MLB’s Cuba Deal Just Got Scuttled
Late last year, news broke that Major League Baseball had reached an agreement for players to leave Cuba using a posting system similar to that which exists between MLB and the Japanese NPB or the Korean KBO.
Major League Baseball, its players’ association and the Cuban Baseball Federation reached an agreement that will allow players from the island to sign big league contracts without defecting, an effort to eliminate the dangerous trafficking that had gone on for decades.
The agreement, which runs through Oct. 31, 2021, allows Cubans to sign under rules similar to those for players under contract to clubs in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan.
While the proposed agreement generated a great deal of excitement at the prospect of a boon of talented Cubans coming to the majors, I wrote at the time that a good deal of caution was warranted given that the United States government considered the Cuban Baseball Federation (“FCB”) to be covered by the decades-old trade embargo.
There’s just one problem: the FCB is an arm of the Cuban government, and has even been run by Fidel Castro’s son, who served as its vice president. This agreement means that MLB, an American business entity, would be paying money to an unofficial arm of the Cuban government. Because of the United States’ trade embargo, which remains in effect, it’s questionable at best whether this arrangement will survive legal scrutiny.
Last week, the Trump administration blocked the agreement from taking effect for exactly that reason.
The thrust of the government's argument, as laid out in a letter from Treasury Dept. to MLB obtained by ESPN: "A payment to the Cuban Baseball Federation is a payment to the Cuban government." U.S. government sees the CBF as an arm of the Cuban government. Deal nixed accordingly. pic.twitter.com/oQhtn2R9gw
— Jeff Passan (@JeffPassan) April 8, 2019
The White House and members of Congress took the position that the proposal “amounts to paying the Cuban government ransom for baseball players.”
“The U.S. does not support actions that would institutionalize a system by which a Cuban government entity garnishes the wages of hard-working athletes who simply seek to live and compete in a free society,” said Garrett Marquis, a National Security Council spokesman. Marquis said the administration will work with MLB “to identify ways for Cuban players to have the individual freedom to benefit from their talents, and not as property of the Cuban State.”
Other prominent figures in the administration agreed with Marquis, and added concern for the current unrest in Venezuela.
Cuba wants to use baseball players as economic pawns – selling their rights to Major League Baseball. America’s national pastime should not enable the Cuban regime‘s support for Maduro in Venezuela.
— John Bolton (@AmbJohnBolton) April 7, 2019
And Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL), another prominent critic of the deal, applauded the decision to block it.
Because #Cuba regime doesn’t allow them to travel freely the only way Cuban baseball players can make it to @MLB is to escape
Regime cut a deal with baseball to allow players to leave, but only if MLB pays them a ransom
In essence they want legalized trafficking of persons
— Marco Rubio (@marcorubio) April 8, 2019
For its part, the FCB, and a number of prominent Cuban political figures, disagreed.
The agreement with #MLB seeks to stop the trafficking of human beings, encourage cooperation and raise the level of baseball. Any contrary idea is false news. Attacks with political motivation against the agreement achieved harm the athletes, their families and the fans pic.twitter.com/7d3Feu26kB
— Federación Cubana de Beisbol y Softbol (@CubanaBeisbol) April 8, 2019
Many in #Cuba and #US disagree with Trump's decision. The Engage Cuba coalition said today that the decision of the Donald Trump Administration to overturn deal between Major League Baseball? and Caribbean country is a cynical, cruel and gratuitous act. #SomosCuba pic.twitter.com/dFZRnc1IyL
— Miguel Díaz-Canel Bermúdez (@DiazCanelB) April 9, 2019
And while the deal’s critics raised a noble sentiment, it’s difficult to ascertain how striking down the proposed accord actually furthers accomplishing those goals. Earlier this month, for example, the FCB released a list of 34 players who, under the agreement, were eligible to play in the United States without penalty for themselves or their families – and, most notably, without the need to defect or be smuggled off of the island by human traffickers. So even if Rubio is correct that the deal amounted to legal human trafficking, its absence does not stop illegal human trafficking, including the extraordinarily dangerous methods Cubans currently use to escape the island. In other words, canceling the deal made human trafficking worse, not better.
