Kendrys Morales: A Gamble on Baseball’s Rhythms
In the weeks when between Billy Butler’s contract was bought out and today, with Kendrys Morales brought to Kansas City on a two-year, $17 million deal, the Royals ranked dead-last in FanGraphs’ projected Designated Hitter Depth Charts. Not dead-last amongst American League teams: Dead. Last. Less projected WAR from their DH spot than 15 NL teams, none of which actually employ a designated hitter.
With Morales now in Kansas City, one can see that the Royals have now soared up the depth chart rankings…up to the #24 position, with an estimated 0.6 WAR now due to emit from this spot in the lineup. The Texas Rangers now have the dishonor at being the lowest-ranked AL team, headlined by the light-hitting combination of Mitch Moreland and Rougned Odor. The Royals are now only just ahead of the Miami Marlins (featuring a rotation of Justin Bour/Jeff Baker/Donovan Solano/Derek Dietrich) and the Philadelphia Philles (Darin Ruf/Grady Sizemore/Cesar Hernandez/Cameron Rupp/Maikel Franco).
Actually: the Royals are not really ahead of these National League lightweights. FanGraphs projects that these NL teams will achieve 0.5 WAR over 300 plate appearances, while the Royals are projected to reach 0.6 WAR over 700 plate appearances. So, really, the Royals have moved from #30 to #29 on the DH rankings, now ahead of only the Rangers on a per-PA basis.
Billy Butler and the A’s are up in sixth place.
Butler would have been paid $4M more than the Royals are going to pay Morales next year. That doesn’t seem like a prohibitive cost to turn around a spot in your lineup from league-worst to well above average.
So why did the Royals make this change at DH? I think they saw, like the rest of us, Morales flounder in 2014. And I think they know, like the rest of us, that Morales is a limited athlete who is traveling down the wrong slope of the aging curve. The Royals are a team that needs to contend next year in order to justify their massively lengthy rebuilding process. They need this to count. So: why?
At first glance, it looks like Morales suffers far more than Butler when it comes to the DH Penalty, the theory that playing DH actually takes a toll on a player’s offensive production, perhaps because of the bizarre rhythms of the position.
In Butler, the Royals had one of the very few players in the Majors whose offensive production does not dip significantly when he is slotted in at DH. Butler’s career positional split, via Baseball Reference:
| PA | BA | OBP | SLG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Butler as DH | 3109 | .290 | .353 | .434 |
| Butler as 1B | 1642 | .303 | .368 | .476 |
Morales has clearly absorbed a bigger penalty over his career:
| PA | BA | OBP | SLG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morales as DH | 1275 | .255 | .311 | .422 |
| Morales as 1B | 1464 | .288 | .340 | .492 |
The penalty was brutal for Morales in 2014:
| PA | BA | OBP | SLG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morales as DH – 2014 | 292 | .196 | .257 | .325 |
| Morales as 1B – 2014 | 108 | .277 | .324 | .376 |
But then, all of 2014 was brutal for Morales. It was easily the worst season of his career, and he was one of the worst regular players in the Majors. It might also have been the most bizarre season of Morales’ whole playing career: after he received a qualifying offer from the Mariners last winter, no team wanted to suffer the penalty of a lost draft pick, and he went unsigned until June. Then, six weeks after the Minnesota Twins picked him up, he was traded to the Seattle Mariners. If you’re used to going to Spring Training every single year of your career, I could see how one would be out of their element if they were suddenly thrown in midseason. Fellow qualifying-offer-recipient Stephen Drew endured virtually the same travel gauntlet, and with similarly dismal on-field results.
The thing is, Morales has actually performed really well as a DH during the two “normal” years of his career when DH was his primary position. He only suffered a slight penalty with the Angels in 2012:
| PA | BA | OBP | SLG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morales as DH – 2012 | 390 | .271 | .313 | .458 |
| Morales as 1B – 2012 | 118 | .283 | .356 | .491 |
And in 2013 with the Seattle Mariners, Morales accomplished the (surprisingly rare) feat of performing better when he hit as a DH:
| PA | BA | OBP | SLG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morales as DH – 2013 | 523 | .273 | .342 | .441 |
| Morales as 1B – 2013 | 131 | .276 | .298 | .433 |
This is the performance that the Royals are hoping to receive from Morales. Morales had 1.7 and 1.4 WAR in these seasons — negative defense and baserunning and all — and identical 119 wRC+. This is the performance that the Royals are trying to help Morales achieve by signing him early in the winter, giving him the time and security to adjust to his new city and enter Spring Training with confidence.
Although I’ve come around on the A’s signing Butler, we also have to consider the old truism that the Royals are the team that knows Butler’s health, condition, et cetera, better than anybody else — and they weren’t interested in keeping him around.
