NERD Game Scores for September 14, 2016

Devised originally in response to a challenge issued by sabermetric nobleman Rob Neyer, and expanded at the request of nobody, NERD scores represent an attempt to summarize in one number (and on a scale of 0-10) the likely aesthetic appeal or watchability, for the learned fan, of a player or team or game. Read more about the components of and formulae for NERD scores here.

***

Most Highly Rated Game
Baltimore at Boston | 19:10 ET
Gausman (152.0 IP, 87 xFIP-) vs. Porcello (193.2 IP, 91 xFIP-)
Were one inclined to facilitate a yelling match between a group of Boston-area residents — ideally, for the purposes of this experiment, men aged 18 to 65 — one means by which to accomplish that might be to ask them whether they regard Rick Porcello or David Price as the ace of the Red Sox. “Porcello’s got more wins,” one might declare. “But Price has better stuff,” another would almost certainly ejaculate. Is that third one, over in the corner, exhibiting signs of a heart attack? No, that’s just how people in Boston look and act. An entire people on the verge of cardiac arrest: this is an adequate characterization of Boston.

Porcello, who’s got a lower FIP-based WAR but higher RA-based WAR than Price, is scheduled to start this particular, urgent game.

Readers’ Preferred Broadcast: Baltimore Television.

Two Other Brief Notes
Today’s Free Game
Today’s free game features San Diego at San Francisco, starts at 15:45 ET, and can be accessed by means of this hyperlinked text.

On NERD’s Playoff Adjustment, the Cubs, and the Rangers
As the season wears on, the algorithm for game NERD scores weights team scores progressively more heavily and pitcher scores less heavily — to account for the greater influence of a team’s posteason chances on the watchability of their games. Also as the season progresses, the algorithm for those team NERD scores weights various performance factors (weighted batting, adjusted home-run rate) less heavily and playoff odds more heavily.

The idea of the postseason adjustment is to assess higher NERD scores to clubs which feature less certainty regarding the postseason. To accomplish this, the author begins with the divisional odds and wild-card odds and finds the absolute value of each number minus 0.5 (or, 50%). I then add the results together divide by two. Then I subtract the result of that figure from 0.5 and multiply the resulting number by 20. Finally, I normalize all the scores to create a league average of 5.0.

Here’s all of that using the Chicago Cubs as an example. The Cubs have divisional and wild-card odds of 100.0% and 0.0%, respectively, using the site’s “coin flip” methodology (which seems to best represent how the human mind conceives of postseason odds).

  • [ |1.000 – 0.5| + |0.000 – 0.5| ] / 2 = 0.500
  • (0.5 – 0.500) * 20 = 0.0

That 0.0 number is the postseason adjustment just before it’s normalized to create a league average of 5.0. The raw league average right now is 1.60. So, to find the Cubs’ score we subtract that figure from 5.0 and add the difference to the Cubs’ raw score.

So:

  • 0.0 + (5.0 – 1.60) = 3.4

That 3.4 represents Chicago’s current playoff adjustment — a figure to which the team’s NERD score will gravitate continuously as the season continues. It’s also the lowest possible score a club can receive at the moment, one shared mostly by very poor clubs that have been effectively (or literally) eliminated from postseason contention. Because, like those clubs, the Cubs aren’t playing games of any great consequence at the moment. Playing in a division where it appears as though 86 wins would be sufficient to claim that division, the Cubs have already recorded 92 wins. Which, that means they could lose every game for the rest of the season and almost certainly still win the Central. A similar principle applies to the Texas Rangers, as well: they’ve already won 87 games, while second-place Seattle is projected for just 86 wins.

Complete Schedule
Here’s the complete and very sortable table for all of today’s games. Pitching probables and game times aggregated from MLB.com and also the rest of the internet. Note that calculations both for team and game NERD scores feature adjustment for postseason odds that increases as season progresses. Read more about those adjustments here and here.

NERD Scores for September 14, 2016
Away SP TM GM TM SP Home Time
Alex Cobb TB 9 4 7 9 4 TOR Marco Estrada 12:37
Jon Lester CHN 6 4 6 8 8 STL Carlos Martinez 13:45
Luis Perdomo SD 8 4 6 8 7 SF Madison Bumgarner 15:45
Clayton Kershaw LAN 10 6 7 6 10 NYA Michael Pineda 16:05
Robert Gsellman NYN 9 6 5 4 4 WAS Tanner Roark 16:05
Steven Brault PIT 2 4 3 3 2 PHI Jake Thompson 19:05
Kevin Gausman BAL 8 10 9 10 6 BOS Rick Porcello 19:10
Jose Fernandez MIA 10 4 5 3 5 ATL Julio Teheran 19:10
Junior Guerra MIL 5 4 4 4 2 CIN Tim Adleman 19:10
Tyler Duffey MIN 7 4 5 6 4 DET Anibal Sanchez 19:10
Sean Manaea OAK 8 3 5 4 6 KC Yordano Ventura 19:15
Josh Tomlin CLE 6 5 5 3 7 CHA Carlos Rodon 20:10
Derek Holland TEX 2 4 4 4 7 HOU Joe Musgrove 20:10
Jeff Hoffman COL 0 4 4 4 6 AZ Rubby de la Rosa 21:40
Hisashi Iwakuma SEA 3 5 4 3 4 LAA Jhoulys Chacin 22:05
SP denotes pitcher NERD score.
TM denotes team score.
GM denotes overall game score.
Highlighted portion denotes game of the day.

* = Fewer than 10 IP, NERD at discretion of clueless author.





Carson Cistulli has published a book of aphorisms called Spirited Ejaculations of a New Enthusiast.

2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Concerned Reader John
8 years ago

Was suprised to see Pineda with a 10, did not expect him to be 3rd in the league in xFIP- (one of the eight pitching parameters in the SP score).