Nick Markakis Is Somehow the Best He’s Ever Been

This offseason, I was tasked with preparing a writeup of right fielders in the game of major-league baseball. That was quite a difficult exercise, for it requires one to predict the future, and soothsayers are, at least to my knowledge, mythical. Still, I was quite confident when I wrote this:

There are those people who believe that Nick Markakis will make a run at 3,000 hits and the Hall of Fame. I am not among those people. Granted, Markakis has compiled 2,052 hits in his big-league career. That’s good! But Markakis, now at 34, is not good. Not at all. In fact, he really hasn’t been good since 2010. Since then, Markakis’s WAR has gone 1.4, 1.6, -0.2, 2.5, 1.5, 1.1, 0.9. In other words, of Markakis’ 25.3 career WAR, almost 17 were accrued in the first five years of his career.

Markakis hasn’t been even a league-average hitter since 2015, and that year he hit three (3) home runs. He hasn’t been even an average defensive outfielder since 2008. He hasn’t added value on the basepaths since 2009. In 2017, Markakis was below average against righties (97 wRC+) as well as lefties (91 wRC+), and his only remaining plus tool is his plate discipline and ability to draw walks. That’s all that separates Markakis from being a replacement-level player, and the projections aren’t optimistic about that, either. Markakis isn’t going to the Hall of Fame because he probably won’t get a big-league deal this offseason.

Welp.

Nick Markakis must have read that, because he has looked like a Hall of Famer so far this year. Entering Sunday, Markakis, who is 34, was slashing .344/.428/.550 (all career bests) with a 169 (career-best) wRC+. He also appears to have turned around his play afield, too, posting positive defensive numbers (that is, UZR and positional adjustment combined) for the first time since the Bush administration (2008). Nick Markakis, in 2018, has been worth roughly as many wins as his 2016 and 2017 combined.

What the hell has gotten into Nick Markakis?

First, we should acknowledge that Markakis has taken his plate discipline to another level this year. After double-digit walk rates every year with Atlanta, Markakis this year walked in more than 13% of his plate appearances. But he’s also cut his strikeout rate in half, down to 8.6% as of today. So he’s walking and not striking out. He also has hit six homers and recorded a career-best .206 ISO.

Digging into Markakis’ numbers does reveal some interesting changes. Markakis is seeing more curveballs than he ever has before, but his fastball rate has held fairly steady. It appears pitchers are emphasizing curveballs over changeups. That change might have occurred because Markakis was at -5.3 wRAA against curveballs last year, but +7.9 against changeups. Unfortunately for pitchers, Markakis is just hitting everything better this year. For the first time in his career, Markakis is showing positive numbers against fastballs, curveballs, sliders, cutters, changeups and splitters. For a 34-year-old, that’s pretty remarkable.

But the other big change is what Markakis is swinging at, and we saw this with Javier Baez, too. Markakis, last year, swung at just 57.4% of pitches in the strike zone. He hadn’t swung more than 60% of the time at pitches in the zone since… 2007. But this year, Markakis is swinging at 60.8% of pitches in the zone, a career high. And his current 43.5% swing percentage overall is also his highest since 2007. But Markakis’ out-of-zone swing rate remains almost precisely at his career average mark. In other words, Markakis is just swinging at hittable pitches more often.

As for red flags in Markakis’ profile, there are actually fewer than one might expect for a hitter whose output has departed so dramatically from his established levels. His exit velocity is still only about 90 mph, just below Austin Romine and Paulo Orlando on that particular leaderboard. That also places him in close proximity to Nolan Arenado, though, too. Nor is this entirely surprising: many great hitters are able to parlay otherwise pedestrian exit velocities into above-average numbers by getting the ball off the ground. Markakis, who’s dropped his ground-ball rate from 48.6% last year to 40.3% this year, has also produced the highest recorded launch angle of his career (12.5 degrees).

There’s also the issue of Markakis’ .345 BABIP, which is considerably higher than his .317 career mark. It’s likely to decline — but also not as much as you think. Statcast, for example, thinks at least some of that is real, crediting him with a xwOBA — a metric that accounts for batted-ball quality — just 14 points worse than his current mark. In fact, Statcast suggests Markakis is a full-blown member of the Fly Ball Revolution, hitting the ball in the air more to right field and especially center.

As to how and why this is happening, I feel obliged to offer an explanation — or at least to attempt one. To do so, here are three screencaps.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

This first one depicts Nick Markakis just before hitting a home run with the Orioles.