If Morales returns to his “normal-season” production, the Royals just might have squeezed some positive dollars-per-WAR value out of the expensive free agent market.
Miles Wray contributes sports commentary to McSweeney's Internet Tendency, Ploughshares, The Classical and Hardwood Paroxysm. Follow him on Twitter @mileswray or email him here.
Miles, could you step into my office please?
I would also say that the 12M difference in guranteed money can help the Royals sign an SP or RF, both of which are still needed.
Morales had a fairly reasonable excuse to suck in 2014, and Butler really didn’t. But instead of going with some terrible in-house rotation, they get just as much possible upside from Morales as they had from Butler and saved money in the process.
I love Billy and it pains me to say it, but this move isn’t terrible. Now if they can get a real starting pitcher..
I watch Butler and he looks like an old man out there.
I think his nosedive is permanent.
My name is Jeff
I am baffled by Drew and Morales collapse last year. I understand they missed ST and the start of the season, but many players who are injured do as well and come back better than this. Maybe the pressure of playing for a contract or the anxiety of not knowing where they would play for so long messed with their heads.
I do expect Morales and Drew to have good bounce back years and provide good value.
Sure. Or perhaps they have hit an insurmountable wall in their careers. See Dan Uggla.
Drew was lousy in 2012 as well, and D-Backs management believed he was malingering the effects of his ankle injury he suffered the year before. The Drews are a talented bunch, but they are weenies.
Morales seems like he’s one of those players who start aging in dog years after hitting 30.
About those DH rankings… why is it that they are projecting the NL teams to have 300 plate appearances from DHs? That seems high. Is there a half chance that the NL will introduce the DH next year?
After that we can discuss “Why is the Pirates’ starting shortstop projected to have as many DH appearances as anyone else on the team, when they don’t actually have a backup shortstop?”
The depth charts at DH for NL teams are inaccurate, is what I’m saying. I’m also saying that Kendrys Morales is an anagram of Mark Reynoldses, though I wasn’t saying it before this sentences.
I think NL DH projections are also for PH appearances..
Butler’s signing, either a stroke of genius or a colossal blunder by Oakland, distorted the DH market and probably bumped Mike Morse up to 2/24 or 3/36 for 110 games per year, so Morales became possible. We’ll just have to see. If he’s healthy and happy he should do alright, even at the K, as he has pull power from both sides.
Umm, err, you’re baffled? Morales missed all of spring training, didn’t start playing until June and didn’t get a minor league rehab assignment. Anyone would have struggled.
One edit: Butler is making $6.66 million this year. My guess is if he’s decent, the A’s dump him on a different team after this year. If he is good in 2015, they’ll actually get something for him.
Maybe the Royals just think if a guy is asking for $75 million one year, he must be a bargain at $17 million the next.
I don’t know. I could honestly probably be convinced either way on this.
Defensible. Reasonable possibility he bounces back.
For all his disastrously bad defense and base running he had always been a good productive hitter.
And his value came from power, which is becoming rare in the league and which the royals desperately need.
And Butler basically lost his power. It’s possible the royals just are deadly afraid that Butler is suddenly becoming a ground ball machine and thought this was a better bet.
Either move was a gamble imo so i can’t really fault either decision for them.
Hell thinking on it now if i had to bet $50 on wwho has a better year with the bat i think I’d take Morales too.
Interesting for sure. Will be a fun story to watch play out.
Drew is also one of the most interesting stories for me this season. I have trouble believing both these guys are cooked.
It was, undoubtedly, a crazy ass situation for both.
To go into the winter assured you were about to sign a massive generationally life altering contract, then wait for months and have no one interested?
Then sign realizing you lost money, didn’t get to play and looked like am idiot?
I’m giving them a pass.
Especially because unlike drew Morales has become a relatively consistent player.
Just a note that, yes, Morales’ contract (as split into 2 years) is 4m less than Butler’s would have been, but given the buyout, it is only a savings of 3m. Not that it matters much (well, unless you count things like an extra 2% when building a team), but the comparison in cost should be the optional payment portions.
Will be interesting to see if this turns out for them.
You are missing some context on those career 1B and DH numbers for Morales. The VAST majority of those 1B PAs occurred before he broke his leg horrifically after hitting a walk off grand slam (typical Angels luck, that) and subsequently missed a season and two thirds. I firmly believe he hasn’t been the same since.
I was thinking along a similar vein regarding the 1B/DH split. Did one set of numbers come out in a “good” year and the “other in a bad? Or did he predominately DH in a pitchers park?
Most all of his Mariner numbers are DH and pitchers park, so I’m willing to accept the splits as presented, but looking at career numbers in that way is a little bit to quick for me. I did enjoy the article in any case.