No Surprise: Clayton Kershaw Is Back With the Dodgers

Rick Scuteri-Imagn Images

On Tuesday, pitchers and catchers officially reported to Camelback Ranch, the spring training home that the Dodgers share with the White Sox in Glendale, Arizona. Among the Dodgers reporting was a familiar face, that of Clayton Kershaw. According to ESPN’s Alden Gonzalez, the three-time Cy Young winner — who had entered free agency for the fourth offseason in a row — has agreed to terms with the Dodgers and will return for his 18th major league season.

For as much as the move was anticipated, the sight of Kershaw in camp was a reassuring harbinger of spring. Given his accomplishments and the slew of injuries he’s endured in recent years, the continuation of the future Hall of Famer’s career isn’t something to take for granted. The details of his contract have not been announced at this writing, and the deal is still pending a physical. Once it’s finalized, we can probably expect some incentives and mechanisms that help to lower the team’s tax hit, whether in the form of deferred money or a less lucrative player option for 2026. The Dodgers’ 40-man roster is full, but with the opening of camp, the team can transfer players to the 60-day injured list and free up roster spots. On Tuesday, they did just that in order to accommodate the return of Enrique Hernández, moving pitcher Gavin Stone, who will miss the whole season due to shoulder surgery, to the 60-day IL.

[Update: The deal became official on Wednesday, with River Ryan, who is recovering from August 2024 Tommy John surgery, transferred to the 60-day IL to make room. According to FanSided’s Robert Murray, Kershaw will receive a base salary of $7.5 million, and can max out at $16 million via incentives. He’ll receive an additional million apiece for starts 13 through 16, a roster bonus of $2.5 million for being active for at least 30 days, and additional $1 million bonuses for reaching 60 and 90 days.]

Kershaw, who turns 37 on March 19, could be a candidate for a 60-day IL slot himself, as he underwent a pair of offseason surgeries following a season in which he made just seven starts totaling 30 innings, the last of them on August 30. He was a bystander during the Dodgers’ championship run, though anyone who witnessed either the clubhouse festivities at Yankee Stadium — during which Kershaw shed his shirt — or the celebration at Dodger Stadium following their victory parade through Los Angeles can attest that he was no less exuberant about the team’s World Series win.

“I didn’t have anything to do with this championship, but it feels like the best feeling in the world,” Kershaw told the Dodger Stadium crowd, his voice cracking. “Dodgers for life!”

Indeed, unlike a couple of his recent trips through free agency, Kershaw did not muse openly about the possibility of joining the Texas Rangers in order to play closer to Highland Park, the Dallas suburb where he grew up and still makes his offseason home. However, he did decline the $10 million player option on the back end of a two-year, $10-million-plus-incentives contract that he signed with the Dodgers in February 2024, a move that freed up a roster spot for the team over the winter.

Since we’ve seen so little of Kershaw in the past 16 months, a refresher is in order. In 2023, he pitched to a 2.46 ERA and 4.03 FIP in 24 starts totaling 131.2 innings, earning a spot on the NL All-Star team for the 10th time along the way. Before he could pitch in the All-Star Game, however, he landed on the IL due to shoulder soreness, missed six weeks, and returned to throw just 36.1 innings in eight post-injury starts. The quality of his stuff (as measured by both the Stuff+ and PitchingBot pitch models) was notably down, and his results reflected that.

Though manager Dave Roberts hinted that Kershaw was not fully healthy, the team nonetheless tabbed him to start Game 1 of the 2023 Division Series against the Diamondbacks. Kershaw was tarred and feathered, retiring just one batter while being charged with six runs, and he didn’t get a shot at redemption because the Diamondbacks swept the Dodgers. On November 3, 2023, the source of his second-half decline came into focus when he revealed that he had undergone surgery to repair the glenohumeral ligaments and capsule of his left shoulder. At the time, he said he hoped to return to pitch for the Dodgers “at some point next summer.”