That’s the last time Markakis was good. Now here’s last year, with the Braves:

And finally, one last image, from just before Markakis homered a few days ago:

In each case, I’ve attempted to pause the action at the same point — that is, when the pitcher’s arm is fully extended before moving towards the plate. I don’t know how much can really be learned from this unscientific study. That said, there do appear to be some differences between the middle image and the other two. In the first and last, Markakis seems to employ a slightly more exaggerated crouch. He also appears to keep the bat off his shoulder, at an angle. Again, it’s not scientific, but differences do appear to exist.

So Nick Markakis is good again, just in time for his contract year and the Braves’ surprising return to contention. I still don’t think he’ll make the Hall of Fame. But if he keeps this up, he’ll get that big-league deal this offseason. And he’ll deserve it, too.





Sheryl Ring is a litigation attorney and General Counsel at Open Communities, a non-profit legal aid agency in the Chicago suburbs. You can reach her on twitter at @Ring_Sheryl. The opinions expressed here are solely the author's. This post is intended for informational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice.

47 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago

Braves and Phillies atop the NL East. The Nats just above .500. The Marlins have won more than 1/3rd of their games. Nick Markakis is raking. Anibal Sanchez has even turned in a couple of quality starts. If you’re not a Nats fan, the NL East is a ton of fun right now.

Forrest Gumption
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Shame its not September, you might be onto something!

Ancalagor
8 years ago

Last I checked, baseball is fun year-round.

Daniel
8 years ago

On his way to 3000 hits!

GoNYGoNYGoGo
8 years ago

Amazing what being in a contract year will do.

Kevbot034
8 years ago

Is 3K hits enough to make the Hall of Fame if you are fairly bad to mediocre at literally everything else your whole career? It’d be really cool if Markakis has a late career surge and reaches that milestone, but would it be enough with the poor defense, low speed, low power?

Daniel
8 years ago
Reply to  Kevbot034

Poor defense? He has the record for consecutive errorless games by an outfielder. He’s the most underappreciated player of our generation.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  Daniel

It’s remarkable how–when you don’t have enough range to get to the difficult catches–you don’t make errors.

Barney Coolio
8 years ago
Reply to  Kevbot034

3000 hits seems to be more sacred than the other “magic number,” 500 homers, as every 3000 hit man seems to make the HOF easily, exclusing steroid/gambling guys.

Markakis doesn’t even need a “late career surge” to reach 3000 hits. He needs to be productive and durable through age 39. If he can average 25.8 hits per month through age 39, he’ll reach 3000. 25.8 hits a month is about 155 hits in a season, which Markakis usually exceeds in healthy seasons. 10 years ago, this would seem very attainable, but players don’t seem to remain regulars at age 39 anymore.

I really like the underwhelming guys who reach milestones, because I like the juicy, hand-wringing, HOF arguments. Spare me the Greg Madduxes and Ken Griffey Jr. HOF “debates.” I would love to see Markakis barely eke out 3000 hits and see how the writers vote. If Biggio had to wait until his 3rd ballot, I am thinking Markakis might be excluded. Also check out Justin Upton. If he can average 25.4 hits a year through his age 39 season, he’ll be at 3000, while also likely being over 400 HRs. This seems unlikely for both Markakis and Upton, but I think that Markakis might have the better chance.

PC1970Member since 2024
8 years ago
Reply to  Barney Coolio

He needs a late career surge in the vein that he needs the playing time to get to 3,000 hits. Until this year, it was questionable if he would even get a guaranteed contract next year, much less get a starting job somewhere

I guess it also wouldn’t hurt him to get “ahead of the pace”. If he can have a 180-190 hit season, he does that AND maybe gets a starting job the next couple of years.

AnonMember since 2025
8 years ago
Reply to  Kevbot034

We’ve never had a test case where somebody questionable or borderline made it to 3,000. There are always a few guys that seem like they might do it and raise the question, but it never happens. To me Markakis seems likely to join Johnny Damon, Juan Pierre and Garrett Anderson as guys who looked like they could do it but fell far short. Markakis is in his age 34 season. Let’s say he finishes with another 120 hits, compare him to those 3 after their age 34 season with their ultimate total:
Markakis 2,217 (guesstimate) / ?????
Anderson 2,081 / 2,529
Pierre 2,141 / 2,217
Damon 2,270 / 2,769

Barney Coolio
8 years ago
Reply to  Anon

Right. I was really pulling for Damon to reach 3000. It would have been fun to see how he would fare on the HOF ballot with 3000 hits, an OPS+ of like 102, and 2 WS rings, and all of the narrative behind the caveman. He really destroyed his own chances though. He finished 2011 with a respectable 152 hits and OPS+ of 109, and over 2700 career hits. His market never developed to his satisfaction, and he signed with Cleveland after the season began, which hurt his season. He totally sucked in Cleveland and was released. If he had just swallowed his pride, and accepted a low contract with maximum playing time, he really could have eked out the 277 hits he needed to reach 3000. If he had done that and said at the press conference, “I am going to give the people what they want, a really juicy HOF debate.” He would have endeared himself to the masses forever. Well, at least to me.