Opinion: Trump's scuttling of MLB-Cuba deal means defections, human trafficking will continue https://t.co/rwGmJKGkGS via @USATODAY
— Dan Wolken (@DanWolken) April 9, 2019
That was the consensus across baseball as well: by scuttling the deal, the Trump administration made it more difficult for Cubans to leave the island to pursue baseball careers, by leaving in place a system that leaves illegal and dangerous human trafficking as players’ only means off of the island. Major League Baseball itself noted that the goal of the agreement was to end human trafficking.
Statement from @MLB on now suspended deal with Cuba: “We stand by the goal of the agreement, which is to end the human trafficking of baseball players from Cuba.”
— Patrick Oppmann CNN (@CNN_Oppmann) April 8, 2019
Included in the letter to the government from MLB were the tales of Yasiel Puig, Jose Abreu, Yoenis Cespedes, Leonys Martin and Yunel Escobar after they left Cuba — ones the deal was supposed to end. The human-trafficking horror stories did nothing to sway Trump Administration.
— Jeff Passan (@JeffPassan) April 8, 2019
And prominent figures across baseball also weighed in, echoing the idea that the failure of the deal would leave in place a far worse system.
Cesar Geronimo Jr., the director of Latin America scouting for the Diamondbacks, echoed his disappointment for future Cuban players when reached by phone Tuesday. . . .
“For the Cubans it’s very hard for them to get out of Cuba and sign as an amateur,” Geronimo said. “The hardship they go through is hard … It makes (scouting) a little more difficult. It is difficult just seeing the talent. A lot of Cuban players are coming through Latin America right now; I don’t know if they’re the top guys but they’re there. They have ways of getting out of Cuba, but it’s always difficult.
“It’s disappointing to the Cuban players. It’s disappointing to them because they’re trying to get a better life and a better future. Now that this happened, their hope is dying. That’s the only way I see it.”
Cuban players in MLB weighed in as well.
Aroldis Chapman prefaced his comments by saying it was “a sensitive subject,’’ discussing the current White House administration’s stance against Cuban baseball players’ entry into Major League Baseball.
“I just feel bad for those young ballplayers who are probably not going to have the same chance to play here,’’ the Yankees closer said through an interpreter Monday.
* * *
“The way we got here was, it was tough to say the least,’’ Chapman said of the Cuban defectors who sought to play in the majors.
And local leaders agreed as well. Juan Francisco Puello, the president of the Confederation of Professional Baseball of the Caribbean (CBPC), also mentioned human trafficking as an impetus for restoring the deal: “You cannot traffic with the dignity of the human being, with that you should not play.”
But it’s frankly hard to see how MLB gets around this problem any time soon. The Cuban government has thus far shown little interest in allowing players to leave willingly absent an agreement like this one, and the Trump administration won’t allow an agreement to take effect so long as the embargo stays in place. A new administration might take a different view, but that’s entirely speculative at this point. And given the President’s broad power in areas concerning national security and foreign relations, it’s unlikely MLB could win a court challenge to the administration’s actions. For better or worse, a legal talent pipeline from Cuba to the United States is, right now, just about dead.
Sheryl Ring is a litigation attorney and General Counsel at Open Communities, a non-profit legal aid agency in the Chicago suburbs. You can reach her on twitter at @Ring_Sheryl. The opinions expressed here are solely the author's. This post is intended for informational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice.
Its off topic but I am wondering if Fangraphs resident legal scholar knows the answer to, can MLBPA void contracts as bad for the union? With the report that Albies is signing away 4 FA seasons at or below 7M per after the Acuna deal can the MLBPA step in and say Fuck NO to these stupidly one sided contracts?
Future mailbag topic!
Awesome, seems like an adult in the room needs to step in and help these kids make good choices.
Yes, people in their 20s shouldn’t be allowed to make these decisions. It’s always better when someone else determines your life choices.