After officially re-signing with the Dodgers in early February, Kershaw finally made his 2024 season debut on July 25, throwing four wobbly innings against the Giants. He didn’t complete five innings until his fourth start, a 5.2-inning, six-strikeout, one-run performance against the Brewers on August 12. He followed that with six shutout innings of the Cardinals on August 18, but then was hit hard while allowing five runs in five frames against the Rays on August 24. One batter into the second inning of his August 30 start against the Diamondbacks, he departed due to pain in his left big toe, and was subsequently diagnosed with a bone spur. He continued his throwing program, with the team readjusting his spikes to help compensate for his soreness, but compromised mechanics triggered pain in other parts of his body, no small matter given not only the shoulder surgery but his past back issues. On October 5, the team announced that he would be shut down regardless of how far the Dodgers advanced in the playoffs, a decision that, in conjunction with other injuries (most notably Tyler Glasnow’s elbow sprain), led to the Dodgers relying upon a three-man rotation of Yoshinobu Yamamoto, Walker Buehler, and Jack Flaherty plus occasional openers in their series against the Padres, Mets, and Yankees.

Shortly after the World Series, orthopedic surgeons played a doubleheader on Kershaw’s left leg. One surgery, performed by Dr. Kenneth Jung, addressed not only the bone spur in his left foot but also arthritis and a ruptured plantar plate, the ligament that runs beneath the metatarsal heads and keeps the toes aligned. The other surgery, done by Dr. Neil ElAttrache, repaired a torn meniscus in his left knee, an injury that did not come to light until he went through testing regarding his foot.

Both injuries, along with Kershaw’s recovery from shoulder surgery, provide context for his unimpressive 2024 numbers (4.50 ERA, 3.53 FIP, 4.59 xERA, 18% strikeout rate) and his diminished stuff, which included a four-seam fastball whose 89.9 mph average velocity represented an 0.8-mph drop from his ’22 and ’23 averages. Both of our pitch modeling systems suggest his arsenal was at least better than during his post-injury stretch in 2023, albeit mainly in terms of command:

Clayton Kershaw via Stuff+ and PitchingBot
Stuff+ IP Stf+ FA Stf+ SL Stf+ CU Stuff+ Location+ Pitching+
2022 126.1 101 118 110 110 100 111
2023 Pre-Injury 95.0 98 120 115 111 98 109
2023 Post-Injury 36.1 86 102 107 96 85 85
2024 30.0 92 103 108 99 97 99
PitchingBot IP bot Stf FA botStf SL botStf Cu botStf botCmd botOvr
2022 126.1 53 50 52 51 62 57
2023 Pre-Injury 95.0 50 45 52 47 56 53
2023 Post-Injury 36.1 45 33 49 37 44 35
2024 30.0 44 31 48 37 54 43
Stuff+ scores are normalized to an average of 100, PitchingBot scores are normalized to a 20–80 scouting scale.

When Kershaw has been healthy, his fastball has at least played about average and his breaking balls have been above average to exceptional, depending upon which model you choose. The hope is that he’ll be able to tap into that pre-injury form. Even on lesser workloads, he was quite effective from 2021–23, posting a 2.75 ERA, 3.21 FIP, and a 27.8% strikeout rate while averaging 127 innings and 3.2 WAR per season.

While Kershaw’s rehab has progressed to the point that he was spotted going through his throwing program at Camelback on Tuesday, it’s unclear how soon he’ll be game-ready. If he is placed on the 60-day IL — which would extend his streak of seasons with a trip to the IL to 10 — he won’t be eligible to return until late May at the earliest. Even if he’s ready sooner, the Dodgers aren’t counting on him to shoulder the workloads of his heyday. Mindful of their threadbare October rotations, president of baseball Andrew Friedman has absolutely loaded up on starting pitching. During the winter of 2023–24, the team signed Yamamoto and traded for Glasnow. While they lost Buehler and Flaherty to free agency, they signed lefty Blake Snell and another Japanese star, righty Roki Sasaki. Sometime around May, they expect that Shohei Ohtani will return to full unicorn status by taking the mound following late-2023 UCL reconstructive surgery, as well November ’24 surgery to repair a tear in his left (non-throwing) labrum. Add Kershaw to the mix and that’s already six.