PC1970Member since 2024
8 years ago
Reply to  Anon

And the beauty of it, is it has been going on for 100 years.

Rusty Staub had over 2450 hits at age 35, but, then ended up with only Part Time playing time the rest of his career to end up at 2716.
Bill Buckner was at 2500 at age 36.
Al Oliver has close to 2550 at age 36.
Harold Baines had a run of .300 seasons between ages 36-40 to get close to 2800 & then fell apart.

It is a # that only the best hitters who have a long, slow decline phase can get to.

Jonathan Vander LugtMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  Anon

I think the best corollary for Markakis in terms of actual value is probably Lou Brock. Obviously the narrative during his career wasn’t that he was borderline but in actuality he really was.

Very different type of player, (and it helped to have the steals record) but his career wRC+ is 109 to Markakis’ 110. Brock’s WAR/600 is 2.3 and Markakis’ is 2.0.

Those numbers don’t factor in a hypothetical Markakis decline for ages 35-39 but if he’s found something new that helps him stay productive for maybe 2-3 years after this then it might be enough to stave off the typical downswing.

Barney Coolio
8 years ago

Wow, Lou Brock was terrible in his final seasons! Recently there was an article on “the slow crawl to 3000 hits,” and I commented that few 3000 hit guys actually did crawl to 3000, and fewer still were perceived to be crawling during their 3000 hit years. I said that only Pujols, Biggio, and maybe Suzuki were perceived to be crawling. While Yount, Brett, Henderson, and Kaline were crawling, but contemporary observers were unlikely to see it like that. Lou Brock clearly was crawling to 3000, and it really must have been obvious even in the late 1970’s. Although Brock in his 3000 hit year was 40, he still hit a very empty .304, so it is possible some fans and writers might have thought he could and should have continued.

BenZobrist4MVP
8 years ago
Reply to  Kevbot034

Starlin Castro averaged 160 hits over his first 8 seasons. If he manages that over his next 11 seasons (including this year), he would reach 3000 hits in his age 38 season. Obviously, a lot would have to go right for him to get there, but he would be another case of a lot of hits, but not great power, steals, OBP, or defense.

AnonMember since 2025
8 years ago
Reply to  BenZobrist4MVP

Castro and Elvis Andrus are both kind of in the same boat – middle infielders with so-so bats who started young enough to pile up a lot of hits early but are not likely to get regular playing time once they no longer have the athleticism to play middle infield. I have a hard time seeing either make it to 3,000. The only guys who were regular middle infielders early in their careers to make it to 3,000 were all much, much, much better hitters than Castro or Andrus (Carew, Biggio, ARod, Yount, Ripken, Lajoie, Collins, Molitor, Wagner, Jeter, Rose)

I mean predicting the future is a fool’s game and certainly Castro and Andrus could become much better hitters the next few years, but it’s not likely.

The Ghost of Johnny Dickshot
8 years ago

I don’t care what you think about Markakis but there have 19,251 players in MLB history and he stands at #231 on the all time hit list, that’s pretty damn impressive.

Barney Coolio
8 years ago

And he could very possibly jump 50 spots on that list this season.

Mean Mr. Mustard
8 years ago

How many is that if you scratch out the pitchers?
Not trying to take anything away from your point; I’m just curious. You’re right that #231 is impressive.

YKnotDisco
8 years ago

Using FG leaderboard – Batting – NP – 1PA minimum – 1871-2018 – 10,239

The Ghost of Johnny Dickshot
8 years ago
Reply to  YKnotDisco

Even just looking at hitters Markakis is in the upper 2.2% all time in hits.

YKnotDisco
8 years ago

That is definitely applaudable – at the very least it’s golf clap worthy.

Jon
8 years ago

Yes. He’s been a decent to pretty good player for a long time.

v2miccaMember since 2016
8 years ago

I’m a die-hard Braves fan who talked a lot of trash about Markakis this off-season. I am more than happy to eat my word.