But 16 y.o. should be allowed to vote in election 🙂
Too stupid to decide about theirselves, but wise enough to decide about lives of the others.
I cannot wait! This is something I think many of us are wondering about.
Screw the unions.
“Human trafficking” = giving someone transportation out of a country that says they can’t leave? I understand there have been situations where the people providing that service essentially kidnap the client and hold them for ransom, but traditionally I think of “human trafficking” as buying and selling human beings.
This usually encompasses both smuggling and trafficking. Smuggling being the transportation of the individual and trafficking being the recruitment/kidnapping/coercion and exploitation of that individual for commercial gain.
You literally hit on the “trafficking” part in your fairly short post.
The Manchurian POTUS is an idiot.
downvoted but true
I normally agree that calling our idiot president an idiot, which he is, deserves to be downvoted on Fangraphs, where mostly politics should be left out. But this is about him and his administration . So at the very least this comment should be left alone. It is on topic and true, though not insightful.
Embargo should be ended. It hurts more than possible MLB players. I don’t see how MLB can get around the embargo without an executive branch willing to look the other way.
Cuba could let it’s citizens travel to other countries to make millions of dollars and bring honor and fame to their land, and then just let them pay some taxes for that freedom and privilege. Just as America does.
Are you sure about that? I wonder if US law allows payment of taxes to the Cuban government for income earned in the US.
It does not. That is one of the major considerations in the process of clearing Cubans to sign with MLB clubs.
This was basically inevitable. As long as US/Cuban relationships are what they are there was no way this would be allowed. If you view Cuba as a rouge/enemy state, then I don’t see how you can view this as any different than paying ransom to terrorists. Like with that maintaining the status quo is worse for the victims involved, but the general idea of not rewarding bad behavior/not wanting to encourage others to follow the practice make it what the US will do.
Regardless of relations the Cuban government preventing their citizens from leaving if they so choose seems wrong. Maybe a middle ground would be for Cuba to try and tax expats?
Note: Not trying to take a stance on what US/Cuban relationships should be.
I generally think we can all agree that a government that keeps its people from leaving
its borders with the threat of violence is bad.
So Cuba has in place a system that says players aren’t allowed to leave except by consent of, and after payment to, the government, and we’re going to say the U.S. government is the bad guy for not participating in it?
I get that having players smuggled out of the country is not a good solution, but shouldn’t the answer be that Cuba needs to liberalize then?
Apparently Cuba’s human trafficking and holding it’s citizens for ransom is more equal than others, to some people here.
It’s basically a 100+ year old trend in this country that the people who are the loudest about government offenses here also are the most profuse with excuses for much more repressive regimes abroad, as long as they are purportedly liberal.
That’s how you get to “Trump is a fascist…but good ole Fidel, he was a real mensch”
Unfortunately the loudest people too often are lionizing Trump, not Fidel, who almost nobody lionizes. You gotta start with the big problem first.
Why in the world should the US (or anyone for that matter) enter into an agreement with a government that won’t simply let their people do what they want? There’s a simple solution to this problem – the Cuban government just needs to let their players do what they want (of course, then they won’t get to pocket the money MLB will pay them which is the real reason for their policy).
Problem is that the US has been attempting to persuade Cuba to liberalize since 1961 and it has resulted in nothing. Cuba is surely to blame but so is the US if it continues to engage in a game of chicken that is closing in on 60 years.
I get that, but the only driver for change is going to be demand from the Cuban people themselves, and how do you generate that demand? Not by appeasing the government, but by making it clear to the people that there is a better life out there that their own government is keeping from them.
And also not by continuing a stalemate either
Eh, is Cuba to blame though? I mean, our hands aren’t entirely clean either. Operation Northwoods was rejected by JFK which most likely led to his assassination. Our country planned to kill our own civilians, then blame Cuba. JFK said no, so we killed him instead. I don’t really think either side is right.
“Eh, is Cuba to blame though?”
Yes, the government that points its guns inward at its own people to prevent them from leaving is to blame.