Particularly with Yamamoto, Sasaki, and Ohtani all used to working in six-man rotations in Japan (and, for the latter, in Anaheim), and with none of the above pitchers throwing more than Glasnow’s 134 innings last year, the Dodgers are likely to go that route in 2025. They have no shortage of pitchers to fill in the gaps while Ohtani and Kershaw complete their rehabs. Tony Gonsolin didn’t pitch for the Dodgers last year, but after undergoing Tommy John surgery on September 1, 2023, he did make three starts for Triple-A Oklahoma City last September and drew at least brief consideration for the postseason roster. Dustin May is returning from surgery to repair an esophageal tear, and Bobby Miller is hoping to rediscover the electrifying stuff that made him such a compelling rookie in 2023 before he bottomed out following a bout of shoulder inflammation in ’24. Landon Knack, Ben Casparius, and Justin Wrobleski all saw time with the team in 2024, with the first two of those pitchers joining them in the postseason; Casparius even opened Game 4 of the World Series (the Dodgers’ lone loss).

When Kershaw does return, he’ll be chasing a major milestone. He’s 32 strikeouts away from becoming the 20th pitcher — and just the fourth lefty, after Steve Carlton, Randy Johnson, and CC Sabathia — to reach 3,000 strikeouts. He’s also about 0.6 bWAR away from passing Robin Roberts to move into the top 20 in S-JAWS. He’s already done more than enough to ensure a spot in the Hall of Fame some day, but those would be impressive capstones to his career. As for whether this is his last go-round, it’s not an unreasonable assumption, particularly if he winds up sidelined by another major injury. Even if he’s fully healthy, there’s little doubt that he’s near the end of his career, so any highlights he produces will be ones to savor.





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

55 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
PC1970Member since 2024
2 months ago

So, the 2 teams at Camelback Ranch should go around .500 combined..Of course, 1 will likely do so with 100+ wins, the other with 100+ losses.

The fact these 2 teams share spring training facilities cracks me up..couldn’t find 2 more opposite orgs. Maybe Chicago should spy on LAD to get some pointers.

TKDCMember since 2016
2 months ago
Reply to  PC1970

Tip #1 – spend money.

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
2 months ago
Reply to  PC1970

::reads spy’s notebook::
SPEND MONEY ON GOOD PLAYERS

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
2 months ago

I mean, yeah. But no one else can really execute the “buy two, get one free” approach on Japanese superstars.

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
2 months ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

Well, it helps to already be a dominant, global powerhouse. But plenty of stars signed big deals elsewhere this year, too (Soto, Burnes, Fried), so it’s not like Sasaki didn’t have options (he took less $ to go LA; hey, Carlos Santana took less money to return to CLE than stay in SEA!).

Anyways, remember when the Angels had Ohtani and Trout and never won more than 80 games in a season? Now *that’s* an outcome that no one else can really execute.

dangledangleMember since 2024
2 months ago

Sasaki seems to have been what pushed people sitting on he fence over the line.on teams spending a lot of money. But it makes no sense when it wasn’t about $. It’s like really that’s where you draw the line? Over an international bonus signing that any team with bonus money could afford and will earn peanuts over his years of team control. Dodgers were the team he felt most comfortable with and have show they will do what it takes to assemble a consistent winner. West coast teams have a leg up when it comes to Japanese players in general due to geography. East Coast teams certainly can make a bid but they have to present a plan that is objectively better to overcome the geography.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
2 months ago
Reply to  dangledangle

So your argument is that the $500m payroll the Dodgers run had no impact on making them the most attractive destination? That’s what makes no sense.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
2 months ago

Look, I don’t even think we disagree very much. If I were running the Dodgers, I’d like to think I’d be doing this exactly like they’re doing it. It’s great for Dodgers fans and it’s obviously the correct approach.