FrancoeursteinMember since 2025
8 years ago
Reply to  v2micca

Die-hard Braves fan here also. I’ve watched Markakis put up mediocre numbers for 3 years now — it’s gonna take more than a 30+ game sample to convince me that he’s figured it out in his mid 30’s.

v2miccaMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

Small Sample Size rules apply of course. But when he has already put up almost as much fWAR in that small sample size as he did in the entirety of the two proceeding seasons, I’m still going to be eating at least a small sample size of humble pie.

Reflect
8 years ago
Reply to  v2micca

Only one word? Who will eat the other ones?

Mean Mr. Mustard
8 years ago

He appears to be more closed off in that middle picture, like he’s looking back over his shoulder rather than along its line. That would account for some portion of weak contact, I would think, given that extra fraction or two of a second to get the bat around.
Interesting that he’s stuck with the evolution of keeping his hands up close to his face, although not as dramatically as in the middle. And his bat has dropped even further to rest on his shoulder in that last picture, no?

I really like these articles about seeing how a batter’s stance can change over the years, and what kind of results they get with each alteration. You’re always a treat to read, Ms. Ring.

TKDCMember since 2016
8 years ago

Nick Markakis was one of those signings that didn’t make a lot of sense. The Braves were clearly rebuilding, but they didn’t want to signal to their fans that they weren’t even going to try. Markakis wasn’t given a QO by the Orioles, so he only cost money. But what seemed like the bad part of the contract was the length, and that by the time it got to now, it would essentially be a waste of $11 million when the Braves would need that, under the assumption they would be contending.*
Pretty much immediately, Markakis’ name was bandied about by fans and media as a possible trade candidate, either for assets when he was on a hot streak, or as a salary dump when he wasn’t. For three years, the Braves kept an aging, mediocre-at-best outfielder despite all the evidence and common sense seeming to suggest that the signing, and the keeping him, were terrible moves.
And how is that repaid? Somehow it works out as if it were a genius move all along. It’s stunning. To me, the fact that Markakis is somehow still a Brave is almost as stunning as his MVP-level offense.

*initial optimism actually had the Braves back in contention in 2017, which was ridiculous.

Bobby Ayala
8 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

This has to be the most surprising high-priced value contract of all time, right? Sitting at 5 WAR for his Braves career for $44 mil.

Bobby Ayala
8 years ago
Reply to  Bobby Ayala

Also just noticed this from Sheryl’s pull quote from her off-season write-up:
“he really hasn’t been good since 2010. Since then, Markakis’s WAR has gone 1.4, 1.6, -0.2, 2.5, 1.5, 1.1, 0.9. ” Those WAR numbers aren’t fangraphs or BR WAR numbers, where are you getting those from?

TKDCMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  Bobby Ayala

Well, it is definitely backwards. When you sign a 31-year-old to a four year deal, you are hoping for value upfront, and you deal with the backside risk. That’s why the contract made no sense for the Braves. To the extent that Markakis was expected to be good, it was during the rebuilding phase. But what actually happened was he was not that good during the first three years, but if he were it would not have really changed anything for the way-out-of-contention Braves. Now, in year four, he is good and the Braves are in contention, at least for now. It’s something you never really see because teams don’t usually sign and then hold onto guys like Markakis when they are going nowhere, AND guys like Markakis don’t usually all of the sudden become great hitters again at age 34 after being no great for several years.

matthayden4Member since 2024
8 years ago

I think another thing to consider with Markakis isn’t just “does 3000 hits put him in?” but also that if he DOES reach 3000, that likely means he’s over 4500 TB, over 4000 times on base, probably 600+ doubles. His rate stats still won’t be great, but man, he’ll have some damn impressive counting stats that will make him an interesting case.

n_scheffel
8 years ago

To be clear, the thesis that is ultimately proposed is: Markakis is hitting better because he is slightly more crouched in his stance.

And then nothing else?

LHPSU
8 years ago
Reply to  n_scheffel

No, the thesis is that Markakis is hitting better, and we don’t know exactly why; they only thing we can tell is that he’s slightly more crouched.

OaktownSteveMember since 2023
8 years ago

His home park isn’t hurting him. Neither are the three guys hitting ahead of him.

Jon
8 years ago

I don’t care if he gets 3000 hits. Assuming he doesn’t continue his 2018 pace for the next 5 seasons, he’s going to end up with somewhere around 30 WAR. A 30 WAR player making the HOF (especially with today’s knowledge about player value) is like Palmeiro winning that gold glove.

But don’t just take it from me (see every BR metric below). He’s so far off from contention that we shouldn’t even be having this conversation. But yeah, we like big round numbers, and apparently we want to rename it from the “Hall of Fame” to the “Hall of guys who stayed healthy for a long time and were just barely good enough to keep a regular job.”