So your solution is to subsidize the oppression of the Cuban people by their government?
The payments would go to the FCB, though, not directly to the Cuban government. Would that really make things in Cuba any worse than they already are?
Do you honestly believe that the money won’t go through the Castro regime’s hands before the FCB? That’s delusional.
Sure, but unless and until that happens, the U.S. does have the ability to ensure that players — who will figure out how to come play in the U.S. one way or another — can do so without jeopardizing their safety or financing black-market smugglers.
There are things in the world that you can control and there are things you can’t. Just because someone else refuses to solve a problem doesn’t absolve you of moral responsibility for reducing the harm of that problem where you can.
So help people defect then, welcome them in, work with Central American countries to expedite their immigration status as well as discourage bad actors.
You can still do your best to help and not capitulate.
Help me understand what you are actually advocating. What does it look like for MLB to “help people defect?” Having an American business actively undermining the policies of a sovereign nation sounds like an international relations nightmare. Not to mention it’s asking a bit much of the guys who have trouble deciding whether it’s a good idea to start a runner on second base in extra innings.
I’m absolutely not saying MLB should be involved, I’m saying there’s a role for the State Department to help Cuban defectors once they’ve left Cuban soil.
Gotcha. We can agree there.
The issue really boils down to how oppressive/bad the Cuban regime is. The US’s policy is pretty clear here: very bad. If that is the case helping a few baseball players, who are likely part of the 1% there, escape is not worth helping to finance that regime and make it more likely that they can hold onto power. We shouldn’t care more about those baseball players as people just because they are talented at baseball.
Nippon Baseball doesn’t allow players to leave until they’ve reached free agency (9 or 10 years of service IIRC) or their team has given consent and been paid a percentage of the player’s new contract. Players who leave as amateurs are blackballed from the league.
The Mexican League doesn’t allow players to leave unless they are sold by their team for a percentage of the player’s signing bonus. Players who leave as amateurs are blackballed from the league.
So the differences between Cuba and Japan and Mexico are that:
1. Cuban government owns the league.
2. Cuba and the US have a long history of not getting along, and US has an embargo against Cuba.
3. Conditions in Cuba are terrible due to a combination of bad government and US embargo.
4. The Cuban government has only allowed its citizens to travel mostly freely since 2012-13.
5. The US government only grants Cubans visas for diplomatic or official purposes or upon certification of life-threatening illness by a doctor.
So we’re fine with a league taking a cut of a player’s value as long as we like its owners, and we’re fine with people travelling here as long as they’re not Cuban. It’s not Cuba that is saying no to international norms in this instance.
Two glaring things here:
1. Yes who gets a cut matters. If one was ISIS and the other was some random baseball team I think it would be a relevant factor. The allegation is that the money goes to a government actively suppressing its own people. Whether that is true or not is an open debate, but you can’t just dismiss it.
2. The Nippon Baseball league doesn’t prevent their players from physically leaving the country. Also seems to be a pretty huge difference.
Yep. You don’t hear stories of Japanese players stowing away on cargo ships or going a week without eating to escape their home country with their lives.
Good luck convincing Cuba of that, though. Why should they let baseball players be the sole career in their country that runs on a free market?
FFS tRump and his crooked cronies have violated trade embargoes with Russia and Iran since day one of his *residency. This is solely for the purpose of appeasing sycophants like Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz and the rich Cuban’s who belong to Mar-a-lago who want Cuban back under US control so they can rob the island blind!
I agree with the principle of the US government’s position. I disagree with allowing the practical results of holding on to that principle inflexibly. Which just leaves the whole thing in an impossible stalemate that won’t change, and that really, really sucks.
Principle by definition is inflexible. It it were felxible, it wouldn’t be principle anymore.
The fault lies with the Cuban government, who won’t give its citizens freedom of movement.
Period.
While true, it’s not a matter of fault. The issue is human lives are at risk under the current model. The MLB model created a *less* bad exit route for players who are being extorted for someone else’s financial gain.