But, it SUCKS for the fans of the 20 teams that have no hope of spending like this. “Get a better billionaire who will pour their personal fortune into player payroll” is not an option because there is no such person.

There are absolutely 5 or so deadbeat owners who aren’t trying at all, and another 10 teams who are probably spending in the vicinity of their revenue capacity but their revenue capacity just isn’t there. Maybe those teams are spending 120m and could be spending 140m. And for a lot of them, their revenue capacity is uncertain because their (relatively tiny) TV deals just got cancelled. MLB is certainly going to pay them less than they were getting before.

If those teams DID spend more, they still wouldn’t be able to access the top tier of free agent. They’d be competing for the second, third, fourth tier guys who the mega-market teams aren’t really interested in.

It’s in this context where the Dodgers (the team that already has everything) getting a FREE star is particularly irritating.

raregokusMember since 2022
2 months ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

You know, tons of people have been saying that Sasaki only signed in LA because of Ohtani and Yamamoto, but I haven’t seen any actual reporting to that effect. Almost makes you think it’s just the latent racism of internet commenters rather than an actual real-life phenomenon

MikeMember since 2018
2 months ago
Reply to  raregokus

It’s not racism. Nobody is denigrating anyone here. Ignorance? Sure. Racism? Not quite.

dodgerbleu
2 months ago
Reply to  Mike

Disagree. The example he gives, saying the Asian guys are only going there bc of other Asian guys isn’t ignorant. And the same words can be said in different ways, the way some people frame things is inherently more discriminatory than the way other people frame things, even when they’re effectively saying the same thing. Prejudice borne out of a stereotype from someone’s ignorance is still prejudice, being ignorant doesn’t make it not so.

I’m Japanese and I find a lot of the comments that talk about Japanese players to end up having a couple blatantly and savagely offensive comments (FG won’t let me say the R word). I am still fuming about a comment left this weekend on the article about the Pirates wasting their young starters. Hard to describe how offensive it is. 5 people upvoted it. It applies to every Japanese person on earth, and it’s made by an enormously ignorant person, but it’s still highly evocative, untrue, and R..

But IMO here it’s only a hypothetical example, bc the comment about buy 2 get 1 free wasn’t alluding to it being an Asian thing or even alluding to Sasaki only going there bc there were other Asian players. As you say, nobody is denigrating anyone here, or showing prejudice from ignorance (that’s still harmful and prejudice).

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
2 months ago
Reply to  raregokus

Would the outcome have been the same if they’d spent their billion on Soto and Burnes? Yeah, most likely. It’s the billion that’s doing the work.

mikejuntMember
2 months ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

So I think this is where I will disagree with you, because I think you’re thinking a little too conventionally.

Ohtani, Yamamoto and Sasaki combined do something no group of domestic players would do or have ever done: They’re making the Dodgers into the dominant team in a large new market. Japan has a population of 120 million. Baseball is a very popular sport there, with less competition than we have domestically. Its local league is quite attractive.

And the Dodgers were already a popular team there for a variety of reasons (from location to Hideo Nomo, etc). But now, this particular run of extremely competitive baseball with 3 of the biggest (and by far the single biggest) Japanese star will help them cement this status. This is good for the league in the long run (big new market!), but in the short term a very disproportionate portion of those benefits are going to go to the Dodgers.

And that is *why* they are spending so much. It is not Cohen “I am rich beyond belief and don’t care if I lose money”, They are owned by a *mutual fund partnership*. What they are doing is *profitable* because they’re not playing the same financial game as the rest of the league anymore.