Black Ink
Batting – 8 (299), Average HOFer ? 27
Gray Ink
Batting – 79 (313), Average HOFer ? 144
Hall of Fame Monitor
Batting – 38 (521), Likely HOFer ? 100
Hall of Fame Standards
Batting – 23 (615), Average HOFer ? 50
JAWS
Right Field (80th):
31.6 career WAR / 23.8 7yr-peak WAR / 27.7 JAWS
Average HOF RF (out of 25):
72.7 career WAR / 42.9 7yr-peak WAR / 57.8 JAWS

Sn0wman
8 years ago
Reply to  Jon

One of us is misunderstanding the conversation, because I didn’t take it as “if Markakis reaches 3k, should he be a Hall of Famer, Fangraphs readers?” I took it as “if Markakis reaches 3k, will the people who can really vote on the HoF put him in?” That’s two very different discussions.

tung_twista
8 years ago

Why in the world are we seeing these ridiculous arguments about 3000 hits and HoF?
This is the same with Adam Dunn and 500 home runs.
Players with 3000 hits/500 home runs get inducted because they are great.

Looking at all the players in the HoF with 3000+ hits, the weaker candidates are Winfield, Murray, and Brock.
But even if you imagine they retired two or three seasons early so that they are stuck in 2900 some hits,
they would still be in the Hall of Fame, easily.

Going back to Markakis.
Yes, if he somehow keeps up this pace for the rest of the season and for another several seasons, then maybe we can talk.
But for now, the dude has a grand total of two(!) seasons with WAR above 3.
If he puts up something like his ’10 numbers (wrc+ 116, war 2.4) for another six years, it would certainly be applaudable.
HoF worthy? Hell no.

Anthony CalamisMember since 2024
8 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

Is it really that crazy that a Markakis that makes it to 3000 H wouldn’t have that much worse of a career than Brock? Brock only ended with 43 fWAR/45 bWAR, and Markakis right now has 27.8 and could be over 30 by season’s end if this continues, at about 75% of the way to 3000 H. So, on pace potentially for 40 WAR when he reaches 3000 H at the same pace his career has currently been on.

tung_twista
8 years ago

One thing about Lou Brock is that his baserunning numbers are almost certainly significantly deflated.
From ’64 to ’76, he had 825 SB and 247 CS (77%) or in other words, 63 SB and 19 CS average.
This is similar to ’14 Dee Gordon (64SB/19CS) who had 10.2 BsR.
However, because we don’t have baserunning data for Brock, he is only credited 5.8 BsR on average.

https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/tim-raines-missing-information/
Sullivan found that elite baserunners create about 93% of their base-stealing runs in non-stealing situations.
Using that number, Brock deserved about 8 more WAR for his baserunning.
43 war and 51 war sound pretty different, don’t they?

More importantly, it means that in his peak, his WARs were probably closer to 4.8-4.2-4.2-5.7-6.2 instead of 4.6-3.9-3.3-5.2-5.3.
For reference, that five year WAR estimate of 25.1, compared to ’12-’17 numbers would be ranked 6th among all position players right between Votto and Altuve (and ahead of Posey, Beltre, Cano, Harper, Machado, Stanton, etc.)

Not to mention that in 21 games in postseason, Brock batted .391/.424/.655 with 4HR and 14SB.
All of this is a long-winded way of saying no.
Unless you think that career WAR is the only number that matters, 3000-hit Markakis and Brock’s career would not be similar. At all.

ND12
8 years ago

“It’s the Hall of Fame, not the Hall of Very Good” is a common refrain when discussing borderline cases. Unfortunately for Nick Markakis, it’s not the “Hall of Somewhat Good” either.

Reflect
8 years ago

Longevity and sustainability are skills. Don’t get me wrong, I wouldn’t vote Markakis in (even with the assumptions for the rest of his career), but being a good and healthy player for an insanely long time deserves more respect as an achievement. It’s a rare feat, but most people just write it off as “counting stats”. You can’t count that high unless you’re doing a lot of things right to take care of yourself, year in, and year out.

timprov
8 years ago

So he has maintained O-swing, increased Z-swing, and improved his effectiveness against his weakest pitch. Is this exactly what we should expect from a hitter who hired a personal sabermetric analyst as part of his offseason training regimen? Seems like it to me. I have no other reason to believe that Markakis did that but it’s not like I keep up on the guy.

lil_uriahMember since 2016
8 years ago

Great write up. Nick is MONEY in daily H2H every year in my deepish league. If I ever meet that guy I’m thanking him. Because you know pro players love talking fantasy.