This solution was akin to a band-aid on a bullet wound, but when one party is a known bad actor choices are limited. The administration offered no alternatives and basically conveyed, not our people, not our problem.
And while this is not the place for this conversation the US is allied with governments who are far worse than Cuba for strategic reasons.
Maybe MLB should set up an alternate Canadian arm to let Cuban players sign with Toronto.
Given that Canada has never had a trade embargo with Cuba.
I’m so confused. Was only a few years ago we were all taking vacation to Havana sipping on mojitos now this?
Awesome decision by Trump. Well done.
Let’s see what happens after the Cheeto is out of office. Some progress might be made
It would be great if the communist government of Cuba progressed to the point of not holding their own citizens hostage, but who cares about that?
Sorry but the only acceptable answer here is “Trump bad”
Might be longer than you dream.
Incredibly, his reelection odds are going up daily.
Of course it’s a political decision. One of the more interesting comparisons is between how we treat Cubans, and how we treated defectors from behind the Iron Curtain during the Cold War. We liked defectors, and many became major stars in sports (joining cultural, scientific, and artistic figures). We don’t like Cubans, largely because of the importance of Florida in elections and the potent Cuban emigre community there, who pines to return, vanquish Communism, and go back to the Batista Era. This opinion is apparently not shared by the younger generation, but they don’t have the power yet.
Obama, of course, made a substantial change in policy, which was immediately denounced by the GOP. Interestingly enough at the time, a lot of Republicans were privately relieved, especially since their corporate contributors thought there would be favorable business opportunities, and that would lead to liberalization. But in public, few could say that.
It should be repeated that the deal that Trump is nullifying was actually negotiated last year, in his second year in office. Since MLB has a tremendous staff of paid lobbyists whose job is to understand Washington, make the right phone calls, and disburse the appropriate contributions, I suspect they must have had some sense of a green light from the Administration—which has now obviously been reversed. Trump (and this is going to be the only overtly political comment I want to make) sees Florida as key to his reelection, and has a particular desire to reverse anything Obama did, so, we are here.
At the legal level, it also depended on a determination by Obama’s OFAC that the Cuban baseball authority did not constitute part of the Cuban government. I don’t know nearly enough to pass judgment, but that proposition seems arguable at best. I don’t like the outcome here but I don’t know that it’s “wrong.”
Congress could also alter the Cuban sanctions regime at any time to allow this or any other deal.
Good observation. I see I’m getting downvoted, but I never said Trump’s decision didn’t have some logic to it, just that you can’t ignore the politics of it-and the timing. Congress will not act, and even if majorities could be found, Trump would veto it anyway, and there’s no way there is going to be an override.
The bottom line on this is the decision has nothing to do with baseball and very little to do with political freedoms. This Administration has a pronounced preference for strongmen and little interest in human rights issues. Now, maybe we can make a case that a continued embargo will somehow bring the Cubans to make systemic changes. Hasn’t happened so far, but I suppose it’s possible.
The U.S. Government has always been too stubborn on certain issues. While not anywhere near as bad, this reminds me of how we interned innocent Japanese-American civilians, or how we used to support brutal Latin American regimes just to keep them from turning Communist.
Not paying a communist regime in Cuba that holds its own citizens hostage and prohibits them from leaving reminds you of internment camps?
Well, Cuba shares states some similarities with internment camps.
Good for Trump. The Cuban regime is in the wrong by not allowing players (or people as a whole) to leave Cuba peacefully and without fear of consequences. Out of every moral issue in baseball, allowing MLB to directly fund the Cuban government would be by far the worst.
If the US and MLB care about Cuban players and people, the best they can do without the Cuban government is ease migration restriction that prevent these players from entering the game as free agents if they defect from Cuba directly into the US. For all talk about Obama lessening tensions, lets not forget he ended Wet-Feet/Dry-Feet.
“canceling the deal made human trafficking worse, not better.” Well that can’t be. It might not have made it better, but how did it make it worse. There wasn’t a deal before, and there still isn’t a deal.
It returned matters to the status quo ante.