That’s why its Ohtani specifically that spurred them to go from ‘one of baseball’s biggest spenders’ to ‘clearly not on the same chart’. Their entire operation is now on a different scale than even the Yankees, and they’re all committed to each other (up to and including Ohtani’s contract allowing him to opt out if Andrew Friedman or Mark Walter, controlling partner, leave their roles). They are building a specific thing, and Sasaki was presented the opportunity to be part of it.

Its not financially fair. But its happening because they no longer have the economics of any other MLB team.

They are *investing*. Great Dodger teams and championships very directly further this goal, which is to ensure that a the whole generation of Japanese kids aged 6-15 grow up to be fans of the Dodgers, to say nothing of how many adults they bring with them.

And this is also why I think that MLB will not actually take any specific actions against them. If it was the Dodgers/Mets/Yankees just leveraging their own, existing domestic financial advantages, all the other owners would have a lot of incentive to shut it down (and ownership needs like an 85% vote on CBA internally, so they need 27/30 votes for things). But the Dodgers are accomplishing more for internationalization of MLB than all of these games played in Mexico and Europe and everywhere else, and that’s a big reason for the rest of the league to let them do what they’re doing. Im sure the poorest, and stupidest, owners will complain alot at CBA time. But they won’t have the near-universal agreement needed to overrule the biggest clubs on spending restrictions, because everyone is going to profit from what the Dodgers are doing now over a 10-15 year timescale.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
2 months ago
Reply to  mikejunt

I don’t disagree with this at all. They’re making money, the players are making money, the other owners are largely indifferent. But it’s terrible for the competitive balance of the league, and the fan experience of the bottom half of the league is already pretty terrible in terms of any hope of competing.

Last edited 2 months ago by cowdisciple
mikejuntMember
2 months ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

Here’s the win totals of the 6th wild card in each league the last 3 seasons:

86
87
86
93
89
84 (5th and 6th!)

These teams collectively put 2 teams in the World Series plus some in the LCS.

Yes, its true a lot of teams will not regularly compete for the best record in the league. Every team has the resources to compete for the playoffs and many of them are choosing not to.

If every smaller budget team was behaving like the Royals, I’d buy your argument, but they don’t. Even teams in bigger markets like the Orioles are pinching pennies in their competitive windows. This is not because the Dodgers or Mets spend too much money – their investments rather notoriously don’t pay off quite frequently.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
2 months ago
Reply to  mikejunt

My argument is in part for a SALARY FLOOR. Those terrible owners should be compelled to spend more. The Dodgers et al should be compelled to spend less. There should be more revenue sharing.

The Royals payroll is projected for 132m. The Dodgers payroll will be literally 300% of that. How can anyone call this parity? Any of you supporters interested in an Ottoneu league where the other owner gets a $400 budget and you get a $100 budget? Does that sound fun? Would you expect to compete?

Last edited 2 months ago by cowdisciple
cowdiscipleMember since 2016
2 months ago
Reply to  raregokus

Just to be clear, did the two of you just call me an ignorant racist? Because that’s what it sounded like. Back off.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
2 months ago
Reply to  raregokus

OK, look: I feel like I’ve expressed my opinions on this matter pretty clearly and reasonably, and some of y’all have consistently responded with personal insults. Stop.

dodgerbleu
2 months ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

FWIW, I’m Japanese. I don’t think you said anything offensive.

It might not be worth much. I think being Japanese absolutely qualifies me to have more of an opinion on what’s offensive to Japanese people. But the last time I tried to defend someone on this site though – pre-COVID so been a while – the virtue signalers told me just bc I’m Japanese didn’t mean I know or can speak for Japanese players, and they knew better than me, and then started insulting me. So… IDK. 🤷🏻‍♂️

I do think you’re fine though, and I wouldn’t hesitate to say otherwise if I felt otherwise.. FWIW 🤣 Good luck bro!

BipMember since 2016
2 months ago
Reply to  raregokus

It’s racist to imagine that a person who is moving to an entirely new country, with a language he doesn’t speak, might feel more comfortable on a team if that team has other people from his country on it?