mays finished 2nd. Mays would have won this year by modern standards; Wills stole 104 bases while only being caught 13 times, and that is absolutely amazing, but the Giants won the pennant and Mays put up flashy stats, and I think that voters probably would have looked past Wills’ incredibly flashy baserunning numbers and given the award to the clearly better player.
1963: Sandy Koufax won; Mays finished 5th. Mays led Koufax in WAR 10.6/9.9, but Koufax went 25-5 with a 1.88 ERA, 11 shutouts, and 306 K’s in 311 innings… Koufax had this.
1964: Ken Boyer won; Mays finished 6th. Boyer won this purely on the basis of St. Louis eking out a win in a tight pennant race; Mays had flashy traditional stats and 11 WAR. He probably would have won.
1965: Mays won.
1966: Roberto Clemente won; Mays finished 3rd. Mays finished first among position players in bWAR, but he was only third in the National League to Juan Marichal and Sandy Koufax… the Dodgers won a close pennant over the Giants, and with Marichal siphoning some WAR votes off of Mays, I think Koufax probably would have won this MVP award (he finished 2nd behind Clemente).

So at the end of the day, real-life Mays won 2 MVP awards; if advanced stats had been around in his time, he probably would have won 3 more in 1960, 1962, and 1964… but I’m not 100% sold on that 1962 award. 104 SB’s is eye-popping, and was the first person to steal 100 since Billy Hamilton in 1894. Nobody had even come close since Ty Cobb’s 96 in 1915.

emh1969
6 years ago
Reply to  Pepper Martin

Wow, great stuff, thanks for doing this!

The one where I would disagree is 1958. It was actually Banks’ 3rd time with 40+ home runs. So I’m not sure how special it would have seemed. And he didn’t win the MVP the first two times he did it. On the other hand, Banks did lead the league in home runs and RBIs in 1958 which might have helped him. Still, I think Mays’ higher WAR (+1.0) and the fact that the Giants won 8 more games than the Cubs would have carried him to a close victory.

SubtleSlightMember since 2026
6 years ago

“His ability to avoid striking out was genuinly remarkable”. Yes, there is certainly no denying that it is worthy of remark.

Sooted72
6 years ago
Reply to  SubtleSlight

lol so much ‘how they do that?’ in one little article

Mahoney
6 years ago

In MLB history, 18 players have been named a unanimous MVP…none more than once (yet).

Among those 18 players, there have been a total of 7 seasons where the player has performed at least 1.0 fWAR better than the year they were the unanimous MVP.

Mike Trout has 5 of those seasons.

Uncle SpikeMember since 2020
6 years ago

It’s crazy to think that, at age 28, it’s possible that Trout could have, and in my opinion should have, 6 MVPs.

Lanidrac
6 years ago
Reply to  Uncle Spike

Although, you could also say the same thing about Albert Pujols at age 29, as he arguably should’ve won in ’06, and only Barroid Bonds kept him from winning in ’02 and ’03.

sabr16
6 years ago

Congrats to Trout for his Most valuable WAR Award.

Uncle SpikeMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  sabr16

Well if it’s was just a WAR award he would have 6 of them so….

MikeSMember since 2020
6 years ago

The only way Pujols retires as the active WAR leader is if he doesn’t play out his contract or if Trout gets hurt. Otherwise Trout making up 14.3 WAR in 2 years is almost automatic.

free-range turducken
6 years ago
Reply to  MikeS

*14.3 minus Pujols’s negative WAR for 2020-21.

Tanned Tom
6 years ago

Any article that does not include steroid use when discussing Bonds, McGwire, and Giambi is an ahistorical, worthless piece of shit.

Sooted72
6 years ago
Reply to  Tanned Tom

ikr he totally should have snuck a steroids reference in there somewhere. reading comprehension; how does it work?

Ukranian to Vietnamese to French is back
6 years ago
Reply to  Tanned Tom

All the posts that do not contain aseptic usage when discussing relationships, Mcg-ice and Giambi are part of the shit history.

ab
6 years ago

https://www.baseball-reference.com/leaders/mvp_cya.shtml

Just due to aging and random luck, I would bet against Trout accumulating 4 more MVPs to tie Bonds, but he could easily get enough top 5 finishes to surpass him in MVP award shares.

manormachine
6 years ago

It’s fun to watch someone with a chance to be the GOAT, but Trout has got a long way to go to catch Bonds. How will he age? How long will he play? The game has not been kind to older players in recent years.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  manormachine

Wonder how they did it before? “Guess we’ll never know.”

connjc
6 years ago

I think everybody else notices too, but it’s amazing how Trout is surrounded by steroid users on that wRC+ list. The only non-steroid users on that list are Trout and Dick Allen. The guy may be the best player ever. I love watching him and I am a Dodger fan who hates everything Angels related.

connjc
6 years ago
Reply to  connjc

It’s disappointing for Bonds too, because that ’91-’94 stretch for him was very likely before he started using steroids. Who knows how good he could’ve been without tainting his legacy with steroids.

TKDCMember since 2016
6 years ago
Reply to  connjc

There is no credible evidence that Frank Thomas used PED.

RoyalsFan#14321Member since 2024
6 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Other than finishing his three year run when he turned 16.

abgb123
6 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

In fact Frank Thomas was well known for his anti steroids stance, if I remember correctly he was the only one to volunteer to interview for the Mitchell report.

bmarkham
6 years ago

I continue to be truly amazed and humbled at the extreme inability of the Angels to put a winning team around him. They really take incompetence to a new level. They truly have wasted one of the all-time greats in terms of leveraging his HoF inner circle-level play into team success.

BobbyJohn69
6 years ago

Why is it that steroid users are vilified, but amphetamine users given a pass?

Neils-Henning Orsted Joc PedersonMember since 2025
6 years ago
Reply to  BobbyJohn69

I’ll answer this one.
All of the amphetamine stories I have read — like bowlfuls of “greenies” on the clubhouse training tables — involved players like Mickey Mantle back in the days before illegal drug use in baseball was explicitly banned. (Violations of state and federal drug laws were banned in MLB by Commissioner Bowie Kuhn in April, 1971. That was MLB’s first binding drug policy.)

Any major league ballplayers who used amphetamines after Kuhn issued his Drug Policy Memo in April, 1971, should absolutely be vilified. Because they were violating a formal, binding MLB drug policy.

Any ballplayer who used “greenies” prior to Kuhn’s Drug Policy Memo was NOT violating MLB rules, and thus they get no criticism from me.

And we know that Kuhn’s Drug Policy Memo was an enforceable and binding rule governing all MLB players, because the Memo was in fact enforced a couple dozen times while Peter Ueberroth was Commissioner in the 1980’s — most notoriously around the time of the Pittsburgh Drug Trials.

Kuhn’s 1971 Drug Policy Memo was enforced again and again in the 1980’s, and a variety of disciplinary actions were appealed and upheld — some were upheld in their entirety, some were reduced, and just one was fully overturned (the rather absurd one-year suspension for Fergie Jenkins).

So it does not matter what percentage of major league ballplayers stopped illegally using amphetamines in 1971.
What matters is that any MLB player illegally using amphetamines after Kuhn issued his Drug Policy Memo was violating explicit, enforceable, binding MLB rules. So if Ozzie Smith or Cal Ripken, Jr. or some other star of the 1980’s admitted he used “greenies,” I’d be more than happy to vilify them alongside Bonds, Clemens, Sosa, Papi, McGwire, A-Rod, et. al.